TOP
닫기
Search 닫기
Advanced Search Quick links
· Most Cited · Most Read · On-line First · Archives · Go to e-Submission

Minireview

Split Viewer

Mol. Cells 2016; 39(7): 524-529

Published online June 16, 2016

https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0105

© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology

Control of Asymmetric Cell Divisions during Root Ground Tissue Maturation

Ji Won Choi, and Jun Lim*

Author Info. +

Department of Systems Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea

Correspondence to : *Correspondence: jlim@konkuk.ac.kr

Received: April 21, 2016; Revised: May 24, 2016; Accepted: May 25, 2016

Abstract

Go to

Controlling the production of diverse cell/tissue types is essential for the development of multicellular organisms such as animals and plants. The Arabidopsis thaliana root, which contains distinct cells/tissues along longitudinal and radial axes, has served as an elegant model to investigate how genetic programs and environmental signals interact to produce different cell/tissue types. In the root, a series of asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) give rise to three ground tissue layers at maturity (endodermis, middle cortex, and cortex). Because the middle cortex is formed by a periclinal (parallel to the axis) ACD of the endodermis around 7 to 14 days post-germination, middle cortex formation is used as a parameter to assess maturation of the root ground tissue. Molecular, genetic, and physiological studies have revealed that the control of the timing and extent of middle cortex formation during root maturation relies on the interaction of plant hormones and transcription factors. In particular, abscisic acid and gibberellin act synergistically to regulate the timing and extent of middle cortex formation, unlike their typical antagonism. The SHORT-ROOT, SCARECROW, SCARECROW-LIKE 3, and DELLA transcription factors, all of which belong to the plant-specific GRAS family, play key roles in the regulation of middle cortex formation. Recently, two additional transcription factors, SEUSS and GA- AND ABA-RESPONSIVE ZINC FINGER, have also been characterized during ground tissue maturation. In this review, we provide a detailed account of the regulatory networks that control the timing and extent of middle cortex formation during post-embryonic root development.

Keywords asymmetric cell division, ground tissue, plant hormone, root development, transcription factor

INTRODUCTION

Go to

Multicellular organisms, such as animals and plants, possess diverse cell/tissue types. How different cells and tissues are generated is one of the fundamental questions in developmental biology. In particular, asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) play an important role in the development of distinct cell and tissue types in the individual organism (Abrash and Bergmann, 2009; De Smet and Beeckman, 2011; Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Knoblich, 2008; Smolarkiewicz and Dhonukshe, 2013; Ten Hove and Heidstra, 2008). Therefore, the timing and extent of ACDs should be controlled to ensure correct patterning. In plants, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root has been used as a model to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of ACDs in cell/tissue patterning (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995). From embryogenesis onwards, stem cells for the ground tissue (GT), namely the cortex/endodermis initial (CEI), undergo a series of ACDs. The divides in the anticlinal direction (perpendicular to the axis), resulting in self-renewal of the CEI and a daughter cell, i.e., the cortex/endodermis initial daughter (CEID). Next, the CEID divides in the periclinal orientation (parallel to the axis). Thus, the Arabidopsis root has two GT layers at the early stages of development: the endodermis (inside) and the cortex (outside) (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995) (Fig. 1). As the root ages, the endodermis divides again in the periclinal direction around 7 to 14 days post-germination (dpg), which results in the regeneration of the endodermis and an additional cortex. Usually, the endodermis cells adjacent to the xylem poles preferentially tend to undergo periclinal division prior to other cells in the endodermis (Baum et al., 2002; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Due to its location between the endodermis and the pre-existing cortex in the GT layers, the new cortex layer is designated as the middle cortex (MC). Thus, the Arabidopsis root can possess three GT layers at maturity (endodermis, MC, and cortex; Fig.1B). Therefore, production of the MC layer by periclinal ACDs in the endodermis is considered to be an indication that post-embryonic root development has entered a more mature phase (Baum et al., 2002; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). To assess maturation of the Arabidopsis root GT, the formation of the MC layer, as measured by the proportion of plants with MC either at a specific time point or in time courses, has been used (Baum et al., 2002; Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012).

Since the production of the MC layer during root GT maturation was first reported (Baum et al., 2002), accumulating evidence has revealed complex regulatory networks involving the interplay of plant hormones and transcription factors, which modulate the timing and extent of ACDs for MC formation. In this review, we focus on the crucial roles of plant hormones as well as transcription factors in the control of MC formation. We also describe the regulatory interactions between plant hormones and transcription factors during GT maturation. In addition, we provide perspective on other factors that potentially control the timing and extent of MC formation, and why roots develop with extra cortex layers during root GT maturation.

PLANT HORMONES IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

Go to

Under normal growth conditions, Columbia wild-type (Col WT) roots undergo periclinal ACDs in the endodermis around 7 to 14 dpg, resulting in an average of 20 to 35% of plants with the MC layer, depending on experimental conditions (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Under gibberellin (GA)-deficient conditions, induced by treatment with a GA biosynthesis inhibitor (e.g., paclobutrazol; PAC) or by loss-of-function mutations in a key GA biosynthesis enzyme (e.g., ga1-3), seedling roots exhibit a 2- to 3-fold increase in MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). In contrast, exogenous GA application substantially suppresses periclinal ACDs in the endodermis, thus resulting in delayed MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). These findings indicate that modulation of bioactive GA levels is critical for the regulation of MC formation in the Arabidopsis root GT.

The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes the effects of GA in numerous processes during plant growth and development (Finkelstein, 2013; Finkelstein et al., 2002; 2008; Hoffmann-Benning and Kende, 1992; Rohde et al., 2000; Sun and Gubler, 2004; Weiss and Ori, 2007). However, similar to seedlings treated with GA, WT roots treated with exogenous ABA exhibit a suppression of MC formation. In addition, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with XERICO fused to the 35S promoter (XER overexpressor; XER-OX), which substantially increases cellular ABA levels, probably through the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent degradation pathway (Ko et al., 2006), have almost no MC layer at 7 dpg (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Lee et al., 2016). In contrast, under ABA-deficient conditions caused by loss-of-function mutations in a key ABA biosynthesis enzyme (aba2-2) or in the XER gene (xer), seedlings display more frequent periclinal ACDs for MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Interestingly, the ABA-deficient aba2-2 and xer mutants are sensitive to PAC, resulting in the precocious formation of the MC layer. Consistent with this finding, under ABA treatment, GA-deficient ga1-3 roots show an elevated frequency of MC formation when compared with WT roots. Therefore, analogous to GA, modulation of ABA levels is also important for the control of root GT maturation. Taken together, these findings indicate that the bioactive levels of the two hormones play key roles in the maturation process of the root GT. However, little is known about the distribution of ABA and GA in post-embryonic root development, even though recent studies have shown that the root endodermis acts as a hub for ABA and GA responses (Dinneny, 2014; Duan et al., 2013; Heo et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2016; Miyashima and Nakajima, 2011; Shani et al., 2013; Ubeda-Tom?s et al., 2008; 2009).

In contrast to what has been known to date, these findings have revealed a unique interaction between ABA and GA, in which the two hormones act synergistically, not antagonistically, to modulate the timing and extent of MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Lee et al., 2016).

TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

Go to

Mutations in SHORT-ROOT (SHR) and SCARECROW (SCR) were first identified over two decades ago (Benfey et al., 1993; Scheres et al., 1995). Both shr and scr mutants have fewer GT layers in the root than do WT plants. At maturity, the WT root has three layers in the GT (endodermis, MC, and cortex; Fig.1B). In shr mutants, no endodermis is found in the GT from embryogenesis onward (Benfey et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000). Later in post-embryonic development, neither endodermis nor MC is formed in the shr root, which is similar to its embryos and young roots, suggesting that the endodermis layer is essential for MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). In contrast, from embryogenesis to the early stages of post-embryonic development, scr mutants possess a single GT layer with mixed traits of the endodermis and cortex (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Heidstra et al., 2004; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995). In later post-embryonic development, sporadic MC layers are precociously produced in the scr root (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Taken together, these results show that the endodermis and cortex layers in the GT fail to separate in the scr root at the early stages, whereas the scr mutant frequently undergoes periclinal ACDs for MC formation in later stages. Therefore, as the root ages, SCR has a dual role in controlling periclinal ACDs: separation of the endodermis and cortex versus MC formation. Both SHR and SCR belong to the GRAS transcription factor family, named after its original three members: GA INSENSITIVE (GAI), REPRESSOR OF GA1-3 (RGA), and SCR (Bolle, 2004; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Lee et al., 2008; Peng et al., 1997; Pysh et al., 1999; Silverstone et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2004). Another GRAS transcription factor, SCARECROW-LIKE 3 (SCL3), is involved in MC formation during maturation of the root GT (Heo et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2016). For example, similar to the scr mutant, scl3 shows premature MC formation, whereas overexpression of SCL3 suppresses periclinal ACDs in the endodermis.

Recently, two additional transcription factors have been shown to play important roles during GT maturation (Gong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016). SEUSS (SEU), which is known to function in reproductive development (Azhakanandam et al., 2008; Bao et al., 2010; Franks et al., 2002; Grigorova et al., 2011; Sridhar et al., 2006), is involved in the control of MC formation. In the Arabidopsis root, the seu mutant displays an increased frequency of MC formation, whereas overexpression of SEU results in reduced periclinal ACDs in the endodermis (Gong et al., 2016). Through transcriptomic, genetic, molecular and physiological analyses, GAZ (GA- AND ABA-RESPONSIVE ZINC FINGER), a previously uncharacterized C2H2-type zinc finger, has been shown to be involved in MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Unfortunately, loss-of-function gaz mutants display no visible phenotype. Thus, as an alternative, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with a fusion of GAZ to the SRDX domain (GAZ-SRDX), which renders strong repressive activity of GAZ (Hiratsu et al., 2003; 2004), have been analyzed, together with RNAi lines (GAZ-RNAi) (Lee et al., 2016). In comparison with GAZ overexpression (GAZ-OX) seedlings, both GAZ-SRDX and GAZ-RNAi plants exhibit the opposite MC formation phenotypes in the hormone-mediated control of root GT maturation (described in detail below).

With only a handful of transcription factors, we currently have a glimpse of the molecular events underlying the maturation process of the root GT.

REGULATORY NETWORKS INVOLVED IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

Go to

The processes involved in MC production during Arabidopsis root maturation were first described more than a decade ago (Baum et al., 2002). Since then, the interconnected genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of the MC layer have been characterized (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Cui et al., 2014; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Accumulating evidence has revealed unexpectedly complex networks of genes that play crucial roles in the regulation of MC formation.

In the root endodermis, SCL3 acts downstream of the SHR/SCR regulatory module during GT maturation. For example, in the scl3 shr double mutant, neither endodermis nor MC is formed, similar to the shr single mutant. In contrast, the scl3 scr double mutant exhibits more frequent periclinal ACDs for MC formation than either scl3 or scr single mutants, whereas overexpression of SCL3 is sufficient to suppress the precocious MC formation phenotype of the scr single mutant (Heo et al., 2011). In addition to the SHR/SCR pathway, SCL3 is directly regulated by DELLA transcription factors (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011), which are the major negative regulators of GA signaling and belong to the GRAS family (Bolle, 2004; Lee et al., 2008; Peng et al., 1997; Pysh et al., 1999; Silverstone et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2004). The gai rga double mutant shows almost no MC formation at 7 dpg, whereas the scl3 gai rga triple mutant displays an approximately 3-fold increase in the frequency of periclinal ACDs for MC formation (Heo et al., 2011). Under GA-deficient conditions, the phenotype of scl3 is exacerbated, thus resulting in precocious MC formation. Taken together, SCL3 serves as a molecular link between hormonal (GA) and developmental (SHR/SCR) pathways that regulate the maturation process in post-embryonic root development (Heo et al., 2011).

Until recently, no molecular component acting upstream of SHR and SCR has been characterized in the regulation of MC formation. In seu mutants, the abundance of SHR and SCR transcripts is substantially reduced, and SEU associates with their promoter regions (Gong et al., 2016). As seen in the shr single mutant, only a single cortex is found in the seu shr double mutant. A higher frequency of MC formation is observed in the seu scr double mutant than in either of the single mutants. In addition to the SHR/SCR module, SEU also directly regulates transcription of SCL3 by binding to its promoter regions (Gong et al., 2016). Genetic analysis of the seu scl3 double mutant has revealed that seu is epistatic to scl3. Therefore, these findings indicate that SEU is involved in the formation of the MC layer by activating expression of SHR, SCR, and SCL3 during GT maturation (Gong et al., 2016).

A recent study also has demonstrated that the GAZ transcription factor, which acts downstream of both the GA and ABA pathways, plays a role in the control of MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Under PAC treatment, GAZ-OX seedlings show a PAC-resistant phenotype, with reduced MC formation. Under the same condition, GAZ-OX in the scl3 background (scl3 GAZOX) has an opposite phenotype, with an increased frequency of MC formation, similar to the scl3 single mutant. Thus, the PAC-sensitive phenotype of scl3 GAZ-OX is likely due to the loss of SCL3 function, placing GAZ downstream of SCL3 in the GA-mediated regulation of GT maturation (Lee et al., 2016). Under ABA treatment, GAZ-OX seedlings are more sensitive to ABA than are the WT seedlings, displaying almost no MC layer. Furthermore, expression of GAZ is regulated by bioactive GA and ABA levels. For instance, the GAZ transcript levels are elevated under GA deficiency induced by PAC treatment or ga1-3 mutation. In contrast, the levels of GAZ expression are reduced in response to ABA treatment or by XER-OX (ABA overproducer). In addition, GAZ plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of ABA and GA homeostasis. Taken together, these results suggest that GAZ serves as a convergent point of the ABA and GA pathways during root GT maturation (Lee et al., 2016).

In summary (Fig. 2), the bioactive levels of ABA and GA play key roles in modulating the timing and extent of MC formation during GT maturation. For example, high levels of ABA and GA suppress the occurrence of periclinal ACDs in the endodermis, whereas mutants with ABA (aba2-2 and xer) or GA (ga1-3) deficiency have substantially increased production of the MC layer (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). In the GA pathway, bioactive GAs negatively regulate DELLA proteins by promoting their degradation (Harberd et al., 2009; Jiang and Fu, 2007; Peng et al., 1997; Silverstone et al., 1998; Sun and Gubler, 2004). Downstream of DELLAs, SCL3 attenuates the activity of DELLAs by protein-protein interaction and auto-regulates its own expression (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). Both DELLA and SCL3 transcription factors are involved in the feedback regulation of GA biosynthesis (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). The DELLA proteins also promote expression of XER, which is involved in the regulation of bioactive ABA levels (Ko et al., 2006; Zentella et al., 2007). Moreover, transcription of SCL3 is under the direct regulation of SHR and SCR in the endodermis (Heo et al., 2011; Levesque et al., 2006). Recently, SEU has been shown to positively regulate the expression of SHR and SCR, and is also involved in the GA-mediated regulation of SCL3 expression (Gong et al., 2016). In addition, GAZ, through maintenance of a constant flux of ABA and GA, plays a role in the control of root GT maturation. Taken together, multiple inputs from both plant hormonal (ABA and GA) and developmental (SHR, SCR, SCL3, SEU, and GAZ transcription factors) pathways should be coordinately integrated to generate the two different cell types (endodermis and MC) during GT maturation (Fig. 2).

CONCLUSION

Go to

While only a single layer of endodermis exists in the GT, most plants have multiple layers of cortex in the root, with the exception of Arabidopsis (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Esau, 1953; 1977; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995; Wu et al., 2014). In the plant root, the cortex layers store carbohydrates and other secondary metabolites. In addition, the root cortex is used to transport materials from the root hair into the central cylinder (Esau, 1953; 1977). Although the physiological function of MC formation is currently unclear, the presence of the multiple cortex layers generated by cell division and differentiation is thought to be a consequence of plant adaptation (Cui et al., 2014; Esau, 1953; 1977; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). For instance, rice is subject to water submergence; therefore, as an anatomical adaptation, the rice root possesses the multiple cortex layers that differentiate into gas-containing aerenchyma cells (Coudert et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2014; He et al., 1994; Rebouillat et al., 2009). In Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon) and rice (Oryza sativa), which contain multiple cortex layers, a plausible mechanism through which the controlled movement of the SHR transcription factor determines the number of cortex cell layers has been proposed (Wu et al., 2014). Moreover, recent work has revealed that MC formation is promoted by reactive oxygen species, suggesting that multiple cortex layers may protect against stresses (Cui, 2015; Cui et al., 2014). Although the number of studies investigating the regulatory networks of MC formation during plant root maturation has increased rapidly in recent years, our understanding of the physiological role of MC formation remains elusive. Future studies should aim to identify additional tissue-specific determinants and to understand how these determinants interact with known players to control MC formation. In addition, it would be of interest to investigate whether other plant hormones are involved in controlling the timing and extent of MC formation.

FIGURES

Go to
Fig. 1. Arabidopsis root development. (A) Arabidopsis root development under standard conditions. As the root ages, length of the primary root increases and lateral roots emerge in the later stages. Scale bar, 1 cm. (B) Schematic presentation of the Arabidopsis root during GT maturation. The left panel illustrates a longitudinal axis of the root at an early stage in post-embryonic root development. The quiescent center (QC) and adjacent stem cells form the stem cell niche, which gives rise to cells in diverse lineages. As the root ages, the endodermis undergoes additional periclinal ACDs to generate the endodermis (EN; blue) and the middle cortex (MC; red), which is located between the endodermis and the cortex (CO; green). The right panel shows that the root has three layers in the GT: endodermis (EN), middle cortex (MC), and cortex (CO) at maturity.
Fig. 2. Schematic model of the regulatory networks involved in MC formation. In the GA signaling pathway, bioactive GAs negatively regulate DELLA transcription factors by facilitating proteolytic degradation of DELLAs. SCL3, acting downstream of both DELLA and SHR/SCR transcription factors, serves as an endodermis-specific integrator. In addition, SEU is involved in the control of MC formation, by positively regulating the expression of SHR, SCR, and SCL3. In parallel, the ABA pathway also controls the abundance of GAZ mRNA, which plays a role in the transcriptional control of GA and ABA metabolism. GAZ is positioned downstream of SCL3, which regulates the level of GAZ expression via an unknown transcription factor (TF X). Thus, GAZ acts as a point of convergence for the ABA and GA pathways. Together, multiple inputs from plant hormone pathways (ABA and GA) and developmental pathways (SHR/SCR and SEU) should be coordinately integrated to control maturation of the Arabidopsis root GT. Arrows represent positive regulation, and bars denote negative regulation.

REFERENCES

Go to
  1. Abrash, E.B., and Bergmann, D.C (2009). Asymmetric cell divisions: a view from plant development. Dev. Cell. 16, 783-796.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Azhakanandam, S., Nole-Wilson, S., Bao, F., and Franks, R.G (2008). SEUSS and AINTEGUMENTA mediate patterning and ovule initiation during gynoecium medial domain development. Plant Physiol.. 146, 1165-1181.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Bao, F., Azhakanandam, S., and Franks, R.G (2010). SEUSS and SEUSS-LIKE transcriptional adaptors regulate floral and embryonic development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.. 152, 821-836.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Baum, S.F., Dubrovsky, Joseph G., and Rost, Thomas L (2002). Apical organization and maturation of the cortex and vascular cylinder in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) roots. Am. J. Bot.. 89, 908-920.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Benfey, P.N., Linstead, P.J., Roberts, K., Schiefelbein, J.W., Hauser, M.T., and Aeschbacher, R.A (1993). Root development in Arabidopsis: four mutants with dramatically altered root morphogenesis. Development. 119, 57-70.
    Pubmed
  6. Bolle, C (2004). The role of GRAS proteins in plant signal transduction and development. Planta. 218, 683-692.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Coudert, Y., Perin, C., Courtois, B., Khong, N.G., and Gantet, P (2010). Genetic control of root development in rice, the model cereal. Trends Plant Sci.. 15, 219-226.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Cruz-Ramirez, A., Diaz-Trivino, S., Blilou, I., Grieneisen, V.A., Sozzani, R., Zamioudis, C., Miskolczi, P., Nieuwland, J., Benjamins, R., and Dhonukshe, P. (2012). A bistable circuit involving SCARECROW-RETINOBLASTOMA integrates cues to inform asymmetric stem cell division. Cell. 150, 1002-1015.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Cui, H (2015). Cortex proliferation in the root is a protective mechanism against abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav.. 10, e1011949.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cui, H., and Benfey, P.N (2009a). Interplay between SCARECROW, GA and LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 in ground tissue patterning in the Arabidopsis root. Plant J.. 58, 1016-1027.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Cui, H., and Benfey, P.N (2009b). Cortex proliferation: simple phenotype, complex regulatory mechanisms. Plant Signal. Behav.. 4, 551-553.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Cui, H., Levesque, M.P., Vernoux, T., Jung, J.W., Paquette, A.J., Gallagher, K.L., Wang, J.Y., Blilou, I., Scheres, B., and Benfey, P.N (2007). An evolutionarily conserved mechanism delimiting SHR movement defines a single layer of endodermis in plants. Science. 316, 421-425.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Cui, H., Kong, D., Wei, P., Hao, Y., Torii, K.U., Lee, J.S., and Li, J (2014). SPINDLY, ERECTA and its ligand STOMAGEN have a role in redox-mediated cortex proliferation in the Arabidopsis root. Mol. Plant. 7, 1727-1739.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. De Smet, I., and Beeckman, T (2011). Asymmetric cell division in land plants and algae: the driving force for differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.. 12, 177-188.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J.E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M.G., Feldmann, K.A., and Benfey, P.N (1996). The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell. 86, 423-433.
    CrossRef
  16. Dinneny, J.R (2014). A gateway with a guard: how the endodermis regulates growth through hormone signaling. Plant Sci.. 214, 14-19.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Dolan, L., Janmaat, K., Willemsen, V., Linstead, P., Poethig, S., Roberts, K., and Scheres, B (1993). Cellular organization of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Development. 119, 71-84.
    Pubmed
  18. Duan, L., Dietrich, D., Ng, C.H., Chan, P.M., Bhalerao, R., Bennett, M.J., and Dinneny, J.R (2013). Endodermal ABA signaling promotes lateral root quiescence during salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell. 25, 324-341.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Esau, K (1953). Plant anatomy. New York: Wiley & Sons
    Pubmed
  20. Esau, K (1977). Anatomy of seed plants. New York: Wiley & Sons
  21. Finkelstein, R.R (2013). Abscisic acid biosynthesis and response. In The Arabidopsis book. 11, e0166.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Finkelstein, R.R., Gampala, S.S., and Rock, C.D (2002). Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell. 14 Suppl, S15-45.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  23. Finkelstein, R.R., Reeves, W., Ariizumi, T., and Steber, C (2008). Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.. 59, 387-415.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Franks, R.G., Wang, C., Levin, J.Z., and Liu, Z (2002). SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIG. Development. 129, 253-263.
    Pubmed
  25. Gong, X., Flores-Vergara, M.A., Hong, J.H., Chu, H., Lim, J., Franks, R.G., Liu, Z., and Xu, J (2016). SEUSS integrates gibberellin signaling with transcriptional inputs from the SHR-SCR-SCL3 module to regulate middle cortex formation in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Physiol.. 170, 1675-1683.
    CrossRef
  26. Grigorova, B, Mara, C, Hollender, C, Sijacic, P, Chen, X, and Liu, Z (2011). LEUNIG and SEUSS co-repressors regulate miR172 expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Development. 138, 2451-2456.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Harberd, N.P., Belfield, E., and Yasumura, Y (2009). The angiosperm gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: how an “inhibitor of an inhibitor” enables flexible response to fluctuating environments. Plant Cell. 21, 1328-1339.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. He, C.J., Drew, M.C., and Morgan, P.W (1994). Induction of enzymes associated with Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiol.. 105, 861-865.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  29. Heidstra, R., Welch, D., and Scheres, B (2004). Mosaic analyses using marked activation and deletion clones dissect Arabidopsis SCARECROW action in asymmetric cell division. Genes Dev.. 18, 1964-1969.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Helariutta, Y., Fukaki, H., Wysocka-Diller, J., Nakajima, K., Jung, J., Sena, G., Hauser, M.T., and Benfey, P.N (2000). The SHORT-ROOT gene controls radial patterning of the Arabidopsis root through radial signaling. Cell. 101, 555-567.
    CrossRef
  31. Heo, J.-O., Chang, K.S., Kim, I.A., Lee, M.-H., Lee, S.A., Song, S.K., Lee, M.M., and Lim, J (2011). Funneling of gibberellin signaling by the GRAS transcription regulator SCARECROW-LIKE 3 in the Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 2166-2171.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Hiratsu, K., Matsui, K., Koyama, T., and Ohme-Takagi, M (2003). Dominant repression of target genes by chimeric repressors that include the EAR motif, a repression domain, in Arabidopsis. Plant J.. 34, 733-739.
    CrossRef
  33. Hiratsu, K., Mitsuda, N., Matsui, K., and Ohme-Takagi, M (2004). Identification of the minimal repression domain of SUPERMAN shows that the DLELRL hexapeptide is both necessary and sufficient for repression of transcription in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. 321, 172-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Hoffmann-Benning, S., and Kende, H (1992). On the role of abscisic acid and gibberellin in the regulation of growth in rice. Plant Physiol.. 99, 1156-1161.
    CrossRef
  35. Horvitz, H.R., and Herskowitz, I (1992). Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell. 68, 237-255.
    CrossRef
  36. Jiang, C., and Fu, X (2007). GA action: turning on de-DELLA repressing signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.. 10, 461-465.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Knoblich, J.A (2008). Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell. 132, 583-597.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Ko, J.H., Yang, S.H., and Han, K.H (2006). Upregulation of an Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene, XERICO, confers drought tolerance through increased abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant J.. 47, 343-355.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Koizumi, K., Hayashi, T., and Gallagher, K.L (2012a). SCARECROW reinforces SHORT-ROOT signaling and inhibits periclinal cell divisions in the ground tissue by maintaining SHR at high levels in the endodermis. Plant Signal. Behav.. 7, 1573-1577.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Koizumi, K., Hayashi, T., Wu, S., and Gallagher, K.L (2012b). The SHORT-ROOT protein acts as a mobile, dose-dependent signal in patterning the ground tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 13010-13015.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Lee, M.-H., Kim, B., Song, S.K., Heo, J.O., Yu, N.I., Lee, S.A., Kim, M., Kim, D.G., Sohn, S.O., and Lim, C.E. (2008). Large-scale analysis of the GRAS gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol.. 67, 659-670.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Lee, S.A., Jang, S., Yoon, E.K., Heo, J.-O., Chang, K.S., Choi, J.W., Dhar, S., Kim, G., Choe, J.E., and Heo, J.B. (2016). Interplay between ABA and GA modulates the timing of asymmetric cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root ground tissue. Mol. Plant. 9, 870-884.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Levesque, M.P., Vernoux, T., Busch, W., Cui, H., Wang, J.Y., Blilou, I., Hassan, H., Nakajima, K., Matsumoto, N., and Lohmann, J.U. (2006). Whole-genome analysis of the SHORT-ROOT developmental pathway in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol.. 4, e143.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Miyashima, S., and Nakajima, K (2011). The root endodermis: a hub of developmental signals and nutrient flow. Plant Signal. Behav.. 6, 1954-1958.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Paquette, A.J., and Benfey, P.N (2005). Maturation of the ground tissue of the root is regulated by gibberellin and SCARECROW and requires SHORT-ROOT. Plant Physiol.. 138, 636-640.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Pauluzzi, G., Divol, F., Puig, J., Guiderdoni, E., Dievart, A., and P?rin, C (2012). Surfing along the root ground tissue gene network. Dev. Biol.. 365, 14-22.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Peng, J., Carol, P., Richards, D., King, K., Cowling, R., Murphy, G., and Harberd, N (1997). The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses. Genes Dev.. 11, 3194-3205.
    CrossRef
  48. Pysh, L.D., Wysocka-Diller, J.W., Camilleri, C., Bouchez, D., and Benfey, P.N (1999). The GRAS gene family in Arabidopsis: sequence characterization and basic expression analysis of the SCARECROW-LIKE genes. Plant J.. 18, 111-119.
    CrossRef
  49. Rebouillat, J., Dievart, A., Verdeil, J., Escoute, J., Giese, G., Breitler, J., Gantet, P., Espeout, S., Guiderdoni, E., and P?rin, C (2009). Molecular genetics of rice root development. Rice. 2, 15-34.
    CrossRef
  50. Rohde, A., Kurup, S., and Holdsworth, M (2000). ABI3 emerges from the seed. Trends Plant Sci.. 5, 418-419.
    CrossRef
  51. Scheres, B., Wolkenfelt, H., Willemsen, V., Terlouw, M., Lawson, E., Dean, C., and Weisbeek, P (1994). Embryonic origin of the Arabidopsis primary root and root meristem initials. Development. 120, 2475-2487.
  52. Scheres, B., Di Laurenzio, L., Willemsen, V., Hauser, M.T., Janmaat, K., Weisbeek, P., and Benfey, P.N (1995). Mutations affecting the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root display specific defects throughout the embryonic axis. Development. 121, 53-62.
  53. Shani, E., Weinstain, R., Zhang, Y., Castillejo, C., Kaiserli, E., Chory, J., Tsien, R.Y., and Estelle, M (2013). Gibberellins accumulate in the elongating endodermal cells of Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 4834-4839.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Silverstone, A., Ciampaglio, C., and Sun, T (1998). The Arabidopsis RGA gene encodes a transcriptional regulator repressing the gibberellin signal transduction pathway. Plant Cell. 10, 155-169.
    CrossRef
  55. Smolarkiewicz, M., and Dhonukshe, P (2013). Formative cell divisions: principal determinants of plant morphogenesis. Plant Cell Physiol.. 54, 333-342.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Sridhar, VV, Surendrarao, A, and Liu, Z (2006). APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact with SEUSS to mediate transcription repression during flower development. Development. 133, 3159-3166.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Sun, T.P., and Gubler, F (2004). Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.. 55, 197-223.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Ten Hove, C.A., and Heidstra, R (2008). Who begets whom? Plant cell fate determination by asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.. 11, 34-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Tian, C., Wan, P., Sun, S., Li, J., and Chen, M (2004). Genome-wide analysis of the GRAS gene family in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.. 54, 519-532.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Ubeda-Tom?s, S., Swarup, R., Coates, J., Swarup, K., Laplaze, L., Beemster, G.T., Hedden, P., Bhalerao, R., and Bennett, M.J (2008). Root growth in Arabidopsis requires gibberellin/DELLA signaling in the endodermis. Nat. Cell Biol.. 10, 625-628.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Ubeda-Tom?s, S., Federici, F., Casimiro, I., Beemster, G.T., Bhalerao, R., Swarup, R., Doerner, P., Haseloff, J., and Bennett, M.J (2009). Gibberellin signaling in the endodermis controls Arabidopsis root meristem size. Curr. Biol.. 19, 1194-1199.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Weiss, D., and Ori, N (2007). Mechanisms of cross talk between gibberellin and other hormones. Plant Physiol.. 144, 1240-1246.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  63. Wu, S., Lee, C.M., Hayashi, T., Price, S., Divol, F., Henry, S., Pauluzzi, G., Perin, C., and Gallagher, K.L (2014). A plausible mechanism, based upon SHORT-ROOT movement, for regulating the number of cortex cell layers in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 16184-16189.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Zentella, R., Zhang, Z.L., Park, M., Thomas, S.G., Endo, A., Murase, K., Fleet, C.M., Jikumaru, Y., Nambara, E., and Kamiya, Y. (2007). Global analysis of DELLA direct targets in early gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 19, 3037-3057.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Zhang, Z.L., Ogawa, M., Fleet, C.M., Zentella, R., Hu, J., Heo, J.-O., Lim, J., Kamiya, Y., Yamaguchi, S., and Sun, T.P (2011). SCARECROW-LIKE 3 promotes gibberellin signaling by antagonizing master growth repressor DELLA in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 2160-2165.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Article

Minireview

Mol. Cells 2016; 39(7): 524-529

Published online July 31, 2016 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0105

Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.

Control of Asymmetric Cell Divisions during Root Ground Tissue Maturation

Ji Won Choi, and Jun Lim*

Department of Systems Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea

Correspondence to:*Correspondence: jlim@konkuk.ac.kr

Received: April 21, 2016; Revised: May 24, 2016; Accepted: May 25, 2016

Abstract

Controlling the production of diverse cell/tissue types is essential for the development of multicellular organisms such as animals and plants. The Arabidopsis thaliana root, which contains distinct cells/tissues along longitudinal and radial axes, has served as an elegant model to investigate how genetic programs and environmental signals interact to produce different cell/tissue types. In the root, a series of asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) give rise to three ground tissue layers at maturity (endodermis, middle cortex, and cortex). Because the middle cortex is formed by a periclinal (parallel to the axis) ACD of the endodermis around 7 to 14 days post-germination, middle cortex formation is used as a parameter to assess maturation of the root ground tissue. Molecular, genetic, and physiological studies have revealed that the control of the timing and extent of middle cortex formation during root maturation relies on the interaction of plant hormones and transcription factors. In particular, abscisic acid and gibberellin act synergistically to regulate the timing and extent of middle cortex formation, unlike their typical antagonism. The SHORT-ROOT, SCARECROW, SCARECROW-LIKE 3, and DELLA transcription factors, all of which belong to the plant-specific GRAS family, play key roles in the regulation of middle cortex formation. Recently, two additional transcription factors, SEUSS and GA- AND ABA-RESPONSIVE ZINC FINGER, have also been characterized during ground tissue maturation. In this review, we provide a detailed account of the regulatory networks that control the timing and extent of middle cortex formation during post-embryonic root development.

Keywords: asymmetric cell division, ground tissue, plant hormone, root development, transcription factor

INTRODUCTION

Multicellular organisms, such as animals and plants, possess diverse cell/tissue types. How different cells and tissues are generated is one of the fundamental questions in developmental biology. In particular, asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) play an important role in the development of distinct cell and tissue types in the individual organism (Abrash and Bergmann, 2009; De Smet and Beeckman, 2011; Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Knoblich, 2008; Smolarkiewicz and Dhonukshe, 2013; Ten Hove and Heidstra, 2008). Therefore, the timing and extent of ACDs should be controlled to ensure correct patterning. In plants, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root has been used as a model to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of ACDs in cell/tissue patterning (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995). From embryogenesis onwards, stem cells for the ground tissue (GT), namely the cortex/endodermis initial (CEI), undergo a series of ACDs. The divides in the anticlinal direction (perpendicular to the axis), resulting in self-renewal of the CEI and a daughter cell, i.e., the cortex/endodermis initial daughter (CEID). Next, the CEID divides in the periclinal orientation (parallel to the axis). Thus, the Arabidopsis root has two GT layers at the early stages of development: the endodermis (inside) and the cortex (outside) (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995) (Fig. 1). As the root ages, the endodermis divides again in the periclinal direction around 7 to 14 days post-germination (dpg), which results in the regeneration of the endodermis and an additional cortex. Usually, the endodermis cells adjacent to the xylem poles preferentially tend to undergo periclinal division prior to other cells in the endodermis (Baum et al., 2002; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Due to its location between the endodermis and the pre-existing cortex in the GT layers, the new cortex layer is designated as the middle cortex (MC). Thus, the Arabidopsis root can possess three GT layers at maturity (endodermis, MC, and cortex; Fig.1B). Therefore, production of the MC layer by periclinal ACDs in the endodermis is considered to be an indication that post-embryonic root development has entered a more mature phase (Baum et al., 2002; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). To assess maturation of the Arabidopsis root GT, the formation of the MC layer, as measured by the proportion of plants with MC either at a specific time point or in time courses, has been used (Baum et al., 2002; Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012).

Since the production of the MC layer during root GT maturation was first reported (Baum et al., 2002), accumulating evidence has revealed complex regulatory networks involving the interplay of plant hormones and transcription factors, which modulate the timing and extent of ACDs for MC formation. In this review, we focus on the crucial roles of plant hormones as well as transcription factors in the control of MC formation. We also describe the regulatory interactions between plant hormones and transcription factors during GT maturation. In addition, we provide perspective on other factors that potentially control the timing and extent of MC formation, and why roots develop with extra cortex layers during root GT maturation.

PLANT HORMONES IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

Under normal growth conditions, Columbia wild-type (Col WT) roots undergo periclinal ACDs in the endodermis around 7 to 14 dpg, resulting in an average of 20 to 35% of plants with the MC layer, depending on experimental conditions (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Under gibberellin (GA)-deficient conditions, induced by treatment with a GA biosynthesis inhibitor (e.g., paclobutrazol; PAC) or by loss-of-function mutations in a key GA biosynthesis enzyme (e.g., ga1-3), seedling roots exhibit a 2- to 3-fold increase in MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). In contrast, exogenous GA application substantially suppresses periclinal ACDs in the endodermis, thus resulting in delayed MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). These findings indicate that modulation of bioactive GA levels is critical for the regulation of MC formation in the Arabidopsis root GT.

The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes the effects of GA in numerous processes during plant growth and development (Finkelstein, 2013; Finkelstein et al., 2002; 2008; Hoffmann-Benning and Kende, 1992; Rohde et al., 2000; Sun and Gubler, 2004; Weiss and Ori, 2007). However, similar to seedlings treated with GA, WT roots treated with exogenous ABA exhibit a suppression of MC formation. In addition, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with XERICO fused to the 35S promoter (XER overexpressor; XER-OX), which substantially increases cellular ABA levels, probably through the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent degradation pathway (Ko et al., 2006), have almost no MC layer at 7 dpg (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Lee et al., 2016). In contrast, under ABA-deficient conditions caused by loss-of-function mutations in a key ABA biosynthesis enzyme (aba2-2) or in the XER gene (xer), seedlings display more frequent periclinal ACDs for MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Interestingly, the ABA-deficient aba2-2 and xer mutants are sensitive to PAC, resulting in the precocious formation of the MC layer. Consistent with this finding, under ABA treatment, GA-deficient ga1-3 roots show an elevated frequency of MC formation when compared with WT roots. Therefore, analogous to GA, modulation of ABA levels is also important for the control of root GT maturation. Taken together, these findings indicate that the bioactive levels of the two hormones play key roles in the maturation process of the root GT. However, little is known about the distribution of ABA and GA in post-embryonic root development, even though recent studies have shown that the root endodermis acts as a hub for ABA and GA responses (Dinneny, 2014; Duan et al., 2013; Heo et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2016; Miyashima and Nakajima, 2011; Shani et al., 2013; Ubeda-Tom?s et al., 2008; 2009).

In contrast to what has been known to date, these findings have revealed a unique interaction between ABA and GA, in which the two hormones act synergistically, not antagonistically, to modulate the timing and extent of MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Lee et al., 2016).

TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

Mutations in SHORT-ROOT (SHR) and SCARECROW (SCR) were first identified over two decades ago (Benfey et al., 1993; Scheres et al., 1995). Both shr and scr mutants have fewer GT layers in the root than do WT plants. At maturity, the WT root has three layers in the GT (endodermis, MC, and cortex; Fig.1B). In shr mutants, no endodermis is found in the GT from embryogenesis onward (Benfey et al., 1993; Helariutta et al., 2000). Later in post-embryonic development, neither endodermis nor MC is formed in the shr root, which is similar to its embryos and young roots, suggesting that the endodermis layer is essential for MC formation (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Paquette and Benfey, 2005; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). In contrast, from embryogenesis to the early stages of post-embryonic development, scr mutants possess a single GT layer with mixed traits of the endodermis and cortex (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Heidstra et al., 2004; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995). In later post-embryonic development, sporadic MC layers are precociously produced in the scr root (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Taken together, these results show that the endodermis and cortex layers in the GT fail to separate in the scr root at the early stages, whereas the scr mutant frequently undergoes periclinal ACDs for MC formation in later stages. Therefore, as the root ages, SCR has a dual role in controlling periclinal ACDs: separation of the endodermis and cortex versus MC formation. Both SHR and SCR belong to the GRAS transcription factor family, named after its original three members: GA INSENSITIVE (GAI), REPRESSOR OF GA1-3 (RGA), and SCR (Bolle, 2004; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Lee et al., 2008; Peng et al., 1997; Pysh et al., 1999; Silverstone et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2004). Another GRAS transcription factor, SCARECROW-LIKE 3 (SCL3), is involved in MC formation during maturation of the root GT (Heo et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2016). For example, similar to the scr mutant, scl3 shows premature MC formation, whereas overexpression of SCL3 suppresses periclinal ACDs in the endodermis.

Recently, two additional transcription factors have been shown to play important roles during GT maturation (Gong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016). SEUSS (SEU), which is known to function in reproductive development (Azhakanandam et al., 2008; Bao et al., 2010; Franks et al., 2002; Grigorova et al., 2011; Sridhar et al., 2006), is involved in the control of MC formation. In the Arabidopsis root, the seu mutant displays an increased frequency of MC formation, whereas overexpression of SEU results in reduced periclinal ACDs in the endodermis (Gong et al., 2016). Through transcriptomic, genetic, molecular and physiological analyses, GAZ (GA- AND ABA-RESPONSIVE ZINC FINGER), a previously uncharacterized C2H2-type zinc finger, has been shown to be involved in MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Unfortunately, loss-of-function gaz mutants display no visible phenotype. Thus, as an alternative, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with a fusion of GAZ to the SRDX domain (GAZ-SRDX), which renders strong repressive activity of GAZ (Hiratsu et al., 2003; 2004), have been analyzed, together with RNAi lines (GAZ-RNAi) (Lee et al., 2016). In comparison with GAZ overexpression (GAZ-OX) seedlings, both GAZ-SRDX and GAZ-RNAi plants exhibit the opposite MC formation phenotypes in the hormone-mediated control of root GT maturation (described in detail below).

With only a handful of transcription factors, we currently have a glimpse of the molecular events underlying the maturation process of the root GT.

REGULATORY NETWORKS INVOLVED IN THE CONTROL OF MC FORMATION

The processes involved in MC production during Arabidopsis root maturation were first described more than a decade ago (Baum et al., 2002). Since then, the interconnected genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of the MC layer have been characterized (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Cui et al., 2014; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). Accumulating evidence has revealed unexpectedly complex networks of genes that play crucial roles in the regulation of MC formation.

In the root endodermis, SCL3 acts downstream of the SHR/SCR regulatory module during GT maturation. For example, in the scl3 shr double mutant, neither endodermis nor MC is formed, similar to the shr single mutant. In contrast, the scl3 scr double mutant exhibits more frequent periclinal ACDs for MC formation than either scl3 or scr single mutants, whereas overexpression of SCL3 is sufficient to suppress the precocious MC formation phenotype of the scr single mutant (Heo et al., 2011). In addition to the SHR/SCR pathway, SCL3 is directly regulated by DELLA transcription factors (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011), which are the major negative regulators of GA signaling and belong to the GRAS family (Bolle, 2004; Lee et al., 2008; Peng et al., 1997; Pysh et al., 1999; Silverstone et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2004). The gai rga double mutant shows almost no MC formation at 7 dpg, whereas the scl3 gai rga triple mutant displays an approximately 3-fold increase in the frequency of periclinal ACDs for MC formation (Heo et al., 2011). Under GA-deficient conditions, the phenotype of scl3 is exacerbated, thus resulting in precocious MC formation. Taken together, SCL3 serves as a molecular link between hormonal (GA) and developmental (SHR/SCR) pathways that regulate the maturation process in post-embryonic root development (Heo et al., 2011).

Until recently, no molecular component acting upstream of SHR and SCR has been characterized in the regulation of MC formation. In seu mutants, the abundance of SHR and SCR transcripts is substantially reduced, and SEU associates with their promoter regions (Gong et al., 2016). As seen in the shr single mutant, only a single cortex is found in the seu shr double mutant. A higher frequency of MC formation is observed in the seu scr double mutant than in either of the single mutants. In addition to the SHR/SCR module, SEU also directly regulates transcription of SCL3 by binding to its promoter regions (Gong et al., 2016). Genetic analysis of the seu scl3 double mutant has revealed that seu is epistatic to scl3. Therefore, these findings indicate that SEU is involved in the formation of the MC layer by activating expression of SHR, SCR, and SCL3 during GT maturation (Gong et al., 2016).

A recent study also has demonstrated that the GAZ transcription factor, which acts downstream of both the GA and ABA pathways, plays a role in the control of MC formation (Lee et al., 2016). Under PAC treatment, GAZ-OX seedlings show a PAC-resistant phenotype, with reduced MC formation. Under the same condition, GAZ-OX in the scl3 background (scl3 GAZOX) has an opposite phenotype, with an increased frequency of MC formation, similar to the scl3 single mutant. Thus, the PAC-sensitive phenotype of scl3 GAZ-OX is likely due to the loss of SCL3 function, placing GAZ downstream of SCL3 in the GA-mediated regulation of GT maturation (Lee et al., 2016). Under ABA treatment, GAZ-OX seedlings are more sensitive to ABA than are the WT seedlings, displaying almost no MC layer. Furthermore, expression of GAZ is regulated by bioactive GA and ABA levels. For instance, the GAZ transcript levels are elevated under GA deficiency induced by PAC treatment or ga1-3 mutation. In contrast, the levels of GAZ expression are reduced in response to ABA treatment or by XER-OX (ABA overproducer). In addition, GAZ plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of ABA and GA homeostasis. Taken together, these results suggest that GAZ serves as a convergent point of the ABA and GA pathways during root GT maturation (Lee et al., 2016).

In summary (Fig. 2), the bioactive levels of ABA and GA play key roles in modulating the timing and extent of MC formation during GT maturation. For example, high levels of ABA and GA suppress the occurrence of periclinal ACDs in the endodermis, whereas mutants with ABA (aba2-2 and xer) or GA (ga1-3) deficiency have substantially increased production of the MC layer (Cui and Benfey, 2009a; 2009b; Gong et al., 2016; Heo et al., 2011; Koizumi et al., 2012a; 2012b; Lee et al., 2016; Paquette and Benfey, 2005). In the GA pathway, bioactive GAs negatively regulate DELLA proteins by promoting their degradation (Harberd et al., 2009; Jiang and Fu, 2007; Peng et al., 1997; Silverstone et al., 1998; Sun and Gubler, 2004). Downstream of DELLAs, SCL3 attenuates the activity of DELLAs by protein-protein interaction and auto-regulates its own expression (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). Both DELLA and SCL3 transcription factors are involved in the feedback regulation of GA biosynthesis (Heo et al., 2011; Zentella et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). The DELLA proteins also promote expression of XER, which is involved in the regulation of bioactive ABA levels (Ko et al., 2006; Zentella et al., 2007). Moreover, transcription of SCL3 is under the direct regulation of SHR and SCR in the endodermis (Heo et al., 2011; Levesque et al., 2006). Recently, SEU has been shown to positively regulate the expression of SHR and SCR, and is also involved in the GA-mediated regulation of SCL3 expression (Gong et al., 2016). In addition, GAZ, through maintenance of a constant flux of ABA and GA, plays a role in the control of root GT maturation. Taken together, multiple inputs from both plant hormonal (ABA and GA) and developmental (SHR, SCR, SCL3, SEU, and GAZ transcription factors) pathways should be coordinately integrated to generate the two different cell types (endodermis and MC) during GT maturation (Fig. 2).

CONCLUSION

While only a single layer of endodermis exists in the GT, most plants have multiple layers of cortex in the root, with the exception of Arabidopsis (Benfey et al., 1993; Cruz-Ramirez et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2007; Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Dolan et al., 1993; Esau, 1953; 1977; Helariutta et al., 2000; Scheres et al., 1994; 1995; Wu et al., 2014). In the plant root, the cortex layers store carbohydrates and other secondary metabolites. In addition, the root cortex is used to transport materials from the root hair into the central cylinder (Esau, 1953; 1977). Although the physiological function of MC formation is currently unclear, the presence of the multiple cortex layers generated by cell division and differentiation is thought to be a consequence of plant adaptation (Cui et al., 2014; Esau, 1953; 1977; Pauluzzi et al., 2012). For instance, rice is subject to water submergence; therefore, as an anatomical adaptation, the rice root possesses the multiple cortex layers that differentiate into gas-containing aerenchyma cells (Coudert et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2014; He et al., 1994; Rebouillat et al., 2009). In Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon) and rice (Oryza sativa), which contain multiple cortex layers, a plausible mechanism through which the controlled movement of the SHR transcription factor determines the number of cortex cell layers has been proposed (Wu et al., 2014). Moreover, recent work has revealed that MC formation is promoted by reactive oxygen species, suggesting that multiple cortex layers may protect against stresses (Cui, 2015; Cui et al., 2014). Although the number of studies investigating the regulatory networks of MC formation during plant root maturation has increased rapidly in recent years, our understanding of the physiological role of MC formation remains elusive. Future studies should aim to identify additional tissue-specific determinants and to understand how these determinants interact with known players to control MC formation. In addition, it would be of interest to investigate whether other plant hormones are involved in controlling the timing and extent of MC formation.

Fig 1.

Download
Figure 1.Arabidopsis root development. (A) Arabidopsis root development under standard conditions. As the root ages, length of the primary root increases and lateral roots emerge in the later stages. Scale bar, 1 cm. (B) Schematic presentation of the Arabidopsis root during GT maturation. The left panel illustrates a longitudinal axis of the root at an early stage in post-embryonic root development. The quiescent center (QC) and adjacent stem cells form the stem cell niche, which gives rise to cells in diverse lineages. As the root ages, the endodermis undergoes additional periclinal ACDs to generate the endodermis (EN; blue) and the middle cortex (MC; red), which is located between the endodermis and the cortex (CO; green). The right panel shows that the root has three layers in the GT: endodermis (EN), middle cortex (MC), and cortex (CO) at maturity.
Molecules and Cells 2016; 39: 524-529https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0105

Fig 2.

Download
Figure 2.Schematic model of the regulatory networks involved in MC formation. In the GA signaling pathway, bioactive GAs negatively regulate DELLA transcription factors by facilitating proteolytic degradation of DELLAs. SCL3, acting downstream of both DELLA and SHR/SCR transcription factors, serves as an endodermis-specific integrator. In addition, SEU is involved in the control of MC formation, by positively regulating the expression of SHR, SCR, and SCL3. In parallel, the ABA pathway also controls the abundance of GAZ mRNA, which plays a role in the transcriptional control of GA and ABA metabolism. GAZ is positioned downstream of SCL3, which regulates the level of GAZ expression via an unknown transcription factor (TF X). Thus, GAZ acts as a point of convergence for the ABA and GA pathways. Together, multiple inputs from plant hormone pathways (ABA and GA) and developmental pathways (SHR/SCR and SEU) should be coordinately integrated to control maturation of the Arabidopsis root GT. Arrows represent positive regulation, and bars denote negative regulation.
Molecules and Cells 2016; 39: 524-529https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0105

References

  1. Abrash, E.B., and Bergmann, D.C (2009). Asymmetric cell divisions: a view from plant development. Dev. Cell. 16, 783-796.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Azhakanandam, S., Nole-Wilson, S., Bao, F., and Franks, R.G (2008). SEUSS and AINTEGUMENTA mediate patterning and ovule initiation during gynoecium medial domain development. Plant Physiol.. 146, 1165-1181.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Bao, F., Azhakanandam, S., and Franks, R.G (2010). SEUSS and SEUSS-LIKE transcriptional adaptors regulate floral and embryonic development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.. 152, 821-836.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Baum, S.F., Dubrovsky, Joseph G., and Rost, Thomas L (2002). Apical organization and maturation of the cortex and vascular cylinder in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) roots. Am. J. Bot.. 89, 908-920.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Benfey, P.N., Linstead, P.J., Roberts, K., Schiefelbein, J.W., Hauser, M.T., and Aeschbacher, R.A (1993). Root development in Arabidopsis: four mutants with dramatically altered root morphogenesis. Development. 119, 57-70.
    Pubmed
  6. Bolle, C (2004). The role of GRAS proteins in plant signal transduction and development. Planta. 218, 683-692.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Coudert, Y., Perin, C., Courtois, B., Khong, N.G., and Gantet, P (2010). Genetic control of root development in rice, the model cereal. Trends Plant Sci.. 15, 219-226.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Cruz-Ramirez, A., Diaz-Trivino, S., Blilou, I., Grieneisen, V.A., Sozzani, R., Zamioudis, C., Miskolczi, P., Nieuwland, J., Benjamins, R., and Dhonukshe, P. (2012). A bistable circuit involving SCARECROW-RETINOBLASTOMA integrates cues to inform asymmetric stem cell division. Cell. 150, 1002-1015.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Cui, H (2015). Cortex proliferation in the root is a protective mechanism against abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav.. 10, e1011949.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cui, H., and Benfey, P.N (2009a). Interplay between SCARECROW, GA and LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 in ground tissue patterning in the Arabidopsis root. Plant J.. 58, 1016-1027.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Cui, H., and Benfey, P.N (2009b). Cortex proliferation: simple phenotype, complex regulatory mechanisms. Plant Signal. Behav.. 4, 551-553.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Cui, H., Levesque, M.P., Vernoux, T., Jung, J.W., Paquette, A.J., Gallagher, K.L., Wang, J.Y., Blilou, I., Scheres, B., and Benfey, P.N (2007). An evolutionarily conserved mechanism delimiting SHR movement defines a single layer of endodermis in plants. Science. 316, 421-425.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Cui, H., Kong, D., Wei, P., Hao, Y., Torii, K.U., Lee, J.S., and Li, J (2014). SPINDLY, ERECTA and its ligand STOMAGEN have a role in redox-mediated cortex proliferation in the Arabidopsis root. Mol. Plant. 7, 1727-1739.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. De Smet, I., and Beeckman, T (2011). Asymmetric cell division in land plants and algae: the driving force for differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.. 12, 177-188.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J.E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M.G., Feldmann, K.A., and Benfey, P.N (1996). The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell. 86, 423-433.
    CrossRef
  16. Dinneny, J.R (2014). A gateway with a guard: how the endodermis regulates growth through hormone signaling. Plant Sci.. 214, 14-19.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Dolan, L., Janmaat, K., Willemsen, V., Linstead, P., Poethig, S., Roberts, K., and Scheres, B (1993). Cellular organization of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Development. 119, 71-84.
    Pubmed
  18. Duan, L., Dietrich, D., Ng, C.H., Chan, P.M., Bhalerao, R., Bennett, M.J., and Dinneny, J.R (2013). Endodermal ABA signaling promotes lateral root quiescence during salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell. 25, 324-341.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Esau, K (1953). Plant anatomy. New York: Wiley & Sons
    Pubmed
  20. Esau, K (1977). Anatomy of seed plants. New York: Wiley & Sons
  21. Finkelstein, R.R (2013). Abscisic acid biosynthesis and response. In The Arabidopsis book. 11, e0166.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Finkelstein, R.R., Gampala, S.S., and Rock, C.D (2002). Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell. 14 Suppl, S15-45.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  23. Finkelstein, R.R., Reeves, W., Ariizumi, T., and Steber, C (2008). Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.. 59, 387-415.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Franks, R.G., Wang, C., Levin, J.Z., and Liu, Z (2002). SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIG. Development. 129, 253-263.
    Pubmed
  25. Gong, X., Flores-Vergara, M.A., Hong, J.H., Chu, H., Lim, J., Franks, R.G., Liu, Z., and Xu, J (2016). SEUSS integrates gibberellin signaling with transcriptional inputs from the SHR-SCR-SCL3 module to regulate middle cortex formation in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Physiol.. 170, 1675-1683.
    CrossRef
  26. Grigorova, B, Mara, C, Hollender, C, Sijacic, P, Chen, X, and Liu, Z (2011). LEUNIG and SEUSS co-repressors regulate miR172 expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Development. 138, 2451-2456.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Harberd, N.P., Belfield, E., and Yasumura, Y (2009). The angiosperm gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: how an “inhibitor of an inhibitor” enables flexible response to fluctuating environments. Plant Cell. 21, 1328-1339.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. He, C.J., Drew, M.C., and Morgan, P.W (1994). Induction of enzymes associated with Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiol.. 105, 861-865.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  29. Heidstra, R., Welch, D., and Scheres, B (2004). Mosaic analyses using marked activation and deletion clones dissect Arabidopsis SCARECROW action in asymmetric cell division. Genes Dev.. 18, 1964-1969.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Helariutta, Y., Fukaki, H., Wysocka-Diller, J., Nakajima, K., Jung, J., Sena, G., Hauser, M.T., and Benfey, P.N (2000). The SHORT-ROOT gene controls radial patterning of the Arabidopsis root through radial signaling. Cell. 101, 555-567.
    CrossRef
  31. Heo, J.-O., Chang, K.S., Kim, I.A., Lee, M.-H., Lee, S.A., Song, S.K., Lee, M.M., and Lim, J (2011). Funneling of gibberellin signaling by the GRAS transcription regulator SCARECROW-LIKE 3 in the Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 2166-2171.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Hiratsu, K., Matsui, K., Koyama, T., and Ohme-Takagi, M (2003). Dominant repression of target genes by chimeric repressors that include the EAR motif, a repression domain, in Arabidopsis. Plant J.. 34, 733-739.
    CrossRef
  33. Hiratsu, K., Mitsuda, N., Matsui, K., and Ohme-Takagi, M (2004). Identification of the minimal repression domain of SUPERMAN shows that the DLELRL hexapeptide is both necessary and sufficient for repression of transcription in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. 321, 172-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Hoffmann-Benning, S., and Kende, H (1992). On the role of abscisic acid and gibberellin in the regulation of growth in rice. Plant Physiol.. 99, 1156-1161.
    CrossRef
  35. Horvitz, H.R., and Herskowitz, I (1992). Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell. 68, 237-255.
    CrossRef
  36. Jiang, C., and Fu, X (2007). GA action: turning on de-DELLA repressing signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.. 10, 461-465.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Knoblich, J.A (2008). Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell. 132, 583-597.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Ko, J.H., Yang, S.H., and Han, K.H (2006). Upregulation of an Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene, XERICO, confers drought tolerance through increased abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant J.. 47, 343-355.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Koizumi, K., Hayashi, T., and Gallagher, K.L (2012a). SCARECROW reinforces SHORT-ROOT signaling and inhibits periclinal cell divisions in the ground tissue by maintaining SHR at high levels in the endodermis. Plant Signal. Behav.. 7, 1573-1577.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Koizumi, K., Hayashi, T., Wu, S., and Gallagher, K.L (2012b). The SHORT-ROOT protein acts as a mobile, dose-dependent signal in patterning the ground tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 13010-13015.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Lee, M.-H., Kim, B., Song, S.K., Heo, J.O., Yu, N.I., Lee, S.A., Kim, M., Kim, D.G., Sohn, S.O., and Lim, C.E. (2008). Large-scale analysis of the GRAS gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol.. 67, 659-670.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Lee, S.A., Jang, S., Yoon, E.K., Heo, J.-O., Chang, K.S., Choi, J.W., Dhar, S., Kim, G., Choe, J.E., and Heo, J.B. (2016). Interplay between ABA and GA modulates the timing of asymmetric cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root ground tissue. Mol. Plant. 9, 870-884.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Levesque, M.P., Vernoux, T., Busch, W., Cui, H., Wang, J.Y., Blilou, I., Hassan, H., Nakajima, K., Matsumoto, N., and Lohmann, J.U. (2006). Whole-genome analysis of the SHORT-ROOT developmental pathway in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol.. 4, e143.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Miyashima, S., and Nakajima, K (2011). The root endodermis: a hub of developmental signals and nutrient flow. Plant Signal. Behav.. 6, 1954-1958.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Paquette, A.J., and Benfey, P.N (2005). Maturation of the ground tissue of the root is regulated by gibberellin and SCARECROW and requires SHORT-ROOT. Plant Physiol.. 138, 636-640.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Pauluzzi, G., Divol, F., Puig, J., Guiderdoni, E., Dievart, A., and P?rin, C (2012). Surfing along the root ground tissue gene network. Dev. Biol.. 365, 14-22.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Peng, J., Carol, P., Richards, D., King, K., Cowling, R., Murphy, G., and Harberd, N (1997). The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses. Genes Dev.. 11, 3194-3205.
    CrossRef
  48. Pysh, L.D., Wysocka-Diller, J.W., Camilleri, C., Bouchez, D., and Benfey, P.N (1999). The GRAS gene family in Arabidopsis: sequence characterization and basic expression analysis of the SCARECROW-LIKE genes. Plant J.. 18, 111-119.
    CrossRef
  49. Rebouillat, J., Dievart, A., Verdeil, J., Escoute, J., Giese, G., Breitler, J., Gantet, P., Espeout, S., Guiderdoni, E., and P?rin, C (2009). Molecular genetics of rice root development. Rice. 2, 15-34.
    CrossRef
  50. Rohde, A., Kurup, S., and Holdsworth, M (2000). ABI3 emerges from the seed. Trends Plant Sci.. 5, 418-419.
    CrossRef
  51. Scheres, B., Wolkenfelt, H., Willemsen, V., Terlouw, M., Lawson, E., Dean, C., and Weisbeek, P (1994). Embryonic origin of the Arabidopsis primary root and root meristem initials. Development. 120, 2475-2487.
  52. Scheres, B., Di Laurenzio, L., Willemsen, V., Hauser, M.T., Janmaat, K., Weisbeek, P., and Benfey, P.N (1995). Mutations affecting the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root display specific defects throughout the embryonic axis. Development. 121, 53-62.
  53. Shani, E., Weinstain, R., Zhang, Y., Castillejo, C., Kaiserli, E., Chory, J., Tsien, R.Y., and Estelle, M (2013). Gibberellins accumulate in the elongating endodermal cells of Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 4834-4839.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Silverstone, A., Ciampaglio, C., and Sun, T (1998). The Arabidopsis RGA gene encodes a transcriptional regulator repressing the gibberellin signal transduction pathway. Plant Cell. 10, 155-169.
    CrossRef
  55. Smolarkiewicz, M., and Dhonukshe, P (2013). Formative cell divisions: principal determinants of plant morphogenesis. Plant Cell Physiol.. 54, 333-342.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Sridhar, VV, Surendrarao, A, and Liu, Z (2006). APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact with SEUSS to mediate transcription repression during flower development. Development. 133, 3159-3166.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Sun, T.P., and Gubler, F (2004). Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.. 55, 197-223.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Ten Hove, C.A., and Heidstra, R (2008). Who begets whom? Plant cell fate determination by asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.. 11, 34-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Tian, C., Wan, P., Sun, S., Li, J., and Chen, M (2004). Genome-wide analysis of the GRAS gene family in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.. 54, 519-532.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Ubeda-Tom?s, S., Swarup, R., Coates, J., Swarup, K., Laplaze, L., Beemster, G.T., Hedden, P., Bhalerao, R., and Bennett, M.J (2008). Root growth in Arabidopsis requires gibberellin/DELLA signaling in the endodermis. Nat. Cell Biol.. 10, 625-628.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Ubeda-Tom?s, S., Federici, F., Casimiro, I., Beemster, G.T., Bhalerao, R., Swarup, R., Doerner, P., Haseloff, J., and Bennett, M.J (2009). Gibberellin signaling in the endodermis controls Arabidopsis root meristem size. Curr. Biol.. 19, 1194-1199.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Weiss, D., and Ori, N (2007). Mechanisms of cross talk between gibberellin and other hormones. Plant Physiol.. 144, 1240-1246.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  63. Wu, S., Lee, C.M., Hayashi, T., Price, S., Divol, F., Henry, S., Pauluzzi, G., Perin, C., and Gallagher, K.L (2014). A plausible mechanism, based upon SHORT-ROOT movement, for regulating the number of cortex cell layers in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 16184-16189.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Zentella, R., Zhang, Z.L., Park, M., Thomas, S.G., Endo, A., Murase, K., Fleet, C.M., Jikumaru, Y., Nambara, E., and Kamiya, Y. (2007). Global analysis of DELLA direct targets in early gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 19, 3037-3057.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Zhang, Z.L., Ogawa, M., Fleet, C.M., Zentella, R., Hu, J., Heo, J.-O., Lim, J., Kamiya, Y., Yamaguchi, S., and Sun, T.P (2011). SCARECROW-LIKE 3 promotes gibberellin signaling by antagonizing master growth repressor DELLA in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 2160-2165.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
Mol. Cells
Nov 30, 2023 Vol.46 No.11, pp. 655~725
COVER PICTURE
Kim et al. (pp. 710-724) demonstrated that a pathogen-derived Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum type III effector RipL delays flowering time and enhances susceptibility to bacterial infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Shown is the RipL-expressing Arabidopsis plant, which displays general dampening of the transcriptional program during pathogen infection, grown in long-day conditions.
Current Issue Archives

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in Mol. Cells

Molecules and Cells

eISSN 0219-1032
qr-code Download