TOP
닫기
Search 닫기
Advanced Search Quick links
· Most Cited · Most Read · On-line First · Archives · Go to e-Submission

Minireview

Split Viewer

Mol. Cells 2023; 46(6): 329-336

Published online February 17, 2023

https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2158

© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology

How Extracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Reach Their Intracellular Targets in Plants

Jinsu Lee1 , Minsoo Han2 , Yesol Shin2 , Jung-Min Lee2 , Geon Heo2 , and Yuree Lee2,3,*

Author Info. +

1Research Institute of Basic Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, 2School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, 3Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Correspondence to : yuree.lee@snu.ac.kr

Received: October 18, 2022; Revised: December 6, 2022; Accepted: December 20, 2022

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.

Abstract

Go to

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve as secondary messengers that regulate various developmental and signal transduction processes, with ROS primarily generated by NADPH OXIDASEs (referred to as RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs [RBOHs] in plants). However, the types and locations of ROS produced by RBOHs are different from those expected to mediate intracellular signaling. RBOHs produce O2•− rather than H2O2 which is relatively long-lived and able to diffuse through membranes, and this production occurs outside the cell instead of in the cytoplasm, where signaling cascades occur. A widely accepted model explaining this discrepancy proposes that RBOH-produced extracellular O2•− is converted to H2O2 by superoxide dismutase and then imported by aquaporins to reach its cytoplasmic targets. However, this model does not explain how the specificity of ROS targeting is ensured while minimizing unnecessary damage during the bulk translocation of extracellular ROS (eROS). An increasing number of studies have provided clues about eROS action mechanisms, revealing various mechanisms for eROS perception in the apoplast, crosstalk between eROS and reactive nitrogen species, and the contribution of intracellular organelles to cytoplasmic ROS bursts. In this review, we summarize these recent advances, highlight the mechanisms underlying eROS action, and provide an overview of the routes by which eROS-induced changes reach the intracellular space.

Keywords NADPH oxidase, peroxidase, reactive oxygen species, receptor-like kinase, superoxide dismutase

INTRODUCTION

Go to

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are inevitable by-products of photosynthesis and metabolic processes in plants. In addition, ROS are actively produced and used as signaling molecules in various developmental processes and in biotic and abiotic stress responses (Huang et al., 2019; Mittler et al., 2022; Waszczak et al., 2018). Along with calcium and electrical signals, ROS also form waves that act as systemic signals that are rapidly propagated and trigger stress responses in tissues throughout the plant (Choi et al., 2017; Fichman and Mittler, 2020; Fichman et al., 2019). The most widely investigated mechanism of redox status-mediated signaling involves post-translational modifications of target proteins through the oxidation of methionine to sulfoxide and of cysteine to sulfenic, sulfinic, and sulfonic acids (Petushkova and Zamyatnin, 2020). Since ROS can also cause irreversible oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins, sophisticated spatiotemporal regulatory mechanisms for ROS metabolism are employed to effectively detoxify ROS produced by multiple mechanisms while specifically activating signaling pathways at the appropriate locations and times.

ROS is a collective term for a number of reactive molecules derived from molecular oxygen, including singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radical anion (O2•−), and other oxygen radicals as well as non-radical derivatives of O2 such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). These molecules exhibit diverse spectra of reactivity, half-life, diffusion, and potential to generate additional downstream reactive species (Möller et al., 2019; Murphy et al., 2022). H2O2, which has a relatively long lifetime and low reactivity, is highly soluble in both lipid and aqueous environments, allowing it to freely diffuse through cell membranes to distances of up to several cell diameters before reacting with specific targets (Scheel and Wasternack, 2002). Because of these properties, H2O2 is regarded as the principal ROS used in signaling. Notably, however, NADPH oxidase (also called respiratory burst oxidase homolog [RBOH] in plants), which is the major enzyme that generates ROS for signal transduction in a wide range of cellular processes, generates O2•−, not H2O2, and does so outside the cell rather than inside (Kumar et al., 2007; Torres et al., 2002). These observations suggest that the activities of various antioxidant enzymes are coordinated to fine-tune ROS concentrations as well as the types and distribution of ROS.

O2•− is a precursor to H2O2, but it performs distinct biological functions (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2018; Tsukagoshi et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2017). O2•− itself can be transported across cell membranes, and the channels responsible for this have been identified in animals (Fisher, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007). O2•− and H2O2 show different distribution patterns in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) roots, with O2•− mainly occurring in the meristematic zone of the root tip and H2O2 in the elongation zone; the balance of these two ROS influences the cellular transition from proliferation to differentiation (Dunand et al., 2007; Tsukagoshi et al., 2010; Yamada et al., 2020). Cell type-specific ROS distribution is also essential for stem cell maintenance in shoot apical meristems and for floral organ abscission (Lee et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2017). Thus, growing evidence suggests that the concentrations and types of ROS are finely regulated to mediate various cellular processes. In this review, we take a closer look at these processes to provide insight into how the spatiotemporal balance of ROS is maintained, how the specificity of ROS action is ensured, and how extracellular ROS (eROS) reach their signaling targets inside cells.

ACCUMULATION OF eROS FOR SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION: SYNTHESIS AND DETOXIFICATION

Go to

Since ROS are continuously generated as by-products of metabolic processes, cells have various enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems to detoxify these molecules (Mittler, 2002). Therefore, raising the ROS concentration to a specific threshold required for signal transduction involves both the activation of ROS-generating enzymes and the local inactivation of detoxifying enzymes.

In Arabidopsis, RBOHs are encoded by 10 homologous genes, RBOHA to RBOHJ (Doke, 1985; Mittler et al., 2011). These enzymes function in a wide range of cellular processes such as guard cell movement, root hair growth, senescence, wound healing, and defense responses (Koo et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2009; Torres et al., 2002). The role of RBOH-generated ROS in signaling pathways is conserved in many plants, including rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) (Nestler et al., 2014; Sagi et al., 2004; Yoshie et al., 2005). In addition to RBOHs, peroxidases and polyamine oxidases also contribute to eROS generation (Do et al., 2019; Kaman-Toth et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019), suggesting that ROS levels are regulated via sophisticated multi-layered mechanisms.

The activity of RBOHs is controlled by multiple post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, Ca2+ binding, nitrosylation, persulfidation, and ubiquitination (Chen et al., 2017; Dubiella et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2020; Ogasawara et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2020; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Yun et al., 2011). Phosphorylation by Ca2+-regulated protein kinases and Ca2+ binding to EF-hand motifs are the most ubiquitous mechanisms for regulating RBOH activity (Dubiella et al., 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2007; Ogasawara et al., 2008). The physiological roles of these and other post-translational modifications in the multilayered regulation of RBOH activity are gradually being revealed. For example, during the plant immune response, the central immune kinase BOTRYTIS-INDUCED KINASE 1 (BIK1) phosphorylates RBOHD independently of Ca2+, and yet this process is essential for Ca2+-based regulation of RBOHD (Kadota et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014). This two-step regulatory process ensures the specificity of immune-associated ROS bursts even though Ca2+-based regulation mediates diverse responses. By contrast, serine-threonine protein phosphatases inhibit RBOH activity. The SnRK2-type kinase OPEN STOMATA1 (OST1) is activated by abscisic acid (ABA), leading to the phosphorylation of RBOHF and subsequently stomatal closure. In the absence of ABA, dephosphorylation by PP2CA, a type 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C) family protein, inhibits OST1 activity and RBOHF-mediated stomatal closure (Brandt et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2009; Sirichandra et al., 2009). The activity of RBOHD is also controlled by persulfidation (Shen et al., 2020) during ABA signaling in guard cells. Interestingly, ROS react with this modification to form perthiosulfenic acid, thereby returning RBOHD activity to its basal state, suggesting that ROS generated by RBOH can act as a negative feedback signal to control the duration of RBOH activation.

A widely accepted model posits that the O2•− produced by RBOH is converted to H2O2 by SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD) before migrating into the cytoplasm via aquaporins (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Bienert et al., 2007). While the identity and regulatory mechanisms of extracellular SODs (eSODs) have been well described in animals (Fattman et al., 2003), there is only limited information on eSODs involved in ROS-mediated signaling in plants. An SOD is classified as either Cu Zn SOD (CSD), Mn SOD (MSD) or Fe SOD (FSD), depending on its metal coenzyme(s) (Alscher et al., 2002). Eight genes encode SODs in the Arabidopsis genome: CSD1–3, MSD1 and 2, and FSD1–3 (Chen et al., 2022; Miller, 2012). Among the products encoded by these genes, MSD2 is the only one that is secreted out of the cell (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022). MSD2 shows SOD activity at a broad range of pH levels and is strongly expressed in specific cell types, such as those in the root tips and abscission zones, suggesting that ROS metabolism regulated by MSD2 is linked to specific signaling pathways. Indeed, phenotypic analysis of msd2 mutants revealed that MSD2 regulates root morphogenesis during light-to-dark transitions (Chen et al., 2022) as well as floral organ abscission (Lee et al., 2022), demonstrating its participation in ROS-mediated signaling pathways.

H2O2 is broken down into water and oxygen by catalases (CATs) or peroxidases (PRXs) (Apel and Hirt, 2004). PRXs are divided into three classes: Class I, II, and III. Class III PRXs are secreted into the vacuole and apoplast (Andrews et al., 2002; Takabe et al., 2001) and are involved in various physiological processes, such as cell wall metabolism, seed germination, wound healing, and defense against pathogens (Movahed et al., 2016; Passardi et al., 2004b; Shigeto and Tsutsumi, 2016). PRXs not only break down ROS but also generate H2O2, as is done by PRX33 and PRX34 in response to pathogen attack (Kaman-Toth et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019) and by PRX62 and PRX69 to regulate root hair growth under low-temperature conditions (Pacheco et al., 2022). Since the ROS substrates and products of PRX also play important roles in signal transduction, understanding how these two opposing activities of PRX are regulated is a remaining task. CATs are also involved in maintaining ROS homeostasis. The expression of CAT2 during stomatal development is directly regulated by SPEECHLESS, the master regulator of stomatal development, which regulates cell type-specific ROS patterns (Shi et al., 2022). As extracellular catalase has been reported in animals (Bohm et al., 2015) but not yet in plants, it remains a question whether this action of catalase can also occur extracellularly.

MULTIFACETED ROUTS FOR eROS TO REACH INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING COMPONENTS

Go to

How can eROS reach specific targets inside the cell? The observation that RBOH-generated ROS also accumulate in the cytosol and that H2O2 can pass through the plasma membrane via aquaporins led to the prevailing hypothesis that eROS are directly transported into the cytoplasm (Bienert et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2010). However, this model leaves several unresolved questions: If most eROS flow into the cell, why are they generated extracellularly? How effectively can eROS be transported into the cell? If eROS move from one place to another in large quantities, how can they act on specific targets while minimizing oxidative damage? Several attempts have been made to address these questions surrounding ROS-mediated signaling, with significant progress being made in recent years.

Perception of eROS outside the cell

The apoplast, where the concentrations of antioxidants and ROS are relatively low (Zechmann and Müller, 2010), would be an ideal site to quickly reach the ROS levels required for signal transduction while minimizing damage to surrounding proteins. The advantages of eROS can be maximized when the targets are also extracellular. Indeed, recent studies have demonstrated that receptors capable of recognizing eROS and initiating signal transduction exist outside the cell.

For instance, the plasma membrane contains numerous receptor-like kinases (RLKs) with ectodomains that can detect molecular changes in the apoplast, possibly including eROS (Morillo and Tax, 2006; Wrzaczek et al., 2010). HPCA1 (HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE-INDUCED Ca2+ INCREASES 1), an LRR-RK (leucine rich repeat-receptor kinase), was recently identified as a crucial regulator of eH2O2-induced increases in Ca2+ levels in Arabidopsis (Wu et al., 2020). Cysteine residues in the HPCA1 ectodomain are directly modified by eH2O2, which induces the autophosphorylation and activation of Ca2+ channel proteins, revealing that HPCA1 is an eH2O2 sensor. HPCA1 acts as a key eROS receptor during plant adaptation to various biotic and abiotic stresses, systemic signaling, and cell-to-cell ROS signal propagation (Fichman et al., 2022; Laohavisit et al., 2020).

Ion channels in the plasma membrane could also act as sensors of eROS. The ability of ROS to activate ion conduction in plant membranes has long been known in relation to Cu2+ toxicity in the charophyte alga Nitella flexilis (Demidchik et al., 1997; 2001). Indeed, a variety of ion channels have been shown to be activated by ROS in Arabidopsis, Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia), pea (Pisum sativum), and Lilium longiflorum, including inwardly and outwardly rectifying channels and voltage-independent channels that function in tip growth and plant responses to various stresses (Demidchik, 2018). Garcia-Mata et al. (2010) provided clues about the molecular mechanism underlying ROS-induced activation of the STELAR K+ outward rectifier (SKOR) in Arabidopsis. Using heterologous expression systems in HEK293 cells and Xenopus oocytes, the authors demonstrated that the Cys168 residue in the S3 α-helix within the voltage sensor of the channel of SKOR is essential for its sensitivity to H2O2. The water-filled pocket in which Cys168 is located is large enough to accept H2O2 and is exposed to the external bulk solution upon depolarization, suggesting that this site is a target of eROS. The corresponding Cys residue is also conserved in the GORK (gated outwardly rectifying K+ channel), suggesting that additional channels with ROS-sensing cysteine moieties remain to be discovered.

eROS-mediated cell wall modification

Considering that the ectodomains of membrane proteins can be modified by eROS, the cell wall and cell wall proteins might also be influenced by eROS. Indeed, the effects of ROS on cell wall loosening have been reported (Airianah et al., 2016; Fry, 1998; Müller et al., 2009). ROS, especially hydroxyl radicals (OH•), can cleave cell wall polymers such as xyloglucan and pectin, thereby promoting cell elongation. Conversely, the accumulation of H2O2 causes the cross-linking of cell wall components and restricts elongation, making it difficult to pinpoint the role of eROS in the cell wall.

Cell wall modification by eROS is often mediated by class III PRXs. Class III PRXs are encoded by large multigene families (75 genes in Arabidopsis and 138 genes in rice) (Passardi et al., 2004a; Valerio et al., 2004) and catalyze the oxidation of numerous substrates such as extensins, monolignols, ferulic acids, and suberin using H2O2 as the electron acceptor (Lee et al., 2013; Shigeto and Tsutsumi, 2016). Class III PRX reactions have different effects, depending on the substrate. In vitro experiments with maize coleoptiles showed that H2O2 promotes cell wall stiffening and that this effect is maintained during indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)- and acid-mediated growth (Schopfer, 1996). The wall-stiffening reaction in maize coleoptiles triggered by H2O2 is mediated by PRX, which induces phenolic cross-linking in the cell wall. Potential phenolic substrates for PRX-catalyzed oxidative cross-linking include lignin precursors, tyrosine residues of certain glycoproteins, and ester-linked hydroxycinnamic-acid residues of pectic or hemicellulosic polysaccharides (Francoz et al., 2015; Passardi et al., 2004b).

Changes in the cell wall can be perceived by plasma membrane-localized RLKs and mechanosensitive ion channels, which initiate intracellular signaling cascades (Basu and Haswell, 2020; Radin et al., 2021; Vaahtera et al., 2019). THESEUS1/FERONIA family RLKs in Arabidopsis can potentially sense changes in cell wall integrity to modulate downstream cell signaling pathways (Bacete et al., 2022; Feng et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2022). Depending on the concentration and longevity of eROS, their effects on cell wall integrity are highly variable. How sensitive the cell wall is to eROS, to what extent cell wall integrity receptors detect changes in the cell wall, and how specificity can be ensured during various interactions with eROS remain to be determined.

Crosstalk between eROS and nitric oxide signaling

Reactive nitrogen species (RNS), along with ROS, act as important signaling molecules in plants and regulate a variety of processes including development, growth, and responses to abiotic and biotic stress (Domingos et al., 2015; Turkan, 2017). RNS induce post-translational modifications, such as S-nitrosylation and tyrosine nitration, causing conformational changes that affect the activity and localization of target proteins.

Nitric oxide (NO•), a highly reactive small gaseous molecule, modulates the expression of several genes involved in hormonal signaling, primary metabolism, and stress responses (Palmieri et al., 2008; Safavi-Rizi et al., 2020). In addition to cytosolic NO•, various physiological functions of apoplastic NO• have been reported (Besson-Bard et al., 2008; Bethke et al., 2004; StoÈhr and Ullrich, 2002). The root-specific membrane-bound nitrite reductase (Ni:NOR) and NR (nitrate reductase) are thought to be responsible for apoplastic RNS generation, which is important for root growth, symbiotic interactions, and drought tolerance (Silveira et al., 2017; Stöhr and Stremlau, 2006).

The bioavailability and action of NO• are modulated by its reaction with O2•− to generate a more reactive peroxide, peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which possesses characteristics of both O2•− reactivity and NO• mobility and functions as a signaling molecule. SOD3, an eSOD in animal cells, is thought to regulate ONOO− availability by controlling NO•/O2•− reactions, which in turn stabilizes the transcription factor HIF-2α to improve tumor-responsive gene expression (Carmona-Rodríguez et al., 2020; Mira et al., 2018). eSOD and RNS were recently shown to interact in floral organs of Arabidopsis during abscission. ONOO− promotes abscission by regulating the expression levels of major signaling components, and MSD2, an eSOD, is involved in this regulation (Lee et al., 2022). Interacting with NO• could represent a major role for O2•− distinct from that of H2O2 in plants, and eSOD could regulate the balance between ROS and RNS.

Coordination with organellar ROS generation

Cytosolic ROS bursts are observed under various biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Although eROS produced by RBOH are considered to be the direct sources of cytoplasmic ROS bursts, it is difficult to prove how many eROS are actually imported into the cell. It cannot be discounted that intracellular organelles such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, and peroxisomes, where large amounts of ROS are produced, contribute to the generation of cytosolic ROS (Del Río and López-Huertas, 2016; Mubarakshina et al., 2010; Zorov et al., 2006).

Intracellular ROS accumulation is important for ABA-induced stomatal closure, which is mediated by RBOHD and RBOHF (Kwak et al., 2003). Contrary to the long-standing model of eROS transport, recent reports have focused on ROS released from the chloroplast (Iwai et al., 2019). Indeed, ABA-induced ROS are first observed in chloroplasts, and cytosolic ROS bursts can be eliminated by inhibiting photosynthetic electron transport (PET). These observations suggest that PET-mediated ROS contribute to ROS bursts that influence ABA‐induced stomatal closure. A similar contribution of chloroplastic ROS has been reported to regulate the hypersensitive response in tobacco (Liu et al., 2007). Thus, intracellular organelles may commonly contribute to ROS signaling.

PERSPECTIVES

Go to

Accumulating evidence points to the involvement of ROS in various signaling and developmental processes, but our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying ROS generation, conversion, and degradation as well as the roles of these molecules as messengers is fragmentary. In this review, we provided a perspective on the various routes of eROS-mediated signaling by examining the factors directly affected by eROS (Fig. 1). Increasing evidence indicates that signal transduction involves not only the production of eROS but also the regulation of eROS metabolism via various detoxifying enzymes. In addition, various targets of eROS exist extracellularly, where the signal can be indirectly transduced into the cell. The next questions to answer include how the localization and activity of extracellular ROS metabolic enzymes are regulated and how they coordinate with each other to maintain the required ROS level and type. It is also conceivable that ROS generation, turnover, and post-translational modifications of targets may occur within specific compartments. Because such associations outside the cell may not be strong or direct, proximity labeling methods will be useful for revealing the spatial organization of enzyme-target interactions. Given the wide scope of ROS reactions, it would not be possible to ensure target specificity through random diffusion or transport. Understanding the sophisticated spatial control mechanisms for the entire process, from ROS generation to degradation and delivery to the target, represents the next important issue to address.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Go to

This work was funded by the Suh Kyungbae Foundation (SUHF-19010003) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1A5A1032428). J.L. was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1I1A1A01068615), and J.-M.L. was supported by the Stadelmann-Lee Scholarship Fund at Seoul National University, Korea.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Go to

Y.L. and J.L. conceived of the study and all authors participated in writing the manuscript. J.L. and M.H. drafted ‘multifaceted routs for eROS to reach intracellular signaling components’ sections, Y.S., J.-M.L., and G.H. drafted ‘accumulation of eROS for signal transduction’ section and M.H. and J.L. designed a draft of the figure 1 diagram. J.L. organized each section into one draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

FIGURES

Go to
Fig. 1. A diagram showing the multifaceted roles of extracellular reactive oxygen species (eROS). (1) Superoxide (O2•−) produced by RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs (RBOHs) is converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and migrates to the cytoplasm via aquaporins (AQPs). (2) In Arabidopsis, MSD2, an apoplastic SOD, functions in root skotomorphogenesis and floral organ abscission (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022). H2O2 is broken down into water and oxygen by catalases (CATs) or peroxidases (PRXs). Extracellular CATs remain to be discovered. (3) Chloride Channel-3 (CLC-3) is responsible for O2•− transport in animal cells (Fisher, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007). O2•− transporters in plants remain to be discovered. (4) eROS directly affect the activities of receptor like kinases (RLKs) such as HPCA1 or membrane-localized channels such as SKOR to initiate signal transduction cascades in the cytosol. (5) eROS can directly or indirectly affect cell wall organization, which is sensed by THESEUS1 (THE1)/FERONIA (FER) family RLKs. (6) O2•− interacts with nitric oxide (NO•); this interaction not only affects the bioavailability and action of NO•, but it also generates the more reactive peroxide peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which functions as a signaling molecule through the post-translational modification of proteins via tyrosine nitration (Pacher et al., 2007). (7) Organellar ROS could contribute to RBOH-dependent cytosolic ROS bursts. Chloroplast-derived ROS contribute to ROS bursts that lead to ABA‐induced stomatal closure (Iwai et al., 2019). The transport of ROS through the stromule restricts ROS accumulation to a localized region, achieving target specificity while minimizing unnecessary oxidative damage (7-1). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–mitochondria–peroxisome redox triangle model proposed in animals (Yoboue et al., 2018) might also be applicable to plants (7-2). Solid-lined arrows represent mechanisms previously examined in the literature. Dashed arrows indicate potential mediating pathways.

REFERENCES

Go to
  1. Airianah O.B., Vreeburg R.A., and Fry S.C. (2016). Pectic polysaccharides are attacked by hydroxyl radicals in ripening fruit: evidence from a fluorescent fingerprinting method. Ann. Bot. 117, 441-455.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Alscher R.G., Erturk N., and Heath L.S. (2002). Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1331-1341.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Andrews J., Adams S., Burton K., and Edmondson R. (2002). Partial purification of tomato fruit peroxidase and its effect on the mechanical properties of tomato fruit skin. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2393-2399.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Apel K. and Hirt H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 373-399.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Bacete L., Schulz J., Engelsdorf T., Bartosova Z., Vaahtera L., Yan G., Gerhold J.M., Tichá T., Øvstebø C., and Gigli-Bisceglia N., et al. (2022). THESEUS1 modulates cell wall stiffness and abscisic acid production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2119258119.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Basu D. and Haswell E.S. (2020). The mechanosensitive ion channel MSL10 potentiates responses to cell swelling in Arabidopsis seedlings. Curr. Biol. 30, 2716-2728.e6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Besson-Bard A., Griveau S., Bedioui F., and Wendehenne D. (2008). Real-time electrochemical detection of extracellular nitric oxide in tobacco cells exposed to cryptogein, an elicitor of defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3407-3414.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Bethke P.C., Badger M.R., and Jones R.L. (2004). Apoplastic synthesis of nitric oxide by plant tissues. Plant Cell 16, 332-341.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Bienert G.P., Møller A.L., Kristiansen K.A., Schulz A., Møller I.M., Schjoerring J.K., and Jahn T.P. (2007). Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1183-1192.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Bohm B., Heinzelmann S., Motz M., and Bauer G. (2015). Extracellular localization of catalase is associated with the transformed state of malignant cells. Biol. Chem. 396, 1339-1356.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Brandt B., Brodsky D.E., Xue S., Negi J., Iba K., Kangasjarvi J., Ghassemian M., Stephan A.B., Hu H., and Schroeder J.I. (2012). Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 10593-10598.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Carmona-Rodríguez L., Martínez-Rey D., Mira E., and Mañes S. (2020). SOD3 boosts T cell infiltration by normalizing the tumor endothelium and inducing laminin-α4. Oncoimmunology 9, 1794163.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Chen D., Cao Y., Li H., Kim D., Ahsan N., Thelen J., and Stacey G. (2017). Extracellular ATP elicits DORN1-mediated RBOHD phosphorylation to regulate stomatal aperture. Nat. Commun. 8, 2265.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Chen H., Lee J., Lee J.M., Han M., Emonet A., Lee J., Jia X., and Lee Y. (2022). MSD2, an apoplastic Mn-SOD, contributes to root skotomorphogenic growth by modulating ROS distribution in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 317, 111192.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Choi W.G., Miller G., Wallace I., Harper J., Mittler R., and Gilroy S. (2017). Orchestrating rapid long-distance signaling in plants with Ca(2+), ROS and electrical signals. Plant J. 90, 698-707.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Del Río L.A. and López-Huertas E. (2016). ROS generation in peroxisomes and its role in cell signaling. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 1364-1376.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Demidchik V. (2018). ROS-activated ion channels in plants: biophysical characteristics, physiological functions and molecular nature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1263.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Demidchik V., Sokolik A., and Yurin V. (1997). The effect of Cu2+ on ion transport systems of the plant cell plasmalemma. Plant Physiol. 114, 1313-1325.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Demidchik V., Sokolik A., and Yurin V. (2001). Characteristics of non-specific permeability and H+-ATPase inhibition induced in the plasma membrane of Nitella flexilis by excessive Cu2+. Planta 212, 583-590.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Do T.H.T., Choi H., Palmgren M., Martinoia E., Hwang J.U., and Lee Y. (2019). Arabidopsis ABCG28 is required for the apical accumulation of reactive oxygen species in growing pollen tubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 12540-12549.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Doke N. (1985). NADPH-dependent O2− generation in membrane fractions isolated from wounded potato tubers inoculated with Phytophthora infestans. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 27, 311-322.
    CrossRef
  22. Domingos P., Prado A.M., Wong A., Gehring C., and Feijo J.A. (2015). Nitric oxide: a multitasked signaling gas in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 506-520.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Dubiella U., Seybold H., Durian G., Komander E., Lassig R., Witte C.P., Schulze W.X., and Romeis T. (2013). Calcium-dependent protein kinase/NADPH oxidase activation circuit is required for rapid defense signal propagation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 8744-8749.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Dunand C., Crèvecoeur M., and Penel C. (2007). Distribution of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis root and their influence on root development: possible interaction with peroxidases. New Phytol. 174, 332-341.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Fattman C.L., Schaefer L.M., and Oury T.D. (2003). Extracellular superoxide dismutase in biology and medicine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 35, 236-256.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Feng W., Kita D., Peaucelle A., Cartwright H.N., Doan V., Duan Q., Liu M.C., Maman J., Steinhorst L., and Schmitz-Thom I., et al. (2018). The FERONIA receptor kinase maintains cell-wall integrity during salt stress through Ca(2+) signaling. Curr. Biol. 28, 666-675.e5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Fichman Y., Miller G., and Mittler R. (2019). Whole-plant live imaging of reactive oxygen species. Mol. Plant 12, 1203-1210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Fichman Y. and Mittler R. (2020). Rapid systemic signaling during abiotic and biotic stresses: is the ROS wave master of all trades? Plant J. 102, 887-896.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Fichman Y., Zandalinas S.I., Peck S., Luan S., and Mittler R. (2022). HPCA1 is required for systemic reactive oxygen species and calcium cell-to-cell signaling and plant acclimation to stress. Plant Cell 34, 4453-4471.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Fisher A.B. (2009). Redox signaling across cell membranes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 1349-1356.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Francoz E., Ranocha P., Nguyen-Kim H., Jamet E., Burlat V., and Dunand C. (2015). Roles of cell wall peroxidases in plant development. Phytochemistry 112, 15-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Fry S.C. (1998). Oxidative scission of plant cell wall polysaccharides by ascorbate-induced hydroxyl radicals. Biochem. J. 332(Pt 2), 507-515.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Garcia-Mata C., Wang J., Gajdanowicz P., Gonzalez W., Hills A., Donald N., Riedelsberger J., Amtmann A., Dreyer I., and Blatt M.R. (2010). A minimal cysteine motif required to activate the SKOR K+ channel of Arabidopsis by the reactive oxygen species H2O2*[S]. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 29286-29294.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Hawkins B.J., Madesh M., Kirkpatrick C., and Fisher A.B. (2007). Superoxide flux in endothelial cells via the chloride channel-3 mediates intracellular signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2002-2012.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Huang H., Ullah F., Zhou D.X., Yi M., and Zhao Y. (2019). Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 800.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Iwai S., Ogata S., Yamada N., Onjo M., Sonoike K., and Shimazaki K. (2019). Guard cell photosynthesis is crucial in abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure. Plant Direct 3, e00137.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Kadota Y., Sklenar J., Derbyshire P., Stransfeld L., Asai S., Ntoukakis V., Jones J.D., Shirasu K., Menke F., and Jones A., et al. (2014). Direct regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD by the PRR-associated kinase BIK1 during plant immunity. Mol. Cell 54, 43-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Kaman-Toth E., Danko T., Gullner G., Bozso Z., Palkovics L., and Pogany M. (2019). Contribution of cell wall peroxidase- and NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species to Alternaria brassicicola-induced oxidative burst in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 485-499.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Kobayashi M., Ohura I., Kawakita K., Yokota N., Fujiwara M., Shimamoto K., Doke N., and Yoshioka H. (2007). Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. Plant Cell 19, 1065-1080.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Koo J.C., Lee I.C., Dai C., Lee Y., Cho H.K., Kim Y., Phee B.K., Kim H., Lee I.H., and Choi S.H., et al. (2017). The protein trio RPK1-CaM4-RbohF mediates transient superoxide production to trigger age-dependent cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 21, 3373-3380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Kumar G., Iyer S., and Knowles N.R. (2007). Strboh A homologue of NADPH oxidase regulates wound-induced oxidative burst and facilitates wound-healing in potato tubers. Planta 227, 25-36.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Kwak J.M., Mori I.C., Pei Z.M., Leonhardt N., Torres M.A., Dangl J.L., Bloom R.E., Bodde S., Jones J.D., and Schroeder J.I. (2003). NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 22, 2623-2633.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Laohavisit A., Wakatake T., Ishihama N., Mulvey H., Takizawa K., Suzuki T., and Shirasu K. (2020). Quinone perception in plants via leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases. Nature 587, 92-97.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Lee D., Lal N.K., Lin Z.D., Ma S., Liu J., Castro B., Toruno T., Dinesh-Kumar S.P., and Coaker G. (2020). Regulation of reactive oxygen species during plant immunity through phosphorylation and ubiquitination of RBOHD. Nat. Commun. 11, 1838.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Lee J., Chen H., Lee G., Emonet A., Kim S.G., Shim D., and Lee Y. (2022). MSD2‐mediated ROS metabolism fine‐tunes the timing of floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 235, 2466-2480.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Lee S.C., Lan W., Buchanan B.B., and Luan S. (2009). A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 21419-21424.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Lee Y., Rubio M.C., Alassimone J., and Geldner N. (2013). A mechanism for localized lignin deposition in the endodermis. Cell 153, 402-412.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Lee Y., Yoon T.H., Lee J., Jeon S.Y., Lee J.H., Lee M.K., Chen H., Yun J., Oh S.Y., and Wen X. (2018). A lignin molecular brace controls precision processing of cell walls critical for surface integrity in Arabidopsis. Cell 173, 1468-1480.e9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Li L., Li M., Yu L., Zhou Z., Liang X., Liu Z., Cai G., Gao L., Zhang X., and Wang Y., et al. (2014). The FLS2-associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 15, 329-338.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Lin W., Tang W., Pan X., Huang A., Gao X., Anderson C.T., and Yang Z. (2022). Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis requires FERONIA binding to pectin for activation of ROP GTPase signaling. Curr. Biol. 32, 497-507.e4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Liu Y., Ren D., Pike S., Pallardy S., Gassmann W., and Zhang S. (2007). Chloroplast‐generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response‐like cell death mediated by a mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascade. Plant J. 51, 941-954.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Miller A.F. (2012). Superoxide dismutases: ancient enzymes and new insights. FEBS Lett. 586, 585-595.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Miller E.W., Dickinson B.C., and Chang C.J. (2010). Aquaporin-3 mediates hydrogen peroxide uptake to regulate downstream intracellular signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 15681-15686.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Miller G., Schlauch K., Tam R., Cortes D., Torres M.A., Shulaev V., Dangl J.L., and Mittler R. (2009). The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli. Sci. Signal. 2, ra45.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Mira E., Carmona-Rodríguez L., Pérez-Villamil B., Casas J., Fernández-Aceñero M.J., Martínez-Rey D., Martín-González P., Heras-Murillo I., Paz-Cabezas M., and Tardáguila M. (2018). SOD3 improves the tumor response to chemotherapy by stabilizing endothelial HIF-2α. Nat. Commun. 9, 575.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Mittler R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 405-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Mittler R., Vanderauwera S., Suzuki N., Miller G., Tognetti V.B., Vandepoele K., Gollery M., Shulaev V., and Van Breusegem F. (2011). ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 16, 300-309.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Mittler R., Zandalinas S.I., Fichman Y., and Van Breusegem F. (2022). Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 663-679.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Möller M.N., Rios N., Trujillo M., Radi R., Denicola A., and Alvarez B. (2019). Detection and quantification of nitric oxide-derived oxidants in biological systems. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 14776-14802.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Morillo S.A. and Tax F.E. (2006). Functional analysis of receptor-like kinases in monocots and dicots. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 460-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Movahed N., Pastore C., Cellini A., Allegro G., Valentini G., Zenoni S., Cavallini E., D'Incà E., Tornielli G.B., and Filippetti I. (2016). The grapevine VviPrx31 peroxidase as a candidate gene involved in anthocyanin degradation in ripening berries under high temperature. J. Plant Res. 129, 513-526.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Mubarakshina M.M., Ivanov B.N., Naydov I.A., Hillier W., Badger M.R., and Krieger-Liszkay A. (2010). Production and diffusion of chloroplastic H2O2 and its implication to signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 3577-3587.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Müller K., Linkies A., Vreeburg R.A.M., Fry S.C., Krieger-Liszkay A., and Leubner-Metzger G. (2009). In vivo cell wall loosening by hydroxyl radicals during cress seed germination and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 150, 1855-1865.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Murphy M.P., Bayir H., Belousov V., Chang C.J., Davies K.J.A., Davies M.J., Dick T.P., Finkel T., Forman H.J., and Janssen-Heininger Y., et al. (2022). Guidelines for measuring reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in cells and in vivo. Nat. Metab. 4, 651-662.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Nestler J., Liu S., Wen T.J., Paschold A., Marcon C., Tang H.M., Li D., Li L., Meeley R.B., and Sakai H. (2014). Roothairless5, which functions in maize (Zea mays L.) root hair initiation and elongation encodes a monocot‐specific NADPH oxidase. Plant J. 79, 729-740.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Ogasawara Y., Kaya H., Hiraoka G., Yumoto F., Kimura S., Kadota Y., Hishinuma H., Senzaki E., Yamagoe S., and Nagata K., et al. (2008). Synergistic activation of the Arabidopsis NADPH oxidase AtrbohD by Ca2+ and phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8885-8892.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Pacheco J.M., Ranocha P., Kasulin L., Fusari C.M., Servi L., Aptekmann A.A., Gabarain V.B., Peralta J.M., Borassi C., and Marzol E., et al. (2022). Apoplastic class III peroxidases PRX62 and PRX69 promote Arabidopsis root hair growth at low temperature. Nat. Commun. 13, 1310.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Pacher P., Beckman J.S., and Liaudet L. (2007). Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 87, 315-424.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Palmieri M.C., Sell S., Huang X., Scherf M., Werner T., Durner J., and Lindermayr C. (2008). Nitric oxide-responsive genes and promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana: a bioinformatics approach. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 177-186.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  70. Passardi F., Longet D., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004a). The class III peroxidase multigenic in land plants family in rice and its evolution. Phytochemistry 65, 1879-1893.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Passardi F., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004b). Performing the paradoxical: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 534-540.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  72. Petushkova A.I. and Zamyatnin A.A. (2020). Redox-mediated post-translational modifications of proteolytic enzymes and their role in protease functioning. Biomolecules 10, 650.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Radin I., Richardson R.A., Coomey J.H., Weiner E.R., Bascom C.S., Li T., Bezanilla M., and Haswell E.S. (2021). Plant PIEZO homologs modulate vacuole morphology during tip growth. Science 373, 586-590.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Safavi-Rizi V., Herde M., and Stohr C. (2020). Identification of nitric oxide (NO)-responsive genes under hypoxia in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root. Sci. Rep. 10, 16509.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Sagi M., Davydov O., Orazova S., Yesbergenova Z., Ophir R., Stratmann J.W., and Fluhr R. (2004). Plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs impinge on wound responsiveness and development in Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Cell 16, 616-628.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Scheel D. and Wasternack C. (2002). The role of reactive oxygen species in signal transduction. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 41-73.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Schopfer P. (1996). Hydrogen peroxide-mediated cell-wall stiffening in vitro in maize coleoptiles. Planta 199, 43-49.
    CrossRef
  78. Shen J., Zhang J., Zhou M., Zhou H., Cui B., Gotor C., Romero L.C., Fu L., Yang J., and Foyer C.H., et al. (2020). Persulfidation-based modification of cysteine desulfhydrase and the NADPH oxidase RBOHD controls guard cell abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 32, 1000-1017.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Shi W., Wang L., Yao L., Hao W., Han C., Fan M., Wang W., and Bai M.Y. (2022). Spatially patterned hydrogen peroxide orchestrates stomatal development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 13, 5040.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  80. Shigeto J. and Tsutsumi Y. (2016). Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytol. 209, 1395-1402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  81. Silveira N.M., Hancock J.T., Frungillo L., Siasou E., Marcos F.C., Salgado I., Machado E.C., and Ribeiro R.V. (2017). Evidence towards the involvement of nitric oxide in drought tolerance of sugarcane. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 115, 354-359.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Sirichandra C., Gu D., Hu H.C., Davanture M., Lee S., Djaoui M., Valot B., Zivy M., Leung J., and Merlot S., et al. (2009). Phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis AtrbohF NADPH oxidase by OST1 protein kinase. FEBS Lett. 583, 2982-2986.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. StoÈhr C. and Ullrich W.R. (2002). Generation and possible roles of NO in plant roots and their apoplastic space. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2293-2303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Stöhr C. and Stremlau S. (2006). Formation and possible roles of nitric oxide in plant roots. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 463-470.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Takabe K., Takeuchi M., Sato T., Ito M., and Fujita M. (2001). Immunocytochemical localization of enzymes involved in lignification of the cell wall. J. Plant Res. 114, 509-515.
    CrossRef
  86. Torres M.A., Dangl J.L., and Jones J.D. (2002). Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 517-522.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  87. Tsukagoshi H., Busch W., and Benfey P.N. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of ROS controls transition from proliferation to differentiation in the root. Cell 143, 606-616.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Turkan I. (2017). Emerging roles for ROS and RNS - versatile molecules in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 4413-4416.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Vaahtera L., Schulz J., and Hamann T. (2019). Cell wall integrity maintenance during plant development and interaction with the environment. Nat. Plants 5, 924-932.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Valerio L., De Meyer M., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004). Expression analysis of the Arabidopsis peroxidase multigenic family. Phytochemistry 65, 1331-1342.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  91. Waszczak C., Carmody M., and Kangasjärvi J. (2018). Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 209-236.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  92. Wrzaczek M., Brosché M., Salojärvi J., Kangasjärvi S., Idänheimo N., Mersmann S., Robatzek S., Karpiński S., Karpińska B., and Kangasjärvi J. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of the CRK/DUF26 group of receptor-like protein kinases by ozone and plant hormones in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 95.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  93. Wu F., Chi Y., Jiang Z., Xu Y., Xie L., Huang F., Wan D., Ni J., Yuan F., and Wu X. (2020). Hydrogen peroxide sensor HPCA1 is an LRR receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Nature 578, 577-581.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  94. Yamada M., Han X., and Benfey P.N. (2020). RGF1 controls root meristem size through ROS signalling. Nature 577, 85-88.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  95. Yoboue E.D., Sitia R., and Simmen T. (2018). Redox crosstalk at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane contact sites (MCS) uses toxic waste to deliver messages. Cell Death Dis. 9, 331.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  96. Yoshie Y., Goto K., Takai R., Iwano M., Takayama S., Isogai A., and Che F.S. (2005). Function of the rice gp91phox homologs OsrbohA and OsrbohE genes in ROS-dependent plant immune responses. Plant Biotechnol. (Tokyo) 22, 127-135.
    CrossRef
  97. Yu Z., Jia D.Y., and Liu T.B. (2019). Polyamine oxidases play various roles in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Plants (Basel) 8, 184.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  98. Yun B.W., Feechan A., Yin M., Saidi N.B., Le Bihan T., Yu M., Moore J.W., Kang J.G., Kwon E., and Spoel S.H., et al. (2011). S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase regulates cell death in plant immunity. Nature 478, 264-268.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  99. Zechmann B. and Müller M. (2010). Subcellular compartmentation of glutathione in dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma 246, 15-24.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  100. Zeng J., Dong Z., Wu H., Tian Z., and Zhao Z. (2017). Redox regulation of plant stem cell fate. EMBO J. 36, 2844-2855.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  101. Zhao L., Phuong L.T., Luan M.T., Fitrianti A.N., Matsui H., Nakagami H., Noutoshi Y., Yamamoto M., Ichinose Y., and Shiraishi T., et al. (2019). A class III peroxidase PRX34 is a component of disease resistance in Arabidopsis. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 85, 405-412.
    CrossRef
  102. Zorov D.B., Juhaszova M., and Sollott S.J. (2006). Mitochondrial ROS-induced ROS release: an update and review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 509-517.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Minireview

Mol. Cells 2023; 46(6): 329-336

Published online June 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2158

Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.

How Extracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Reach Their Intracellular Targets in Plants

Jinsu Lee1 , Minsoo Han2 , Yesol Shin2 , Jung-Min Lee2 , Geon Heo2 , and Yuree Lee2,3,*

1Research Institute of Basic Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, 2School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, 3Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Correspondence to:yuree.lee@snu.ac.kr

Received: October 18, 2022; Revised: December 6, 2022; Accepted: December 20, 2022

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve as secondary messengers that regulate various developmental and signal transduction processes, with ROS primarily generated by NADPH OXIDASEs (referred to as RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs [RBOHs] in plants). However, the types and locations of ROS produced by RBOHs are different from those expected to mediate intracellular signaling. RBOHs produce O2•− rather than H2O2 which is relatively long-lived and able to diffuse through membranes, and this production occurs outside the cell instead of in the cytoplasm, where signaling cascades occur. A widely accepted model explaining this discrepancy proposes that RBOH-produced extracellular O2•− is converted to H2O2 by superoxide dismutase and then imported by aquaporins to reach its cytoplasmic targets. However, this model does not explain how the specificity of ROS targeting is ensured while minimizing unnecessary damage during the bulk translocation of extracellular ROS (eROS). An increasing number of studies have provided clues about eROS action mechanisms, revealing various mechanisms for eROS perception in the apoplast, crosstalk between eROS and reactive nitrogen species, and the contribution of intracellular organelles to cytoplasmic ROS bursts. In this review, we summarize these recent advances, highlight the mechanisms underlying eROS action, and provide an overview of the routes by which eROS-induced changes reach the intracellular space.

Keywords: NADPH oxidase, peroxidase, reactive oxygen species, receptor-like kinase, superoxide dismutase

INTRODUCTION

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are inevitable by-products of photosynthesis and metabolic processes in plants. In addition, ROS are actively produced and used as signaling molecules in various developmental processes and in biotic and abiotic stress responses (Huang et al., 2019; Mittler et al., 2022; Waszczak et al., 2018). Along with calcium and electrical signals, ROS also form waves that act as systemic signals that are rapidly propagated and trigger stress responses in tissues throughout the plant (Choi et al., 2017; Fichman and Mittler, 2020; Fichman et al., 2019). The most widely investigated mechanism of redox status-mediated signaling involves post-translational modifications of target proteins through the oxidation of methionine to sulfoxide and of cysteine to sulfenic, sulfinic, and sulfonic acids (Petushkova and Zamyatnin, 2020). Since ROS can also cause irreversible oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins, sophisticated spatiotemporal regulatory mechanisms for ROS metabolism are employed to effectively detoxify ROS produced by multiple mechanisms while specifically activating signaling pathways at the appropriate locations and times.

ROS is a collective term for a number of reactive molecules derived from molecular oxygen, including singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radical anion (O2•−), and other oxygen radicals as well as non-radical derivatives of O2 such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). These molecules exhibit diverse spectra of reactivity, half-life, diffusion, and potential to generate additional downstream reactive species (Möller et al., 2019; Murphy et al., 2022). H2O2, which has a relatively long lifetime and low reactivity, is highly soluble in both lipid and aqueous environments, allowing it to freely diffuse through cell membranes to distances of up to several cell diameters before reacting with specific targets (Scheel and Wasternack, 2002). Because of these properties, H2O2 is regarded as the principal ROS used in signaling. Notably, however, NADPH oxidase (also called respiratory burst oxidase homolog [RBOH] in plants), which is the major enzyme that generates ROS for signal transduction in a wide range of cellular processes, generates O2•−, not H2O2, and does so outside the cell rather than inside (Kumar et al., 2007; Torres et al., 2002). These observations suggest that the activities of various antioxidant enzymes are coordinated to fine-tune ROS concentrations as well as the types and distribution of ROS.

O2•− is a precursor to H2O2, but it performs distinct biological functions (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2018; Tsukagoshi et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2017). O2•− itself can be transported across cell membranes, and the channels responsible for this have been identified in animals (Fisher, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007). O2•− and H2O2 show different distribution patterns in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) roots, with O2•− mainly occurring in the meristematic zone of the root tip and H2O2 in the elongation zone; the balance of these two ROS influences the cellular transition from proliferation to differentiation (Dunand et al., 2007; Tsukagoshi et al., 2010; Yamada et al., 2020). Cell type-specific ROS distribution is also essential for stem cell maintenance in shoot apical meristems and for floral organ abscission (Lee et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2017). Thus, growing evidence suggests that the concentrations and types of ROS are finely regulated to mediate various cellular processes. In this review, we take a closer look at these processes to provide insight into how the spatiotemporal balance of ROS is maintained, how the specificity of ROS action is ensured, and how extracellular ROS (eROS) reach their signaling targets inside cells.

ACCUMULATION OF eROS FOR SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION: SYNTHESIS AND DETOXIFICATION

Since ROS are continuously generated as by-products of metabolic processes, cells have various enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems to detoxify these molecules (Mittler, 2002). Therefore, raising the ROS concentration to a specific threshold required for signal transduction involves both the activation of ROS-generating enzymes and the local inactivation of detoxifying enzymes.

In Arabidopsis, RBOHs are encoded by 10 homologous genes, RBOHA to RBOHJ (Doke, 1985; Mittler et al., 2011). These enzymes function in a wide range of cellular processes such as guard cell movement, root hair growth, senescence, wound healing, and defense responses (Koo et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2009; Torres et al., 2002). The role of RBOH-generated ROS in signaling pathways is conserved in many plants, including rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) (Nestler et al., 2014; Sagi et al., 2004; Yoshie et al., 2005). In addition to RBOHs, peroxidases and polyamine oxidases also contribute to eROS generation (Do et al., 2019; Kaman-Toth et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019), suggesting that ROS levels are regulated via sophisticated multi-layered mechanisms.

The activity of RBOHs is controlled by multiple post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, Ca2+ binding, nitrosylation, persulfidation, and ubiquitination (Chen et al., 2017; Dubiella et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2020; Ogasawara et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2020; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Yun et al., 2011). Phosphorylation by Ca2+-regulated protein kinases and Ca2+ binding to EF-hand motifs are the most ubiquitous mechanisms for regulating RBOH activity (Dubiella et al., 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2007; Ogasawara et al., 2008). The physiological roles of these and other post-translational modifications in the multilayered regulation of RBOH activity are gradually being revealed. For example, during the plant immune response, the central immune kinase BOTRYTIS-INDUCED KINASE 1 (BIK1) phosphorylates RBOHD independently of Ca2+, and yet this process is essential for Ca2+-based regulation of RBOHD (Kadota et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014). This two-step regulatory process ensures the specificity of immune-associated ROS bursts even though Ca2+-based regulation mediates diverse responses. By contrast, serine-threonine protein phosphatases inhibit RBOH activity. The SnRK2-type kinase OPEN STOMATA1 (OST1) is activated by abscisic acid (ABA), leading to the phosphorylation of RBOHF and subsequently stomatal closure. In the absence of ABA, dephosphorylation by PP2CA, a type 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C) family protein, inhibits OST1 activity and RBOHF-mediated stomatal closure (Brandt et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2009; Sirichandra et al., 2009). The activity of RBOHD is also controlled by persulfidation (Shen et al., 2020) during ABA signaling in guard cells. Interestingly, ROS react with this modification to form perthiosulfenic acid, thereby returning RBOHD activity to its basal state, suggesting that ROS generated by RBOH can act as a negative feedback signal to control the duration of RBOH activation.

A widely accepted model posits that the O2•− produced by RBOH is converted to H2O2 by SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD) before migrating into the cytoplasm via aquaporins (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Bienert et al., 2007). While the identity and regulatory mechanisms of extracellular SODs (eSODs) have been well described in animals (Fattman et al., 2003), there is only limited information on eSODs involved in ROS-mediated signaling in plants. An SOD is classified as either Cu Zn SOD (CSD), Mn SOD (MSD) or Fe SOD (FSD), depending on its metal coenzyme(s) (Alscher et al., 2002). Eight genes encode SODs in the Arabidopsis genome: CSD1–3, MSD1 and 2, and FSD1–3 (Chen et al., 2022; Miller, 2012). Among the products encoded by these genes, MSD2 is the only one that is secreted out of the cell (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022). MSD2 shows SOD activity at a broad range of pH levels and is strongly expressed in specific cell types, such as those in the root tips and abscission zones, suggesting that ROS metabolism regulated by MSD2 is linked to specific signaling pathways. Indeed, phenotypic analysis of msd2 mutants revealed that MSD2 regulates root morphogenesis during light-to-dark transitions (Chen et al., 2022) as well as floral organ abscission (Lee et al., 2022), demonstrating its participation in ROS-mediated signaling pathways.

H2O2 is broken down into water and oxygen by catalases (CATs) or peroxidases (PRXs) (Apel and Hirt, 2004). PRXs are divided into three classes: Class I, II, and III. Class III PRXs are secreted into the vacuole and apoplast (Andrews et al., 2002; Takabe et al., 2001) and are involved in various physiological processes, such as cell wall metabolism, seed germination, wound healing, and defense against pathogens (Movahed et al., 2016; Passardi et al., 2004b; Shigeto and Tsutsumi, 2016). PRXs not only break down ROS but also generate H2O2, as is done by PRX33 and PRX34 in response to pathogen attack (Kaman-Toth et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019) and by PRX62 and PRX69 to regulate root hair growth under low-temperature conditions (Pacheco et al., 2022). Since the ROS substrates and products of PRX also play important roles in signal transduction, understanding how these two opposing activities of PRX are regulated is a remaining task. CATs are also involved in maintaining ROS homeostasis. The expression of CAT2 during stomatal development is directly regulated by SPEECHLESS, the master regulator of stomatal development, which regulates cell type-specific ROS patterns (Shi et al., 2022). As extracellular catalase has been reported in animals (Bohm et al., 2015) but not yet in plants, it remains a question whether this action of catalase can also occur extracellularly.

MULTIFACETED ROUTS FOR eROS TO REACH INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING COMPONENTS

How can eROS reach specific targets inside the cell? The observation that RBOH-generated ROS also accumulate in the cytosol and that H2O2 can pass through the plasma membrane via aquaporins led to the prevailing hypothesis that eROS are directly transported into the cytoplasm (Bienert et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2010). However, this model leaves several unresolved questions: If most eROS flow into the cell, why are they generated extracellularly? How effectively can eROS be transported into the cell? If eROS move from one place to another in large quantities, how can they act on specific targets while minimizing oxidative damage? Several attempts have been made to address these questions surrounding ROS-mediated signaling, with significant progress being made in recent years.

Perception of eROS outside the cell

The apoplast, where the concentrations of antioxidants and ROS are relatively low (Zechmann and Müller, 2010), would be an ideal site to quickly reach the ROS levels required for signal transduction while minimizing damage to surrounding proteins. The advantages of eROS can be maximized when the targets are also extracellular. Indeed, recent studies have demonstrated that receptors capable of recognizing eROS and initiating signal transduction exist outside the cell.

For instance, the plasma membrane contains numerous receptor-like kinases (RLKs) with ectodomains that can detect molecular changes in the apoplast, possibly including eROS (Morillo and Tax, 2006; Wrzaczek et al., 2010). HPCA1 (HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE-INDUCED Ca2+ INCREASES 1), an LRR-RK (leucine rich repeat-receptor kinase), was recently identified as a crucial regulator of eH2O2-induced increases in Ca2+ levels in Arabidopsis (Wu et al., 2020). Cysteine residues in the HPCA1 ectodomain are directly modified by eH2O2, which induces the autophosphorylation and activation of Ca2+ channel proteins, revealing that HPCA1 is an eH2O2 sensor. HPCA1 acts as a key eROS receptor during plant adaptation to various biotic and abiotic stresses, systemic signaling, and cell-to-cell ROS signal propagation (Fichman et al., 2022; Laohavisit et al., 2020).

Ion channels in the plasma membrane could also act as sensors of eROS. The ability of ROS to activate ion conduction in plant membranes has long been known in relation to Cu2+ toxicity in the charophyte alga Nitella flexilis (Demidchik et al., 1997; 2001). Indeed, a variety of ion channels have been shown to be activated by ROS in Arabidopsis, Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia), pea (Pisum sativum), and Lilium longiflorum, including inwardly and outwardly rectifying channels and voltage-independent channels that function in tip growth and plant responses to various stresses (Demidchik, 2018). Garcia-Mata et al. (2010) provided clues about the molecular mechanism underlying ROS-induced activation of the STELAR K+ outward rectifier (SKOR) in Arabidopsis. Using heterologous expression systems in HEK293 cells and Xenopus oocytes, the authors demonstrated that the Cys168 residue in the S3 α-helix within the voltage sensor of the channel of SKOR is essential for its sensitivity to H2O2. The water-filled pocket in which Cys168 is located is large enough to accept H2O2 and is exposed to the external bulk solution upon depolarization, suggesting that this site is a target of eROS. The corresponding Cys residue is also conserved in the GORK (gated outwardly rectifying K+ channel), suggesting that additional channels with ROS-sensing cysteine moieties remain to be discovered.

eROS-mediated cell wall modification

Considering that the ectodomains of membrane proteins can be modified by eROS, the cell wall and cell wall proteins might also be influenced by eROS. Indeed, the effects of ROS on cell wall loosening have been reported (Airianah et al., 2016; Fry, 1998; Müller et al., 2009). ROS, especially hydroxyl radicals (OH•), can cleave cell wall polymers such as xyloglucan and pectin, thereby promoting cell elongation. Conversely, the accumulation of H2O2 causes the cross-linking of cell wall components and restricts elongation, making it difficult to pinpoint the role of eROS in the cell wall.

Cell wall modification by eROS is often mediated by class III PRXs. Class III PRXs are encoded by large multigene families (75 genes in Arabidopsis and 138 genes in rice) (Passardi et al., 2004a; Valerio et al., 2004) and catalyze the oxidation of numerous substrates such as extensins, monolignols, ferulic acids, and suberin using H2O2 as the electron acceptor (Lee et al., 2013; Shigeto and Tsutsumi, 2016). Class III PRX reactions have different effects, depending on the substrate. In vitro experiments with maize coleoptiles showed that H2O2 promotes cell wall stiffening and that this effect is maintained during indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)- and acid-mediated growth (Schopfer, 1996). The wall-stiffening reaction in maize coleoptiles triggered by H2O2 is mediated by PRX, which induces phenolic cross-linking in the cell wall. Potential phenolic substrates for PRX-catalyzed oxidative cross-linking include lignin precursors, tyrosine residues of certain glycoproteins, and ester-linked hydroxycinnamic-acid residues of pectic or hemicellulosic polysaccharides (Francoz et al., 2015; Passardi et al., 2004b).

Changes in the cell wall can be perceived by plasma membrane-localized RLKs and mechanosensitive ion channels, which initiate intracellular signaling cascades (Basu and Haswell, 2020; Radin et al., 2021; Vaahtera et al., 2019). THESEUS1/FERONIA family RLKs in Arabidopsis can potentially sense changes in cell wall integrity to modulate downstream cell signaling pathways (Bacete et al., 2022; Feng et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2022). Depending on the concentration and longevity of eROS, their effects on cell wall integrity are highly variable. How sensitive the cell wall is to eROS, to what extent cell wall integrity receptors detect changes in the cell wall, and how specificity can be ensured during various interactions with eROS remain to be determined.

Crosstalk between eROS and nitric oxide signaling

Reactive nitrogen species (RNS), along with ROS, act as important signaling molecules in plants and regulate a variety of processes including development, growth, and responses to abiotic and biotic stress (Domingos et al., 2015; Turkan, 2017). RNS induce post-translational modifications, such as S-nitrosylation and tyrosine nitration, causing conformational changes that affect the activity and localization of target proteins.

Nitric oxide (NO•), a highly reactive small gaseous molecule, modulates the expression of several genes involved in hormonal signaling, primary metabolism, and stress responses (Palmieri et al., 2008; Safavi-Rizi et al., 2020). In addition to cytosolic NO•, various physiological functions of apoplastic NO• have been reported (Besson-Bard et al., 2008; Bethke et al., 2004; StoÈhr and Ullrich, 2002). The root-specific membrane-bound nitrite reductase (Ni:NOR) and NR (nitrate reductase) are thought to be responsible for apoplastic RNS generation, which is important for root growth, symbiotic interactions, and drought tolerance (Silveira et al., 2017; Stöhr and Stremlau, 2006).

The bioavailability and action of NO• are modulated by its reaction with O2•− to generate a more reactive peroxide, peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which possesses characteristics of both O2•− reactivity and NO• mobility and functions as a signaling molecule. SOD3, an eSOD in animal cells, is thought to regulate ONOO− availability by controlling NO•/O2•− reactions, which in turn stabilizes the transcription factor HIF-2α to improve tumor-responsive gene expression (Carmona-Rodríguez et al., 2020; Mira et al., 2018). eSOD and RNS were recently shown to interact in floral organs of Arabidopsis during abscission. ONOO− promotes abscission by regulating the expression levels of major signaling components, and MSD2, an eSOD, is involved in this regulation (Lee et al., 2022). Interacting with NO• could represent a major role for O2•− distinct from that of H2O2 in plants, and eSOD could regulate the balance between ROS and RNS.

Coordination with organellar ROS generation

Cytosolic ROS bursts are observed under various biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Although eROS produced by RBOH are considered to be the direct sources of cytoplasmic ROS bursts, it is difficult to prove how many eROS are actually imported into the cell. It cannot be discounted that intracellular organelles such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, and peroxisomes, where large amounts of ROS are produced, contribute to the generation of cytosolic ROS (Del Río and López-Huertas, 2016; Mubarakshina et al., 2010; Zorov et al., 2006).

Intracellular ROS accumulation is important for ABA-induced stomatal closure, which is mediated by RBOHD and RBOHF (Kwak et al., 2003). Contrary to the long-standing model of eROS transport, recent reports have focused on ROS released from the chloroplast (Iwai et al., 2019). Indeed, ABA-induced ROS are first observed in chloroplasts, and cytosolic ROS bursts can be eliminated by inhibiting photosynthetic electron transport (PET). These observations suggest that PET-mediated ROS contribute to ROS bursts that influence ABA‐induced stomatal closure. A similar contribution of chloroplastic ROS has been reported to regulate the hypersensitive response in tobacco (Liu et al., 2007). Thus, intracellular organelles may commonly contribute to ROS signaling.

PERSPECTIVES

Accumulating evidence points to the involvement of ROS in various signaling and developmental processes, but our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying ROS generation, conversion, and degradation as well as the roles of these molecules as messengers is fragmentary. In this review, we provided a perspective on the various routes of eROS-mediated signaling by examining the factors directly affected by eROS (Fig. 1). Increasing evidence indicates that signal transduction involves not only the production of eROS but also the regulation of eROS metabolism via various detoxifying enzymes. In addition, various targets of eROS exist extracellularly, where the signal can be indirectly transduced into the cell. The next questions to answer include how the localization and activity of extracellular ROS metabolic enzymes are regulated and how they coordinate with each other to maintain the required ROS level and type. It is also conceivable that ROS generation, turnover, and post-translational modifications of targets may occur within specific compartments. Because such associations outside the cell may not be strong or direct, proximity labeling methods will be useful for revealing the spatial organization of enzyme-target interactions. Given the wide scope of ROS reactions, it would not be possible to ensure target specificity through random diffusion or transport. Understanding the sophisticated spatial control mechanisms for the entire process, from ROS generation to degradation and delivery to the target, represents the next important issue to address.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Suh Kyungbae Foundation (SUHF-19010003) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1A5A1032428). J.L. was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1I1A1A01068615), and J.-M.L. was supported by the Stadelmann-Lee Scholarship Fund at Seoul National University, Korea.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Y.L. and J.L. conceived of the study and all authors participated in writing the manuscript. J.L. and M.H. drafted ‘multifaceted routs for eROS to reach intracellular signaling components’ sections, Y.S., J.-M.L., and G.H. drafted ‘accumulation of eROS for signal transduction’ section and M.H. and J.L. designed a draft of the figure 1 diagram. J.L. organized each section into one draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Go to
Fig. 1.A diagram showing the multifaceted roles of extracellular reactive oxygen species (eROS). (1) Superoxide (O2•−) produced by RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs (RBOHs) is converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and migrates to the cytoplasm via aquaporins (AQPs). (2) In Arabidopsis, MSD2, an apoplastic SOD, functions in root skotomorphogenesis and floral organ abscission (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022). H2O2 is broken down into water and oxygen by catalases (CATs) or peroxidases (PRXs). Extracellular CATs remain to be discovered. (3) Chloride Channel-3 (CLC-3) is responsible for O2•− transport in animal cells (Fisher, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007). O2•− transporters in plants remain to be discovered. (4) eROS directly affect the activities of receptor like kinases (RLKs) such as HPCA1 or membrane-localized channels such as SKOR to initiate signal transduction cascades in the cytosol. (5) eROS can directly or indirectly affect cell wall organization, which is sensed by THESEUS1 (THE1)/FERONIA (FER) family RLKs. (6) O2•− interacts with nitric oxide (NO•); this interaction not only affects the bioavailability and action of NO•, but it also generates the more reactive peroxide peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which functions as a signaling molecule through the post-translational modification of proteins via tyrosine nitration (Pacher et al., 2007). (7) Organellar ROS could contribute to RBOH-dependent cytosolic ROS bursts. Chloroplast-derived ROS contribute to ROS bursts that lead to ABA‐induced stomatal closure (Iwai et al., 2019). The transport of ROS through the stromule restricts ROS accumulation to a localized region, achieving target specificity while minimizing unnecessary oxidative damage (7-1). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–mitochondria–peroxisome redox triangle model proposed in animals (Yoboue et al., 2018) might also be applicable to plants (7-2). Solid-lined arrows represent mechanisms previously examined in the literature. Dashed arrows indicate potential mediating pathways.

Fig 1.

Download
Figure 1.A diagram showing the multifaceted roles of extracellular reactive oxygen species (eROS). (1) Superoxide (O2•−) produced by RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs (RBOHs) is converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and migrates to the cytoplasm via aquaporins (AQPs). (2) In Arabidopsis, MSD2, an apoplastic SOD, functions in root skotomorphogenesis and floral organ abscission (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022). H2O2 is broken down into water and oxygen by catalases (CATs) or peroxidases (PRXs). Extracellular CATs remain to be discovered. (3) Chloride Channel-3 (CLC-3) is responsible for O2•− transport in animal cells (Fisher, 2009; Hawkins et al., 2007). O2•− transporters in plants remain to be discovered. (4) eROS directly affect the activities of receptor like kinases (RLKs) such as HPCA1 or membrane-localized channels such as SKOR to initiate signal transduction cascades in the cytosol. (5) eROS can directly or indirectly affect cell wall organization, which is sensed by THESEUS1 (THE1)/FERONIA (FER) family RLKs. (6) O2•− interacts with nitric oxide (NO•); this interaction not only affects the bioavailability and action of NO•, but it also generates the more reactive peroxide peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which functions as a signaling molecule through the post-translational modification of proteins via tyrosine nitration (Pacher et al., 2007). (7) Organellar ROS could contribute to RBOH-dependent cytosolic ROS bursts. Chloroplast-derived ROS contribute to ROS bursts that lead to ABA‐induced stomatal closure (Iwai et al., 2019). The transport of ROS through the stromule restricts ROS accumulation to a localized region, achieving target specificity while minimizing unnecessary oxidative damage (7-1). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–mitochondria–peroxisome redox triangle model proposed in animals (Yoboue et al., 2018) might also be applicable to plants (7-2). Solid-lined arrows represent mechanisms previously examined in the literature. Dashed arrows indicate potential mediating pathways.
Molecules and Cells 2023; 46: 329-336https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2158

References

  1. Airianah O.B., Vreeburg R.A., and Fry S.C. (2016). Pectic polysaccharides are attacked by hydroxyl radicals in ripening fruit: evidence from a fluorescent fingerprinting method. Ann. Bot. 117, 441-455.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Alscher R.G., Erturk N., and Heath L.S. (2002). Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1331-1341.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Andrews J., Adams S., Burton K., and Edmondson R. (2002). Partial purification of tomato fruit peroxidase and its effect on the mechanical properties of tomato fruit skin. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2393-2399.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Apel K. and Hirt H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 373-399.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Bacete L., Schulz J., Engelsdorf T., Bartosova Z., Vaahtera L., Yan G., Gerhold J.M., Tichá T., Øvstebø C., and Gigli-Bisceglia N., et al. (2022). THESEUS1 modulates cell wall stiffness and abscisic acid production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2119258119.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Basu D. and Haswell E.S. (2020). The mechanosensitive ion channel MSL10 potentiates responses to cell swelling in Arabidopsis seedlings. Curr. Biol. 30, 2716-2728.e6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Besson-Bard A., Griveau S., Bedioui F., and Wendehenne D. (2008). Real-time electrochemical detection of extracellular nitric oxide in tobacco cells exposed to cryptogein, an elicitor of defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3407-3414.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Bethke P.C., Badger M.R., and Jones R.L. (2004). Apoplastic synthesis of nitric oxide by plant tissues. Plant Cell 16, 332-341.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Bienert G.P., Møller A.L., Kristiansen K.A., Schulz A., Møller I.M., Schjoerring J.K., and Jahn T.P. (2007). Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1183-1192.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Bohm B., Heinzelmann S., Motz M., and Bauer G. (2015). Extracellular localization of catalase is associated with the transformed state of malignant cells. Biol. Chem. 396, 1339-1356.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Brandt B., Brodsky D.E., Xue S., Negi J., Iba K., Kangasjarvi J., Ghassemian M., Stephan A.B., Hu H., and Schroeder J.I. (2012). Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 10593-10598.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Carmona-Rodríguez L., Martínez-Rey D., Mira E., and Mañes S. (2020). SOD3 boosts T cell infiltration by normalizing the tumor endothelium and inducing laminin-α4. Oncoimmunology 9, 1794163.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Chen D., Cao Y., Li H., Kim D., Ahsan N., Thelen J., and Stacey G. (2017). Extracellular ATP elicits DORN1-mediated RBOHD phosphorylation to regulate stomatal aperture. Nat. Commun. 8, 2265.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Chen H., Lee J., Lee J.M., Han M., Emonet A., Lee J., Jia X., and Lee Y. (2022). MSD2, an apoplastic Mn-SOD, contributes to root skotomorphogenic growth by modulating ROS distribution in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 317, 111192.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Choi W.G., Miller G., Wallace I., Harper J., Mittler R., and Gilroy S. (2017). Orchestrating rapid long-distance signaling in plants with Ca(2+), ROS and electrical signals. Plant J. 90, 698-707.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Del Río L.A. and López-Huertas E. (2016). ROS generation in peroxisomes and its role in cell signaling. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 1364-1376.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Demidchik V. (2018). ROS-activated ion channels in plants: biophysical characteristics, physiological functions and molecular nature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1263.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Demidchik V., Sokolik A., and Yurin V. (1997). The effect of Cu2+ on ion transport systems of the plant cell plasmalemma. Plant Physiol. 114, 1313-1325.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Demidchik V., Sokolik A., and Yurin V. (2001). Characteristics of non-specific permeability and H+-ATPase inhibition induced in the plasma membrane of Nitella flexilis by excessive Cu2+. Planta 212, 583-590.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Do T.H.T., Choi H., Palmgren M., Martinoia E., Hwang J.U., and Lee Y. (2019). Arabidopsis ABCG28 is required for the apical accumulation of reactive oxygen species in growing pollen tubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 12540-12549.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Doke N. (1985). NADPH-dependent O2− generation in membrane fractions isolated from wounded potato tubers inoculated with Phytophthora infestans. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 27, 311-322.
    CrossRef
  22. Domingos P., Prado A.M., Wong A., Gehring C., and Feijo J.A. (2015). Nitric oxide: a multitasked signaling gas in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 506-520.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Dubiella U., Seybold H., Durian G., Komander E., Lassig R., Witte C.P., Schulze W.X., and Romeis T. (2013). Calcium-dependent protein kinase/NADPH oxidase activation circuit is required for rapid defense signal propagation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 8744-8749.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Dunand C., Crèvecoeur M., and Penel C. (2007). Distribution of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis root and their influence on root development: possible interaction with peroxidases. New Phytol. 174, 332-341.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Fattman C.L., Schaefer L.M., and Oury T.D. (2003). Extracellular superoxide dismutase in biology and medicine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 35, 236-256.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Feng W., Kita D., Peaucelle A., Cartwright H.N., Doan V., Duan Q., Liu M.C., Maman J., Steinhorst L., and Schmitz-Thom I., et al. (2018). The FERONIA receptor kinase maintains cell-wall integrity during salt stress through Ca(2+) signaling. Curr. Biol. 28, 666-675.e5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Fichman Y., Miller G., and Mittler R. (2019). Whole-plant live imaging of reactive oxygen species. Mol. Plant 12, 1203-1210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Fichman Y. and Mittler R. (2020). Rapid systemic signaling during abiotic and biotic stresses: is the ROS wave master of all trades? Plant J. 102, 887-896.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Fichman Y., Zandalinas S.I., Peck S., Luan S., and Mittler R. (2022). HPCA1 is required for systemic reactive oxygen species and calcium cell-to-cell signaling and plant acclimation to stress. Plant Cell 34, 4453-4471.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Fisher A.B. (2009). Redox signaling across cell membranes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 1349-1356.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Francoz E., Ranocha P., Nguyen-Kim H., Jamet E., Burlat V., and Dunand C. (2015). Roles of cell wall peroxidases in plant development. Phytochemistry 112, 15-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Fry S.C. (1998). Oxidative scission of plant cell wall polysaccharides by ascorbate-induced hydroxyl radicals. Biochem. J. 332(Pt 2), 507-515.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Garcia-Mata C., Wang J., Gajdanowicz P., Gonzalez W., Hills A., Donald N., Riedelsberger J., Amtmann A., Dreyer I., and Blatt M.R. (2010). A minimal cysteine motif required to activate the SKOR K+ channel of Arabidopsis by the reactive oxygen species H2O2*[S]. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 29286-29294.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Hawkins B.J., Madesh M., Kirkpatrick C., and Fisher A.B. (2007). Superoxide flux in endothelial cells via the chloride channel-3 mediates intracellular signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2002-2012.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Huang H., Ullah F., Zhou D.X., Yi M., and Zhao Y. (2019). Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 800.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Iwai S., Ogata S., Yamada N., Onjo M., Sonoike K., and Shimazaki K. (2019). Guard cell photosynthesis is crucial in abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure. Plant Direct 3, e00137.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Kadota Y., Sklenar J., Derbyshire P., Stransfeld L., Asai S., Ntoukakis V., Jones J.D., Shirasu K., Menke F., and Jones A., et al. (2014). Direct regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD by the PRR-associated kinase BIK1 during plant immunity. Mol. Cell 54, 43-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Kaman-Toth E., Danko T., Gullner G., Bozso Z., Palkovics L., and Pogany M. (2019). Contribution of cell wall peroxidase- and NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species to Alternaria brassicicola-induced oxidative burst in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 485-499.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Kobayashi M., Ohura I., Kawakita K., Yokota N., Fujiwara M., Shimamoto K., Doke N., and Yoshioka H. (2007). Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. Plant Cell 19, 1065-1080.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Koo J.C., Lee I.C., Dai C., Lee Y., Cho H.K., Kim Y., Phee B.K., Kim H., Lee I.H., and Choi S.H., et al. (2017). The protein trio RPK1-CaM4-RbohF mediates transient superoxide production to trigger age-dependent cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 21, 3373-3380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Kumar G., Iyer S., and Knowles N.R. (2007). Strboh A homologue of NADPH oxidase regulates wound-induced oxidative burst and facilitates wound-healing in potato tubers. Planta 227, 25-36.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Kwak J.M., Mori I.C., Pei Z.M., Leonhardt N., Torres M.A., Dangl J.L., Bloom R.E., Bodde S., Jones J.D., and Schroeder J.I. (2003). NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 22, 2623-2633.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Laohavisit A., Wakatake T., Ishihama N., Mulvey H., Takizawa K., Suzuki T., and Shirasu K. (2020). Quinone perception in plants via leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases. Nature 587, 92-97.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Lee D., Lal N.K., Lin Z.D., Ma S., Liu J., Castro B., Toruno T., Dinesh-Kumar S.P., and Coaker G. (2020). Regulation of reactive oxygen species during plant immunity through phosphorylation and ubiquitination of RBOHD. Nat. Commun. 11, 1838.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Lee J., Chen H., Lee G., Emonet A., Kim S.G., Shim D., and Lee Y. (2022). MSD2‐mediated ROS metabolism fine‐tunes the timing of floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 235, 2466-2480.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Lee S.C., Lan W., Buchanan B.B., and Luan S. (2009). A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 21419-21424.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Lee Y., Rubio M.C., Alassimone J., and Geldner N. (2013). A mechanism for localized lignin deposition in the endodermis. Cell 153, 402-412.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Lee Y., Yoon T.H., Lee J., Jeon S.Y., Lee J.H., Lee M.K., Chen H., Yun J., Oh S.Y., and Wen X. (2018). A lignin molecular brace controls precision processing of cell walls critical for surface integrity in Arabidopsis. Cell 173, 1468-1480.e9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Li L., Li M., Yu L., Zhou Z., Liang X., Liu Z., Cai G., Gao L., Zhang X., and Wang Y., et al. (2014). The FLS2-associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 15, 329-338.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Lin W., Tang W., Pan X., Huang A., Gao X., Anderson C.T., and Yang Z. (2022). Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis requires FERONIA binding to pectin for activation of ROP GTPase signaling. Curr. Biol. 32, 497-507.e4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Liu Y., Ren D., Pike S., Pallardy S., Gassmann W., and Zhang S. (2007). Chloroplast‐generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response‐like cell death mediated by a mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascade. Plant J. 51, 941-954.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Miller A.F. (2012). Superoxide dismutases: ancient enzymes and new insights. FEBS Lett. 586, 585-595.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Miller E.W., Dickinson B.C., and Chang C.J. (2010). Aquaporin-3 mediates hydrogen peroxide uptake to regulate downstream intracellular signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 15681-15686.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Miller G., Schlauch K., Tam R., Cortes D., Torres M.A., Shulaev V., Dangl J.L., and Mittler R. (2009). The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli. Sci. Signal. 2, ra45.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Mira E., Carmona-Rodríguez L., Pérez-Villamil B., Casas J., Fernández-Aceñero M.J., Martínez-Rey D., Martín-González P., Heras-Murillo I., Paz-Cabezas M., and Tardáguila M. (2018). SOD3 improves the tumor response to chemotherapy by stabilizing endothelial HIF-2α. Nat. Commun. 9, 575.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Mittler R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 405-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Mittler R., Vanderauwera S., Suzuki N., Miller G., Tognetti V.B., Vandepoele K., Gollery M., Shulaev V., and Van Breusegem F. (2011). ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 16, 300-309.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Mittler R., Zandalinas S.I., Fichman Y., and Van Breusegem F. (2022). Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 663-679.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Möller M.N., Rios N., Trujillo M., Radi R., Denicola A., and Alvarez B. (2019). Detection and quantification of nitric oxide-derived oxidants in biological systems. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 14776-14802.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Morillo S.A. and Tax F.E. (2006). Functional analysis of receptor-like kinases in monocots and dicots. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 460-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Movahed N., Pastore C., Cellini A., Allegro G., Valentini G., Zenoni S., Cavallini E., D'Incà E., Tornielli G.B., and Filippetti I. (2016). The grapevine VviPrx31 peroxidase as a candidate gene involved in anthocyanin degradation in ripening berries under high temperature. J. Plant Res. 129, 513-526.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Mubarakshina M.M., Ivanov B.N., Naydov I.A., Hillier W., Badger M.R., and Krieger-Liszkay A. (2010). Production and diffusion of chloroplastic H2O2 and its implication to signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 3577-3587.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Müller K., Linkies A., Vreeburg R.A.M., Fry S.C., Krieger-Liszkay A., and Leubner-Metzger G. (2009). In vivo cell wall loosening by hydroxyl radicals during cress seed germination and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 150, 1855-1865.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Murphy M.P., Bayir H., Belousov V., Chang C.J., Davies K.J.A., Davies M.J., Dick T.P., Finkel T., Forman H.J., and Janssen-Heininger Y., et al. (2022). Guidelines for measuring reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in cells and in vivo. Nat. Metab. 4, 651-662.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Nestler J., Liu S., Wen T.J., Paschold A., Marcon C., Tang H.M., Li D., Li L., Meeley R.B., and Sakai H. (2014). Roothairless5, which functions in maize (Zea mays L.) root hair initiation and elongation encodes a monocot‐specific NADPH oxidase. Plant J. 79, 729-740.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Ogasawara Y., Kaya H., Hiraoka G., Yumoto F., Kimura S., Kadota Y., Hishinuma H., Senzaki E., Yamagoe S., and Nagata K., et al. (2008). Synergistic activation of the Arabidopsis NADPH oxidase AtrbohD by Ca2+ and phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8885-8892.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Pacheco J.M., Ranocha P., Kasulin L., Fusari C.M., Servi L., Aptekmann A.A., Gabarain V.B., Peralta J.M., Borassi C., and Marzol E., et al. (2022). Apoplastic class III peroxidases PRX62 and PRX69 promote Arabidopsis root hair growth at low temperature. Nat. Commun. 13, 1310.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Pacher P., Beckman J.S., and Liaudet L. (2007). Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 87, 315-424.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Palmieri M.C., Sell S., Huang X., Scherf M., Werner T., Durner J., and Lindermayr C. (2008). Nitric oxide-responsive genes and promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana: a bioinformatics approach. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 177-186.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  70. Passardi F., Longet D., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004a). The class III peroxidase multigenic in land plants family in rice and its evolution. Phytochemistry 65, 1879-1893.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Passardi F., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004b). Performing the paradoxical: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 534-540.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  72. Petushkova A.I. and Zamyatnin A.A. (2020). Redox-mediated post-translational modifications of proteolytic enzymes and their role in protease functioning. Biomolecules 10, 650.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Radin I., Richardson R.A., Coomey J.H., Weiner E.R., Bascom C.S., Li T., Bezanilla M., and Haswell E.S. (2021). Plant PIEZO homologs modulate vacuole morphology during tip growth. Science 373, 586-590.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Safavi-Rizi V., Herde M., and Stohr C. (2020). Identification of nitric oxide (NO)-responsive genes under hypoxia in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root. Sci. Rep. 10, 16509.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Sagi M., Davydov O., Orazova S., Yesbergenova Z., Ophir R., Stratmann J.W., and Fluhr R. (2004). Plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs impinge on wound responsiveness and development in Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Cell 16, 616-628.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Scheel D. and Wasternack C. (2002). The role of reactive oxygen species in signal transduction. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 41-73.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Schopfer P. (1996). Hydrogen peroxide-mediated cell-wall stiffening in vitro in maize coleoptiles. Planta 199, 43-49.
    CrossRef
  78. Shen J., Zhang J., Zhou M., Zhou H., Cui B., Gotor C., Romero L.C., Fu L., Yang J., and Foyer C.H., et al. (2020). Persulfidation-based modification of cysteine desulfhydrase and the NADPH oxidase RBOHD controls guard cell abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 32, 1000-1017.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Shi W., Wang L., Yao L., Hao W., Han C., Fan M., Wang W., and Bai M.Y. (2022). Spatially patterned hydrogen peroxide orchestrates stomatal development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 13, 5040.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  80. Shigeto J. and Tsutsumi Y. (2016). Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytol. 209, 1395-1402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  81. Silveira N.M., Hancock J.T., Frungillo L., Siasou E., Marcos F.C., Salgado I., Machado E.C., and Ribeiro R.V. (2017). Evidence towards the involvement of nitric oxide in drought tolerance of sugarcane. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 115, 354-359.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Sirichandra C., Gu D., Hu H.C., Davanture M., Lee S., Djaoui M., Valot B., Zivy M., Leung J., and Merlot S., et al. (2009). Phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis AtrbohF NADPH oxidase by OST1 protein kinase. FEBS Lett. 583, 2982-2986.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. StoÈhr C. and Ullrich W.R. (2002). Generation and possible roles of NO in plant roots and their apoplastic space. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2293-2303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Stöhr C. and Stremlau S. (2006). Formation and possible roles of nitric oxide in plant roots. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 463-470.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Takabe K., Takeuchi M., Sato T., Ito M., and Fujita M. (2001). Immunocytochemical localization of enzymes involved in lignification of the cell wall. J. Plant Res. 114, 509-515.
    CrossRef
  86. Torres M.A., Dangl J.L., and Jones J.D. (2002). Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 517-522.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  87. Tsukagoshi H., Busch W., and Benfey P.N. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of ROS controls transition from proliferation to differentiation in the root. Cell 143, 606-616.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Turkan I. (2017). Emerging roles for ROS and RNS - versatile molecules in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 4413-4416.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Vaahtera L., Schulz J., and Hamann T. (2019). Cell wall integrity maintenance during plant development and interaction with the environment. Nat. Plants 5, 924-932.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Valerio L., De Meyer M., Penel C., and Dunand C. (2004). Expression analysis of the Arabidopsis peroxidase multigenic family. Phytochemistry 65, 1331-1342.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  91. Waszczak C., Carmody M., and Kangasjärvi J. (2018). Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 209-236.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  92. Wrzaczek M., Brosché M., Salojärvi J., Kangasjärvi S., Idänheimo N., Mersmann S., Robatzek S., Karpiński S., Karpińska B., and Kangasjärvi J. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of the CRK/DUF26 group of receptor-like protein kinases by ozone and plant hormones in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 95.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  93. Wu F., Chi Y., Jiang Z., Xu Y., Xie L., Huang F., Wan D., Ni J., Yuan F., and Wu X. (2020). Hydrogen peroxide sensor HPCA1 is an LRR receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Nature 578, 577-581.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  94. Yamada M., Han X., and Benfey P.N. (2020). RGF1 controls root meristem size through ROS signalling. Nature 577, 85-88.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  95. Yoboue E.D., Sitia R., and Simmen T. (2018). Redox crosstalk at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane contact sites (MCS) uses toxic waste to deliver messages. Cell Death Dis. 9, 331.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  96. Yoshie Y., Goto K., Takai R., Iwano M., Takayama S., Isogai A., and Che F.S. (2005). Function of the rice gp91phox homologs OsrbohA and OsrbohE genes in ROS-dependent plant immune responses. Plant Biotechnol. (Tokyo) 22, 127-135.
    CrossRef
  97. Yu Z., Jia D.Y., and Liu T.B. (2019). Polyamine oxidases play various roles in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Plants (Basel) 8, 184.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  98. Yun B.W., Feechan A., Yin M., Saidi N.B., Le Bihan T., Yu M., Moore J.W., Kang J.G., Kwon E., and Spoel S.H., et al. (2011). S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase regulates cell death in plant immunity. Nature 478, 264-268.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  99. Zechmann B. and Müller M. (2010). Subcellular compartmentation of glutathione in dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma 246, 15-24.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  100. Zeng J., Dong Z., Wu H., Tian Z., and Zhao Z. (2017). Redox regulation of plant stem cell fate. EMBO J. 36, 2844-2855.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  101. Zhao L., Phuong L.T., Luan M.T., Fitrianti A.N., Matsui H., Nakagami H., Noutoshi Y., Yamamoto M., Ichinose Y., and Shiraishi T., et al. (2019). A class III peroxidase PRX34 is a component of disease resistance in Arabidopsis. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 85, 405-412.
    CrossRef
  102. Zorov D.B., Juhaszova M., and Sollott S.J. (2006). Mitochondrial ROS-induced ROS release: an update and review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 509-517.
    Pubmed CrossRef
Mol. Cells
Sep 30, 2023 Vol.46 No.9, pp. 527~572
COVER PICTURE
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is marked by airspace enlargement (emphysema) and small airway fibrosis, leading to airflow obstruction and eventual respiratory failure. Shown is a microphotograph of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histological sections of the enlarged alveoli as an indicator of emphysema. Piao et al. (pp. 558-572) demonstrate that recombinant human hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (rhHAPLN1) significantly reduces the extended airspaces of the emphysematous alveoli by increasing the levels of TGF-β receptor I and SIRT1/6, as a previously unrecognized mechanism in human alveolar epithelial cells, and consequently mitigates COPD.
Current Issue Archives

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in Mol. Cells

Molecules and Cells

eISSN 0219-1032
qr-code Download