Mol. Cells 2017; 40(11): 880-887
Published online November 16, 2017
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2017.0230
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: hschoi@mail.ulsan.ac.kr
We hypothesized that inflammation affects number and activity of osteoclasts (OCs) via enhancing autophagy. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced autophagy, osteoclastogenesis, and cytoplasmic reactive oxygen species (ROS) in bone marrow-derived macrophages that were pre-stimulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand. An autophagy inhibitor, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) decreased LPS-induced OC formation and bone resorption, indicating that autophagy is responsible for increasing number and activity of OCs upon LPS stimulus. Knockdown of autophagy-related protein 7 attenuated the effect of LPS on OC-specific genes, supporting a role of LPS as an autophagy inducer in OC. Removal of ROS decreased LPS-induced OC formation as well as autophagy. However, 3-MA did not affect LPS-induced ROS levels, suggesting that ROS act upstream of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase in LPS-induced autophagy. Our results suggest the possible use of autophagy inhibitors targeting OCs to reduce inflammatory bone loss.
Keywords autophagy, lipopolysaccharide, osteoclast
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is an important component of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. Injection of LPS increases the area of eroded surface in rat femurs along with a significant elevation of the number of osteoclasts (OC) (Orcel et al., 1993), whereas
Autophagy is characterized by phagophore formation and subsequent fusion of autophagosome with lysosomes, and was initially discovered as a cell survival mechanism in response to nutrient starvation. However, unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular components are degraded and removed by autophagy under physiological conditions, suggesting that autophagy acts to preserve the balance between organelle biogenesis and protein synthesis, and their breakdown. Dysregulated autophagy has been implicated in the development of several diseases. Pathway analysis based on human genome-wide association data showed that regulation of autophagy was associated with the development of osteoporosis (Zhang et al., 2010), indicating a close link between autophagy and bone metabolism. This association is supported by the bone-sparing effects of PI3K inhibitors, wortmannin and LY301497 that all prevented ovariectomy (OVX)-induced bone loss
In the present study we have investigated whether autophagy plays a role in LPS-stimulated osteoclastogenesis
All mice were handled in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Immunomodulation Research Center (IRC), University of Ulsan. All animal procedures were approved by the IACUC of the IRC. The approval ID for this study is # UOU-2014-010. Bone marrow cells were isolated from 4–5-week-old C57BL/6J mice as described before (Ke et al., 2014). Femora and tibiae were removed aseptically and dissected free of adherent soft tissue. The bone ends were cut, and the marrow cavity was flushed out with α-MEM from one end of the bone using a sterile 21-gauge needle, and agitation with a Pasteur pipette was used to get a single cell suspension. The resulting bone marrow suspension was washed twice, and incubated on plates along with M-CSF (20 ng/ml) (R&D Systems, USA) for 16 h. Non-adherent cells were harvested, layered on a Ficoll-hypaque gradient for collecting the cells at the interface, and cultured for two more days, at which time large populations of adherent monocyte/macrophage-like cells had formed on the bottom of the culture plates, as described before (Ke et al., 2014). The small numbers of non-adherent cells were removed by washing the dishes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the remaining, adherent, cells (bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM)) were harvested, and seeded in plates. The adherent cells were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA) and found to be negative for CD3 and CD45R, and positive for CD11b. The absence of contaminating stromal cells was confirmed by lack of growth without addition of M-CSF. Pre-OC cells were generated by incubation with M-CSF and RANKL (R&D Systems) for 40 h, and these cells were treated with M-CSF and LPS (Sigma Chemical., USA) for 48 h to generate OCs. A sample of these cells was fixed in 10% formalin for 10 min, and stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) as described (Ke et al., 2014). Numbers of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (MNC) (three or more nuclei) were scored.
OCs were further characterized by assessing their ability to form pits on dentine slices (Jimi et al., 1999). Mature OC were seeded on dentine slices (Immunodiagnostic Systems, UK) and incubated for 3 days with M-CSF and LPS in the presence or absence of 3-MA. The slices were cleaned by ultrasonication in 1 M NH4OH to remove adherent cells and stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma) to visualize resorption pits. Resportion pit areas were measured with Image J 1.37v.
Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, USA). qPCR was carried out using SYBR Green 1 Taq polymerase (Qiagen, Germany) and appropriate primers on a StepOnePlus™ Real Time System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The specificity of each primer pair was confirmed by melting curve analysis and agarose-gel electrophoresis. The housekeeping 18S rRNA (RPS) gene was amplified in parallel with the genes of interest. Relative copy numbers compared to RPS were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt. The primer sequences used were as follows: 5′-ttcagttgctatccaggactcgga-3′ and 5′-gcatgtcatgtag gtgagaaatgtgctca-3′ (ATP6v0d2); 5′-gggccaggatgaaagttgta-3′ and 5′-cactgctctcttcagggctt-3′ (Cathepsin K); 5′-agttgccctc ttatgaaggagaag-3′ and 5′-ggagtgtcgtcccagcacat-3′ (calcitonin receptor); 5′-tcctccatgaacaaacagttccaa-3′ and 5′-agacgtgg tttaggaatgcagctc-3′ (DC-STAMP); 5′ gaccaccttggcaatgtctctg-3′ 5′-tggctgaggaagtcatctgagttg-3′ (TRAP); 5′-atcagagagttga ccgcagttg-3′ and 5′-aatgaaccgaagcacaccatag-3′ (RPS).
Cultured cells were harvested after washing with ice-cold PBS and lysed in extraction buffer (50 mM Trsi-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.01% protease inhibitor mixture). Cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose. Membranes were blocked for 1 h with skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4°C with Abs against LC3B (#2775, Cell signaling), and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Membranes were washed, incubated for 1 h with HRP-conjugated secondary Abs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and developed using chemiluminescence substrates.
To characterize autophagy, acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs; autophagosomes and autolysosomes) were quantified by flow cytometry after staining with acridine orange (AO) as described (Chen et al., 2007). AO is a fluorescent weak base that accumulates in acidic spaces and fluoresces bright red. In AO-treated cells, the cytoplasm and nucleolus fluoresce bright green and dim red, respectively, whereas AVOs fluoresce bright red. The intensity of the red fluorescence is proportional to the degree of acidity. Cells were stained with a final concentration of 1 μg/ml AO for 20 min. The cells were washed twice with PBS, removed from the plate with trypsin-EDTA and collected. Green (510–530 nm) and red (>650 nm) fluorescence emissions from 1 × 104 cells, illuminated with blue (488 nm) excitation light, were measured using a BD Bioscience FACSCanto II system and FACSDiva software.
The intracellular formation of ROS was detected using the fluorescent probe, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) (Molecular Probes). BMMs were prepared and incubated with M-CSF and RANKL for 40 h, washed thoroughly, and incubated further for the indicated periods with LPS in the presence of M-CSF, harvested, suspended in PBS, loaded with H2DCFDA, and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Intracellular ROS were measured by flow cytometry.
BMMs were incubated with M-CSF and RANKL for 40h and transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA) against NOX1 (sc-43940), NOX2 (sc-14920), and ATG7 (sc-41448) or with scrambled siRNA (scRNA, sc-37007) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA). In brief, 2.5 μl of siRNA (50 μM) or an equal amount of scRNA was mixed with 3.75 μl of lipofectamine 3000 reagent in a 50 μl Opti-MEM (Gibco, USA) culture medium. After incubation for 15 min, the mixtures were added to 2 × 105 cells already plated in 24 well plates. After transfection, the cells were incubated further for the indicated periods with LPS and MCSF.
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. Pairs of groups were compared by Student’s
To investigate a direct effect of LPS on pre-OCs, we examined whether LPS increased OC formation and bone resorption
Autophagy has been reported to increase the number and function of OCs (DeSelm et al., 2011; Xiu et al., 2014). Inflammation, represented by elevated TNF-α, induces bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis via enhanced autophagy (Cejka et al., 2010). Based on these, we hypothesized that LPS increases the formation of OCs by inducing autophagy. We evaluated LPS-induced autophagy by two methods (Chen et al., 2010; Sharifi et al., 2015). Autophagosome formation was detected by immunoblotting cell lysates with an antibody against microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3). As shown in Fig. 2A, LPS increased the lipidated form of LC3 (LC3II), which is the most straightforward indicator of autophagic flux (Sharifi et al., 2015). Since LC3II is continuously degraded in autophagolysosomes during autophagy, addition of bafilomycin A1 is recommended to demonstrate autophagic flux (Sharifi et al., 2015). Addition of bafilomycin A1 in LPS-treated OC resulted in a more pronounced increase of LC3II than vehicle-treatment. We also evaluated LPS-induced autophagy by determining the formation of acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs, which include autolysosomes) by flow cytometry using the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye acridine orange. As shown in Fig. 2B, increased levels of LPS-induced AVOs were observed but only at 48 h, whereas elevated levels of LPS-induced LC3II were observed after 24 h (Fig. 2A), supporting the idea that formation of autophagosomes precedes that of autolysosomes. To confirm that LPS induces autophagy in pre-OCs, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) was added, as an autophagy inhibitor, and significantly decreased LPS-induced LC3 II formation in the presence of bafilomycin A (Fig. 2A). The formation of LPS-induced AVOs was also inhibited by 3-MA: the percentage of cells with AVOs was reduced from 37.4% to 27.6% by 3-MA (Fig. 2B). Similar pattern was observed with treatment of bafilomycin A1. 3-MA did not have any detrimental effect on the viability of OC under the assayed conditions (Fig. 2C). Next, we determined the effect of inhibition of autophagy on OC-specific gene expression. As shown in Fig. 2D, 3-MA opposed the LPS-stimulated increases in transcripts of TRAP, cathepsin K, calcitonin receptor, DC-STAMP, and ATP6v0d2. In addition, 3-MA significantly decreased the areas of pits induced by LPS (Fig. 1G). To confirm that the effect of LPS on OC was due to LPS-induced autophagy, we examined the effect of ATG7 silencing. Knockdown of ATG7 attenuated LPS-induced LC3II level as well as LPS-induced OC-specific genes (Fig. 2E).
RANKL induces a sustaining increase of cytoplasmic ROS, leading to OC differentiation (Lee et al., 2005) and ROS induce autophagy (Chen et al., 2009). We examined whether LPS increased cytoplasmic ROS level in pre-OCs primed by RANKL. LPS indeed elevated ROS to a maximum level after 24 h (Fig. 3A). The ROS scavenger, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), decreased LPS-induced ROS level and OC-specific gene expression (Figs. 3A and 3B). As expected, it also decreased autophagy flux activity in response to LPS (Fig. 3C), demonstrating that LPS-induced autophagy is mediated by ROS. To determine the effect of ROS production on LPS-induced autophagy, we manipulated the cellular levels of ROS by reducing the level of NOX1 or/and NOX2 by siRNA knockdown (Fig. 4A). Both siNOX2 and siNOX1 reduced LPS-stimulated OC-specific genes expression as well as cytoplasmic ROS to a modest degree, whereas the combination of siNOX1 and siNOX2 was more effective for reducing those (Figs. 4B and 4C). Moreover LPS-induced LC3II accumulation was dramatically decreased by the combination of siNOX1 and siNOX2 (Fig. 4D). These results indicated that LPS-induced ROS enhanced autophagy in pre-OCs. Next, we wondered whether autophagy might also affect the accumulation of ROS. However, blockade of autophagy by 3-MA did not alter levels of ROS formed in response to LPS (Fig. 3A), suggesting that ROS act upstream of the Class III PI3K in the process of autophagy in OCs.
We have demonstrated that LPS induces OC autophagy as well as osteoclastogenesis
In our studies, LPS induced a sustained level of cytoplasmic ROS along with elevated differentiation to OCs. Decreasing ROS with the antioxidant, NAC, or combined knockdowns of NOX1 and NOX2, decreased both the formation of OCs and autophagy in response to LPS, demonstrating that ROS are associated with LPS-induced differentiation as well as autophagy. This view is supported by the finding that oxidative stress induced autophagy and OC differentiation (Wang et al., 2011). The participation of ROS in autophagic processes has been demonstrated in several other systems. Thus, starvation increased ROS as well as autophagy (Shi et al., 2015). Administration of NAC reduced the induction of autophagy by lowering ROS in neurons (Scherz-Shouval et al., 2007), whereas stimulation of NOX promoted autophagy in phagosomes (Kirkland et al., 2002). ROS are involved directly in thiol modification of Cys residues in ATG4 during starvation-induced autophagy (Shi et al., 2015) and indirectly through Nrf2 by increasing the level of the autophagic proteins p62 (Huang and Brumell, 2009) and p53 and so increasing sestrin (Fujita et al., 2011). Since oxidation of mTOR reduces its activity (Budanov and Karin, 2008), mTOR may be a target of ROS. The activity of the beclin-1-class III PI3K complex may also be a target due to the redox-sensitive cysteine-rich domains of autophagy factor-1 (Dames et al., 2005) and Rubicon (Chang et al., 2010), which suggests that redox regulation may play a key role in the process of autophagy. However, we showed that 3-MA did not decrease LPS-induced ROS in OCs, suggesting that ROS lie upstream of the class III PI3K in the process of autophagy. Similar findings have been reported by others: 3-MA did not decrease ROS levels in starvation-induced autophagy (Chen et al., 2009) or in dexamethasone-induced autophagy (Zhong et al., 2009).
In conclusion, our studies show that LPS stimulates OC differentiation from pre-OCs by enhancing autophagy as a result of raising ROS levels in pre-OCs. The present findings suggest that autophagy and ROS levels might be targeted therapeutically to reduce inflammatory bone loss.
Mol. Cells 2017; 40(11): 880-887
Published online November 30, 2017 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2017.0230
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Ok-Joo Sul1,2, Hyun-Jung Park1,2, Ho-Jung Son1, and Hye-Seon Choi1,*
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Korea
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: hschoi@mail.ulsan.ac.kr
We hypothesized that inflammation affects number and activity of osteoclasts (OCs) via enhancing autophagy. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced autophagy, osteoclastogenesis, and cytoplasmic reactive oxygen species (ROS) in bone marrow-derived macrophages that were pre-stimulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand. An autophagy inhibitor, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) decreased LPS-induced OC formation and bone resorption, indicating that autophagy is responsible for increasing number and activity of OCs upon LPS stimulus. Knockdown of autophagy-related protein 7 attenuated the effect of LPS on OC-specific genes, supporting a role of LPS as an autophagy inducer in OC. Removal of ROS decreased LPS-induced OC formation as well as autophagy. However, 3-MA did not affect LPS-induced ROS levels, suggesting that ROS act upstream of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase in LPS-induced autophagy. Our results suggest the possible use of autophagy inhibitors targeting OCs to reduce inflammatory bone loss.
Keywords: autophagy, lipopolysaccharide, osteoclast
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is an important component of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. Injection of LPS increases the area of eroded surface in rat femurs along with a significant elevation of the number of osteoclasts (OC) (Orcel et al., 1993), whereas
Autophagy is characterized by phagophore formation and subsequent fusion of autophagosome with lysosomes, and was initially discovered as a cell survival mechanism in response to nutrient starvation. However, unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular components are degraded and removed by autophagy under physiological conditions, suggesting that autophagy acts to preserve the balance between organelle biogenesis and protein synthesis, and their breakdown. Dysregulated autophagy has been implicated in the development of several diseases. Pathway analysis based on human genome-wide association data showed that regulation of autophagy was associated with the development of osteoporosis (Zhang et al., 2010), indicating a close link between autophagy and bone metabolism. This association is supported by the bone-sparing effects of PI3K inhibitors, wortmannin and LY301497 that all prevented ovariectomy (OVX)-induced bone loss
In the present study we have investigated whether autophagy plays a role in LPS-stimulated osteoclastogenesis
All mice were handled in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Immunomodulation Research Center (IRC), University of Ulsan. All animal procedures were approved by the IACUC of the IRC. The approval ID for this study is # UOU-2014-010. Bone marrow cells were isolated from 4–5-week-old C57BL/6J mice as described before (Ke et al., 2014). Femora and tibiae were removed aseptically and dissected free of adherent soft tissue. The bone ends were cut, and the marrow cavity was flushed out with α-MEM from one end of the bone using a sterile 21-gauge needle, and agitation with a Pasteur pipette was used to get a single cell suspension. The resulting bone marrow suspension was washed twice, and incubated on plates along with M-CSF (20 ng/ml) (R&D Systems, USA) for 16 h. Non-adherent cells were harvested, layered on a Ficoll-hypaque gradient for collecting the cells at the interface, and cultured for two more days, at which time large populations of adherent monocyte/macrophage-like cells had formed on the bottom of the culture plates, as described before (Ke et al., 2014). The small numbers of non-adherent cells were removed by washing the dishes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the remaining, adherent, cells (bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM)) were harvested, and seeded in plates. The adherent cells were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA) and found to be negative for CD3 and CD45R, and positive for CD11b. The absence of contaminating stromal cells was confirmed by lack of growth without addition of M-CSF. Pre-OC cells were generated by incubation with M-CSF and RANKL (R&D Systems) for 40 h, and these cells were treated with M-CSF and LPS (Sigma Chemical., USA) for 48 h to generate OCs. A sample of these cells was fixed in 10% formalin for 10 min, and stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) as described (Ke et al., 2014). Numbers of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (MNC) (three or more nuclei) were scored.
OCs were further characterized by assessing their ability to form pits on dentine slices (Jimi et al., 1999). Mature OC were seeded on dentine slices (Immunodiagnostic Systems, UK) and incubated for 3 days with M-CSF and LPS in the presence or absence of 3-MA. The slices were cleaned by ultrasonication in 1 M NH4OH to remove adherent cells and stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma) to visualize resorption pits. Resportion pit areas were measured with Image J 1.37v.
Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, USA). qPCR was carried out using SYBR Green 1 Taq polymerase (Qiagen, Germany) and appropriate primers on a StepOnePlus™ Real Time System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The specificity of each primer pair was confirmed by melting curve analysis and agarose-gel electrophoresis. The housekeeping 18S rRNA (RPS) gene was amplified in parallel with the genes of interest. Relative copy numbers compared to RPS were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt. The primer sequences used were as follows: 5′-ttcagttgctatccaggactcgga-3′ and 5′-gcatgtcatgtag gtgagaaatgtgctca-3′ (ATP6v0d2); 5′-gggccaggatgaaagttgta-3′ and 5′-cactgctctcttcagggctt-3′ (Cathepsin K); 5′-agttgccctc ttatgaaggagaag-3′ and 5′-ggagtgtcgtcccagcacat-3′ (calcitonin receptor); 5′-tcctccatgaacaaacagttccaa-3′ and 5′-agacgtgg tttaggaatgcagctc-3′ (DC-STAMP); 5′ gaccaccttggcaatgtctctg-3′ 5′-tggctgaggaagtcatctgagttg-3′ (TRAP); 5′-atcagagagttga ccgcagttg-3′ and 5′-aatgaaccgaagcacaccatag-3′ (RPS).
Cultured cells were harvested after washing with ice-cold PBS and lysed in extraction buffer (50 mM Trsi-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.01% protease inhibitor mixture). Cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose. Membranes were blocked for 1 h with skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4°C with Abs against LC3B (#2775, Cell signaling), and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Membranes were washed, incubated for 1 h with HRP-conjugated secondary Abs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and developed using chemiluminescence substrates.
To characterize autophagy, acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs; autophagosomes and autolysosomes) were quantified by flow cytometry after staining with acridine orange (AO) as described (Chen et al., 2007). AO is a fluorescent weak base that accumulates in acidic spaces and fluoresces bright red. In AO-treated cells, the cytoplasm and nucleolus fluoresce bright green and dim red, respectively, whereas AVOs fluoresce bright red. The intensity of the red fluorescence is proportional to the degree of acidity. Cells were stained with a final concentration of 1 μg/ml AO for 20 min. The cells were washed twice with PBS, removed from the plate with trypsin-EDTA and collected. Green (510–530 nm) and red (>650 nm) fluorescence emissions from 1 × 104 cells, illuminated with blue (488 nm) excitation light, were measured using a BD Bioscience FACSCanto II system and FACSDiva software.
The intracellular formation of ROS was detected using the fluorescent probe, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) (Molecular Probes). BMMs were prepared and incubated with M-CSF and RANKL for 40 h, washed thoroughly, and incubated further for the indicated periods with LPS in the presence of M-CSF, harvested, suspended in PBS, loaded with H2DCFDA, and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Intracellular ROS were measured by flow cytometry.
BMMs were incubated with M-CSF and RANKL for 40h and transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA) against NOX1 (sc-43940), NOX2 (sc-14920), and ATG7 (sc-41448) or with scrambled siRNA (scRNA, sc-37007) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA). In brief, 2.5 μl of siRNA (50 μM) or an equal amount of scRNA was mixed with 3.75 μl of lipofectamine 3000 reagent in a 50 μl Opti-MEM (Gibco, USA) culture medium. After incubation for 15 min, the mixtures were added to 2 × 105 cells already plated in 24 well plates. After transfection, the cells were incubated further for the indicated periods with LPS and MCSF.
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. Pairs of groups were compared by Student’s
To investigate a direct effect of LPS on pre-OCs, we examined whether LPS increased OC formation and bone resorption
Autophagy has been reported to increase the number and function of OCs (DeSelm et al., 2011; Xiu et al., 2014). Inflammation, represented by elevated TNF-α, induces bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis via enhanced autophagy (Cejka et al., 2010). Based on these, we hypothesized that LPS increases the formation of OCs by inducing autophagy. We evaluated LPS-induced autophagy by two methods (Chen et al., 2010; Sharifi et al., 2015). Autophagosome formation was detected by immunoblotting cell lysates with an antibody against microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3). As shown in Fig. 2A, LPS increased the lipidated form of LC3 (LC3II), which is the most straightforward indicator of autophagic flux (Sharifi et al., 2015). Since LC3II is continuously degraded in autophagolysosomes during autophagy, addition of bafilomycin A1 is recommended to demonstrate autophagic flux (Sharifi et al., 2015). Addition of bafilomycin A1 in LPS-treated OC resulted in a more pronounced increase of LC3II than vehicle-treatment. We also evaluated LPS-induced autophagy by determining the formation of acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs, which include autolysosomes) by flow cytometry using the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye acridine orange. As shown in Fig. 2B, increased levels of LPS-induced AVOs were observed but only at 48 h, whereas elevated levels of LPS-induced LC3II were observed after 24 h (Fig. 2A), supporting the idea that formation of autophagosomes precedes that of autolysosomes. To confirm that LPS induces autophagy in pre-OCs, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) was added, as an autophagy inhibitor, and significantly decreased LPS-induced LC3 II formation in the presence of bafilomycin A (Fig. 2A). The formation of LPS-induced AVOs was also inhibited by 3-MA: the percentage of cells with AVOs was reduced from 37.4% to 27.6% by 3-MA (Fig. 2B). Similar pattern was observed with treatment of bafilomycin A1. 3-MA did not have any detrimental effect on the viability of OC under the assayed conditions (Fig. 2C). Next, we determined the effect of inhibition of autophagy on OC-specific gene expression. As shown in Fig. 2D, 3-MA opposed the LPS-stimulated increases in transcripts of TRAP, cathepsin K, calcitonin receptor, DC-STAMP, and ATP6v0d2. In addition, 3-MA significantly decreased the areas of pits induced by LPS (Fig. 1G). To confirm that the effect of LPS on OC was due to LPS-induced autophagy, we examined the effect of ATG7 silencing. Knockdown of ATG7 attenuated LPS-induced LC3II level as well as LPS-induced OC-specific genes (Fig. 2E).
RANKL induces a sustaining increase of cytoplasmic ROS, leading to OC differentiation (Lee et al., 2005) and ROS induce autophagy (Chen et al., 2009). We examined whether LPS increased cytoplasmic ROS level in pre-OCs primed by RANKL. LPS indeed elevated ROS to a maximum level after 24 h (Fig. 3A). The ROS scavenger, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), decreased LPS-induced ROS level and OC-specific gene expression (Figs. 3A and 3B). As expected, it also decreased autophagy flux activity in response to LPS (Fig. 3C), demonstrating that LPS-induced autophagy is mediated by ROS. To determine the effect of ROS production on LPS-induced autophagy, we manipulated the cellular levels of ROS by reducing the level of NOX1 or/and NOX2 by siRNA knockdown (Fig. 4A). Both siNOX2 and siNOX1 reduced LPS-stimulated OC-specific genes expression as well as cytoplasmic ROS to a modest degree, whereas the combination of siNOX1 and siNOX2 was more effective for reducing those (Figs. 4B and 4C). Moreover LPS-induced LC3II accumulation was dramatically decreased by the combination of siNOX1 and siNOX2 (Fig. 4D). These results indicated that LPS-induced ROS enhanced autophagy in pre-OCs. Next, we wondered whether autophagy might also affect the accumulation of ROS. However, blockade of autophagy by 3-MA did not alter levels of ROS formed in response to LPS (Fig. 3A), suggesting that ROS act upstream of the Class III PI3K in the process of autophagy in OCs.
We have demonstrated that LPS induces OC autophagy as well as osteoclastogenesis
In our studies, LPS induced a sustained level of cytoplasmic ROS along with elevated differentiation to OCs. Decreasing ROS with the antioxidant, NAC, or combined knockdowns of NOX1 and NOX2, decreased both the formation of OCs and autophagy in response to LPS, demonstrating that ROS are associated with LPS-induced differentiation as well as autophagy. This view is supported by the finding that oxidative stress induced autophagy and OC differentiation (Wang et al., 2011). The participation of ROS in autophagic processes has been demonstrated in several other systems. Thus, starvation increased ROS as well as autophagy (Shi et al., 2015). Administration of NAC reduced the induction of autophagy by lowering ROS in neurons (Scherz-Shouval et al., 2007), whereas stimulation of NOX promoted autophagy in phagosomes (Kirkland et al., 2002). ROS are involved directly in thiol modification of Cys residues in ATG4 during starvation-induced autophagy (Shi et al., 2015) and indirectly through Nrf2 by increasing the level of the autophagic proteins p62 (Huang and Brumell, 2009) and p53 and so increasing sestrin (Fujita et al., 2011). Since oxidation of mTOR reduces its activity (Budanov and Karin, 2008), mTOR may be a target of ROS. The activity of the beclin-1-class III PI3K complex may also be a target due to the redox-sensitive cysteine-rich domains of autophagy factor-1 (Dames et al., 2005) and Rubicon (Chang et al., 2010), which suggests that redox regulation may play a key role in the process of autophagy. However, we showed that 3-MA did not decrease LPS-induced ROS in OCs, suggesting that ROS lie upstream of the class III PI3K in the process of autophagy. Similar findings have been reported by others: 3-MA did not decrease ROS levels in starvation-induced autophagy (Chen et al., 2009) or in dexamethasone-induced autophagy (Zhong et al., 2009).
In conclusion, our studies show that LPS stimulates OC differentiation from pre-OCs by enhancing autophagy as a result of raising ROS levels in pre-OCs. The present findings suggest that autophagy and ROS levels might be targeted therapeutically to reduce inflammatory bone loss.
Jae Hyeong Lee, Sang-Ah Park, Il-Geun Park, Bo Kyung Yoon, Jung-Shin Lee, and Ji Min Lee
Mol. Cells 2023; 46(8): 476-485 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.0011Seon Beom Song, Woosung Shim, and Eun Seong Hwang*
Mol. Cells 2023; 46(8): 486-495 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.0019Seo Jin Hong, Suhan Jung, Ji Sun Jang, Shenzheng Mo, Jun-Oh Kwon, Min Kyung Kim, and Hong-Hee Kim*
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(10): 749-760 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.0058