Mol. Cells 2019; 42(4): 292-300
Published online April 19, 2019
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2019.0016
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *chung@ulsan.ac.kr
Immunometabolism, defined as the interaction of metabolic pathways with the immune system, influences the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. Metformin and carbon monoxide (CO) are two pharmacological agents known to ameliorate metabolic disorders. There are notable similarities and differences in the reported effects of metformin and CO on immunometabolism. Metformin, an anti-diabetes drug, has positive effects on metabolism and can exert anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects
Keywords heme oxygenase-1, metabolic diseases, metabolic homeostasis, mitochondrial ROS, PERK
Cellular metabolism, which consists of the concerted actions of many thousands of genes, proteins, and metabolites, refers to the complex chemical reactions that occur in living cells. Generally, these reactions can be divided into those supporting catabolic metabolism or anabolic metabolism. Catabolic metabolism, which includes glucose transport, fatty acid β-oxidation and other processes, converts complex molecules to simpler molecules. In contrast, anabolic metabolism, which includes lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis and other processes, converts simple precursor molecules into more complex biomolecules such as proteins and other polymers. The reactants and products of these chemical reactions are known as metabolites. An imbalance of metabolic functions is associated with the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases (Bray, 2004; Bugianesi et al., 2010; Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011; Weyer et al., 1999). Metabolic diseases include cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (DM2), stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer. These diseases are caused by complicated conditions such as insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension and hyperglycemia (Alberti et al., 2009; Grundy et al., 2004). The pathogenesis of metabolic disease is related to altered metabolism and immune responses, which can lead to activation and infiltration of immune cells into metabolic tissues, such as liver, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle; and chronic low-grade activation of inflammatory pathways in both stromal and immune components. These events may be followed by the activation of stress kinases, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); and the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), activation of which negatively affects the signaling of metabolic hormones such as insulin, leading to dysregulated glucose and lipid homeostasis (Boucher et al., 2014; Hotamisligil, 2017; Manieri and Sabio, 2015; Wu and Ballantyne, 2017). Altered cellular metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, and contributes to the conversion to malignancy and the initiation, growth and maintenance of tumors (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Metabolites in tumors can have profound effects on both cancer cells and immune system cells. For example, adenosine is known to enhance tumor progression, whereas this compound inhibits proinflammatory responses (Prado-Garcia and Sanchez-Garcia, 2017).
Immunometabolism refers to an emerging research field at the interface of metabolism and the innate immune system (Mathis and Shoelson, 2011). In 1966, the first observation of immunometabolism was the infiltration of macrophages into adipose tissue in obese mice (Hausberger, 1966). Specifically, the term immunometabolism describes two major processes: (I) the progression of non-immune pathologies, such as obesity, can result in the mobilization of innate and adaptive immune systems; (II) secondly, the dysbalance of internal metabolites can influence the immune response of lymphocytes and other leukocytes. Thus, metabolism and immunity have been broadly linked throughout evolution (Hotamisligil, 2017; Schertzer and Steinberg, 2014). Many studies have implicated immunometabolism during the development of metabolic disease. For example, the conditioned medium from macrophages incubated with LPS can induce resistance to insulin-induced glucose uptake and lipoprotein lipase expression in adipocytes (Pekala et al., 1983). Adipose tissue-derived TNF-α contributes to type 2 diabetes in obese mice (Uysal et al., 1997). In addition, various signaling pathways have been linked to glucose metabolism (Copps and White, 2012; Fullerton et al., 2013). Recently, it has been reported that adipose tissue-resident immune cells play an important role in tissue remodeling during weight gain and brown adipose tissue modulation (Lee et al., 2013; Wolf et al., 2017). Therefore, the relationship between metabolic diseases and the innate immune response is closely related, such that immunometabolism can be a therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. On the other hand, the behavior of leukocytes and lymphocytes can be regulated by metabolism. Changes in CD8+ and CD4+ T cell populations have been associated with diabetes. In diabetic patients, CD8+ T cells were associated with impaired glycemic control and lipidemia in Type 1 diabetes (Laban et al., 2018), and CD4+ T cells were associated with progression of subclinical inflammation in Type 2 diabetes (Kumar, 2018; Sheikh et al., 2018). In addition, B cells were associated with metabolic homeostasis. Specifically, B-1a lymphocytes can attenuate insulin resistance through IL-10 and IgM-dependent mechanisms (Shen et al., 2015). Furthermore, the polarization of macrophage is important for progression of obesity (Li et al., 2018). M1 macrophages induce insulin resistance, whereas M2 macrophages protect against obesity-induced insulin resistance (Chawla et al., 2011). Metformin has been commonly used to treat DM2 (Witters, 2001). Metformin enhances the insulin response and glucose transport through adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation (Shaw et al., 2005). Also, metformin inhibits fatty acid synthesis, and increases β-oxidation in an AMPK-dependent manner (Zhou et al., 2001). Beyond the modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, metformin can exert anti-inflammatory functions (Caballero et al., 2004; Dandona et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2014). Metformin has been used to treat not only DM2 but also other metabolic diseases, such as CVD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cancer, in both an AMPK-dependent and -independent manner (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Gotlieb et al., 2008; Griffin et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2013a; Zakikhani et al., 2006). Metformin, when administered at high doses (3000 mg/day) for treatment, can cause side effects such as gastrointestinal disturbances (Siavash et al., 2017) and lactic acidosis (DeFronzo et al., 2016).
Carbon monoxide (CO) is another molecule that can modulate metabolic responses. Endogenous CO is produced by the enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) (Otterbein et al., 2016). CO has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects (Jamal Uddin et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2007) and can confer cytoprotection in metabolic diseases
Therefore, further studies are needed to identify the differences between metformin and CO, and to determine if CO, which has a therapeutic effect at low concentrations, can compensate for the disadvantages of metformin, which can also incur side effects at high doses. Both metformin and CO continue to show potential for therapeutic application in metabolic diseases associated with immunometabolism, though further studies are needed.
Metformin is known as metabolic drug that is extensively prescribed for DM2 due to its ability to enhance insulin sensitivity. Numerous studies have demonstrated that metformin regulates glucose and lipid metabolism (Cao et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Gopoju et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2016). Also, metformin has been shown to decrease various proinflammatory markers, including soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, macrophage migration inhibitory factor and C-reactive protein (Caballero et al., 2004; Dandona et al., 2004). Metformin also influences the behavior of immune cells in response to metabolic mediators. For example, metformin can enhance B cell responses through a reduction in B cell-intrinsic inflammation in individuals with obesity and DM2 (Diaz et al., 2017). Metformin was also shown to regulate the immune response by alteration of macrophage polarization and T cell infiltration in a zebrafish model of NAFLD-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (de Oliveira et al., 2019). Furthermore, it has been reported that metformin can exert anti-inflammatory effects, which are related to an alteration in macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype through activation of AMPK in a HFD-induced model of obesity, and in palmitate-stimulated macrophage in vitro (Jing et al., 2018). The intracellular target of metformin is the mitochondria, where metformin transiently inhibits complex I of the mitochondrial ETC, which results in a decline in energy charge. This inhibition of complex I induces a mild elevation in mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) (Kim et al., 2013a), a decrease in ATP production and an increase in AMP levels which drive the activation of AMPK (Zhou et al., 2001)(Fig. 1).
AMPK acts as an energy and nutrient sensor and coordinates an integrated signaling network that constitutes metabolic and growth pathways. Metformin-induced AMPK activation exhibits enhancement of glucose transport (Gunton et al., 2003) and inhibits gluconeogenic gene expression
Several findings support the notion of an AMPK-independent pathway in metabolic diseases. In this context, AMPK-independent effects of metformin have been described. Metformin has been shown to inhibit hepatic gluconeogenesis, which is mediated in an AMPK-independent manner
Cells and tissues have been known to induce an adaptive response to stress (Otterbein et al., 2003), which is responsible for defending against damage and preserving cellular homeostasis, and depends on the induction of several beneficial defense systems (Otterbein et al., 2016). Among these, the stress protein HO-1 can defend against cellular damage by the catalysis of heme, a pro-oxidant molecule (Otterbein et al., 2016). HO-1 can be induced by numerous agents, including CO, curcumin, resveratrol and flavonoids (Chen et al., 2005; McNally et al., 2007; Szabo et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2014) (Fig. 3). The major function of HO-1 is to degrade heme which results in the generation of CO and biliverdin, and the release of iron (Otterbein et al., 2003). Many reports suggest that the reaction products of HO-1 (i.e., CO, biliverdin and iron) acting individually or in concert, can mediate its cytoprotective effects. In this section, the positive effects of CO are described, with respect to immune responses and metabolism.
CO can exert cytoprotective and therapeutic effects in several disease models (Otterbein et al., 1999; 2000; Motterlini et al., 2002; Morse et al., 2003). Also, CO can have a cytoprotective effect at low concentrations (Otterbein et al., 2016), but may be impractical for clinical use in the gaseous state (Ismailova et al., 2018). CORMs may be used to exert similar effects as inhalation of gaseous CO in a controlled manner (Motterlini et al., 2002). CORM compounds, typically transition metal carbonyls that can release CO, include CORM-1, CORM-2, CORM-3 and CORM-A1 (Foresti et al., 2004; Motterlini et al., 2002; 2005) (Fig. 3). CORM-1 [Mn2(CO)10] was the first of such compounds developed, and is restricted as a pharmacological agent because it is insoluble in aqueous media and requires photoactivation to release CO (Motterlini et al., 2002). CORM-2 [Ru(CO3Cl2)] is hydrophobic and can release CO from organic solvents (Motterlini et al., 2002). Further studies have identified water-soluble CORM-3 [Ru(CO)3Cl(glycinate)] and CORM-A1 [Na2H3BCO2]. These CORMs are known to release CO in aqueous media (Foresti et al., 2004; Motterlini et al., 2005). Therefore, these CORMs can potentially treat many disease models by cytoprotective action including antioxidant action. CO has been shown to suppresses the pro-inflammatory response, which is mediated by decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), in the presence of LPS; and by promoting the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, both of which are mediated by activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Otterbein et al., 2000). Furthermore, CO can generate itaconate, which exerts immunosuppression and anti-microbial functions
Metformin and CO generate ROS through blocking of mitochondria ETC. The generated-ROS activate PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling, one of the branches of the UPR, but not IRE1α and ATF6. Metformin and CO both increase the expression levels of FGF21, SESN2 and REDD1, and also activate Nrf2. Specifically, FGF21 was induced by metformin and CO
Metformin induces ROS
Metformin increases activity of Nrf2 in an AMPK-dependent manner and then exerts anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Also, metformin increases lifespan through AMPK-activated Nrf2 signaling. While metformin activates Nrf2
As we have discussed, both metformin and CO can attenuate metabolic diseases, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes (DM2), NAFLD and cancer through similar responses, involving induction of mild ROS-enhanced metabolic homeostasis molecules. While numerous studies have shown that metformin is associated with activation of AMPK and p53 in the induction of metabolic effector molecules, the effects of CO are related to the PERK-dependent ATF4 pathway. However, more research is needed to understand the detailed pathways by which metformin and CO impact immunometabolism.
I apologize to colleagues whose work has not been mentioned because of space limitations. This work is supported by grants NRF-2017R1A2B4002335 to T.C.
Similarities and distinctions of metformin and carbon monoxide
Metformin | Carbon monoxide | |
---|---|---|
Similarity | - Exhibiting effects of cytoprotection by production of ROS in mitochondria (Kim et al., 2013a; Liu et al., 2008; Zuckerbraun et al., 2007) | |
- Activation of the PERK pathway by induction of mitochondrial stress (Joe et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2013a; 2017; Quentin et al., 2012) | ||
- Induction of metabolic homeostasis molecules (e.g., FGF21 and SESN2) and anti-tumor and anti-oxidant molecules (e.g., REDD1 and Nrf2, respectively) (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2007; 2013a; 2018b) | ||
Distinction | - Increase of ROS by partial inhibition of mitochondrial complex I (Kim, Jeong et al., 2013a) | - Production of ROS via temporarily blocking cytochrome c oxidase, complex IV (Otterbein et al., 2016; Zuckerbraun et al., 2007) |
- Induction of SESN2 and REDD1 by the p53-dependent pathway in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and prostate cancer cell lines, respectively (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2016) | - Induction of SESN2 and REDD1 by PERK-dependent pathway in liver and several cancer cell lines, respectively (Kim et al., 2017; 2018b) | |
- Activation of Nrf2 in an AMPK-dependent manner in rat brain and | - Activation of Nrf2 via PERK activation in human endothelial cells (Kim et al., 2007) |
Mol. Cells 2019; 42(4): 292-300
Published online April 30, 2019 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2019.0016
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Jeongmin Park1, Yeonsoo Joe1, Stefan W. Ryter2, Young-Joon Surh3, and Hun Taeg Chung1,*
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Korea, 2Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, NY 10065, USA, 3Tumor microenvironment Global Core Research Center and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08733, Korea
Correspondence to:*chung@ulsan.ac.kr
Immunometabolism, defined as the interaction of metabolic pathways with the immune system, influences the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. Metformin and carbon monoxide (CO) are two pharmacological agents known to ameliorate metabolic disorders. There are notable similarities and differences in the reported effects of metformin and CO on immunometabolism. Metformin, an anti-diabetes drug, has positive effects on metabolism and can exert anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects
Keywords: heme oxygenase-1, metabolic diseases, metabolic homeostasis, mitochondrial ROS, PERK
Cellular metabolism, which consists of the concerted actions of many thousands of genes, proteins, and metabolites, refers to the complex chemical reactions that occur in living cells. Generally, these reactions can be divided into those supporting catabolic metabolism or anabolic metabolism. Catabolic metabolism, which includes glucose transport, fatty acid β-oxidation and other processes, converts complex molecules to simpler molecules. In contrast, anabolic metabolism, which includes lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis and other processes, converts simple precursor molecules into more complex biomolecules such as proteins and other polymers. The reactants and products of these chemical reactions are known as metabolites. An imbalance of metabolic functions is associated with the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases (Bray, 2004; Bugianesi et al., 2010; Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011; Weyer et al., 1999). Metabolic diseases include cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (DM2), stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer. These diseases are caused by complicated conditions such as insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension and hyperglycemia (Alberti et al., 2009; Grundy et al., 2004). The pathogenesis of metabolic disease is related to altered metabolism and immune responses, which can lead to activation and infiltration of immune cells into metabolic tissues, such as liver, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle; and chronic low-grade activation of inflammatory pathways in both stromal and immune components. These events may be followed by the activation of stress kinases, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); and the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), activation of which negatively affects the signaling of metabolic hormones such as insulin, leading to dysregulated glucose and lipid homeostasis (Boucher et al., 2014; Hotamisligil, 2017; Manieri and Sabio, 2015; Wu and Ballantyne, 2017). Altered cellular metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, and contributes to the conversion to malignancy and the initiation, growth and maintenance of tumors (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Metabolites in tumors can have profound effects on both cancer cells and immune system cells. For example, adenosine is known to enhance tumor progression, whereas this compound inhibits proinflammatory responses (Prado-Garcia and Sanchez-Garcia, 2017).
Immunometabolism refers to an emerging research field at the interface of metabolism and the innate immune system (Mathis and Shoelson, 2011). In 1966, the first observation of immunometabolism was the infiltration of macrophages into adipose tissue in obese mice (Hausberger, 1966). Specifically, the term immunometabolism describes two major processes: (I) the progression of non-immune pathologies, such as obesity, can result in the mobilization of innate and adaptive immune systems; (II) secondly, the dysbalance of internal metabolites can influence the immune response of lymphocytes and other leukocytes. Thus, metabolism and immunity have been broadly linked throughout evolution (Hotamisligil, 2017; Schertzer and Steinberg, 2014). Many studies have implicated immunometabolism during the development of metabolic disease. For example, the conditioned medium from macrophages incubated with LPS can induce resistance to insulin-induced glucose uptake and lipoprotein lipase expression in adipocytes (Pekala et al., 1983). Adipose tissue-derived TNF-α contributes to type 2 diabetes in obese mice (Uysal et al., 1997). In addition, various signaling pathways have been linked to glucose metabolism (Copps and White, 2012; Fullerton et al., 2013). Recently, it has been reported that adipose tissue-resident immune cells play an important role in tissue remodeling during weight gain and brown adipose tissue modulation (Lee et al., 2013; Wolf et al., 2017). Therefore, the relationship between metabolic diseases and the innate immune response is closely related, such that immunometabolism can be a therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. On the other hand, the behavior of leukocytes and lymphocytes can be regulated by metabolism. Changes in CD8+ and CD4+ T cell populations have been associated with diabetes. In diabetic patients, CD8+ T cells were associated with impaired glycemic control and lipidemia in Type 1 diabetes (Laban et al., 2018), and CD4+ T cells were associated with progression of subclinical inflammation in Type 2 diabetes (Kumar, 2018; Sheikh et al., 2018). In addition, B cells were associated with metabolic homeostasis. Specifically, B-1a lymphocytes can attenuate insulin resistance through IL-10 and IgM-dependent mechanisms (Shen et al., 2015). Furthermore, the polarization of macrophage is important for progression of obesity (Li et al., 2018). M1 macrophages induce insulin resistance, whereas M2 macrophages protect against obesity-induced insulin resistance (Chawla et al., 2011). Metformin has been commonly used to treat DM2 (Witters, 2001). Metformin enhances the insulin response and glucose transport through adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation (Shaw et al., 2005). Also, metformin inhibits fatty acid synthesis, and increases β-oxidation in an AMPK-dependent manner (Zhou et al., 2001). Beyond the modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, metformin can exert anti-inflammatory functions (Caballero et al., 2004; Dandona et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2014). Metformin has been used to treat not only DM2 but also other metabolic diseases, such as CVD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cancer, in both an AMPK-dependent and -independent manner (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Gotlieb et al., 2008; Griffin et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2013a; Zakikhani et al., 2006). Metformin, when administered at high doses (3000 mg/day) for treatment, can cause side effects such as gastrointestinal disturbances (Siavash et al., 2017) and lactic acidosis (DeFronzo et al., 2016).
Carbon monoxide (CO) is another molecule that can modulate metabolic responses. Endogenous CO is produced by the enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) (Otterbein et al., 2016). CO has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects (Jamal Uddin et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2007) and can confer cytoprotection in metabolic diseases
Therefore, further studies are needed to identify the differences between metformin and CO, and to determine if CO, which has a therapeutic effect at low concentrations, can compensate for the disadvantages of metformin, which can also incur side effects at high doses. Both metformin and CO continue to show potential for therapeutic application in metabolic diseases associated with immunometabolism, though further studies are needed.
Metformin is known as metabolic drug that is extensively prescribed for DM2 due to its ability to enhance insulin sensitivity. Numerous studies have demonstrated that metformin regulates glucose and lipid metabolism (Cao et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Gopoju et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2016). Also, metformin has been shown to decrease various proinflammatory markers, including soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, macrophage migration inhibitory factor and C-reactive protein (Caballero et al., 2004; Dandona et al., 2004). Metformin also influences the behavior of immune cells in response to metabolic mediators. For example, metformin can enhance B cell responses through a reduction in B cell-intrinsic inflammation in individuals with obesity and DM2 (Diaz et al., 2017). Metformin was also shown to regulate the immune response by alteration of macrophage polarization and T cell infiltration in a zebrafish model of NAFLD-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (de Oliveira et al., 2019). Furthermore, it has been reported that metformin can exert anti-inflammatory effects, which are related to an alteration in macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype through activation of AMPK in a HFD-induced model of obesity, and in palmitate-stimulated macrophage in vitro (Jing et al., 2018). The intracellular target of metformin is the mitochondria, where metformin transiently inhibits complex I of the mitochondrial ETC, which results in a decline in energy charge. This inhibition of complex I induces a mild elevation in mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) (Kim et al., 2013a), a decrease in ATP production and an increase in AMP levels which drive the activation of AMPK (Zhou et al., 2001)(Fig. 1).
AMPK acts as an energy and nutrient sensor and coordinates an integrated signaling network that constitutes metabolic and growth pathways. Metformin-induced AMPK activation exhibits enhancement of glucose transport (Gunton et al., 2003) and inhibits gluconeogenic gene expression
Several findings support the notion of an AMPK-independent pathway in metabolic diseases. In this context, AMPK-independent effects of metformin have been described. Metformin has been shown to inhibit hepatic gluconeogenesis, which is mediated in an AMPK-independent manner
Cells and tissues have been known to induce an adaptive response to stress (Otterbein et al., 2003), which is responsible for defending against damage and preserving cellular homeostasis, and depends on the induction of several beneficial defense systems (Otterbein et al., 2016). Among these, the stress protein HO-1 can defend against cellular damage by the catalysis of heme, a pro-oxidant molecule (Otterbein et al., 2016). HO-1 can be induced by numerous agents, including CO, curcumin, resveratrol and flavonoids (Chen et al., 2005; McNally et al., 2007; Szabo et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2014) (Fig. 3). The major function of HO-1 is to degrade heme which results in the generation of CO and biliverdin, and the release of iron (Otterbein et al., 2003). Many reports suggest that the reaction products of HO-1 (i.e., CO, biliverdin and iron) acting individually or in concert, can mediate its cytoprotective effects. In this section, the positive effects of CO are described, with respect to immune responses and metabolism.
CO can exert cytoprotective and therapeutic effects in several disease models (Otterbein et al., 1999; 2000; Motterlini et al., 2002; Morse et al., 2003). Also, CO can have a cytoprotective effect at low concentrations (Otterbein et al., 2016), but may be impractical for clinical use in the gaseous state (Ismailova et al., 2018). CORMs may be used to exert similar effects as inhalation of gaseous CO in a controlled manner (Motterlini et al., 2002). CORM compounds, typically transition metal carbonyls that can release CO, include CORM-1, CORM-2, CORM-3 and CORM-A1 (Foresti et al., 2004; Motterlini et al., 2002; 2005) (Fig. 3). CORM-1 [Mn2(CO)10] was the first of such compounds developed, and is restricted as a pharmacological agent because it is insoluble in aqueous media and requires photoactivation to release CO (Motterlini et al., 2002). CORM-2 [Ru(CO3Cl2)] is hydrophobic and can release CO from organic solvents (Motterlini et al., 2002). Further studies have identified water-soluble CORM-3 [Ru(CO)3Cl(glycinate)] and CORM-A1 [Na2H3BCO2]. These CORMs are known to release CO in aqueous media (Foresti et al., 2004; Motterlini et al., 2005). Therefore, these CORMs can potentially treat many disease models by cytoprotective action including antioxidant action. CO has been shown to suppresses the pro-inflammatory response, which is mediated by decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), in the presence of LPS; and by promoting the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, both of which are mediated by activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Otterbein et al., 2000). Furthermore, CO can generate itaconate, which exerts immunosuppression and anti-microbial functions
Metformin and CO generate ROS through blocking of mitochondria ETC. The generated-ROS activate PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling, one of the branches of the UPR, but not IRE1α and ATF6. Metformin and CO both increase the expression levels of FGF21, SESN2 and REDD1, and also activate Nrf2. Specifically, FGF21 was induced by metformin and CO
Metformin induces ROS
Metformin increases activity of Nrf2 in an AMPK-dependent manner and then exerts anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Also, metformin increases lifespan through AMPK-activated Nrf2 signaling. While metformin activates Nrf2
As we have discussed, both metformin and CO can attenuate metabolic diseases, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes (DM2), NAFLD and cancer through similar responses, involving induction of mild ROS-enhanced metabolic homeostasis molecules. While numerous studies have shown that metformin is associated with activation of AMPK and p53 in the induction of metabolic effector molecules, the effects of CO are related to the PERK-dependent ATF4 pathway. However, more research is needed to understand the detailed pathways by which metformin and CO impact immunometabolism.
I apologize to colleagues whose work has not been mentioned because of space limitations. This work is supported by grants NRF-2017R1A2B4002335 to T.C.
. Similarities and distinctions of metformin and carbon monoxide.
Metformin | Carbon monoxide | |
---|---|---|
Similarity | - Exhibiting effects of cytoprotection by production of ROS in mitochondria (Kim et al., 2013a; Liu et al., 2008; Zuckerbraun et al., 2007) | |
- Activation of the PERK pathway by induction of mitochondrial stress (Joe et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2013a; 2017; Quentin et al., 2012) | ||
- Induction of metabolic homeostasis molecules (e.g., FGF21 and SESN2) and anti-tumor and anti-oxidant molecules (e.g., REDD1 and Nrf2, respectively) (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2007; 2013a; 2018b) | ||
Distinction | - Increase of ROS by partial inhibition of mitochondrial complex I (Kim, Jeong et al., 2013a) | - Production of ROS via temporarily blocking cytochrome c oxidase, complex IV (Otterbein et al., 2016; Zuckerbraun et al., 2007) |
- Induction of SESN2 and REDD1 by the p53-dependent pathway in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and prostate cancer cell lines, respectively (Ben Sahra et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2016) | - Induction of SESN2 and REDD1 by PERK-dependent pathway in liver and several cancer cell lines, respectively (Kim et al., 2017; 2018b) | |
- Activation of Nrf2 in an AMPK-dependent manner in rat brain and | - Activation of Nrf2 via PERK activation in human endothelial cells (Kim et al., 2007) |
Ji Ae Lee, Young-Won Kwon, Hye Ri Kim, Nari Shin, Hyo Jin Son, Chan Seong Cheong, Dong Jin Kim, and Onyou Hwang
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(3): 134-147 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0074Ji Ae Lee, Dong Jin Kim, and Onyou Hwang
Mol. Cells 2019; 42(10): 702-710 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2019.0129Subash Dhakal and Youngseok Lee
Mol. Cells 2019; 42(8): 569-578 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2019.0007