Mol. Cells 2023; 46(5): 259-267
Published online February 9, 2023
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2128
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : leei@knu.ac.kr
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.
Pyruvate metabolism, a key pathway in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, is crucial for energy homeostasis and mitochondrial quality control (MQC), including fusion/fission dynamics and mitophagy. Alterations in pyruvate flux and MQC are associated with reactive oxygen species accumulation and Ca2+ flux into the mitochondria, which can induce mitochondrial ultrastructural changes, mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic dysregulation. Perturbations in MQC are emerging as a central mechanism for the pathogenesis of various metabolic diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes and insulin resistance-related diseases. Mitochondrial Ca2+ regulates the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), which is central to pyruvate metabolism, by promoting its dephosphorylation. Increase of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) is associated with perturbation of mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) function and Ca2+ flux. Pyruvate metabolism also plays an important role in immune cell activation and function, dysregulation of which also leads to insulin resistance and inflammatory disease. Pyruvate metabolism affects macrophage polarization, mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation, which are critical in determining macrophage function and immune response. MAMs and MQCs have also been intensively studied in macrophage and T cell immunity. Metabolic reprogramming connected with pyruvate metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation are important to macrophages polarization (M1/M2) and function. T cell differentiation is also directly linked to pyruvate metabolism, with inhibition of pyruvate oxidation by PDKs promoting proinflammatory T cell polarization. This article provides a brief review on the emerging role of pyruvate metabolism in MQC and MAM function, and how dysfunction in these processes leads to metabolic and inflammatory diseases.
Keywords macrophage, mitochondria-associated membranes, mitochondria quality control, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, T cell
Mitochondria are the primary sites of energy production in cells. Pyruvate metabolism is a key function of mitochondria (Spinelli and Haigis, 2018): under physiological conditions, cells oxidize pyruvate, the end-product of glycolysis, to form acetyl-CoA within the mitochondria; acetyl-CoA then efficiently produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. Under anaerobic conditions, pyruvate can be reduced to lactate by anaerobic glycolysis; however, in certain circumstances, cells redirect pyruvate from oxidation to reduction to meet metabolic demands, despite aerobic conditions (Martínez-Reyes and Chandel, 2020). These metabolic adaptations are called the Warburg effect, or aerobic glycolysis; during this process, mitochondria coordinate and execute the changes in metabolic processes to maintain energy homeostasis (Palikaras et al., 2018). During this process, mitochondria undergo morphological transformation, characterized by fusion/fission cycles and inter-organelle crosstalk (Cho et al., 2019; 2020; Giacomello et al., 2020; Picca et al., 2018; Srinivasan et al., 2017; Yu and Pekkurnaz, 2018).
Recent evidence suggests that pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) flux and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) are strongly associated with mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM) function, Ca2+ flux, mitochondrial quality control (MQC) and several metabolic disorders (Thoudam et al., 2019).
In this review, we summarize current understanding of the molecular signaling pathways that require mitochondrial adaptation and the metabolic reprogramming that occurs to meet metabolic demands. First, we describe how critical PDC flux and mitochondrial respiration are in response to pathological conditions. Second, we discuss the association between pyruvate metabolism and mitochondrial inter-organelle communication and how mitochondrial morphological adaptations are relevant to cell health and disease. Lastly, we examine how dysfunction of mitochondrial PDC flux leads to inflammation in macrophages and T cells.
The PDC consists of multiple copies of three catalytic enzymes (E1, E2, and E3) that function sequentially to oxidatively decarboxylate pyruvate at the expense of NAD+ and CoA, which results in the formation of acetyl-CoA, NADH, and CO2. The activity of the PDC is regulated by four protein kinases (PDK1, 2, 3, and 4) that inactivate E1, the rate-limiting enzyme of the complex, and two protein phosphatases (pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatases; PDP1 and PDP2) that stimulate activity of E1 (Patel et al., 2014). Therefore, the overall catalytic activity of PDC is determined by the balance between PDKs and PDPs (Harris et al., 2002).
Since pyruvate occupies a central position in essential metabolic pathways, both catabolic and anabolic, the activities of the PDC and PDKs require tight regulation (Fig. 1). Genetically induced deficiency and pharmacologically induced inhibition of PDKs often produce beneficial effects in pathological conditions, which has led to an interest in the therapeutic potential of PDK inhibitors. For example, in
Mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum (ER) contact sites are generally referred to as MERCs (mitochondria–ER contacts) or MAMs when studied at a biochemical level. Mitochondria and ER actively communicate with MAMs understood to be important hubs for several key cellular processes such as lipid trafficking, mitochondrial dynamics, Ca2+ signaling, ER stress, apoptosis, and macroautophagy (Gordaliza-Alaguero et al., 2019). Prior to being studied at the molecular level, evidence suggested that specific regions of mitochondria were sometimes found in close proximity to the ER. This active communication appeared to initiate reactive oxygen species accumulation at the MAM interface as a consequence of Ca2+ flux from the ER, resulting in mitochondrial ultrastructural changes (Rizzuto et al., 1998). Subsequent studies established a key role of MAMs in mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling. Mitochondrial Ca2+ regulates and activates the PDC, and as a result, the TCA, by promoting PDC dephosphorylation (Balaban, 2009); a finely-tuned mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake mechanism following its release from ER is thus necessary to maintain cellular bioenergetics (Cardenas et al., 2010; 2016; Csordas et al., 2006). Recent results suggest a complex relationship between metabolic perturbations and inter-organelle interactions; while some evidence suggests that metabolic changes cause defects in inter-organelle crosstalk, other studies show that deficiency in proteins that tether or facilitate the interaction between mitochondria and the ER lead to metabolic perturbations in various tissues. Further study of inter-organelle interactions will allow identification of key proteins, elucidate novel pathways, and unravel their implications in human disease.
The structural scaffold of MAMs consists of several proteins residing on the outer mitochondrial membrane that interact with those in the ER membrane. Our current understanding points towards the following protein complexes governing mitochondria–ER bridging: inositol 1, 4, 5-triphosphate receptors (IP3R1/2/3), vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B and B-cell receptor-associated protein 31 in the ER; glucose-regulated protein (GRP)75, voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC)1, protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein (PTPIP)51 and mitochondrial fission 1 protein in mitochondria; and mitofusin (MFN)2 in both the ER and mitochondria (Iwasawa et al., 2011). Not only do these proteins shape MAM architecture, they also participate in functions associated with these domains. Motile sperm domain containing 2 is a recently identified MAM tethering protein located in the ER that interacts with PTPIP51 (Di Mattia et al., 2018). IP3Rs, GRP75, and VDAC1 form a Ca2+ channeling complex that acts as a gateway through which Ca2+ leaves the ER and enters mitochondria (Szabadkai et al., 2006). Recently, our group identified that MAM tethering capacity and calcium flux are sustained by the mitochondrial protein PDK4 (Thoudam et al., 2019) (Fig. 2).
Human, animal, and cellular studies have revealed that metabolic perturbations affect MAM function in liver and muscle cells. Genetic ablation of tethering proteins influences MAM architecture:
Dysfunction of MQC is emerging as a central mechanism in the pathogenesis of various metabolic diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, diabetes, and aging (Picca et al., 2018). Several reports suggest that PDKs play a role in MQC besides their canonical function, i.e., regulation of PDC activity (Deng et al., 2020; Pajuelo-Reguera et al., 2015; Park et al., 2015; Shi and McQuibban, 2017; Thoudam et al., 2022). Recently, we identified a unique role of PDK4 in modulating mitochondrial dynamics, where PDK4-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts showed delayed mitochondrial fission in response to mitochondrial electron transport chain toxins compared with wild-type cells. Interestingly, overexpression of PDK4 alone was able to promote mitochondrial fission in the absence of mitochondrial stressors. Mechanistically, PDK4 acts to induce phosphorylation of septin 2 at Ser218, which promotes recruitment of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), mediating mitochondrial fragmentation (Thoudam et al., 2022) (Fig. 3). Additionally, we found that the suppression of septin 2-DRP1 axis by knocking down PDK4 reduced KRAS mutant lung cancer cells growth. Furthermore, knock down of PDK4 was shown to inhibit KRAS mutant cancer cells growth without affecting PDC phosphorylation, supporting a critical role of non-canonical PDK4 action in promoting KRAS mutant cancer growth.
Previously, a genome-wide siRNA screening revealed that PDK1 and PDK4 may play a role in carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP)-induced mitophagy (Orvedahl et al., 2011). PDK4-mediated pyruvate accumulation was implicated in promoting CCCP-induced mitophagy via stabilization of the mitophagy adaptor protein PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1). Additionally, PDK4 overexpression or addition of pyruvate strongly stimulated CCCP-induced mitophagy in a PINK1/Parkin dependent manner. However, pyruvate alone failed to stimulate mitophagy in the absence of mitochondrial stress (Park et al., 2015). Overall, this implicates PDK4-pyruvate axis in promoting mitophagy during mitochondrial stress. In contrast, PDK2 inhibits mitophagy by phosphorylating PARL to promote PINK1 degradation, while depletion of mitochondrial ATP decreased PDK2 activity leading to induction of PINK1-mediated mitophagy (Fig. 3). Interestingly, in this study, induction of PDK2 did not affect cellular pyruvate levels (Shi and McQuibban, 2017), suggesting a pyruvate-independent mechanism. Together, these findings suggest that individual PDKs may function independently to sense mitochondrial dysfunction depending on cellular status to regulate MQC, since activity of PDKs can be affected by the availability of several factors, including pyruvate, ATP, NADH, and acetyl-CoA (Park et al., 2018b).
During inflammation, activated immune cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to facilitate cell proliferation, cytokine production, differentiation and immune responses. A key feature of metabolic reprograming is an increased rate of aerobic glycolysis and decreased rate of mitochondrial respiration. Aberrant metabolic regulation in immune cells can therefore impair immune homeostasis and cause immune disorders, meaning that targeting metabolic mechanisms may offer therapeutic opportunities to resolve inflammation (Palsson-McDermott and O'Neill, 2020).
Macrophages play an essential role in innate immunity and are involved in a variety of immune functions. Macrophages are commonly divided into two lineages, M1 macrophages (classically activated macrophages) and M2 macrophages (alternatively activated macrophages). M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or interferon-γ, while M2 macrophages display an anti-inflammatory signature in response to interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-10. Macrophage polarization (M1/M2) requires metabolic reprogramming to enhance glycolysis and repurpose mitochondrial function. Several studies have shown that regulation of pyruvate oxidation plays an important role in macrophage polarization. For example, PDK1 is required for metabolic reprograming towards aerobic glycolysis and M1 polarization in macrophages (Tan et al., 2015). Inhibition of mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation, either via depletion of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) or the PDC, has proinflammatory effects, rewiring mitochondrial respiration to aerobic glycolysis and enhancing Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) activation and IL-1β secretion in nigericin-stimulated macrophages (Lin et al., 2021). By contrast, deletion of PDK2/4 diminishes M1 polarization
Recent studies have also shown that mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation are critical in macrophage function: LPS-stimulated macrophages display DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fragmentation and correspondingly elevated inflammatory cytokines (Gao et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2022; Kapetanovic et al., 2020). Additionally, defects in MAM formation by MFN2 deficiency significantly enhance proinflammatory responses in macrophages (Khodzhaeva et al., 2021).
Pyruvate oxidation is also involved in T cell development. Defects in mitochondrial pyruvate transport via deletion of MPC1 in T cells impairs mitochondrial respiration and affects early T cell development in the thymus (Ramstead et al., 2020); consequently, MPC1 deficiency results in irregular peripheral T cell homeostasis (Ramstead et al., 2020). Consistent with this, mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation via PDC is required for normal T cell development: PDHA1 deletion leads to pyruvate accumulation, oxidative stress and reductions in double-positive thymocytes during T cell development (Jun et al., 2021). Pyruvate oxidation also regulates T cell activation early in the T cell receptor signaling pathway; within an hour of T cell receptor activation, T cells initiate aerobic glycolysis by activating PDK1, inhibiting pyruvate oxidation (Menk et al., 2018). In line with this, treatment with DCA, a pan-PDK inhibitor, prevents the rapid activation of aerobic glycolysis in T cells (Menk et al., 2018).
T cell subsets have distinct metabolic patterns. Several studies have shown that manipulation of metabolism towards aerobic glycolysis is required for proinflammatory T cell differentiation, while metabolic reprograming towards pyruvate oxidation is required for anti-inflammatory Treg differentiation. DCA treatment inhibits the expression of transcription factors (T-bet, GATA3, and RORγt), differentiation and effector function of proinflammatory Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, whereas it enhances Treg cell differentiation, Foxp3 expression and immunosuppressive function (Eleftheriadis et al., 2016; Gerriets et al., 2015; Makita et al., 2017; Ostroukhova et al., 2012). Interestingly, Hif1α, a transcription factor regulating PDK expression, is exclusively expressed in Th17 cells (Shi et al., 2011) and deletion of Hif1α downregulates glycolytic enzyme transcription, thereby compromising Th17 cell differentiation and promoting Treg cell polarization (Shi et al., 2011). In line with the effect of pyruvate metabolism on Th17 cell function, overexpression of PDP2 (a PDC activator) decreases aerobic glycolysis and Th17 polarization but deletion of PDP2 increases aerobic glycolysis and Th17 polarization (Kono et al., 2018).
Collectively, evidence suggests that pyruvate oxidation is a key pathway orchestrating immunometabolism and T cell function, suggesting that pyruvate oxidation may provide a novel target for therapeutic intervention in T cell-mediated immune disorders. Indeed, inhibition of aerobic glycolysis by DCA attenuates rheumatic disorders such as collagen-induced arthritis (Bian et al., 2009). DCA treatment also selectively inhibits Th17 cell differentiation and attenuates multiple sclerosis in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (Gerriets et al., 2015). In addition, CD4+ T cells from patients with lupus (Gergely et al., 2002; Tsokos, 2011; Yin et al., 2015) and inflammatory bowel disease (Dumitru et al., 2018; Gerriets et al., 2015; Imam et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2023), display higher levels of Th17 cells, mitochondrial dysfunction and aerobic glycolysis. However, DCA treatment failed to resolve inflammation effectively in an animal models of colitis (Gerriets et al., 2015) and lupus (Yin et al., 2016), despite diminished Th17 differentiation. These contradictory findings suggest further study is required.
A recent investigation has illuminated the role of PDK4 in colitogenic CD4+ T cells. The study indicates that PDK4 and phosphorylated PDHE1a are augmented in gut-infiltrating CD4+ T cells obtained from inflamed intestinal tissues in both DSS-induced colitis models and patients with IBD (Lee et al., 2023). Furthermore, utilizing DSS-induced colitis models and adoptive T cell transfer colitis models, CD4-specific PDK4 knockout mice exhibited a reduced extent of gut inflammation, with a decrease in Th1 and Th17 cells and an increase in Treg cells (Lee et al., 2023). The
PDK2 also plays an important role in survival of proinflammatory T cells under hypoxic stress. Kidney tissue-infiltrating T cells from lupus-prone mice display distinct metabolic phenotypes linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and T cell exhaustion (Tilstra et al., 2018). Under hypoxic conditions, T cells from the renal tissue of lupus-prone mice express Hif1α-dependent PDK2, which promotes alternative splicing of BCL2 interacting protein 3, increasing T cell adaptation and survival in the presence of hypoxia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction (Chen et al., 2020). By contrast, inhibition of Hif1α by T cell-specific genetic deletion or pharmacological intervention (with PX-478) attenuates T cell infiltration and tissue damage, improving survival in lupus-prone mice (Chen et al., 2020) (Fig. 4).
Finally, the role of mitochondrial dynamics (Buck et al., 2016; Cogliati et al., 2013; Simula et al., 2018) and MAM, as discussed above and previous (Bantug et al., 2018), has been intensively studied in T cell immunity. However, whether pyruvate metabolism is directly or indirectly linked to such mitochondrial scaffolds in immune cells is largely unknown, although pyruvate flux is known to decline due to mitochondrial fission and cristae disorganization in T cells (Buck et al., 2016).
Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells. However, mitochondria are also actively involved in the metabolic response to energy supply and subsequently adapt to metabolic changes, including via morphological changes such as fission/fusion cycles and MAM formation. Evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction, including metabolic reprograming, mitochondrial dynamics and inter-organelle mislinkage, is observed in metabolic syndromes and inflammation; therefore, recent studies suggest that targeting mitochondrial dysfunction could be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating these disorders. In this Minireview, we have discussed the role of PDC flux in mitochondrial dysfunction and disease manifestation. Although targeting PDC flux may offer therapeutic opportunities to treat metabolic syndrome and inflammation, molecular mechanisms between PDC flux and mitochondrial dysfunction have not been elucidated in detail. However, our group has shown that PDK4 has non-canonical roles in MAM formation (Thoudam et al., 2019) and MQC (Thoudam et al., 2022), suggesting further investigation is needed to uncover other functions of metabolic enzymes involved in PDC flux and their potential impact on metabolic syndromes and inflammatory disease.
M.-J.K. is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2022R1C1C101089811). H.L. is supported by the Basic Science Research Program, through the NRF of Korea government (MSIT) (2020R1C1C1009322). H.-J.K. is supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A1A01062968). I.-K.L. is supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant No. HR22C1832).
M.-J.K., H.L., D.C., T.T., H.-J.K., and R.A.H. wrote the manuscript and designed the figures. I.-K.L. conceived and supervised the overall process.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Mol. Cells 2023; 46(5): 259-267
Published online May 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.2128
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Min-Ji Kim1 , Hoyul Lee2
, Dipanjan Chanda2
, Themis Thoudam2
, Hyeon-Ji Kang2
, Robert A. Harris3
, and In-Kyu Lee4,*
1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea, 2Research Institute of Aging and Metabolism, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea, 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA, 4Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
Correspondence to:leei@knu.ac.kr
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.
Pyruvate metabolism, a key pathway in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, is crucial for energy homeostasis and mitochondrial quality control (MQC), including fusion/fission dynamics and mitophagy. Alterations in pyruvate flux and MQC are associated with reactive oxygen species accumulation and Ca2+ flux into the mitochondria, which can induce mitochondrial ultrastructural changes, mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic dysregulation. Perturbations in MQC are emerging as a central mechanism for the pathogenesis of various metabolic diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes and insulin resistance-related diseases. Mitochondrial Ca2+ regulates the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), which is central to pyruvate metabolism, by promoting its dephosphorylation. Increase of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) is associated with perturbation of mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) function and Ca2+ flux. Pyruvate metabolism also plays an important role in immune cell activation and function, dysregulation of which also leads to insulin resistance and inflammatory disease. Pyruvate metabolism affects macrophage polarization, mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation, which are critical in determining macrophage function and immune response. MAMs and MQCs have also been intensively studied in macrophage and T cell immunity. Metabolic reprogramming connected with pyruvate metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation are important to macrophages polarization (M1/M2) and function. T cell differentiation is also directly linked to pyruvate metabolism, with inhibition of pyruvate oxidation by PDKs promoting proinflammatory T cell polarization. This article provides a brief review on the emerging role of pyruvate metabolism in MQC and MAM function, and how dysfunction in these processes leads to metabolic and inflammatory diseases.
Keywords: macrophage, mitochondria-associated membranes, mitochondria quality control, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, T cell
Mitochondria are the primary sites of energy production in cells. Pyruvate metabolism is a key function of mitochondria (Spinelli and Haigis, 2018): under physiological conditions, cells oxidize pyruvate, the end-product of glycolysis, to form acetyl-CoA within the mitochondria; acetyl-CoA then efficiently produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. Under anaerobic conditions, pyruvate can be reduced to lactate by anaerobic glycolysis; however, in certain circumstances, cells redirect pyruvate from oxidation to reduction to meet metabolic demands, despite aerobic conditions (Martínez-Reyes and Chandel, 2020). These metabolic adaptations are called the Warburg effect, or aerobic glycolysis; during this process, mitochondria coordinate and execute the changes in metabolic processes to maintain energy homeostasis (Palikaras et al., 2018). During this process, mitochondria undergo morphological transformation, characterized by fusion/fission cycles and inter-organelle crosstalk (Cho et al., 2019; 2020; Giacomello et al., 2020; Picca et al., 2018; Srinivasan et al., 2017; Yu and Pekkurnaz, 2018).
Recent evidence suggests that pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) flux and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) are strongly associated with mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM) function, Ca2+ flux, mitochondrial quality control (MQC) and several metabolic disorders (Thoudam et al., 2019).
In this review, we summarize current understanding of the molecular signaling pathways that require mitochondrial adaptation and the metabolic reprogramming that occurs to meet metabolic demands. First, we describe how critical PDC flux and mitochondrial respiration are in response to pathological conditions. Second, we discuss the association between pyruvate metabolism and mitochondrial inter-organelle communication and how mitochondrial morphological adaptations are relevant to cell health and disease. Lastly, we examine how dysfunction of mitochondrial PDC flux leads to inflammation in macrophages and T cells.
The PDC consists of multiple copies of three catalytic enzymes (E1, E2, and E3) that function sequentially to oxidatively decarboxylate pyruvate at the expense of NAD+ and CoA, which results in the formation of acetyl-CoA, NADH, and CO2. The activity of the PDC is regulated by four protein kinases (PDK1, 2, 3, and 4) that inactivate E1, the rate-limiting enzyme of the complex, and two protein phosphatases (pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatases; PDP1 and PDP2) that stimulate activity of E1 (Patel et al., 2014). Therefore, the overall catalytic activity of PDC is determined by the balance between PDKs and PDPs (Harris et al., 2002).
Since pyruvate occupies a central position in essential metabolic pathways, both catabolic and anabolic, the activities of the PDC and PDKs require tight regulation (Fig. 1). Genetically induced deficiency and pharmacologically induced inhibition of PDKs often produce beneficial effects in pathological conditions, which has led to an interest in the therapeutic potential of PDK inhibitors. For example, in
Mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum (ER) contact sites are generally referred to as MERCs (mitochondria–ER contacts) or MAMs when studied at a biochemical level. Mitochondria and ER actively communicate with MAMs understood to be important hubs for several key cellular processes such as lipid trafficking, mitochondrial dynamics, Ca2+ signaling, ER stress, apoptosis, and macroautophagy (Gordaliza-Alaguero et al., 2019). Prior to being studied at the molecular level, evidence suggested that specific regions of mitochondria were sometimes found in close proximity to the ER. This active communication appeared to initiate reactive oxygen species accumulation at the MAM interface as a consequence of Ca2+ flux from the ER, resulting in mitochondrial ultrastructural changes (Rizzuto et al., 1998). Subsequent studies established a key role of MAMs in mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling. Mitochondrial Ca2+ regulates and activates the PDC, and as a result, the TCA, by promoting PDC dephosphorylation (Balaban, 2009); a finely-tuned mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake mechanism following its release from ER is thus necessary to maintain cellular bioenergetics (Cardenas et al., 2010; 2016; Csordas et al., 2006). Recent results suggest a complex relationship between metabolic perturbations and inter-organelle interactions; while some evidence suggests that metabolic changes cause defects in inter-organelle crosstalk, other studies show that deficiency in proteins that tether or facilitate the interaction between mitochondria and the ER lead to metabolic perturbations in various tissues. Further study of inter-organelle interactions will allow identification of key proteins, elucidate novel pathways, and unravel their implications in human disease.
The structural scaffold of MAMs consists of several proteins residing on the outer mitochondrial membrane that interact with those in the ER membrane. Our current understanding points towards the following protein complexes governing mitochondria–ER bridging: inositol 1, 4, 5-triphosphate receptors (IP3R1/2/3), vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B and B-cell receptor-associated protein 31 in the ER; glucose-regulated protein (GRP)75, voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC)1, protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein (PTPIP)51 and mitochondrial fission 1 protein in mitochondria; and mitofusin (MFN)2 in both the ER and mitochondria (Iwasawa et al., 2011). Not only do these proteins shape MAM architecture, they also participate in functions associated with these domains. Motile sperm domain containing 2 is a recently identified MAM tethering protein located in the ER that interacts with PTPIP51 (Di Mattia et al., 2018). IP3Rs, GRP75, and VDAC1 form a Ca2+ channeling complex that acts as a gateway through which Ca2+ leaves the ER and enters mitochondria (Szabadkai et al., 2006). Recently, our group identified that MAM tethering capacity and calcium flux are sustained by the mitochondrial protein PDK4 (Thoudam et al., 2019) (Fig. 2).
Human, animal, and cellular studies have revealed that metabolic perturbations affect MAM function in liver and muscle cells. Genetic ablation of tethering proteins influences MAM architecture:
Dysfunction of MQC is emerging as a central mechanism in the pathogenesis of various metabolic diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, diabetes, and aging (Picca et al., 2018). Several reports suggest that PDKs play a role in MQC besides their canonical function, i.e., regulation of PDC activity (Deng et al., 2020; Pajuelo-Reguera et al., 2015; Park et al., 2015; Shi and McQuibban, 2017; Thoudam et al., 2022). Recently, we identified a unique role of PDK4 in modulating mitochondrial dynamics, where PDK4-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts showed delayed mitochondrial fission in response to mitochondrial electron transport chain toxins compared with wild-type cells. Interestingly, overexpression of PDK4 alone was able to promote mitochondrial fission in the absence of mitochondrial stressors. Mechanistically, PDK4 acts to induce phosphorylation of septin 2 at Ser218, which promotes recruitment of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), mediating mitochondrial fragmentation (Thoudam et al., 2022) (Fig. 3). Additionally, we found that the suppression of septin 2-DRP1 axis by knocking down PDK4 reduced KRAS mutant lung cancer cells growth. Furthermore, knock down of PDK4 was shown to inhibit KRAS mutant cancer cells growth without affecting PDC phosphorylation, supporting a critical role of non-canonical PDK4 action in promoting KRAS mutant cancer growth.
Previously, a genome-wide siRNA screening revealed that PDK1 and PDK4 may play a role in carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP)-induced mitophagy (Orvedahl et al., 2011). PDK4-mediated pyruvate accumulation was implicated in promoting CCCP-induced mitophagy via stabilization of the mitophagy adaptor protein PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1). Additionally, PDK4 overexpression or addition of pyruvate strongly stimulated CCCP-induced mitophagy in a PINK1/Parkin dependent manner. However, pyruvate alone failed to stimulate mitophagy in the absence of mitochondrial stress (Park et al., 2015). Overall, this implicates PDK4-pyruvate axis in promoting mitophagy during mitochondrial stress. In contrast, PDK2 inhibits mitophagy by phosphorylating PARL to promote PINK1 degradation, while depletion of mitochondrial ATP decreased PDK2 activity leading to induction of PINK1-mediated mitophagy (Fig. 3). Interestingly, in this study, induction of PDK2 did not affect cellular pyruvate levels (Shi and McQuibban, 2017), suggesting a pyruvate-independent mechanism. Together, these findings suggest that individual PDKs may function independently to sense mitochondrial dysfunction depending on cellular status to regulate MQC, since activity of PDKs can be affected by the availability of several factors, including pyruvate, ATP, NADH, and acetyl-CoA (Park et al., 2018b).
During inflammation, activated immune cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to facilitate cell proliferation, cytokine production, differentiation and immune responses. A key feature of metabolic reprograming is an increased rate of aerobic glycolysis and decreased rate of mitochondrial respiration. Aberrant metabolic regulation in immune cells can therefore impair immune homeostasis and cause immune disorders, meaning that targeting metabolic mechanisms may offer therapeutic opportunities to resolve inflammation (Palsson-McDermott and O'Neill, 2020).
Macrophages play an essential role in innate immunity and are involved in a variety of immune functions. Macrophages are commonly divided into two lineages, M1 macrophages (classically activated macrophages) and M2 macrophages (alternatively activated macrophages). M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or interferon-γ, while M2 macrophages display an anti-inflammatory signature in response to interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-10. Macrophage polarization (M1/M2) requires metabolic reprogramming to enhance glycolysis and repurpose mitochondrial function. Several studies have shown that regulation of pyruvate oxidation plays an important role in macrophage polarization. For example, PDK1 is required for metabolic reprograming towards aerobic glycolysis and M1 polarization in macrophages (Tan et al., 2015). Inhibition of mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation, either via depletion of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) or the PDC, has proinflammatory effects, rewiring mitochondrial respiration to aerobic glycolysis and enhancing Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) activation and IL-1β secretion in nigericin-stimulated macrophages (Lin et al., 2021). By contrast, deletion of PDK2/4 diminishes M1 polarization
Recent studies have also shown that mitochondrial dynamics and MAM formation are critical in macrophage function: LPS-stimulated macrophages display DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fragmentation and correspondingly elevated inflammatory cytokines (Gao et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2022; Kapetanovic et al., 2020). Additionally, defects in MAM formation by MFN2 deficiency significantly enhance proinflammatory responses in macrophages (Khodzhaeva et al., 2021).
Pyruvate oxidation is also involved in T cell development. Defects in mitochondrial pyruvate transport via deletion of MPC1 in T cells impairs mitochondrial respiration and affects early T cell development in the thymus (Ramstead et al., 2020); consequently, MPC1 deficiency results in irregular peripheral T cell homeostasis (Ramstead et al., 2020). Consistent with this, mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation via PDC is required for normal T cell development: PDHA1 deletion leads to pyruvate accumulation, oxidative stress and reductions in double-positive thymocytes during T cell development (Jun et al., 2021). Pyruvate oxidation also regulates T cell activation early in the T cell receptor signaling pathway; within an hour of T cell receptor activation, T cells initiate aerobic glycolysis by activating PDK1, inhibiting pyruvate oxidation (Menk et al., 2018). In line with this, treatment with DCA, a pan-PDK inhibitor, prevents the rapid activation of aerobic glycolysis in T cells (Menk et al., 2018).
T cell subsets have distinct metabolic patterns. Several studies have shown that manipulation of metabolism towards aerobic glycolysis is required for proinflammatory T cell differentiation, while metabolic reprograming towards pyruvate oxidation is required for anti-inflammatory Treg differentiation. DCA treatment inhibits the expression of transcription factors (T-bet, GATA3, and RORγt), differentiation and effector function of proinflammatory Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, whereas it enhances Treg cell differentiation, Foxp3 expression and immunosuppressive function (Eleftheriadis et al., 2016; Gerriets et al., 2015; Makita et al., 2017; Ostroukhova et al., 2012). Interestingly, Hif1α, a transcription factor regulating PDK expression, is exclusively expressed in Th17 cells (Shi et al., 2011) and deletion of Hif1α downregulates glycolytic enzyme transcription, thereby compromising Th17 cell differentiation and promoting Treg cell polarization (Shi et al., 2011). In line with the effect of pyruvate metabolism on Th17 cell function, overexpression of PDP2 (a PDC activator) decreases aerobic glycolysis and Th17 polarization but deletion of PDP2 increases aerobic glycolysis and Th17 polarization (Kono et al., 2018).
Collectively, evidence suggests that pyruvate oxidation is a key pathway orchestrating immunometabolism and T cell function, suggesting that pyruvate oxidation may provide a novel target for therapeutic intervention in T cell-mediated immune disorders. Indeed, inhibition of aerobic glycolysis by DCA attenuates rheumatic disorders such as collagen-induced arthritis (Bian et al., 2009). DCA treatment also selectively inhibits Th17 cell differentiation and attenuates multiple sclerosis in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (Gerriets et al., 2015). In addition, CD4+ T cells from patients with lupus (Gergely et al., 2002; Tsokos, 2011; Yin et al., 2015) and inflammatory bowel disease (Dumitru et al., 2018; Gerriets et al., 2015; Imam et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2023), display higher levels of Th17 cells, mitochondrial dysfunction and aerobic glycolysis. However, DCA treatment failed to resolve inflammation effectively in an animal models of colitis (Gerriets et al., 2015) and lupus (Yin et al., 2016), despite diminished Th17 differentiation. These contradictory findings suggest further study is required.
A recent investigation has illuminated the role of PDK4 in colitogenic CD4+ T cells. The study indicates that PDK4 and phosphorylated PDHE1a are augmented in gut-infiltrating CD4+ T cells obtained from inflamed intestinal tissues in both DSS-induced colitis models and patients with IBD (Lee et al., 2023). Furthermore, utilizing DSS-induced colitis models and adoptive T cell transfer colitis models, CD4-specific PDK4 knockout mice exhibited a reduced extent of gut inflammation, with a decrease in Th1 and Th17 cells and an increase in Treg cells (Lee et al., 2023). The
PDK2 also plays an important role in survival of proinflammatory T cells under hypoxic stress. Kidney tissue-infiltrating T cells from lupus-prone mice display distinct metabolic phenotypes linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and T cell exhaustion (Tilstra et al., 2018). Under hypoxic conditions, T cells from the renal tissue of lupus-prone mice express Hif1α-dependent PDK2, which promotes alternative splicing of BCL2 interacting protein 3, increasing T cell adaptation and survival in the presence of hypoxia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction (Chen et al., 2020). By contrast, inhibition of Hif1α by T cell-specific genetic deletion or pharmacological intervention (with PX-478) attenuates T cell infiltration and tissue damage, improving survival in lupus-prone mice (Chen et al., 2020) (Fig. 4).
Finally, the role of mitochondrial dynamics (Buck et al., 2016; Cogliati et al., 2013; Simula et al., 2018) and MAM, as discussed above and previous (Bantug et al., 2018), has been intensively studied in T cell immunity. However, whether pyruvate metabolism is directly or indirectly linked to such mitochondrial scaffolds in immune cells is largely unknown, although pyruvate flux is known to decline due to mitochondrial fission and cristae disorganization in T cells (Buck et al., 2016).
Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells. However, mitochondria are also actively involved in the metabolic response to energy supply and subsequently adapt to metabolic changes, including via morphological changes such as fission/fusion cycles and MAM formation. Evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction, including metabolic reprograming, mitochondrial dynamics and inter-organelle mislinkage, is observed in metabolic syndromes and inflammation; therefore, recent studies suggest that targeting mitochondrial dysfunction could be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating these disorders. In this Minireview, we have discussed the role of PDC flux in mitochondrial dysfunction and disease manifestation. Although targeting PDC flux may offer therapeutic opportunities to treat metabolic syndrome and inflammation, molecular mechanisms between PDC flux and mitochondrial dysfunction have not been elucidated in detail. However, our group has shown that PDK4 has non-canonical roles in MAM formation (Thoudam et al., 2019) and MQC (Thoudam et al., 2022), suggesting further investigation is needed to uncover other functions of metabolic enzymes involved in PDC flux and their potential impact on metabolic syndromes and inflammatory disease.
M.-J.K. is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2022R1C1C101089811). H.L. is supported by the Basic Science Research Program, through the NRF of Korea government (MSIT) (2020R1C1C1009322). H.-J.K. is supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A1A01062968). I.-K.L. is supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant No. HR22C1832).
M.-J.K., H.L., D.C., T.T., H.-J.K., and R.A.H. wrote the manuscript and designed the figures. I.-K.L. conceived and supervised the overall process.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Gil-Ran Kim and Je-Min Choi
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(8): 513-521 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.2056Yoonjeong Lee, Jaehyeon Kim, Hyunjin Kim, Ji Eun Han, Sohee Kim, Kyong-hwa Kang, Donghoon Kim, Jong-Min Kim, and Hyongjong Koh
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(7): 454-464 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.5002Yuan-Shen Chen, Wei-Chu Chuang, Hsiu-Ni Kung, Ching-Yuan Cheng, Duen-Yi Huang, Ponarulselvam Sekar, and Wan-Wan Lin
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(4): 257-272 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0193