Mol. Cells 2012; 33(5): 525-531
Published online April 20, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0038-x
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: klim@sm.ac.kr
Retroviral integration provides us with a powerful tool to realize prolonged gene expressions that are often critical to gene therapy. However, the perturbation of gene regulations in host cells by viral genome integration can lead to detrimental effects, yielding cancer. The oncogenic potential of retroviruses is linked to the preference of retroviruses to integrate into genomic regions that are enriched in gene regulatory elements. To better navigate the double-edged sword of retroviral integration we need to understand how retroviruses select their favored genomic loci during infections. In this study I showed that in addition to host proteins that tether retroviral pre-integration complexes to specific genomic regions, the epigenetic architecture of host genome might strongly affect retroviral integration patterns. Specifically, retroviruses showed their characteristic integration preference in differentiated somatic cells. In contrast, retroviral infections of hES cells, which are known to display decondensed chromatin, produced random-like integration patterns lacking of strong preference for regulatory-element-rich genomic regions. Better identification of the cellular and viral factors that determine retroviral integration patterns will facilitate the design of retroviral vectors for safer use in gene therapy.
Keywords gene therapy, human embryonic stem cells, oncogenic potential, overall chromatin structure, retroviral integration patterns
Mol. Cells 2012; 33(5): 525-531
Published online May 31, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0038-x
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Kwang-il Lim1,2,*
1Departments of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering and The Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 2Department of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Science, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 140-742, Korea
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: klim@sm.ac.kr
Retroviral integration provides us with a powerful tool to realize prolonged gene expressions that are often critical to gene therapy. However, the perturbation of gene regulations in host cells by viral genome integration can lead to detrimental effects, yielding cancer. The oncogenic potential of retroviruses is linked to the preference of retroviruses to integrate into genomic regions that are enriched in gene regulatory elements. To better navigate the double-edged sword of retroviral integration we need to understand how retroviruses select their favored genomic loci during infections. In this study I showed that in addition to host proteins that tether retroviral pre-integration complexes to specific genomic regions, the epigenetic architecture of host genome might strongly affect retroviral integration patterns. Specifically, retroviruses showed their characteristic integration preference in differentiated somatic cells. In contrast, retroviral infections of hES cells, which are known to display decondensed chromatin, produced random-like integration patterns lacking of strong preference for regulatory-element-rich genomic regions. Better identification of the cellular and viral factors that determine retroviral integration patterns will facilitate the design of retroviral vectors for safer use in gene therapy.
Keywords: gene therapy, human embryonic stem cells, oncogenic potential, overall chromatin structure, retroviral integration patterns
Nayeon Lee, Jae Woo Park, Hyung Joon Kim, Ju Hun Yeon, Jihye Kwon, Jung Jae Ko, Seung-Hun Oh, Hyun Sook Kim, Aeri Kim, Baek Soo Han, Sang Chul Lee, Noo Li Jeon, and Jihwan Song
Mol. Cells 2014; 37(6): 497-502 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2014.0137Hong Lian Jin, Jong Soo Kim, Young June Kim, Su Jin Kim, Hal E. Broxmeyer, and Kye-Seong Kim*
Mol. Cells 2012; 34(2): 177-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0090-6Sung-Hwan Moon, Sung-Whan Kim, Jong Soo Kim, Soon-Jung Park, Jeong Tae Do, Dong Ryul Lee, and Hyung-Min Chung*
Mol. Cells 2011; 31(4): 315-326 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-0039-1