Mol. Cells 2012; 33(4): 393-399
Published online March 21, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0008-3
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: eycii@snu.ac.kr
TCR of CD8 T cells recognizes peptides of 8-9 amino acids in length (epitope) complexed with MHC class I. Peptide ligands differing from an epitope by one or two amino acids are thought to modulate the immune response specific to that epitope. H60 is a minor histocompatibility antigen for which the specific CD8 T-cell response dominates during alloresponse after MHC-matched allogeneic transplantation. In the present study, we developed a transgenic mouse (designated H60H Tg) expressing a variant of H60, designated H60H, in which the arginine residue at position 4 of the H60 epitope sequence (LTFNYRNL) is replaced by a histidine residue (LTFHYRNL). Immunization of female C57BL/6 mice with splenocytes from male H60H Tg induced a CD8 T cell primary response and memory respon-se after re-challenge. The response was CD4 help-depen-dent, demonstrating the potency of H60H as a cellular antigen. The response induced by the H60H cellular antigen was comparable to that induced by H60 in its peak magnitude and overall immune kinetics. H60H challenge recruited broadly diverse TCRs to the specific response, shaping a TCR repertoire different from that of the natural H60 epitope. However, some of the TCRs did overlap between the H60H- and H60-specific CD8 T cells, suggesting that H60H might modulate the H60-specific response. These results may provide a basis for the modulation of the H60-specific CD8 T-cell response.
Keywords CD8 epitope, immune response, single amino acid variation, TCR repertoire
Mol. Cells 2012; 33(4): 393-399
Published online April 30, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0008-3
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Su Jeong Ryu, Ji Yeong Jeon, Jun Chang1, Thomas J. Sproule2, Derry C. Roopenian2, and Eun Young Choi*
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea, 1Division of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea, 2The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: eycii@snu.ac.kr
TCR of CD8 T cells recognizes peptides of 8-9 amino acids in length (epitope) complexed with MHC class I. Peptide ligands differing from an epitope by one or two amino acids are thought to modulate the immune response specific to that epitope. H60 is a minor histocompatibility antigen for which the specific CD8 T-cell response dominates during alloresponse after MHC-matched allogeneic transplantation. In the present study, we developed a transgenic mouse (designated H60H Tg) expressing a variant of H60, designated H60H, in which the arginine residue at position 4 of the H60 epitope sequence (LTFNYRNL) is replaced by a histidine residue (LTFHYRNL). Immunization of female C57BL/6 mice with splenocytes from male H60H Tg induced a CD8 T cell primary response and memory respon-se after re-challenge. The response was CD4 help-depen-dent, demonstrating the potency of H60H as a cellular antigen. The response induced by the H60H cellular antigen was comparable to that induced by H60 in its peak magnitude and overall immune kinetics. H60H challenge recruited broadly diverse TCRs to the specific response, shaping a TCR repertoire different from that of the natural H60 epitope. However, some of the TCRs did overlap between the H60H- and H60-specific CD8 T cells, suggesting that H60H might modulate the H60-specific response. These results may provide a basis for the modulation of the H60-specific CD8 T-cell response.
Keywords: CD8 epitope, immune response, single amino acid variation, TCR repertoire
Ji-Eun You, Se-Hwa Jung, and Pyung-Hwan Kim
Mol. Cells 2021; 44(4): 195-206 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0020Jae-Seon So
Mol. Cells 2018; 41(8): 705-716 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.0241Xinguang Han, Yongfu Han, Huifeng Jiao, and Yaqiong Jie
Mol. Cells 2015; 38(2): 112-121 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2101