Mol. Cells 2010; 30(6): 497-506
Published online November 26, 2010
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-010-0159-z
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: jurgen.roth@yonsei.ac.kr
Quality control of protein folding represents a funda-mental cellular activity. Early steps of protein N-glycosylation involving the removal of three glucose and some specific mannose residues in the endoplasmic reticulum have been recognized as being of importance for protein quality control. Specific oligosaccharide structures resulting from the oligosaccharide processing may represent a glycocode promoting productive protein folding, whereas others may represent glyco-codes for routing not correctly folded proteins for dislocation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol and subsequent degradation. Although quality control of protein folding is essential for the proper functioning of cells, it is also the basis for protein folding disorders since the recognition and elimination of non-native conformers can result either in loss-of-function or pathological-gain-of-function. The machinery for protein folding control represents a prime example of an intricate interactome present in a single organelle, the endoplasmic reticulum. Here, current views of mechanisms for the recognition and retention leading to productive protein folding or the eventual elimination of misfolded glycoproteins in yeast and mammalian cells are reviewed.
Keywords electron microscopy, endoplasmic reticulum, N-glycosylation, protein folding, protein quality control
Mol. Cells 2010; 30(6): 497-506
Published online December 31, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-010-0159-z
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
J?rgen Roth*, Christian Zuber1, Sujin Park, Insook Jang, Yangsin Lee, Katarina Gaplovska Kysela1,2, Val?rie Le Fourn1,3, Roger Santimaria1, Bruno Guhl1,4, and Jin Won Cho
Department of Integrated OMICs for Biomedical Sciences, WCU Program of Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea, 1Division of Cell and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland, 2Present address: Department of Genetics, Comenius University, SK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia, 3Present address: Selexis SA, CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates/Geneva, Switzerland, 4Present address: Center for Microscopy and Image Analysis, University of Zurich-Irchel, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: jurgen.roth@yonsei.ac.kr
Quality control of protein folding represents a funda-mental cellular activity. Early steps of protein N-glycosylation involving the removal of three glucose and some specific mannose residues in the endoplasmic reticulum have been recognized as being of importance for protein quality control. Specific oligosaccharide structures resulting from the oligosaccharide processing may represent a glycocode promoting productive protein folding, whereas others may represent glyco-codes for routing not correctly folded proteins for dislocation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol and subsequent degradation. Although quality control of protein folding is essential for the proper functioning of cells, it is also the basis for protein folding disorders since the recognition and elimination of non-native conformers can result either in loss-of-function or pathological-gain-of-function. The machinery for protein folding control represents a prime example of an intricate interactome present in a single organelle, the endoplasmic reticulum. Here, current views of mechanisms for the recognition and retention leading to productive protein folding or the eventual elimination of misfolded glycoproteins in yeast and mammalian cells are reviewed.
Keywords: electron microscopy, endoplasmic reticulum, N-glycosylation, protein folding, protein quality control
Eun Ju Cho, Christen Y.L. Yuen, Byung-Ho Kang, Christine A. Ondzighi, L. Andrew Staehelin, and David A. Christopher*
Mol. Cells 2011; 32(5): 459-475 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-0150-3Chang Man Ha, Dong Hee Kim, Tae Hwan Lee, Han Rae Kim, Jungil Choi, Yoonju Kim, Dasol Kang, Jeong Woo Park, Sergio R. Ojeda, Jin Kwon Jeong, and Byung Ju Lee
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(8): 537-549 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.2051Jong-Cheol Rah and Joon Ho Choi
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(2): 84-92 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.2021