Mol. Cells 2015; 38(12): 1086-1095
Published online November 26, 2015
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0191
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: junhyucklee@kopri.re.kr (JHL); jhcbio@knu.ac.kr (JHC)
The psychrophilic organism
Keywords
Psychrophilic organisms are cold-adapted microorganisms that have overcome the constraints associated with living in permanently cold environments (Pikuta et al., 2007; Russell, 1990). Cold environments can induce molecular changes in an organism, including abnormalities such as low enzymatic activity, protein denaturation, and mis-folding of proteins (Russell, 1998). In order to overcome these deficiencies, several cold-adaptation mechanisms have been described, including cold-active enzymes, an unsaturated fatty-acid membrane, anti-freeze proteins, and sugar and/or alcohol compounds such as glycerol, trehalose, and sorbitol (Chattopadhyay, 2006; Feller, 2013; Feller and Gerday, 2003).
One of the most interesting cold-adaptation mechanisms is biofilm formation using extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPSs) that are found in the O-antigen component of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and cell-bound polysaccharides (Bazaka et al., 2011). The EPSs play important temperature-buffering and cryoprotectant roles in cold-adapted microorganisms (Bazaka et al., 2011; Krembs et al., 2002). The psychrophilic bacterium
Gram-negative bacteria, including
The structure and catalytic mechanisms of GmhA from various species have been characterized because GmhA is considered an important target for antibiotic development (Harmer, 2010; Kim and Shin, 2009; Seetharaman et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2008). In this study, we determined the crystal structure of GmhA from
The gene encoding GmhA protein (UniProtKB code: Q47VU0, amino acids 1?196) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the genomic DNA of
Ni-NTA affinity resin (Clontech, USA) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer was used to purify of the target protein. After washing the column and matrix with a ten-column volume of washing buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate [pH 8.0], 300 mM NaCl, and 35 mM imidazole), the His-tagged protein was eluted using a solution of the same composition but with 300 mM imidazole. Once the His tag was cleaved at 4°C overnight with thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), the resulting protein has an additional GSHM sequence at the N-terminus, an artifact of the cloning. The cleaved protein was loaded onto a Superdex-200 column (GE Healthcare, USA) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The fractions containing
The purified
The data were recorded, integrated, and scaled using iMosflm software (Battye et al., 2011). In order to obtain the phase, molecular replacement (MR) was performed using the program MOLREP (Vagin and Teplyakov, 2009), using the homologous structure from
The amino acid sequences of GmhA and DiaA from
The atomic coordinates and experimental structure have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (accession codes 5BY2).
The GmhA from
The bulk of helices (α1-α4 and α6) form a tetramer with a broad surface range. Half of the long N-terminal α1 helix interacts with the same region of the neighboring monomers via the hydrophobic residues Met1, Leu2, Ile5, Phe9, Ile13, Ile17, and Ile27, resulting in a four-helix frame around the tetramer (Figs. 1C and 1D). The four α1-helices in the tetramer form a hexagon tilted at an angle of 120°, which could be important for structural stabilization, because the four α1-helices surrounding the tetramer have broad contacting surfaces that serve as clamps on each of the two subunits (Fig. 1C). Extensive interactions with neighboring molecules support the order of the α3 helix, such that the overall shape has a closed conformation in comparison with homologous structures (see below) (Harmer, 2010; Taylor et al., 2008).
The active site of GmhA is mainly composed of four α-helices, which are each composed of two equivalent helices (α2?α6 and α2′?α6′) from two subunits. In addition, the conserved residues on the α3 helix and the three loops (β1?α2, α2?β2, and β3?α5) support the conformation of the active site (Fig. 2A). The E-Q-H residues, which are located at the α2, α6′, and α6 helices, respectively, are strongly involved in catalytic reactions. The E-QH residues are highly conserved in the GmhA family; however, the glutamate residue is replaced by glutamine at the equivalent position in
The tetrameric structures of GmhA can be classified into two distinct conformations, open or closed, depending on whether an additional α3′ helix is present in the central region. The closed conformation may allow for the ingress and egress of a substrate and product in solution due to the extension of the solvent accessible area of the active site (Harmer, 2010). Since the conformation of
Conformational differences between the open and closed may be because of the binding of the product to the active site. For example, the open-conformation structure of
We searched for structural homologs of
Next, we compared the structural similarity among the four structures. Structural comparisons show that
To date, eight crystal structures of GmhA have been reported from various mesophilic species (Harmer, 2010; Kim and Shin, 2009; Seetharaman et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2008). The overall structures are divided into two forms: open and closed. The conformations of the apo-structures are also variable in that the GmhAs of
The reaction mechanisms of GmhA have been proposed by complex structures with either product or substrate (Harmer, 2010; Taylor et al., 2008). To date, there have been three GmhA complex structures reported in either substrate form or product-bound form. The substrate S7P is only present in the
As shown in the previous section, only
. X- Ray data collection and refinement statistics for
Data collection | |
??X-ray source | PLS-5C |
??Space group | |
??Unit-cell parameters (?) | |
??Wavelength (?) | 0.97951 |
??Resolution Range (?) | 44.3?2.8 (2.95?2.80) |
??No. of observed reflections | 54978 (8311) |
??No. of unique reflections | 4643 (671) |
??Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
??Redundancy | 6.4 (6.5) |
?? | 0.136 (0.315) |
?? | 13.0 (7.3) |
Refinement | |
??Resolution range | 44.3?2.8 (3.53?2.80) |
??Reflections: working/free | 4643/215 |
?? | 0.210 (0.234) |
?? | 0.280 (0.341) |
??Ramachandran plot: | |
??favored/ allowed/disallowed (%) d | 94.8/5.2/0 |
??R.m.s.d. bonds (?) | 0.001 |
??R.m.s.d. angles (°) | 0.381 |
PDB accession code | 5BY2 |
a
b
c
dThe Ramachandran plot was calculated using MolProbity (
. Sequence information of the consensus cladogram
Protein | Species | NCBI reference sequence |
---|---|---|
GmhA | Q47VU0.1 | |
NP_308276.1 | ||
WP_002858021.1 | ||
WP_016253868.1 | ||
WP_011205222.1 | ||
WP_000284054.1 | ||
WP_020772754.1 | ||
WP_042636128.1 | ||
WP_005663828.1 | ||
KFJ54879.1 | ||
WP_002242076.1 | ||
DiaA | WP_033091889.1 | |
WP_005174225.1 | ||
WP_025299231.1 | ||
WP_032476931.1 | ||
WP_004018383.1 | ||
WP_002210146.1 | ||
WP_024559311.1 | ||
WP_000893482.1 | ||
WP_043080845.1 | ||
WP_017801381.1 | ||
WP_034786756.1 | ||
WP_032629664.1 |
Mol. Cells 2015; 38(12): 1086-1095
Published online December 31, 2015 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0191
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Hackwon Do1, Ji-Sook Yun2, Chang Woo Lee1,3, Young Jun Choi2, Hye-Yeon Kim4, Youn-Jung Kim5, Hyun Park1,3, Jeong Ho Chang2,*, and Jun Hyuck Lee1,3,*
1Division of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 406-840, Korea, 2Department of Biology Education, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea, 3Department of Polar Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Incheon 406-840, Korea, 4Protein Structure Group, Korea Basic Science Institute, Chungbuk 363-883, Korea, 5Department of Marine Science, Incheon National University, Incheon 406-772, Korea
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: junhyucklee@kopri.re.kr (JHL); jhcbio@knu.ac.kr (JHC)
The psychrophilic organism
Keywords:
Psychrophilic organisms are cold-adapted microorganisms that have overcome the constraints associated with living in permanently cold environments (Pikuta et al., 2007; Russell, 1990). Cold environments can induce molecular changes in an organism, including abnormalities such as low enzymatic activity, protein denaturation, and mis-folding of proteins (Russell, 1998). In order to overcome these deficiencies, several cold-adaptation mechanisms have been described, including cold-active enzymes, an unsaturated fatty-acid membrane, anti-freeze proteins, and sugar and/or alcohol compounds such as glycerol, trehalose, and sorbitol (Chattopadhyay, 2006; Feller, 2013; Feller and Gerday, 2003).
One of the most interesting cold-adaptation mechanisms is biofilm formation using extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPSs) that are found in the O-antigen component of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and cell-bound polysaccharides (Bazaka et al., 2011). The EPSs play important temperature-buffering and cryoprotectant roles in cold-adapted microorganisms (Bazaka et al., 2011; Krembs et al., 2002). The psychrophilic bacterium
Gram-negative bacteria, including
The structure and catalytic mechanisms of GmhA from various species have been characterized because GmhA is considered an important target for antibiotic development (Harmer, 2010; Kim and Shin, 2009; Seetharaman et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2008). In this study, we determined the crystal structure of GmhA from
The gene encoding GmhA protein (UniProtKB code: Q47VU0, amino acids 1?196) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the genomic DNA of
Ni-NTA affinity resin (Clontech, USA) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer was used to purify of the target protein. After washing the column and matrix with a ten-column volume of washing buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate [pH 8.0], 300 mM NaCl, and 35 mM imidazole), the His-tagged protein was eluted using a solution of the same composition but with 300 mM imidazole. Once the His tag was cleaved at 4°C overnight with thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), the resulting protein has an additional GSHM sequence at the N-terminus, an artifact of the cloning. The cleaved protein was loaded onto a Superdex-200 column (GE Healthcare, USA) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The fractions containing
The purified
The data were recorded, integrated, and scaled using iMosflm software (Battye et al., 2011). In order to obtain the phase, molecular replacement (MR) was performed using the program MOLREP (Vagin and Teplyakov, 2009), using the homologous structure from
The amino acid sequences of GmhA and DiaA from
The atomic coordinates and experimental structure have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (accession codes 5BY2).
The GmhA from
The bulk of helices (α1-α4 and α6) form a tetramer with a broad surface range. Half of the long N-terminal α1 helix interacts with the same region of the neighboring monomers via the hydrophobic residues Met1, Leu2, Ile5, Phe9, Ile13, Ile17, and Ile27, resulting in a four-helix frame around the tetramer (Figs. 1C and 1D). The four α1-helices in the tetramer form a hexagon tilted at an angle of 120°, which could be important for structural stabilization, because the four α1-helices surrounding the tetramer have broad contacting surfaces that serve as clamps on each of the two subunits (Fig. 1C). Extensive interactions with neighboring molecules support the order of the α3 helix, such that the overall shape has a closed conformation in comparison with homologous structures (see below) (Harmer, 2010; Taylor et al., 2008).
The active site of GmhA is mainly composed of four α-helices, which are each composed of two equivalent helices (α2?α6 and α2′?α6′) from two subunits. In addition, the conserved residues on the α3 helix and the three loops (β1?α2, α2?β2, and β3?α5) support the conformation of the active site (Fig. 2A). The E-Q-H residues, which are located at the α2, α6′, and α6 helices, respectively, are strongly involved in catalytic reactions. The E-QH residues are highly conserved in the GmhA family; however, the glutamate residue is replaced by glutamine at the equivalent position in
The tetrameric structures of GmhA can be classified into two distinct conformations, open or closed, depending on whether an additional α3′ helix is present in the central region. The closed conformation may allow for the ingress and egress of a substrate and product in solution due to the extension of the solvent accessible area of the active site (Harmer, 2010). Since the conformation of
Conformational differences between the open and closed may be because of the binding of the product to the active site. For example, the open-conformation structure of
We searched for structural homologs of
Next, we compared the structural similarity among the four structures. Structural comparisons show that
To date, eight crystal structures of GmhA have been reported from various mesophilic species (Harmer, 2010; Kim and Shin, 2009; Seetharaman et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2008). The overall structures are divided into two forms: open and closed. The conformations of the apo-structures are also variable in that the GmhAs of
The reaction mechanisms of GmhA have been proposed by complex structures with either product or substrate (Harmer, 2010; Taylor et al., 2008). To date, there have been three GmhA complex structures reported in either substrate form or product-bound form. The substrate S7P is only present in the
As shown in the previous section, only
. X- Ray data collection and refinement statistics for
Data collection | |
??X-ray source | PLS-5C |
??Space group | |
??Unit-cell parameters (?) | |
??Wavelength (?) | 0.97951 |
??Resolution Range (?) | 44.3?2.8 (2.95?2.80) |
??No. of observed reflections | 54978 (8311) |
??No. of unique reflections | 4643 (671) |
??Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
??Redundancy | 6.4 (6.5) |
?? | 0.136 (0.315) |
?? | 13.0 (7.3) |
Refinement | |
??Resolution range | 44.3?2.8 (3.53?2.80) |
??Reflections: working/free | 4643/215 |
?? | 0.210 (0.234) |
?? | 0.280 (0.341) |
??Ramachandran plot: | |
??favored/ allowed/disallowed (%) d | 94.8/5.2/0 |
??R.m.s.d. bonds (?) | 0.001 |
??R.m.s.d. angles (°) | 0.381 |
PDB accession code | 5BY2 |
a
b
c
dThe Ramachandran plot was calculated using MolProbity (
. Sequence information of the consensus cladogram.
Protein | Species | NCBI reference sequence |
---|---|---|
GmhA | Q47VU0.1 | |
NP_308276.1 | ||
WP_002858021.1 | ||
WP_016253868.1 | ||
WP_011205222.1 | ||
WP_000284054.1 | ||
WP_020772754.1 | ||
WP_042636128.1 | ||
WP_005663828.1 | ||
KFJ54879.1 | ||
WP_002242076.1 | ||
DiaA | WP_033091889.1 | |
WP_005174225.1 | ||
WP_025299231.1 | ||
WP_032476931.1 | ||
WP_004018383.1 | ||
WP_002210146.1 | ||
WP_024559311.1 | ||
WP_000893482.1 | ||
WP_043080845.1 | ||
WP_017801381.1 | ||
WP_034786756.1 | ||
WP_032629664.1 |