Split Viewer
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(5): 448-458
Published online May 31, 2020
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.2290
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : yhc@snu.ac.kr
T-DNA insertional mutations in Arabidopsis genes have conferred huge benefits to the research community, greatly facilitating gene function analyses. However, the insertion process can cause chromosomal rearrangements. Here, we show an example of a likely rearrangement following T-DNA insertion in the Anti-Silencing Function 1B (ASF1B) gene locus on Arabidopsis chromosome 5, so that the phenotype was not relevant to the gene of interest, ASF1B. ASF1 is a histone H3/H4 chaperone involved in chromatin remodeling in the sporophyte and during reproduction. Plants that were homozygous for mutant alleles asf1a or asf1b were developmentally normal. However, following self-fertilization of double heterozygotes (ASF1A/asf1a ASF1B/asf1b, hereafter AaBb), defects were visible in both male and female gametes. Half of the AaBb and aaBb ovules displayed arrested embryo sacs with functional megaspore identity. Similarly, half of the AaBb and aaBb pollen grains showed centromere defects, resulting in pollen abortion at the bi-cellular stage of the male gametophyte. However, inheritance of the mutant allele in a given gamete did not solely determine the abortion phenotype. Introducing functional ASF1B failed to rescue the AaBb- and aaBb- mediated abortion, suggesting that heterozygosity in the ASF1B gene causes gametophytic defects, rather than the loss of ASF1. The presence of reproductive defects in heterozygous mutants but not in homozygotes, and the characteristic all-or-nothing pollen viability within tetrads, were both indicative of commonly-observed T-DNA-mediated translocation activity for this allele. Our observations reinforce the importance of complementation tests in assigning gene function using reverse genetics.
Keywords chromosomal rearrangement, gametogenesis, T-DNA insertion
The genome of the dicotyledonous model plant Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutagenized using transfer DNA (T-DNA) of the soil bacterium
The process of T-DNA excision from the tumor inducing (Ti) plasmid and passage through the Agrobacterial membrane is well established; however, the exact mechanism of T-DNA integration into the host genome is not well understood. It is known that multiple T-DNA insertions as direct or inverted repeats occurs frequently during integration, and that this multiple repeat structure often results in intra- and inter-chromosomal rearrangements (Errampalli et al., 1991; Nacry et al., 1998; Thomashow et al., 1980; Ulker et al., 2008; Zambryski et al., 1982; Zhu et al., 2006). In directed T-DNA mutant screens, approximately 17% of the insertion mutants were found to contain chromosomal rearrangements (Castle et al., 1993), although they are often aphenotypic and thus not generally detected. However, there are a number of scenarios whereby T-DNA mediated chromosomal rearrangements can obscure or bias mutant inheritance data, in which case they must be taken into account. For example, intra-chromosomal rearrangements that result in the inversion of chromosomal fragments normally lead to recombination suppression during homologous chromosomal pairing in meiosis. Inter-chromosomal rearrangement results in translocation of the chromosomal fragment and distortion of the linkage group (Curtis et al., 2009). If mutant loci are linked to the rearranged portions of chromosomes, non-Mendelian distribution of segregating populations can be observed during genetic crosses (Clark and Krysan, 2010).
ASF1 is an evolutionarily conserved histone chaperone of the H3/H4 family involved in several fundamental cellular processes, including nucleosome rearrangement and DNA damage repair (English et al., 2005; Le et al., 1997; Mousson et al., 2005; Schulz and Tyler, 2006; Singer et al., 1998). Two Arabidopsis homologues,
Seeds, and any undeveloped ovules, were dissected and the number of each counted on a Leica stereoscopic microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). For whole mount clearing, pistils of mature FG7 stage and developing siliques were dissected and mounted in a clearing solution containing chloral hydrate in distilled water. Cleared ovules and seeds were observed using an Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) under DIC optics and photographed using an AxioCam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss) as previously described (Min et al., 2019).
GUS histochemical analysis was performed as previously described (Yadegari et al., 2000). Female gametophytes from plants expressing GFP fluorescence were analyzed using an LSM700 (Carl Zeiss) confocal laser microscope.
For the analysis of embryo sac development in wild type and asf1 mutants, confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) analysis of ovules was performed as previously described (Min et al., 2019).
For analysis of pollen viability, pollen grains were mounted with Alexander’s staining solution as previously described (Park et al., 2014). To visualize nuclei in pollen grains, DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining was performed. The Alexander-stained slides and DAPI fluorescence were examined using an Axio Imager A1 microscope under DIC optics and were photographed using an AxioCam HRc camera.
The two
In
To delineate the cause of ovule arrest in
ASF1 was shown previously to not affect pollen viability, as demonstrated in double
To analyze at what stage
To visualize mitotic defects in the
In both male and female gametophytes, we observed that
During male gametogenesis, we observed many aborted pollen grains in
To examine whether the reproductive phenotypes observed in
ASF1 is an evolutionarily conserved histone chaperone required for H3/H4 nucleosome assembly and disassembly and essential cellular processes such as DNA replication, transcription, gene silencing, and DNA damage checkpoint and repair. Previous reports of
From single
From
The phenotype we observe in
ASF1A and ASF1B proteins are both expressed from the beginning of male and female gamete formation, whereby they are present in the PMC and megaspore mother cell (MMC), and then expressed throughout gametogenesis (Min et al., 2019). Since their expression patterns and the defects of both genuine ASF1 mutant plants (
The work was supported by NRF of Korea (2017R1A2B2 007067) and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program Grant (PJ013127). Y.M. was supported by the Stadelmann-Lee Scholarship Fund, Seoul National University.
Y.M. and Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.M. performed the experiments. Y.M., J.M.F., and Y.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Analysis of
| Parental genotypes | Normal seed (%) | Ovule abortion (%) | Seed abortion (%) | Total (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92.5 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 796 | |
| 96.1 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1,196 | |
| 97 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 881 | |
| 47 | 49.6 | 3.4 | 1,351 | |
| 83.5 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 3,323 | |
| 52.2 | 47 | 0.8 | 2,009 |
Abortion ratio (%) = (No. of aborted seeds or ovules / No. of total seeds) × 100.
Transmission efficiency of the
| Parental genotypes (female × male) | Progeny (n) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aa | AA | Bb | BB | Total (n) | TEF (%) | TEM (%) | |
| 152 | 81 | 71 | 152 | 114.1 | |||
| 127 | 47 | 80 | 127 | 58.8 | |||
The F1 genotype was determined by PCR. Transmission efficiencies (TE) were calculated as following: TE (%) = No. of progeny with T-DNA insertion / No. of progeny without T-DNA insertion × 100. TEF, female transmission efficiency; TEM, male transmission efficiency.
| Genotype | Transgene (GFP) | Ovule A % | Seed A % | Total (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 1 | 590 | ||
| 43 | 1 | 175 | ||
| 44 | 0 | 1,010 | ||
| 47 | 1 | 526 | ||
| 47 | 6 | 293 | ||
| 42 | 4 | 330 | ||
| 46 | 5 | 1,281 | ||
| 49 | 5 | 360 | ||
| 45 | 11 | 192 | ||
| 45 | 13 | 409 | ||
| No transgene | 51 | 0 | 441 | |
| No transgene | 2.3 | 0.7 | 881 | |
| No transgene | 3 | 0 | 404 |
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(5): 448-458
Published online May 31, 2020 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.2290
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Yunsook Min1
, Jennifer M. Frost2,3
, and Yeonhee Choi1,* 
1Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, 2Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, 3Present address: Genomics and Child Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom
Correspondence to:yhc@snu.ac.kr
T-DNA insertional mutations in Arabidopsis genes have conferred huge benefits to the research community, greatly facilitating gene function analyses. However, the insertion process can cause chromosomal rearrangements. Here, we show an example of a likely rearrangement following T-DNA insertion in the Anti-Silencing Function 1B (ASF1B) gene locus on Arabidopsis chromosome 5, so that the phenotype was not relevant to the gene of interest, ASF1B. ASF1 is a histone H3/H4 chaperone involved in chromatin remodeling in the sporophyte and during reproduction. Plants that were homozygous for mutant alleles asf1a or asf1b were developmentally normal. However, following self-fertilization of double heterozygotes (ASF1A/asf1a ASF1B/asf1b, hereafter AaBb), defects were visible in both male and female gametes. Half of the AaBb and aaBb ovules displayed arrested embryo sacs with functional megaspore identity. Similarly, half of the AaBb and aaBb pollen grains showed centromere defects, resulting in pollen abortion at the bi-cellular stage of the male gametophyte. However, inheritance of the mutant allele in a given gamete did not solely determine the abortion phenotype. Introducing functional ASF1B failed to rescue the AaBb- and aaBb- mediated abortion, suggesting that heterozygosity in the ASF1B gene causes gametophytic defects, rather than the loss of ASF1. The presence of reproductive defects in heterozygous mutants but not in homozygotes, and the characteristic all-or-nothing pollen viability within tetrads, were both indicative of commonly-observed T-DNA-mediated translocation activity for this allele. Our observations reinforce the importance of complementation tests in assigning gene function using reverse genetics.
Keywords: chromosomal rearrangement, gametogenesis, T-DNA insertion
The genome of the dicotyledonous model plant Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutagenized using transfer DNA (T-DNA) of the soil bacterium
The process of T-DNA excision from the tumor inducing (Ti) plasmid and passage through the Agrobacterial membrane is well established; however, the exact mechanism of T-DNA integration into the host genome is not well understood. It is known that multiple T-DNA insertions as direct or inverted repeats occurs frequently during integration, and that this multiple repeat structure often results in intra- and inter-chromosomal rearrangements (Errampalli et al., 1991; Nacry et al., 1998; Thomashow et al., 1980; Ulker et al., 2008; Zambryski et al., 1982; Zhu et al., 2006). In directed T-DNA mutant screens, approximately 17% of the insertion mutants were found to contain chromosomal rearrangements (Castle et al., 1993), although they are often aphenotypic and thus not generally detected. However, there are a number of scenarios whereby T-DNA mediated chromosomal rearrangements can obscure or bias mutant inheritance data, in which case they must be taken into account. For example, intra-chromosomal rearrangements that result in the inversion of chromosomal fragments normally lead to recombination suppression during homologous chromosomal pairing in meiosis. Inter-chromosomal rearrangement results in translocation of the chromosomal fragment and distortion of the linkage group (Curtis et al., 2009). If mutant loci are linked to the rearranged portions of chromosomes, non-Mendelian distribution of segregating populations can be observed during genetic crosses (Clark and Krysan, 2010).
ASF1 is an evolutionarily conserved histone chaperone of the H3/H4 family involved in several fundamental cellular processes, including nucleosome rearrangement and DNA damage repair (English et al., 2005; Le et al., 1997; Mousson et al., 2005; Schulz and Tyler, 2006; Singer et al., 1998). Two Arabidopsis homologues,
Seeds, and any undeveloped ovules, were dissected and the number of each counted on a Leica stereoscopic microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). For whole mount clearing, pistils of mature FG7 stage and developing siliques were dissected and mounted in a clearing solution containing chloral hydrate in distilled water. Cleared ovules and seeds were observed using an Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) under DIC optics and photographed using an AxioCam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss) as previously described (Min et al., 2019).
GUS histochemical analysis was performed as previously described (Yadegari et al., 2000). Female gametophytes from plants expressing GFP fluorescence were analyzed using an LSM700 (Carl Zeiss) confocal laser microscope.
For the analysis of embryo sac development in wild type and asf1 mutants, confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) analysis of ovules was performed as previously described (Min et al., 2019).
For analysis of pollen viability, pollen grains were mounted with Alexander’s staining solution as previously described (Park et al., 2014). To visualize nuclei in pollen grains, DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining was performed. The Alexander-stained slides and DAPI fluorescence were examined using an Axio Imager A1 microscope under DIC optics and were photographed using an AxioCam HRc camera.
The two
In
To delineate the cause of ovule arrest in
ASF1 was shown previously to not affect pollen viability, as demonstrated in double
To analyze at what stage
To visualize mitotic defects in the
In both male and female gametophytes, we observed that
During male gametogenesis, we observed many aborted pollen grains in
To examine whether the reproductive phenotypes observed in
ASF1 is an evolutionarily conserved histone chaperone required for H3/H4 nucleosome assembly and disassembly and essential cellular processes such as DNA replication, transcription, gene silencing, and DNA damage checkpoint and repair. Previous reports of
From single
From
The phenotype we observe in
ASF1A and ASF1B proteins are both expressed from the beginning of male and female gamete formation, whereby they are present in the PMC and megaspore mother cell (MMC), and then expressed throughout gametogenesis (Min et al., 2019). Since their expression patterns and the defects of both genuine ASF1 mutant plants (
The work was supported by NRF of Korea (2017R1A2B2 007067) and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program Grant (PJ013127). Y.M. was supported by the Stadelmann-Lee Scholarship Fund, Seoul National University.
Y.M. and Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.M. performed the experiments. Y.M., J.M.F., and Y.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
. Analysis of
| Parental genotypes | Normal seed (%) | Ovule abortion (%) | Seed abortion (%) | Total (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92.5 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 796 | |
| 96.1 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1,196 | |
| 97 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 881 | |
| 47 | 49.6 | 3.4 | 1,351 | |
| 83.5 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 3,323 | |
| 52.2 | 47 | 0.8 | 2,009 |
Abortion ratio (%) = (No. of aborted seeds or ovules / No. of total seeds) × 100..
. Transmission efficiency of the
| Parental genotypes (female × male) | Progeny (n) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aa | AA | Bb | BB | Total (n) | TEF (%) | TEM (%) | |
| 152 | 81 | 71 | 152 | 114.1 | |||
| 127 | 47 | 80 | 127 | 58.8 | |||
The F1 genotype was determined by PCR. Transmission efficiencies (TE) were calculated as following: TE (%) = No. of progeny with T-DNA insertion / No. of progeny without T-DNA insertion × 100. TEF, female transmission efficiency; TEM, male transmission efficiency..
.
| Genotype | Transgene (GFP) | Ovule A % | Seed A % | Total (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 1 | 590 | ||
| 43 | 1 | 175 | ||
| 44 | 0 | 1,010 | ||
| 47 | 1 | 526 | ||
| 47 | 6 | 293 | ||
| 42 | 4 | 330 | ||
| 46 | 5 | 1,281 | ||
| 49 | 5 | 360 | ||
| 45 | 11 | 192 | ||
| 45 | 13 | 409 | ||
| No transgene | 51 | 0 | 441 | |
| No transgene | 2.3 | 0.7 | 881 | |
| No transgene | 3 | 0 | 404 |

eISSN 0219-1032
Download