TOP

Journal Club

Split Viewer

Mol. Cells 2023; 46(9): 535-537

Published online July 28, 2023

https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.0086

© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology

Unveiling Nature’s Nitrogen-Fixing Secrets

Wonchull Kang1,2,*

1Department of Chemistry and Integrative Institute of Basic Science, College of Natural Sciences, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea, 2Department of Green Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea

Correspondence to : wonchullkang@ssu.ac.kr

Received: May 24, 2023; Revised: June 12, 2023; Accepted: June 13, 2023

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.


Biological nitrogen fixation is the process of converting atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia. This process is catalyzed by a metalloenzyme complex composed of an iron protein (Fe Protein) and an iron-molybdenum protein (MoFe Protein). During adenine triphosphate hydrolysis, electrons are transported from FeP to MoFeP, resulting in the formation a transient nitrogenase complex. Despite its significance, the atomic details of the mechanism remain unknown. In a recent study by Rutledge et al. (2022), who presented the first cryo-electron microscopy structure of the nitrogenase complex, a significant breakthrough was achieved in understanding the structure of the nitrogenase complex structure. The study revealed that one FeP binds to MoFeP, suggesting a ping-pong mechanism. This investigation lays the groundwork for future studies on the structure and mechanism of metalloprotein, particularly nitrogenase. Future research on nitrogenase will provide valuable insights into fundamental biological processes and the advancement of sustainable agricultural practices. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate.

Nitrogen (N) plays a crucial role in the biosynthesis of amino acids and nucleotides. The reduction of atmospheric nitrogen (N2) and protons to ammonia and hydrogen is exclusively catalyzed by nitrogenase, an enzyme of great importance (Burgess and Lowe, 1996; Thorneley and Lowe, 1996). Three homologous nitrogenases, namely molybdenum-dependent, vanadium-dependent, and iron-only nitrogenases, have been discovered. Among them, molybdenum (Mo) nitrogenase has received the great attention (Jasniewski et al., 2020). The Mo-nitrogenase complex consists of two proteins. The first is the reductase component, commonly known as iron protein (FeP). FeP is a γ2-homodimer that contains a subunit-bridging (Fe4S4) cluster and an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding site within each subunit (Einsle and Rees, 2020). The second component is the catalytic component called the molybdenum iron protein (MoFeP), MoFeP is an α2β2-tetramer that harbors two complex metalloclusters per αβ-dimer: A P-cluster (Fe8S7) and an M-cluster [(R-homocitrate)MoFe7S9C], also known as the iron–molybdenum cofactor (Einsle and Rees, 2020). During substrate turnover, the two components of nitrogenase form a complex that facilitates electron transfer from the (Fe4S4) cluster of FeP to the P-cluster of MoFeP through ATP hydrolysis in each FeP subunit (Rutledge and Tezcan, 2020). These electrons are subsequently transported to the M-cluster of MoFeP, where the reduction of N2 occurs (Rutledge and Tezcan, 2020).

Understanding the biological mechanism of nitrogenase is hindered by the small size of N2 and the challenge associated with isolating N2-bound M-clusters (Threatt and Rees, 2023). Furthermore, interpreting biochemical and spectroscopic data under turnover conditions presents difficulties due to the presence of multiple conformational states (Threatt and Rees, 2023).

In a recent study by Rutledge et al. (2022), cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) was employed to analyze nitrogenase complex at near-atomic resolution catalytic turnover conditions. Due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of the nitrogenase complex, the researchers gathered a substantial dataset comprising 4.5 million usable particles obtained from over 15,000 movies. To prevent activity loss caused by exposure to oxygen, a protein solution containing adequate levels of ATP and dithionite (5 mM each) was prepared and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen in an anaerobic chamber. The cryo-EM grid was manually prepared at 277 K using a plunge freezer developed by the Herzik Lab. The entire process, from turnover to the grid preparation, was completed in less than 30 s, allowing the system to reach a steady state without depleting ATP and dithionite (Rutledge et al., 2022).

Due to their extensive efforts, nitrogenase complexes (FeP and MoFeP) constituted approximately 35% of the total usable particles detected on the cryo-EM grid, while the remaining particles correspond to single proteins consisting of either FeP or MoFeP. Under turnover conditions, two structures of the nitrogenase complex were resolved at a resolution of 2.3 Å, while the cryo-EM structure of resting state of MoFeP was determined at a resolution of 1.8 Å under the same conditions. Although the resting state structure reported in this study exhibited similarity to the earlier crystal structure (Protein Data Bank ID 3U7Q with a root-mean-square deviation = 0.29), distinct nitrogenase complexes were observed under catalytic turnover conditions (Rutledge et al., 2022; Spatzal et al., 2011; Tezcan et al., 2005). The crystal structures of the nitrogenase complex comprised one MoFeP and two homodimeric FePs, resulting in a stoichiometry of 2:1 for the FeP to MoFeP ratio. In contrast, the cryo-EM structures contained one MoFeP and one homodimeric FeP, accompanied by either two nonhydrolyzable ATP analogs or one nonhydrolyzable ATP analog and one ADP (adenosine diphosphate) (Rutledge et al., 2022; Tezcan et al., 2015). The cryo-EM structures revealed that the two αβ halves of MoFeP function independently. Furthermore, these structures demonstrated that the observed partial reactivity and negative cooperativity in nitrogenase arise from the FeP molecule coupled to MoFeP throughout the turnover process. The asymmetric binding of FeP to MoFeP has implications for prolonging the lifespan of the FeP and MoFeP nitrogenase complex, while simultaneously reducing the subsequent electron transfer step from FeP to the P-cluster and M-cluster in MoFeP.

In their groundbreaking study, Rutledge et al. (2022) presented the first cryo-EM structures that unveiled the dynamic nature of the nitrogenase complex under turnover conditions, revealing insights that were not previously attainable through X-ray crystallography. These structures offer compelling evidence supporting the catalytic model of half-reactivity and negative cooperativity in nitrogenase.

Further structural studies coupled with time-resolved studies hold the key to unraveling the precise conformational rearrangements of the M-cluster during turnover in nitrogenase. By capturing dynamic snapshots of the enzyme at different stages of its catalytic cycle, we can gain crucial insights into the intricate structural changes that occur during ATP hydrolysis and dinitrogen reduction. Furthermore, integrating experimental methods with advanced computational modeling and simulation techniques can provide a comprehensive understanding of the nitrogenase mechanism. This integrative approach will enable us to decipher the conformational changes of the cofactors, and the dynamics of the active site, shedding light on the fine details of nitrogenase’s mechanism. Ultimately, these in-depth structural biology studies have the potential to inspire the design of innovative strategies for developing new crops that can fix nitrogen by themselves, potentially providing a sustainable alternative to the energy–consuming Haber–Bosch process of nitrogen fixation and revolutionizing agricultural practices worldwide.

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2022R1C1C1004221) and the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6A1A10044154).

The author has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

  1. Burgess B.K. and Lowe D.J. (1996). Mechanism of molybdenum nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 96, 2983-3012.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Einsle O. and Rees D.C. (2020). Structural enzymology of nitrogenase enzymes. Chem. Rev. 120, 4969-5004.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Jasniewski A.J., Lee C.C., Ribbe M.W., and Hu Y. (2020). Reactivity, mechanism, and assembly of the alternative nitrogenases. Chem. Rev. 120, 5107-5157.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Rutledge H.L., Cook B.D., Nguyen H.P.M., Herzik M.A. Jr., and Tezcan F.A. Jr. (2022). Structures of the nitrogenase complex prepared under catalytic turnover conditions. Science 377, 865-869.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Rutledge H.L. and Tezcan F.A. (2020). Electron transfer in nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 120, 5158-5193.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Spatzal T., Aksoyoglu M., Zhang L., Andrade S.L., Schleicher E., Weber S., Rees D.C., and Einsle O. (2011). Evidence for interstitial carbon in nitrogenase FeMo cofactor. Science 334, 940.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Tezcan F.A., Kaiser J.T., Howard J.B., and Rees D.C. (2015). Structural evidence for asymmetrical nucleotide interactions in nitrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 146-149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Tezcan F.A., Kaiser J.T., Mustafi D., Walton M.Y., Howard J.B., and Rees D.C. (2005). Nitrogenase complexes: multiple docking sites for a nucleotide switch protein. Science 309, 1377-1380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Thorneley R.N.F. and Lowe D.J. (1996). Nitrogenase: substrate binding and activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1, 576-580.
    CrossRef
  10. Threatt S.D. and Rees D.C. (2023). Biological nitrogen fixation in theory, practice, and reality: a perspective on the molybdenum nitrogenase system. FEBS Lett. 597, 45-58.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Article

Journal Club

Mol. Cells 2023; 46(9): 535-537

Published online September 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.0086

Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.

Unveiling Nature’s Nitrogen-Fixing Secrets

Wonchull Kang1,2,*

1Department of Chemistry and Integrative Institute of Basic Science, College of Natural Sciences, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea, 2Department of Green Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea

Correspondence to:wonchullkang@ssu.ac.kr

Received: May 24, 2023; Revised: June 12, 2023; Accepted: June 13, 2023

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.

Body

Nitrogen (N) plays a crucial role in the biosynthesis of amino acids and nucleotides. The reduction of atmospheric nitrogen (N2) and protons to ammonia and hydrogen is exclusively catalyzed by nitrogenase, an enzyme of great importance (Burgess and Lowe, 1996; Thorneley and Lowe, 1996). Three homologous nitrogenases, namely molybdenum-dependent, vanadium-dependent, and iron-only nitrogenases, have been discovered. Among them, molybdenum (Mo) nitrogenase has received the great attention (Jasniewski et al., 2020). The Mo-nitrogenase complex consists of two proteins. The first is the reductase component, commonly known as iron protein (FeP). FeP is a γ2-homodimer that contains a subunit-bridging (Fe4S4) cluster and an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding site within each subunit (Einsle and Rees, 2020). The second component is the catalytic component called the molybdenum iron protein (MoFeP), MoFeP is an α2β2-tetramer that harbors two complex metalloclusters per αβ-dimer: A P-cluster (Fe8S7) and an M-cluster [(R-homocitrate)MoFe7S9C], also known as the iron–molybdenum cofactor (Einsle and Rees, 2020). During substrate turnover, the two components of nitrogenase form a complex that facilitates electron transfer from the (Fe4S4) cluster of FeP to the P-cluster of MoFeP through ATP hydrolysis in each FeP subunit (Rutledge and Tezcan, 2020). These electrons are subsequently transported to the M-cluster of MoFeP, where the reduction of N2 occurs (Rutledge and Tezcan, 2020).

Understanding the biological mechanism of nitrogenase is hindered by the small size of N2 and the challenge associated with isolating N2-bound M-clusters (Threatt and Rees, 2023). Furthermore, interpreting biochemical and spectroscopic data under turnover conditions presents difficulties due to the presence of multiple conformational states (Threatt and Rees, 2023).

In a recent study by Rutledge et al. (2022), cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) was employed to analyze nitrogenase complex at near-atomic resolution catalytic turnover conditions. Due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of the nitrogenase complex, the researchers gathered a substantial dataset comprising 4.5 million usable particles obtained from over 15,000 movies. To prevent activity loss caused by exposure to oxygen, a protein solution containing adequate levels of ATP and dithionite (5 mM each) was prepared and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen in an anaerobic chamber. The cryo-EM grid was manually prepared at 277 K using a plunge freezer developed by the Herzik Lab. The entire process, from turnover to the grid preparation, was completed in less than 30 s, allowing the system to reach a steady state without depleting ATP and dithionite (Rutledge et al., 2022).

Due to their extensive efforts, nitrogenase complexes (FeP and MoFeP) constituted approximately 35% of the total usable particles detected on the cryo-EM grid, while the remaining particles correspond to single proteins consisting of either FeP or MoFeP. Under turnover conditions, two structures of the nitrogenase complex were resolved at a resolution of 2.3 Å, while the cryo-EM structure of resting state of MoFeP was determined at a resolution of 1.8 Å under the same conditions. Although the resting state structure reported in this study exhibited similarity to the earlier crystal structure (Protein Data Bank ID 3U7Q with a root-mean-square deviation = 0.29), distinct nitrogenase complexes were observed under catalytic turnover conditions (Rutledge et al., 2022; Spatzal et al., 2011; Tezcan et al., 2005). The crystal structures of the nitrogenase complex comprised one MoFeP and two homodimeric FePs, resulting in a stoichiometry of 2:1 for the FeP to MoFeP ratio. In contrast, the cryo-EM structures contained one MoFeP and one homodimeric FeP, accompanied by either two nonhydrolyzable ATP analogs or one nonhydrolyzable ATP analog and one ADP (adenosine diphosphate) (Rutledge et al., 2022; Tezcan et al., 2015). The cryo-EM structures revealed that the two αβ halves of MoFeP function independently. Furthermore, these structures demonstrated that the observed partial reactivity and negative cooperativity in nitrogenase arise from the FeP molecule coupled to MoFeP throughout the turnover process. The asymmetric binding of FeP to MoFeP has implications for prolonging the lifespan of the FeP and MoFeP nitrogenase complex, while simultaneously reducing the subsequent electron transfer step from FeP to the P-cluster and M-cluster in MoFeP.

In their groundbreaking study, Rutledge et al. (2022) presented the first cryo-EM structures that unveiled the dynamic nature of the nitrogenase complex under turnover conditions, revealing insights that were not previously attainable through X-ray crystallography. These structures offer compelling evidence supporting the catalytic model of half-reactivity and negative cooperativity in nitrogenase.

Further structural studies coupled with time-resolved studies hold the key to unraveling the precise conformational rearrangements of the M-cluster during turnover in nitrogenase. By capturing dynamic snapshots of the enzyme at different stages of its catalytic cycle, we can gain crucial insights into the intricate structural changes that occur during ATP hydrolysis and dinitrogen reduction. Furthermore, integrating experimental methods with advanced computational modeling and simulation techniques can provide a comprehensive understanding of the nitrogenase mechanism. This integrative approach will enable us to decipher the conformational changes of the cofactors, and the dynamics of the active site, shedding light on the fine details of nitrogenase’s mechanism. Ultimately, these in-depth structural biology studies have the potential to inspire the design of innovative strategies for developing new crops that can fix nitrogen by themselves, potentially providing a sustainable alternative to the energy–consuming Haber–Bosch process of nitrogen fixation and revolutionizing agricultural practices worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2022R1C1C1004221) and the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6A1A10044154).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Fig. 1.Biological nitrogen fixation is the process of converting atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia. This process is catalyzed by a metalloenzyme complex composed of an iron protein (Fe Protein) and an iron-molybdenum protein (MoFe Protein). During adenine triphosphate hydrolysis, electrons are transported from FeP to MoFeP, resulting in the formation a transient nitrogenase complex. Despite its significance, the atomic details of the mechanism remain unknown. In a recent study by Rutledge et al. (2022), who presented the first cryo-electron microscopy structure of the nitrogenase complex, a significant breakthrough was achieved in understanding the structure of the nitrogenase complex structure. The study revealed that one FeP binds to MoFeP, suggesting a ping-pong mechanism. This investigation lays the groundwork for future studies on the structure and mechanism of metalloprotein, particularly nitrogenase. Future research on nitrogenase will provide valuable insights into fundamental biological processes and the advancement of sustainable agricultural practices. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Biological nitrogen fixation is the process of converting atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia. This process is catalyzed by a metalloenzyme complex composed of an iron protein (Fe Protein) and an iron-molybdenum protein (MoFe Protein). During adenine triphosphate hydrolysis, electrons are transported from FeP to MoFeP, resulting in the formation a transient nitrogenase complex. Despite its significance, the atomic details of the mechanism remain unknown. In a recent study by Rutledge et al. (2022), who presented the first cryo-electron microscopy structure of the nitrogenase complex, a significant breakthrough was achieved in understanding the structure of the nitrogenase complex structure. The study revealed that one FeP binds to MoFeP, suggesting a ping-pong mechanism. This investigation lays the groundwork for future studies on the structure and mechanism of metalloprotein, particularly nitrogenase. Future research on nitrogenase will provide valuable insights into fundamental biological processes and the advancement of sustainable agricultural practices. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate.
Molecules and Cells 2023; 46: 535-537https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2023.0086

References

  1. Burgess B.K. and Lowe D.J. (1996). Mechanism of molybdenum nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 96, 2983-3012.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Einsle O. and Rees D.C. (2020). Structural enzymology of nitrogenase enzymes. Chem. Rev. 120, 4969-5004.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Jasniewski A.J., Lee C.C., Ribbe M.W., and Hu Y. (2020). Reactivity, mechanism, and assembly of the alternative nitrogenases. Chem. Rev. 120, 5107-5157.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Rutledge H.L., Cook B.D., Nguyen H.P.M., Herzik M.A. Jr., and Tezcan F.A. Jr. (2022). Structures of the nitrogenase complex prepared under catalytic turnover conditions. Science 377, 865-869.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Rutledge H.L. and Tezcan F.A. (2020). Electron transfer in nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 120, 5158-5193.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Spatzal T., Aksoyoglu M., Zhang L., Andrade S.L., Schleicher E., Weber S., Rees D.C., and Einsle O. (2011). Evidence for interstitial carbon in nitrogenase FeMo cofactor. Science 334, 940.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Tezcan F.A., Kaiser J.T., Howard J.B., and Rees D.C. (2015). Structural evidence for asymmetrical nucleotide interactions in nitrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 146-149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Tezcan F.A., Kaiser J.T., Mustafi D., Walton M.Y., Howard J.B., and Rees D.C. (2005). Nitrogenase complexes: multiple docking sites for a nucleotide switch protein. Science 309, 1377-1380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Thorneley R.N.F. and Lowe D.J. (1996). Nitrogenase: substrate binding and activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1, 576-580.
    CrossRef
  10. Threatt S.D. and Rees D.C. (2023). Biological nitrogen fixation in theory, practice, and reality: a perspective on the molybdenum nitrogenase system. FEBS Lett. 597, 45-58.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
Mol. Cells
Sep 30, 2023 Vol.46 No.9, pp. 527~572
COVER PICTURE
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is marked by airspace enlargement (emphysema) and small airway fibrosis, leading to airflow obstruction and eventual respiratory failure. Shown is a microphotograph of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histological sections of the enlarged alveoli as an indicator of emphysema. Piao et al. (pp. 558-572) demonstrate that recombinant human hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (rhHAPLN1) significantly reduces the extended airspaces of the emphysematous alveoli by increasing the levels of TGF-β receptor I and SIRT1/6, as a previously unrecognized mechanism in human alveolar epithelial cells, and consequently mitigates COPD.

Share this article on

  • line

Molecules and Cells

eISSN 0219-1032
qr-code Download