Mol. Cells 2012; 34(5): 463-471
Published online October 31, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0213-0
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: mckim@gnu.ac.kr
Nitric oxide (NO) is known for its role in the activation of plant defense responses. To examine the involvement and mode of action of NO in plant defense responses, we introduced calmodulin-dependent mammalian neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), which controls the CaMV35S promoter, into wild-type and NahG tobacco plants. Constitutive expression of nNOS led to NO production and triggered spontaneous induction of leaf lesions. Transgenic plants accumulated high amounts of H2O2, with catalase activity lower than that in the wild type. nNOS transgenic plants contained high levels of salicylic acid (SA), and they induced an array of SA-, jasmonic acid (JA)-, and/or ethylene (ET)-related genes. Consequently, NahG co-expres-sion blocked the induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR)-associated genes in transgenic plants, implying SA is involved in NO-mediated induction of SAR genes. The transgenic plants exhibited enhanced resistance to a spectrum of pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Our results suggest a highly ranked regulatory role for NO in SA-, JA-, and/or ET-dependent pathways that lead to disease resistance.
Keywords nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), plant defense signaling, reactive oxygen species, salicylic acid
Mol. Cells 2012; 34(5): 463-471
Published online November 30, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0213-0
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Hyun Jin Chun1,4, Hyeong Cheol Park1,4, Sung Cheol Koo2, Ju Huck Lee1, Chan Young Park1, Man Soo Choi2, Chang Ho Kang1, Dongwon Baek1, Yong Hwa Cheong3, Dae-Jin Yun1, Woo Sik Chung1, Moo Je Cho1, and Min Chul Kim1,*
1Division of Applied Life Science (Brain Korea 21 Program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea, 2National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Suwon 441-857, Korea, 3Department of Bio-Environmental Science, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 550-742, Korea, 4These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: mckim@gnu.ac.kr
Nitric oxide (NO) is known for its role in the activation of plant defense responses. To examine the involvement and mode of action of NO in plant defense responses, we introduced calmodulin-dependent mammalian neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), which controls the CaMV35S promoter, into wild-type and NahG tobacco plants. Constitutive expression of nNOS led to NO production and triggered spontaneous induction of leaf lesions. Transgenic plants accumulated high amounts of H2O2, with catalase activity lower than that in the wild type. nNOS transgenic plants contained high levels of salicylic acid (SA), and they induced an array of SA-, jasmonic acid (JA)-, and/or ethylene (ET)-related genes. Consequently, NahG co-expres-sion blocked the induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR)-associated genes in transgenic plants, implying SA is involved in NO-mediated induction of SAR genes. The transgenic plants exhibited enhanced resistance to a spectrum of pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Our results suggest a highly ranked regulatory role for NO in SA-, JA-, and/or ET-dependent pathways that lead to disease resistance.
Keywords: nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), plant defense signaling, reactive oxygen species, salicylic acid
Jinsu Lee, Minsoo Han, Yesol Shin, Jung-Min Lee, Geon Heo, and Yuree Lee
Mol. Cells 2023; 46(6): 329-336 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2158Hyo-Ji Lee, Wan-Gi Hong, Yunseo Woo, Jae-Hee Ahn, Hyun-Jeong Ko, Hyeran Kim, Sungjin Moon, Tae-Wook Hahn, Young Mee Jung, Dong-Keun Song, and Yu-Jin Jung
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(12): 989-1001 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.0030Mi-Jeong Kim, Woo-Gyun Choi, Kyung-Ju Ahn, In Gyeong Chae, Rina Yu, and Sung Hoon Back
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(3): 264-275 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.2197