Mol. Cells 2014; 37(9): 664-671
Published online September 18, 2014
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2014.0121
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: junhuaguo2008@hotmail.com
MiR-217 can function as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene depending on cell type. However, the function of miR-217 in lung cancer remains unclear to date. This study aims to evaluate the function of miR-217 in lung cancer and investigate its effect on the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin. The expression of miR-217 was detected in 100 patients by real-time PCR. The effects of miR-217 overexpression on the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells were investigated. The target gene of miR-217 was predicted by Targetscan online software, screened by dual luciferase reporter gene assay and demonstrated by Western blot. Finally, the effects of miR-217 up-regulation on the sensitivity of A549 cells to cisplatin were determined. The expression of miR-217 was significantly lower in lung cancer tissues than in noncancerous tissues (p < 0.001). The overexpression of miR-217 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion as well as promoted the apoptosis of lung cancer cells by targeting KRAS. The up-regulation of miR-217 enhanced the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin. In conclusion, miR-217 suppresses tumour development in lung cancer by targeting KRAS and enhances cell sensitivity to cisplatin. Our results encourage researchers to use cisplatin in combination with miR-217 to treat lung cancer. This regime might lead to low-dose cisplatin application and cisplatin side-effect reduction.
Keywords cisplatin, KRAS, lung cancer, miR-217, tumour suppressor
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (Jemal et al., 2010). Lung cancer has been traditionally subdividedinto two principal groups, namely, neuroendocrine and non-small cell lungcancer (NSCLC). The latter type is more common than the former. Cancer occurs and develops as a complicated result of an accumulation of various endogenous and exogenous effects. Gene alterations participate in cancer genesis. Alterations in many oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes have been reported in lung cancer.
MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a class of small RNA molecules that regulate the translation and degradation of mRNAs (Tomari and Zamore, 2005). MiRNAs bind to complementary sequences in the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of their target mRNAs to promote mRNA degradation or translational repression (Engels and Hutvagner, 2006). MiRNAs function in negative gene regulation. These molecules silence gene expression by interfering with mRNA stability or protein translation.
MiRNAs participate in numerous biological processes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and invasion. During tumourigenesis, miRNAs act as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene and contribute to cancer initiation and progression by regulating target genes (Ambs et al., 2008). MiRNAs function in tumourigenesis and metastasis by directly targeting oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes (Garzon et al., 2009; Slack and Weidhaas, 2008). MiRNAs such as miR-17-92 cluster (Inomata et al., 2009), miR-21 (Qi et al., 2009) and miR-31 (Zhang et al., 2011) function as oncogenes. Conversely, miRNAs such as miR-451 (Wang et al., 2011), miR-15/16 (Cimmino et al., 2005), let-7 (Johnson et al., 2005), miR-125a/125b (Iorio et al., 2007) and miR-145 (Schepeler et al., 2008) function as tumour suppressor genes. Meanwhile, some miRNAs can function as oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes depending on cell type. For example, miR-96 decreases FOXO1 protein levels and contributes to the survival of breast cancer cells (Guttilla and White, 2009). Alternatively, miR-96 induces tumour suppression in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting KRAS (Yuet al., 2010a). Similarly, miR-217 targets the oncogene SirT1 or KRAS in endothelial and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (Menghini et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010) but targets the tumour suppressor gene PTEN (Kato et al., 2009). However, the function of miR-217 in lung cancer remains unclear to date.
The relationship between miRNAdysregulation and human cancer resistance has attracted increasing attention (Ma et al., 2010). MiRNAdysregulation can contribute to cisplatinchemoresistance in human tumour cells (Sorrentino et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010b). In NSCLC, miRNA-451 can up-regulate cisplatin sensitivity (Bian et al., 2011). However, the association of other miRNA expression with the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin has yet to be explored. The present study aims to provide insights into the association of miR-217 expression with cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer. Results show that miR-217 is down-regulated in human lung cancer and that miR-217 overexpression can reduce cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer cell lines. Our
We collected pairs of matched lung cancer and noncancerous tissue samples from 100 patients (male 56, female 44) who underwent surgical resection at the Cancer Institute and Hospital of Hebei; the Chongmin Hospital of Nanjing; First affiliated hospital of Henan University; Hebei Cancer Hospital between 2009 and 2012 after obtaining informed consent from all patients and receiving approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Committee. The lung cancer cell lines SPC-A-1 and A549 were cultured in RPMI1640 or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin as well as streptomycin.
Total RNA from tissues and cells was extracted byTrizolmethod (Ambion, USA) completely following the instructions. Single strand cDNA was synthesized by M-MLV (Ambion, USA) using 2 μg of total RNA as template. Oligo (dT)18 was used for mRNA reverse transcription while stem loop used for miRNA. Real time-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed by Bio-rad CFX96 (Bio-rad, USA) using SYBR mix (Tiangen, China). The PCR condition was: 95°C × 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C × 5 s, 60°C × 34 s. For mRNAs, GAPDH was used as normalized control. For miRNAs, U6 snRNA was used for miRNA control. The relative expression of miR-217 was computed by 2-ΔΔCT method. Primer sequences have been shown in
The miR-217 precursor sequence was generated by annealing. MiR-217-precursor-F and miR-217-precursor-R extension was digested by
The miR-217 and scramble mimics were designed and synthesised by GenePharma (GenePharma, China). All mimics were transfected by DharmaFECT1 Reagent (Dharmacon, USA) into the lung cancer cells to a final concentration of 10 nM. Three independent replication experiments were performed for each transfection.
Cell proliferation assay was performed by the CCK8 method (DOJINDO, Japan). Briefly, approximately 5000 miR-217 mimic-transfected cells and scramble cells were seeded into 96-well plates and then cultured. Proliferation rates were determined at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after transfection by adding 10 μl of CCK8 reagent.
Apoptosis assays were tested in SPC-A-1and A549 cell lines with or without miR-217 overexpression using Apoptosis Detection kit I (BD Biosciences, USA) and C6 Flow Cytometer (USA).
We performed the wound-healing assay to test cell migration ability with or without miR-217 mimic transfection. The artificial wounds wereproduced on the confluent cell monolayer with FBS free, using a 200 μl pipette tip at 24 h post miR-217 transfection. The images were respectivelytaken at 0, 12, 24 and 36 h after wound creation.
We then performed transwell assays to evaluate cells’invasionability. The 5 × 104 cells suspended in 200 μl medium without FBS were placed on the upper chamber of each insert with 430 μl of 1 mg/ml matrigel(Millipore, USA). The 600 μl medium with 10% FBS as the nutritional attractant was put in the lower chamber. After 24 h, the cells attached to the lower surface of chamber were fixed 20 min by 20% methanol and stained for 10 min with 10% maygruwald-giemsa (MGG). The invasion membranes were then cut down and embedded under cover slips. We counted the cells in 3 different vision fields in condition with 20× magnification which were then used as the average number of cells. All assays were performed in three independent experiments.
Experiments involving animals were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the institutional ethical guidelines for animal experiments. Scramble-transfected and miR-217-overexpressing A549 cells (6 × 106 cells) were inoculated s.c. into the dorsal flanks of BALB/c nude mice (female, Nu/Nu, six week old). The mice were purchased from the Animal Centre of Henan University and raised under pathogen-free conditions. The tumour volume was measured for 5 weeks. All mice were killed, s.c. tumours were resected, and tumour weights were recorded.
Mouse tumour tissues were embedded into paraffin sections, treated for 2 h at 65°C and then deparaffinised. Before applying the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, we carried out the antigen retrieval step. The slides were incubated with a secondary antibody for 2 h at 25°C and then conjugated to HRP (1:100; Zhongshanjinqiao, China). Liquid DAB+ Substrate (zsgb-bio, China) was used to detect HRP activity.
The full length of the 3′UTRs of 6 human genes, including KRAS, MAPK1, ACVR2A, TPD52L2, NOVA1, MAF, who have complementary sequences in their 3′UTR predicting by Targetscan on line software, were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pMIR-REPORTTM Luciferase Reporter Vector (Ambion, USA). Mutations of the predicted seed regions in the mRNA sequences were created using primers including the mutated sites. HEK-293T cells were transfected with pRL-TK luciferase reporters (50 ng/well, 24-well plates, 1 × 105 cells per well), pGL-3firefly luciferase (10 ng/well), and mimic-217 (50 nmol/L, GenePharma, China) or scramble (50 nmol/L) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA). Luciferase activities were measured according to the manuscript of the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega, USA).
Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to 0.45 μm PVDF membranes (Amersham, UK). The membranes were incubated with 5% non-fat dried milk overnight at 4°C and with anti-KRAS antibody (CST, USA) at 1:1000 dilution for 2h at room temperature, anti-Bad/p/Bad antibody (Bio-world, USA) at 1:500 dilution, anti-AKT/p-AKT antibody (CST, USA) at 1:1000 dilution and anti-GAPDH antibody (Proteintech, USA) at 1:30,000 dilution. After washing twice with TBST, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit antibody (zsgb-bio, China) at 1:5000 and 1:50000 dilutions for 2 h.
Each of the experiments was at least performed triplicate. Student’s
The expression of miR-217 in 100 patients (56 males/44 females, mean age of 53 years) was detected by RT-PCR. The expression of miR-217 was down-regulated in 77 (77%) of the 100 lung cancer samples compared with adjacent tissues when the cut off was set to 1.5 (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, miR-217 was up-regulated in 23 (23%) of the 100 lung cancer samples. In general, miR-217 expression was frequently down-regulated in lung cancer tissues. The difference in miR-217 expression was significant between lung cancer tissues and adjacent tissues (p = 0.00079, Fig. 1B).
The results of CCK8 growth assays at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after miR-217 and scramble transfection are shown in Figs. 2A and 2B. Compared with scramble transfection, miR-217 transfection significantly reduced the proliferation of A549 and A549 and SPC-A-1 cells. We investigated the effect of miR-217 on the apoptosis of A549 and SPC-A-1 cells after miR-217 transfection. Scramble transfection induced the early apoptosis of 22.9% SPC-A-1 cells and 20.8% A549 cells; meanwhile, miR-217 transfection induced the early apoptosis of 27.7% SPC-A-1 cells and 28.4% A549 cells (Figs. 2C and 2D). These results indicate that miR-217 can suppress lung cancer cell survival by inducing early apoptosis.
To further verify these findings, an
We further studied the effects of miR-217 on cell migration and invasion using a wound healing/scratch assay in SPC-A-1 and A549 cells with or without miR-217 mimic transfection. Results showed that both SPC-A-1 and A549 cell lines with miR-217 overexpression showed less migration ability than the scramble and untreated groups at 24 and 36 h after wound creation (Fig. 4A).
We also detected the invasion abilities of lung cancer cells after miR-217 overexpression in SPC-A-1 and A549 cells. The cells with miR-217 overexpression showed significantly lower invasiveness than the scramble or untreated groups (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that miR-217 regulates lung cancer cell migration and invasiveness. Therefore, the down-regulation of miR-217 may strengthen tumour metastasis in lung carcinogenesis.
As predicted by Targetscan, complementarity can be found between has-miR-217 and KRAS 3′-UTR (Fig. 5A). To test whether or not KRAS is a target of miR-217, the plasmid pMIR-reportor containing the wild-type 3′-UTR region of KRAS downstream of the luciferase coding region (Fig. 5A, KRAS_WT) was constructed. HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with reporter plasmid (KRAS_WT) and scramble. Luciferase activity was markedly reduced by approximately 58% in the miR-217-overexpressing cells. The same assay was performed for another reporter plasmid containing mutated KRAS 3′-UTR in miR-217 binding sites. As expected, the miR-217-induced inhibition of luciferase activity was partly removed with binding site 1 orbinding site 2 mutant and almost abolished in the KRAS_MUT double mutant (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that the conserved region regulates the functions of miR-217.
We tested five other potential target genes using the same methods. The results of luciferase miRNA target reporter assay showed that the five potential target genes were not the target ofmiR-217 (
SPC-A-1 and A549 cells were transfected with miR-217 to further investigate the interaction between miR-217 and KRAS. Western blot was conducted to measure the level of KRAS protein. The protein expression of KRAS was down-regulated in the miR-217-treated SPC-A-1 and A549 cells but not in the scramble or untreated cells (Fig. 5D). The mRNA expression of KRAS was determined by real-time PCR. No significant difference was observed between miR-217-treated and scramble-treated or untreated SPC-A-1 and A549 cells (Fig. 5C). These results suggest-that miR-217 directly recognises the 3′-UTR of KRAS mRNA and inhibits KRAS translation. Thus, miR-217 down-regulation in lung cancer inhibits KRAS suppression, which consequently decelerates tumourigenesis. Interestingly, the phosphorylation levels of Akt and Bad were similarly altered to the expression level of KRAS (Fig. 5E).
Previous research demonstrated that miRNAdysregulation is related to the chemoresistance of cancers, including lung cancer (Bian et al., 2011; Giovannetti et al., 2010). However, to the best of our knowledge, the relationship between miR-217 expression and lung cancer sensitivity has yet to be explored. Therefore, we treated scramble- or miR-217-transfected SPC-A-1 and A549 cells with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 μg/ml of cisplatin for 12 h. The results of CCK8 assay indicated that miR-217 up-regulation significantly decreased the cell viability of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells in response to cisplatin in a dose-dependent manner (Figs. 6A and 6C). Moreover, cisplatin up-regulated miR-217 in the two cell lines. The expression level of miR-217 increased with cisplatin in a dose-and time-dependent manner (Figs. 6B and 6D). To confirm this effect, we evaluated the mRNA and proteinexpression levels of KRAS. As expected, the mRNA and protein levels of KRAS significantly reduced, coinciding with miR-217 expression (Figs. 6E and 6F). We silenced miR-217 using antagomiR to investigate the effect of miR-217 on the sensitivity oflung cancer cell lines SPC-A-1 and A549 to cisplastin. Compared with miR-217 mimic, antagomiR-217 caused cisplatin torrent in both SPC-A-1 and A549 cells (Figs. 6G and 6H). This result demonstrates that miR-217 can enhance the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin.
MiRNAs as regulators play important roles in tumourigenesis (Deng et al., 2008; Pasquinelli, 2012). MiRNAs exhibit differential expression modes in cancers and function as tumour suppressor genes or oncogenes by targeting specific target genes (Zhang, 2007). Generally, miRNAs that function as tumour suppressors are expressed at relatively low levels, whereas oncogenic miRNAs exhibit relatively high expression levels in tumours. Therefore, miRNAs may serve as new biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in the future (Esteller, 2011).
MiR-217 is a special miRNA that can function as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene depending on cell type. For example, miR-217 targets the oncogene SirT1 or KRAS in endothelial cells and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (Menghini et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010) but targets the tumour suppressor gene PTEN in kidney cells (Kato et al., 2009).
Cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug. MiRNAdysregulation can alter cisplatinchemoresistance in cancer cells (Sorrentino et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010). MicroRNA-451 can increase the cisplatin sensitivity of lung cancer cells (Bian et al., 2011).
The present study provided insights into the association of miR-217 expression with cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer. We evaluated miR-217 expression in lung cancer patients. Results showed that 77% of lung cancer clinical samples showed significantly lower miR-217 expression than adjacent normal tissues (p = 0.00079). This result suggests that miR-217 may function as a tumour suppressor.
This study is the first to report that miR-217 overexpression can reduce cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer cell lines. Therefore, combining cisplatin with miR-217 regulation may serve as a potential approach for lung cancer therapy. High cisplatin doses can cause toxic effects, such as nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. The results of this study showed that the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin significantly increased. Therefore, we speculate that using cisplatin in combination with miR-217 as a potential approach for lung cancer therapy may achieve low-dose cisplatin application and reduce cisplatin toxic effects.
No significant changes in KRAS mRNA level were observed (Fig. 5C). This result indicates that miR-217 may function as a post-transcriptional regulation factor of KRAS. However, the cisplatin-induced up-regulation of miR-217 significantly changed the mRNA level of KRAS. This result indicates that cisplatin targets other genes aside from miR-217 and influences KRAS mRNA. These data reflect the complexity of biological control. However, we failed to find the key regulator in this process. Thus, this phenomenon warrants further investigations.
In conclusion, miR-217 is frequently down-regulated in lung cancer and acts as a tumour suppressor in lung cancer cells by targeting KRAS. MiR-217 up-regulation enhances the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin. These results provided insights into the functions of miR-217 in cisplatinchemoresistance and the rational development of new targeted combinations against lung cancer.
Mol. Cells 2014; 37(9): 664-671
Published online September 30, 2014 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2014.0121
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Junhua Guo*, Zhijun Feng, Zhi’ang Huang, Hongyan Wang, and Wujie Lu
Department of Respiratory, The First Hospital Affiliated to Henan University, Henan 475000, China
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: junhuaguo2008@hotmail.com
MiR-217 can function as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene depending on cell type. However, the function of miR-217 in lung cancer remains unclear to date. This study aims to evaluate the function of miR-217 in lung cancer and investigate its effect on the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin. The expression of miR-217 was detected in 100 patients by real-time PCR. The effects of miR-217 overexpression on the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells were investigated. The target gene of miR-217 was predicted by Targetscan online software, screened by dual luciferase reporter gene assay and demonstrated by Western blot. Finally, the effects of miR-217 up-regulation on the sensitivity of A549 cells to cisplatin were determined. The expression of miR-217 was significantly lower in lung cancer tissues than in noncancerous tissues (p < 0.001). The overexpression of miR-217 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion as well as promoted the apoptosis of lung cancer cells by targeting KRAS. The up-regulation of miR-217 enhanced the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin. In conclusion, miR-217 suppresses tumour development in lung cancer by targeting KRAS and enhances cell sensitivity to cisplatin. Our results encourage researchers to use cisplatin in combination with miR-217 to treat lung cancer. This regime might lead to low-dose cisplatin application and cisplatin side-effect reduction.
Keywords: cisplatin, KRAS, lung cancer, miR-217, tumour suppressor
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (Jemal et al., 2010). Lung cancer has been traditionally subdividedinto two principal groups, namely, neuroendocrine and non-small cell lungcancer (NSCLC). The latter type is more common than the former. Cancer occurs and develops as a complicated result of an accumulation of various endogenous and exogenous effects. Gene alterations participate in cancer genesis. Alterations in many oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes have been reported in lung cancer.
MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a class of small RNA molecules that regulate the translation and degradation of mRNAs (Tomari and Zamore, 2005). MiRNAs bind to complementary sequences in the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of their target mRNAs to promote mRNA degradation or translational repression (Engels and Hutvagner, 2006). MiRNAs function in negative gene regulation. These molecules silence gene expression by interfering with mRNA stability or protein translation.
MiRNAs participate in numerous biological processes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and invasion. During tumourigenesis, miRNAs act as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene and contribute to cancer initiation and progression by regulating target genes (Ambs et al., 2008). MiRNAs function in tumourigenesis and metastasis by directly targeting oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes (Garzon et al., 2009; Slack and Weidhaas, 2008). MiRNAs such as miR-17-92 cluster (Inomata et al., 2009), miR-21 (Qi et al., 2009) and miR-31 (Zhang et al., 2011) function as oncogenes. Conversely, miRNAs such as miR-451 (Wang et al., 2011), miR-15/16 (Cimmino et al., 2005), let-7 (Johnson et al., 2005), miR-125a/125b (Iorio et al., 2007) and miR-145 (Schepeler et al., 2008) function as tumour suppressor genes. Meanwhile, some miRNAs can function as oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes depending on cell type. For example, miR-96 decreases FOXO1 protein levels and contributes to the survival of breast cancer cells (Guttilla and White, 2009). Alternatively, miR-96 induces tumour suppression in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting KRAS (Yuet al., 2010a). Similarly, miR-217 targets the oncogene SirT1 or KRAS in endothelial and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (Menghini et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010) but targets the tumour suppressor gene PTEN (Kato et al., 2009). However, the function of miR-217 in lung cancer remains unclear to date.
The relationship between miRNAdysregulation and human cancer resistance has attracted increasing attention (Ma et al., 2010). MiRNAdysregulation can contribute to cisplatinchemoresistance in human tumour cells (Sorrentino et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010b). In NSCLC, miRNA-451 can up-regulate cisplatin sensitivity (Bian et al., 2011). However, the association of other miRNA expression with the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin has yet to be explored. The present study aims to provide insights into the association of miR-217 expression with cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer. Results show that miR-217 is down-regulated in human lung cancer and that miR-217 overexpression can reduce cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer cell lines. Our
We collected pairs of matched lung cancer and noncancerous tissue samples from 100 patients (male 56, female 44) who underwent surgical resection at the Cancer Institute and Hospital of Hebei; the Chongmin Hospital of Nanjing; First affiliated hospital of Henan University; Hebei Cancer Hospital between 2009 and 2012 after obtaining informed consent from all patients and receiving approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Committee. The lung cancer cell lines SPC-A-1 and A549 were cultured in RPMI1640 or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin as well as streptomycin.
Total RNA from tissues and cells was extracted byTrizolmethod (Ambion, USA) completely following the instructions. Single strand cDNA was synthesized by M-MLV (Ambion, USA) using 2 μg of total RNA as template. Oligo (dT)18 was used for mRNA reverse transcription while stem loop used for miRNA. Real time-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed by Bio-rad CFX96 (Bio-rad, USA) using SYBR mix (Tiangen, China). The PCR condition was: 95°C × 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C × 5 s, 60°C × 34 s. For mRNAs, GAPDH was used as normalized control. For miRNAs, U6 snRNA was used for miRNA control. The relative expression of miR-217 was computed by 2-ΔΔCT method. Primer sequences have been shown in
The miR-217 precursor sequence was generated by annealing. MiR-217-precursor-F and miR-217-precursor-R extension was digested by
The miR-217 and scramble mimics were designed and synthesised by GenePharma (GenePharma, China). All mimics were transfected by DharmaFECT1 Reagent (Dharmacon, USA) into the lung cancer cells to a final concentration of 10 nM. Three independent replication experiments were performed for each transfection.
Cell proliferation assay was performed by the CCK8 method (DOJINDO, Japan). Briefly, approximately 5000 miR-217 mimic-transfected cells and scramble cells were seeded into 96-well plates and then cultured. Proliferation rates were determined at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after transfection by adding 10 μl of CCK8 reagent.
Apoptosis assays were tested in SPC-A-1and A549 cell lines with or without miR-217 overexpression using Apoptosis Detection kit I (BD Biosciences, USA) and C6 Flow Cytometer (USA).
We performed the wound-healing assay to test cell migration ability with or without miR-217 mimic transfection. The artificial wounds wereproduced on the confluent cell monolayer with FBS free, using a 200 μl pipette tip at 24 h post miR-217 transfection. The images were respectivelytaken at 0, 12, 24 and 36 h after wound creation.
We then performed transwell assays to evaluate cells’invasionability. The 5 × 104 cells suspended in 200 μl medium without FBS were placed on the upper chamber of each insert with 430 μl of 1 mg/ml matrigel(Millipore, USA). The 600 μl medium with 10% FBS as the nutritional attractant was put in the lower chamber. After 24 h, the cells attached to the lower surface of chamber were fixed 20 min by 20% methanol and stained for 10 min with 10% maygruwald-giemsa (MGG). The invasion membranes were then cut down and embedded under cover slips. We counted the cells in 3 different vision fields in condition with 20× magnification which were then used as the average number of cells. All assays were performed in three independent experiments.
Experiments involving animals were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the institutional ethical guidelines for animal experiments. Scramble-transfected and miR-217-overexpressing A549 cells (6 × 106 cells) were inoculated s.c. into the dorsal flanks of BALB/c nude mice (female, Nu/Nu, six week old). The mice were purchased from the Animal Centre of Henan University and raised under pathogen-free conditions. The tumour volume was measured for 5 weeks. All mice were killed, s.c. tumours were resected, and tumour weights were recorded.
Mouse tumour tissues were embedded into paraffin sections, treated for 2 h at 65°C and then deparaffinised. Before applying the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, we carried out the antigen retrieval step. The slides were incubated with a secondary antibody for 2 h at 25°C and then conjugated to HRP (1:100; Zhongshanjinqiao, China). Liquid DAB+ Substrate (zsgb-bio, China) was used to detect HRP activity.
The full length of the 3′UTRs of 6 human genes, including KRAS, MAPK1, ACVR2A, TPD52L2, NOVA1, MAF, who have complementary sequences in their 3′UTR predicting by Targetscan on line software, were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pMIR-REPORTTM Luciferase Reporter Vector (Ambion, USA). Mutations of the predicted seed regions in the mRNA sequences were created using primers including the mutated sites. HEK-293T cells were transfected with pRL-TK luciferase reporters (50 ng/well, 24-well plates, 1 × 105 cells per well), pGL-3firefly luciferase (10 ng/well), and mimic-217 (50 nmol/L, GenePharma, China) or scramble (50 nmol/L) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA). Luciferase activities were measured according to the manuscript of the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega, USA).
Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to 0.45 μm PVDF membranes (Amersham, UK). The membranes were incubated with 5% non-fat dried milk overnight at 4°C and with anti-KRAS antibody (CST, USA) at 1:1000 dilution for 2h at room temperature, anti-Bad/p/Bad antibody (Bio-world, USA) at 1:500 dilution, anti-AKT/p-AKT antibody (CST, USA) at 1:1000 dilution and anti-GAPDH antibody (Proteintech, USA) at 1:30,000 dilution. After washing twice with TBST, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit antibody (zsgb-bio, China) at 1:5000 and 1:50000 dilutions for 2 h.
Each of the experiments was at least performed triplicate. Student’s
The expression of miR-217 in 100 patients (56 males/44 females, mean age of 53 years) was detected by RT-PCR. The expression of miR-217 was down-regulated in 77 (77%) of the 100 lung cancer samples compared with adjacent tissues when the cut off was set to 1.5 (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, miR-217 was up-regulated in 23 (23%) of the 100 lung cancer samples. In general, miR-217 expression was frequently down-regulated in lung cancer tissues. The difference in miR-217 expression was significant between lung cancer tissues and adjacent tissues (p = 0.00079, Fig. 1B).
The results of CCK8 growth assays at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after miR-217 and scramble transfection are shown in Figs. 2A and 2B. Compared with scramble transfection, miR-217 transfection significantly reduced the proliferation of A549 and A549 and SPC-A-1 cells. We investigated the effect of miR-217 on the apoptosis of A549 and SPC-A-1 cells after miR-217 transfection. Scramble transfection induced the early apoptosis of 22.9% SPC-A-1 cells and 20.8% A549 cells; meanwhile, miR-217 transfection induced the early apoptosis of 27.7% SPC-A-1 cells and 28.4% A549 cells (Figs. 2C and 2D). These results indicate that miR-217 can suppress lung cancer cell survival by inducing early apoptosis.
To further verify these findings, an
We further studied the effects of miR-217 on cell migration and invasion using a wound healing/scratch assay in SPC-A-1 and A549 cells with or without miR-217 mimic transfection. Results showed that both SPC-A-1 and A549 cell lines with miR-217 overexpression showed less migration ability than the scramble and untreated groups at 24 and 36 h after wound creation (Fig. 4A).
We also detected the invasion abilities of lung cancer cells after miR-217 overexpression in SPC-A-1 and A549 cells. The cells with miR-217 overexpression showed significantly lower invasiveness than the scramble or untreated groups (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that miR-217 regulates lung cancer cell migration and invasiveness. Therefore, the down-regulation of miR-217 may strengthen tumour metastasis in lung carcinogenesis.
As predicted by Targetscan, complementarity can be found between has-miR-217 and KRAS 3′-UTR (Fig. 5A). To test whether or not KRAS is a target of miR-217, the plasmid pMIR-reportor containing the wild-type 3′-UTR region of KRAS downstream of the luciferase coding region (Fig. 5A, KRAS_WT) was constructed. HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with reporter plasmid (KRAS_WT) and scramble. Luciferase activity was markedly reduced by approximately 58% in the miR-217-overexpressing cells. The same assay was performed for another reporter plasmid containing mutated KRAS 3′-UTR in miR-217 binding sites. As expected, the miR-217-induced inhibition of luciferase activity was partly removed with binding site 1 orbinding site 2 mutant and almost abolished in the KRAS_MUT double mutant (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that the conserved region regulates the functions of miR-217.
We tested five other potential target genes using the same methods. The results of luciferase miRNA target reporter assay showed that the five potential target genes were not the target ofmiR-217 (
SPC-A-1 and A549 cells were transfected with miR-217 to further investigate the interaction between miR-217 and KRAS. Western blot was conducted to measure the level of KRAS protein. The protein expression of KRAS was down-regulated in the miR-217-treated SPC-A-1 and A549 cells but not in the scramble or untreated cells (Fig. 5D). The mRNA expression of KRAS was determined by real-time PCR. No significant difference was observed between miR-217-treated and scramble-treated or untreated SPC-A-1 and A549 cells (Fig. 5C). These results suggest-that miR-217 directly recognises the 3′-UTR of KRAS mRNA and inhibits KRAS translation. Thus, miR-217 down-regulation in lung cancer inhibits KRAS suppression, which consequently decelerates tumourigenesis. Interestingly, the phosphorylation levels of Akt and Bad were similarly altered to the expression level of KRAS (Fig. 5E).
Previous research demonstrated that miRNAdysregulation is related to the chemoresistance of cancers, including lung cancer (Bian et al., 2011; Giovannetti et al., 2010). However, to the best of our knowledge, the relationship between miR-217 expression and lung cancer sensitivity has yet to be explored. Therefore, we treated scramble- or miR-217-transfected SPC-A-1 and A549 cells with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 μg/ml of cisplatin for 12 h. The results of CCK8 assay indicated that miR-217 up-regulation significantly decreased the cell viability of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells in response to cisplatin in a dose-dependent manner (Figs. 6A and 6C). Moreover, cisplatin up-regulated miR-217 in the two cell lines. The expression level of miR-217 increased with cisplatin in a dose-and time-dependent manner (Figs. 6B and 6D). To confirm this effect, we evaluated the mRNA and proteinexpression levels of KRAS. As expected, the mRNA and protein levels of KRAS significantly reduced, coinciding with miR-217 expression (Figs. 6E and 6F). We silenced miR-217 using antagomiR to investigate the effect of miR-217 on the sensitivity oflung cancer cell lines SPC-A-1 and A549 to cisplastin. Compared with miR-217 mimic, antagomiR-217 caused cisplatin torrent in both SPC-A-1 and A549 cells (Figs. 6G and 6H). This result demonstrates that miR-217 can enhance the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin.
MiRNAs as regulators play important roles in tumourigenesis (Deng et al., 2008; Pasquinelli, 2012). MiRNAs exhibit differential expression modes in cancers and function as tumour suppressor genes or oncogenes by targeting specific target genes (Zhang, 2007). Generally, miRNAs that function as tumour suppressors are expressed at relatively low levels, whereas oncogenic miRNAs exhibit relatively high expression levels in tumours. Therefore, miRNAs may serve as new biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in the future (Esteller, 2011).
MiR-217 is a special miRNA that can function as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene depending on cell type. For example, miR-217 targets the oncogene SirT1 or KRAS in endothelial cells and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (Menghini et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010) but targets the tumour suppressor gene PTEN in kidney cells (Kato et al., 2009).
Cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug. MiRNAdysregulation can alter cisplatinchemoresistance in cancer cells (Sorrentino et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010). MicroRNA-451 can increase the cisplatin sensitivity of lung cancer cells (Bian et al., 2011).
The present study provided insights into the association of miR-217 expression with cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer. We evaluated miR-217 expression in lung cancer patients. Results showed that 77% of lung cancer clinical samples showed significantly lower miR-217 expression than adjacent normal tissues (p = 0.00079). This result suggests that miR-217 may function as a tumour suppressor.
This study is the first to report that miR-217 overexpression can reduce cisplatin cell resistance in lung cancer cell lines. Therefore, combining cisplatin with miR-217 regulation may serve as a potential approach for lung cancer therapy. High cisplatin doses can cause toxic effects, such as nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. The results of this study showed that the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin significantly increased. Therefore, we speculate that using cisplatin in combination with miR-217 as a potential approach for lung cancer therapy may achieve low-dose cisplatin application and reduce cisplatin toxic effects.
No significant changes in KRAS mRNA level were observed (Fig. 5C). This result indicates that miR-217 may function as a post-transcriptional regulation factor of KRAS. However, the cisplatin-induced up-regulation of miR-217 significantly changed the mRNA level of KRAS. This result indicates that cisplatin targets other genes aside from miR-217 and influences KRAS mRNA. These data reflect the complexity of biological control. However, we failed to find the key regulator in this process. Thus, this phenomenon warrants further investigations.
In conclusion, miR-217 is frequently down-regulated in lung cancer and acts as a tumour suppressor in lung cancer cells by targeting KRAS. MiR-217 up-regulation enhances the sensitivity of SPC-A-1 and A549 cells to cisplatin. These results provided insights into the functions of miR-217 in cisplatinchemoresistance and the rational development of new targeted combinations against lung cancer.
Xian Zhang, Qinggong Guo, Jingtao Chen, and Zhaohui Chen
Mol. Cells 2015; 38(7): 638-642 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0037Xiangyu Hou, Xupeng Bai, Xiaoli Gou, Hang Zeng, Chen Xia, Wei Zhuang, Xinmeng Chen, Zhongxiang Zhao, Min Huang, and Jing Jin
Mol. Cells 2015; 38(5): 396-401 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2183Minji Lee, Yeonhwa Song, Inhee Choi, Su-Yeon Lee, Sanghwa Kim, Se-Hyuk Kim, Jiho Kim, and Haeng Ran Seo
Mol. Cells 2021; 44(1): 50-62 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.0212