Mol. Cells 2016; 39(7): 566-572
Published online June 21, 2016
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0112
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: jkchoi@chungbuk.ac.kr (JKC); breedlee@empas.com (HKL)
Lysosomes are cellular organelles containing diverse classes of catabolic enzymes that are implicated in diverse cellular processes including phagocytosis, autophagy, lipid transport, and aging. Lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMP-1 and LAMP-2) are major glycoproteins important for maintaining lysosomal integrity, pH, and catabolism. LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 are constitutively expressed in
Keywords LAMP-3, LPS, lysosome,
Lysosomes are membranous cell organelles that are involved in endocytosis, exocytosis, and intracellular trafficking of vesicles (Appelqvist et al., 2013) and autophagy (Ryter et el., 2013). These organelles play a major metabolic role in the intracellular digestion of macromolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. A spectrum of 50 hydrolytic enzymes is involved in the lysosomal catabolic process. Abnormal regulation of this pathway appears to be linked to lysosomal storage diseases such as Danon disease, Tay-Sachs disease, and Gaucher disease (Cox et al., 2012; Eskelinen and Saftig, 2009).
In response to bacterial infection, cellular pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Nod-like receptors (NLRs), are known to be activated to initiate the autophagic (or xenophagic) process (Shroff et al., 2014). Lysosomes play a key role in innate immune defense by fusing with and degrading pathogens contained in autophagic vesicles directly, or fusing with the pathogen-containing vesicles (Knodler and Celli, 2011; Levine and Deretic, 2007). These processes generally result in the destruction of the invasive bacteria, although some bacteria, including
LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 are major lysosomal membrane proteins that account for about half of the total lysosomal membrane proteins. These glycoproteins are responsible for maintaining lysosomal integrity, pH, and catabolism (Andrejewski et al., 1999; Eskelinen 2006). Aberrant localization or expression of LAMP-2 has been implicated in human disease. Expression of LAMP-2 on the cell surface has been implicated in
Compared to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2, LAMP-3 is poorly understood. LAMP-3 exhibits 30% and 28% amino acid sequence identity to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 respectively. LAMP-3 carries numerous potential glycosylation sites in comparison to those of LAMP-1 or LAMP-2 (de Saint-Vis et al., 1998; Wilke et al., 2012). In contrast to the constitutive expression of LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 in many cell types, LAMP-3 expression is regulated temporally and spatially, or is induced by hypoxic conditions. Overexpression of LAMP-3 is known to be associated with cancer metastasis (Liao et al., 2015; Mujcic 2009; Nagelkerke et al., 2013). Recently, LAMP-3 was reported to be associated with modulation of autophagy and autophagy-mediated drug sensitivity (Dominguez-Bautista et al., 2015; Nagelkerke et al., 2014). Compared to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2, LAMP-3 remains poorly understood for its role in the bacterial infection process and we investigated whether LAMP-3 expression plays a role in the
Antibodies against phospho-p38 MAPK, phospho-NF-κB p65 were purchased from Cell Signaling (USA). Antibodies against p38MAPK, Anti-NF-κB, LAMP-1, LAMP-2 and LAMP-3 were purchased from Santa Cruz (USA). Anti-GAPDH antibody was purchased from Ab Frontier (Korea). RNA Blood Mini kit (QIAGEN, USA) and cDNA synthesis kit were purchased respectively from QIAGEN (Netherlands) and Invitrogen (USA). LPS and PEI transfection reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. LAMP-3 shRNA and scrambled shRNA constructs (29mer each) in pRS plasmid were purchased from Origene (USA).
Chemical Inhibitors of NF-κB (PDTC) and JNK II were purchased from Calbiochem (USA). ERK inhibitor (FR180204) and p38 inhibitor (AMG548) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (UK).
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM media supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) antibiotics. THP-1 cells, a pro-monocytic cell line, were culture in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, USA) containing 10% FBS (WellGene, Korea), P/S antibiotics (Life Technologies, USA) and 0.05mM mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldich, USA). All cell cultures were maintained at 5% CO2 and 37°C.
After treatment with 1ug/ml LPS or Salmonella bacteria, total RNAs were isolated from THP-1 cells using the RNA Blood Mini kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, USA). cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR analysis were performed simultaneously in a single tube using 10ng/ml of total RNA according to the manufacture’s instruction (AccuPower? RocketScriptTM RT Premix (Bioneer, Korea); cDNA was synthesized using the primers listed below at 42°C for 40 min., followed by pre-denaturation at 95°C for 5min., and 35 cycles (95°C/30 s → 54°C /30 s → 72°C /30 s) of PCR reaction before the final extension (72°C/10 min.) step. The primers used in this study were designed according to “Primer 3 program (Whithead Institute, USA)” and are listed in Table 1.
Hela cells were transfected by PEI transfection reagent with two LAMP-3 shRNA plasmids containing the following oligonucleotides (5′-ACTGGAACCAGTTCATCAACCGTCAGCC-3′ and 5′-GTGGATGAGT GCTCGTCTGACTACACAAT-3′). Two days later, puromycin selection was followed at 1 ug/ml concentration and the emerging colonies were checked for the expression level of LAMP-3 knock-down by western blotting with anti LAMP-3 antibody.
HeLa cells, at about 60% confluency, were infected with salmonella (eGFP) for 30 min. and treated with gentamycin (50 ug/ml) for 30 min. before PBS washing 3 times. Subsequently, the infected HeLa cells were washed 3 times with PBS buffer and lyzed with lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, PBS). The lysates were serially diluted in PBS and plated on LB plate containing ampicillin (100 ug/ml). After overnight, the number of bacteria colonies was counted for CFU.
HeLa cells (1 × 106/well) were cultured in DMEM growth media overnight on coverglass in 35 mm dish (NUNC) before infection with Salmonella (eGFP) at about 1:40 MOI. To remove any extracellular bacteria, gentamicin was added 30 min later at the final concentration of 50 ug/ml and after an hour, the media was removed and replaced with fresh DMEM growth media for the indicated time. After washing with PBS 3 times, the HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After PBS washing, the cells were blocked with 10% FBS in PBS for 30 min. and reacted with primary LAMP-2 and LAMP-3 antibodies for 3 h and after PBS washing, incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa-594 or Alexa-633) for 2 h and washed with PBS buffer before mounting on slide glass for N-SIM microscope analysis with NIS-Elements Viewer.
To identify lipopolysaccharide (LPS) responsive genes, we used the Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kit. We identified
In order to confirm that LPS induces
Given the central role of TLR4 in the LPS-mediated signaling pathway including NF-κB, ERK, JNK and p38 (Guha and Mackman, 2002), we investigated which of these signaling components might control the LAMP-3 expression. We treated THP-1 cells for 30 min with the following chemical inhibitors; ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC: (NF-κB inhibitor, 20 μg/ml)), FR180204 (ERK inhibitor, μM), 420119 (JNK II inhibitor, 40 μM), and AMG548 (p38 inhibitor, 20 μM). Then, cells were stimulated with 1 μg/ml of LPS for 4 hrs and RNA or protein was isolated from the cells. As expected, RT-PCR analysis indicated that LPS stimulation caused a 2-fold increase in
The N-SIM super-resolution microscope was used to investigate the colocalization of LAMP-3 with LAMP-2 and
To investigate the relationship between LAMP-3 expression and intracellular proliferation of
Pathogenic
For intracellular survival,
Although LAMP-3 expression is documented in many cell types including lung, dendritic, and cancer cells, as well as influenza virus-infected cells (Barois et al., 2002; Bechetoille et al., 2006; Honess and Simmons, 1993; Kanao et al., 2005; Kleijmeer et al., 2001; de Saint-Vis et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2011), little is known about its expression in
LAMP-3 is also known to be a novel hypoxia-inducible gene under the control of the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 arm of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and is independent of HIF-1α (Mujcic et al., 2009; Nagelkerke et al., 2011). In epithelial cells infected with either influenza A virus or
N-SIM super-resolution imaging data revealed that LAMP-3 localized at the periphery of HeLa cells before infection, but localized with
Mol. Cells 2016; 39(7): 566-572
Published online July 31, 2016 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0112
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Eun-Ju Lee1,5, Kwan-Sik Park1,4,5, In-Sook Jeon1, Jae-Woon Choi2, Sang-Jeon Lee2, Hyun E. Choy3, Ki-Duk Song4, Hak-Kyo Lee4,*, and Joong-Kook Choi1,*
1Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea, 2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea, 3Department of Microbiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61186, Korea, 4Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea, 5These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: jkchoi@chungbuk.ac.kr (JKC); breedlee@empas.com (HKL)
Lysosomes are cellular organelles containing diverse classes of catabolic enzymes that are implicated in diverse cellular processes including phagocytosis, autophagy, lipid transport, and aging. Lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMP-1 and LAMP-2) are major glycoproteins important for maintaining lysosomal integrity, pH, and catabolism. LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 are constitutively expressed in
Keywords: LAMP-3, LPS, lysosome,
Lysosomes are membranous cell organelles that are involved in endocytosis, exocytosis, and intracellular trafficking of vesicles (Appelqvist et al., 2013) and autophagy (Ryter et el., 2013). These organelles play a major metabolic role in the intracellular digestion of macromolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. A spectrum of 50 hydrolytic enzymes is involved in the lysosomal catabolic process. Abnormal regulation of this pathway appears to be linked to lysosomal storage diseases such as Danon disease, Tay-Sachs disease, and Gaucher disease (Cox et al., 2012; Eskelinen and Saftig, 2009).
In response to bacterial infection, cellular pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Nod-like receptors (NLRs), are known to be activated to initiate the autophagic (or xenophagic) process (Shroff et al., 2014). Lysosomes play a key role in innate immune defense by fusing with and degrading pathogens contained in autophagic vesicles directly, or fusing with the pathogen-containing vesicles (Knodler and Celli, 2011; Levine and Deretic, 2007). These processes generally result in the destruction of the invasive bacteria, although some bacteria, including
LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 are major lysosomal membrane proteins that account for about half of the total lysosomal membrane proteins. These glycoproteins are responsible for maintaining lysosomal integrity, pH, and catabolism (Andrejewski et al., 1999; Eskelinen 2006). Aberrant localization or expression of LAMP-2 has been implicated in human disease. Expression of LAMP-2 on the cell surface has been implicated in
Compared to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2, LAMP-3 is poorly understood. LAMP-3 exhibits 30% and 28% amino acid sequence identity to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 respectively. LAMP-3 carries numerous potential glycosylation sites in comparison to those of LAMP-1 or LAMP-2 (de Saint-Vis et al., 1998; Wilke et al., 2012). In contrast to the constitutive expression of LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 in many cell types, LAMP-3 expression is regulated temporally and spatially, or is induced by hypoxic conditions. Overexpression of LAMP-3 is known to be associated with cancer metastasis (Liao et al., 2015; Mujcic 2009; Nagelkerke et al., 2013). Recently, LAMP-3 was reported to be associated with modulation of autophagy and autophagy-mediated drug sensitivity (Dominguez-Bautista et al., 2015; Nagelkerke et al., 2014). Compared to LAMP-1 and LAMP-2, LAMP-3 remains poorly understood for its role in the bacterial infection process and we investigated whether LAMP-3 expression plays a role in the
Antibodies against phospho-p38 MAPK, phospho-NF-κB p65 were purchased from Cell Signaling (USA). Antibodies against p38MAPK, Anti-NF-κB, LAMP-1, LAMP-2 and LAMP-3 were purchased from Santa Cruz (USA). Anti-GAPDH antibody was purchased from Ab Frontier (Korea). RNA Blood Mini kit (QIAGEN, USA) and cDNA synthesis kit were purchased respectively from QIAGEN (Netherlands) and Invitrogen (USA). LPS and PEI transfection reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. LAMP-3 shRNA and scrambled shRNA constructs (29mer each) in pRS plasmid were purchased from Origene (USA).
Chemical Inhibitors of NF-κB (PDTC) and JNK II were purchased from Calbiochem (USA). ERK inhibitor (FR180204) and p38 inhibitor (AMG548) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (UK).
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM media supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) antibiotics. THP-1 cells, a pro-monocytic cell line, were culture in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, USA) containing 10% FBS (WellGene, Korea), P/S antibiotics (Life Technologies, USA) and 0.05mM mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldich, USA). All cell cultures were maintained at 5% CO2 and 37°C.
After treatment with 1ug/ml LPS or Salmonella bacteria, total RNAs were isolated from THP-1 cells using the RNA Blood Mini kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, USA). cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR analysis were performed simultaneously in a single tube using 10ng/ml of total RNA according to the manufacture’s instruction (AccuPower? RocketScriptTM RT Premix (Bioneer, Korea); cDNA was synthesized using the primers listed below at 42°C for 40 min., followed by pre-denaturation at 95°C for 5min., and 35 cycles (95°C/30 s → 54°C /30 s → 72°C /30 s) of PCR reaction before the final extension (72°C/10 min.) step. The primers used in this study were designed according to “Primer 3 program (Whithead Institute, USA)” and are listed in Table 1.
Hela cells were transfected by PEI transfection reagent with two LAMP-3 shRNA plasmids containing the following oligonucleotides (5′-ACTGGAACCAGTTCATCAACCGTCAGCC-3′ and 5′-GTGGATGAGT GCTCGTCTGACTACACAAT-3′). Two days later, puromycin selection was followed at 1 ug/ml concentration and the emerging colonies were checked for the expression level of LAMP-3 knock-down by western blotting with anti LAMP-3 antibody.
HeLa cells, at about 60% confluency, were infected with salmonella (eGFP) for 30 min. and treated with gentamycin (50 ug/ml) for 30 min. before PBS washing 3 times. Subsequently, the infected HeLa cells were washed 3 times with PBS buffer and lyzed with lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, PBS). The lysates were serially diluted in PBS and plated on LB plate containing ampicillin (100 ug/ml). After overnight, the number of bacteria colonies was counted for CFU.
HeLa cells (1 × 106/well) were cultured in DMEM growth media overnight on coverglass in 35 mm dish (NUNC) before infection with Salmonella (eGFP) at about 1:40 MOI. To remove any extracellular bacteria, gentamicin was added 30 min later at the final concentration of 50 ug/ml and after an hour, the media was removed and replaced with fresh DMEM growth media for the indicated time. After washing with PBS 3 times, the HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After PBS washing, the cells were blocked with 10% FBS in PBS for 30 min. and reacted with primary LAMP-2 and LAMP-3 antibodies for 3 h and after PBS washing, incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa-594 or Alexa-633) for 2 h and washed with PBS buffer before mounting on slide glass for N-SIM microscope analysis with NIS-Elements Viewer.
To identify lipopolysaccharide (LPS) responsive genes, we used the Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kit. We identified
In order to confirm that LPS induces
Given the central role of TLR4 in the LPS-mediated signaling pathway including NF-κB, ERK, JNK and p38 (Guha and Mackman, 2002), we investigated which of these signaling components might control the LAMP-3 expression. We treated THP-1 cells for 30 min with the following chemical inhibitors; ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC: (NF-κB inhibitor, 20 μg/ml)), FR180204 (ERK inhibitor, μM), 420119 (JNK II inhibitor, 40 μM), and AMG548 (p38 inhibitor, 20 μM). Then, cells were stimulated with 1 μg/ml of LPS for 4 hrs and RNA or protein was isolated from the cells. As expected, RT-PCR analysis indicated that LPS stimulation caused a 2-fold increase in
The N-SIM super-resolution microscope was used to investigate the colocalization of LAMP-3 with LAMP-2 and
To investigate the relationship between LAMP-3 expression and intracellular proliferation of
Pathogenic
For intracellular survival,
Although LAMP-3 expression is documented in many cell types including lung, dendritic, and cancer cells, as well as influenza virus-infected cells (Barois et al., 2002; Bechetoille et al., 2006; Honess and Simmons, 1993; Kanao et al., 2005; Kleijmeer et al., 2001; de Saint-Vis et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2011), little is known about its expression in
LAMP-3 is also known to be a novel hypoxia-inducible gene under the control of the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 arm of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and is independent of HIF-1α (Mujcic et al., 2009; Nagelkerke et al., 2011). In epithelial cells infected with either influenza A virus or
N-SIM super-resolution imaging data revealed that LAMP-3 localized at the periphery of HeLa cells before infection, but localized with
Rui Lu, Juan Chen, Fangbin Wang, Lu Wang, Jian Liu, and Yan Lin
Mol. Cells 2022; 45(9): 649-659 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.0073Seongryong Kim, Hyun-Sup Song, Jihyun Yu, and You-Me Kim
Mol. Cells 2021; 44(5): 342-355 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0067Yoon-Gu Jang, Yujin Choi, Kyoungho Jun, and Jongkyeong Chung
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(8): 705-717 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.0089