Mol. Cells 2020; 43(4): 313-322
Published online April 30, 2020
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.2245
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : ranny@kangwon.ac.kr
Eukaryotes transport biomolecules between intracellular organelles and between cells and the environment via vesicle trafficking. Soluble N -ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE proteins) play pivotal roles in vesicle and membrane trafficking. These proteins are categorized as Qa, Qb, Qc, and R SNAREs and form a complex that induces vesicle fusion for targeting of vesicle cargos. As the core components of the SNARE complex, the SNAP25 Qbc SNAREs perform various functions related to cellular homeostasis. The Arabidopsis thaliana SNAP25 homolog AtSNAP33 interacts with Qa and R SNAREs and plays a key role in cytokinesis and in triggering innate immune responses. However, other Arabidopsis SNAP25 homologs, such as AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, are not well studied; this includes their localization, interactions, structures, and functions. Here, we discuss three biological functions of plant SNAP25 orthologs in the context of AtSNAP33 and highlight recent findings on SNAP25 orthologs in various plants. We propose future directions for determining the roles of the less well-characterized AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30 proteins.
Keywords abiotic stress responses, cytokinesis, innate immune response, Qbc SNARE, SNAP25
Vesicle trafficking is a fundamental mechanism for maintaining cellular homeostasis in eukaryotes. Soluble
The first cDNA encoding SNAP25 was identified in mouse brain (Oyler et al., 1989). Five years later, human
The
Here, to examine plant SNAP25 proteins, we first generated a phylogenetic tree of plant SNAP25 proteins based on the Qbc SNARE motifs in
In general, SNARE proteins have a transmembrane domain and an α-helical coiled-coil domain termed the “SNARE domain”, which forms part of the SNARE complex (Weimbs et al., 1997). The coiled-coil domains in SNARE proteins twist together to induce the fusion of vesicles and membranes. Unlike general SNARE proteins, SNAP25 proteins consist of two SNARE domains, namely Qb and Qc, and a linker (Weimbs et al., 1997). The N-terminal Qb SNARE domain is connected via a linker region to the C-terminal Qc SNARE domain of the SNAP25 protein (Fig. 2).
SNAP25 homologs have no transmembrane domains; therefore, it is unclear how SNAP25 homologs localize to the cellular membranes. One possibility is that lipid modifications allow the SNAP25 proteins to associate with membranes. For example, PtSNAP25 from
Similar to SNAP29 and SNAP47, plant SNAP25 homologs have a linker region lacking the cysteine residue. This indicates that plant SNAP25 homologs use another mechanism, possibly fatty acid modification, for cell membrane attachment. However, to our knowledge, no structural studies on plant SNAP25 homologs have been reported and further studies are needed to determine how plant SNAP25 localizes to the cellular membrane, and how it forms complex structures with other SNARE proteins.
The mechanism of cytokinesis in plants differs from that in animals. An animal cell is divided by cytoplasmic abscission through the formation of a cleavage furrow (Cao and Wang, 1990; Mierzwa and Gerlich, 2014), whereas a plant cell is divided by the formation of a cell plate through vesicle fusion and concomitant formation of vesicular-tubular structures (Ahn et al., 2017). Plants contain a Qa SNARE, a cytokinesis-specific syntaxin termed SYP111 (SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS 111)/KNOLLE (meaning tuber-shaped in German), which localizes to the Golgi stacks and plasma membranes, and is involved in the fusion of vesicles from the Golgi to the center of the dividing cell (Lauber et al., 1997; Volker et al., 2001). The delivered vesicles and
Other SNAP25 homologs, such as the Qbc SNAREs AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, also interact with KNOLLE/ SYP111
Members of
Unlike animals, plants do not have an adaptive immune system, but depend on their innate immunity against various pathogens. Secreted defense molecules are crucial for defense against non-host-adapted pathogens and plants primarily secrete compounds associated with defense, such as pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and secondary metabolites, via SNARE complex-mediated vesicle trafficking. PENETRATION RESISTANCE1 (PEN1)/AtSYP121 is the main syntaxin involved in mediating resistance responses (Collins et al., 2003). Additionally, the PEN2/PEN3 pathway transports phytoalexins to the outside of the cell via a membrane transporter (Lipka et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2006). In response to pathogen infection,
SNAP25 orthologs play a role in the innate immune response against fungal pathogens in
SNAP25 homologs in
The AtSNAP33 orthologs in dicots as well as in monocots have conserved functions as a component of a ternary SNARE complex in innate immune responses against environmental pathogens. However, plants have other SNAP25 homologs, such as AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, which are differentially expressed throughout the plant and may have evolved to counter distinct pathogens or to trigger immune responses via different SNARE interactions to enable plant survival in varied environments.
Plants have evolved high-order trafficking mechanisms via numerous SNAREs to maintain cellular homeostasis against environmental stresses. Plant vacuoles and the
Plants have evolved high-order trafficking mechanisms via numerous SNAREs to maintain cellular homeostasis against environmental stresses. Plant vacuoles and the
How SNARE and SNAP25 proteins mechanistically func tion in abiotic stress responses remains unclear; however, several studies have suggested that they have important roles in mediating these responses. For example, AtSYP61 and AtSYP121 are involved in aquaporin distribution, and
How SNAP25 homologs are maintained at appropriate levels in various organelles, such as the
Work on animal SNAP25s has identified interactions with proteins lacking SNARE motifs; however, whether plant SNAP25s interact with other non-SNARE proteins remains to be determined. For example, during mitosis, the C-terminal SNARE domain of SNAP29 directly recruits kinetochores and supports tissue development in
Similarities in domain structure can help identify candidate interactors. Unlike other SNAP25 homologs in mammals, human SNAP29 harbors an NPF (Asn-Pro-Phe) motif, which interacts with the Eps15-Homology (EH) domain-containing protein1, EHD1 (Rotem-Yehudar et al., 2001; Rapaport et al., 2010). EHD1 is required for the redistribution of the endocytic recycling compartment (Lin et al., 2001). EHD1 and SNAP29 directly interact and form a complex with insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, IGF-1R (Rotem-Yehudar et al., 2001; Rapaport et al., 2010). Based on these interactions in animals, we predicted that AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP33, which harbor the NPF motif, can interact with AtEHD1, a regulator of endocytosis. It has been shown that down-regulation of AtEHD1 delays the internalization of the styryl dye FM4-64, an endocytosis marker (Bar et al., 2008).
Studies on SNAP29 and SNAP47 in animals suggested that plant SNAP25 homologs could interact with other proteins in autophagy or endocytosis, or other functions, in addition to their role in regulating SNARE complexes. As an autophagy-regulating Qbc SNARE in animals, SNAP29 was identified together with STX17 on autophagosomes (Diao et al., 2015). Autophagy Related 14 (ATG14), an essential autophagy-specific regulator, directly binds to the STX17–SNAP29 binary SNARE complex on autophagosomes, thus priming the SNAP29 complex to interact with VAMP8 and stimulating autophagosome–endolysosome fusion (Diao et al., 2015). Additionally, animal SNAP47 interacts with STX16 and VAMP7, which localize in ATG9a-resident vesicles from recycling endosomes (Aoyagi et al., 2018). The autophagic trafficking of SNAP29 and SNAP47 proteins was hijacked by coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), respectively, to enhance viral replication (Mohamud et al., 2018; Corona et al., 2018).
A recent report identified QUIRKY, a member of the family of multiple C2 domain and transmembrane region proteins, as interacting with an
Animal SNAP25 proteins undergo several post-translational modifications to modulate their functions. In animals,
The NetOGlyc 4.0 Server (
Numerous tools for predicting post-translational modifications based on large-scale proteome profiling are available, but the predictions require additional experimental validation. For example, regarding the phosphorylation site in AtSNAP33, one prediction tool (Functional Analysis Tools for Post-Translational Modifications, FAT-PTM;
AtSNAP29 proteins contain K119 as a potential ubiq-uitination modification site without a phosphorylation site from FAT-PTM tool and 13 phosphorylation sites from PhosPhAt4.0 tool. AtSNAP30 proteins contain S183 as a matched phosphorylation site from both 1 residue in FAT-PTM and 14 residues in PhosPhAt4.0. Interestingly, phosphorylated AtSNAP30 proteins were enriched in pollen (Mayank et al., 2012), where AtSNAP30 proteins are specifically and highly expressed. However, which residues contribute to post-translational modifications in specific cellular functions require further analysis.
Based on genetic, biochemical, and cell biological studies in
AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30 have distinct expression profiles throughout development of
This work was supported by funds from the Basic Science Research Program of National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (grant No. 2018R1A2B6006233). Both authors appreciate the PCGE lab members.
Plant SNAP25 proteins used to construct the phylogenetic tree
Species | Name (in tree) | Accession No. | Gene ID | ID source |
---|---|---|---|---|
AtSNAP29 | Q9SD96 | At5g07880 | UniProt | |
AtSNAP30 | Q9LMG8 | At1g13890 | ||
AtSNAP33 | Q9S7P9 | At5g61210 | ||
Bra012978 | M4D918 | Bra012978 | UniProt | |
Bra029328 | M4EKL1 | Bra029328 | ||
Bra005958 | M4CP20 | Bra005958 | ||
Bra009311 | M4CYL4 | Bra009311 | ||
Bra026875 | M4EDL5 | Bra026875 | ||
Glyma04g32710 | C6T803 | Glyma04g32710 | UniProt | |
Glyma06g21560 | I1KCY1 | Glyma06g21560 | ||
Glyma05g00640 | I1JZK8 | Glyma05g00640 | ||
Glyma17g08450 | C6TJG5 | Glyma17g08450 | ||
Glyma02g12821 | K7K7S4 | Glyma02g12821 | ||
Glyma01g06860 | I1J5Y3 | Glyma01g06860 | ||
GsSNAP33 | KHN18338.1 | KHN18338 | GenBank | |
MTR_3g023720 | KEH33106 | MTR_3g023720 | GenBank | |
MTR_4g109310 | KEH31992 | MTR_4g109310 | ||
MTR_5g043850 | AES96982 | MTR_5g043850 | ||
MTR_8g021950 | AET01821 | MTR_8g021950 | ||
OsSNAP32 | Q5EEP3 | AAW82752 | UniProt | |
OsSNAP29 | Q10Q25 | Os03g0212400 | ||
HvSNAP34 | AAP79417.1 | AAP79417 | GenBank | |
TaSNAP34 | AFQ60149.1 | AFQ60149 | GenBank | |
Zm00001d019505_P001 | A0A1D6HXY8 | Zm00001d019505_P001 | UniProt | |
Zm00001d016686_P002 | A0A1D6H9U2 | Zm00001d016686_P002 | ||
CA03g29520 | CA03g29520 | CA03g29520 | Sol Genomics | |
CA06g18580 | CA06g18580 | CA06g18580 | ||
CA11g03560 | CA11g03560 | CA11g03560 | ||
Solyc06g069570.3 | Solyc06g069570.3 | Solyc06g069570.3 | Sol Genomics | |
Solyc03g115470.3 | Solyc03g115470.3 | Solyc03g115470.3 | ||
Solyc05g012520.3 | Solyc05g012520.3 | Solyc05g012520.3 | ||
PGSC0003DMP400055866 | PGSC0003DMP400055866 | PGSC0003DMP400055866 (StSNAP33-1) | Sol Genomics | |
PGSC0003DMP400042481 | PGSC0003DMP400042481 | PGSC0003DMP400042481 (StSNAP33-2) | ||
PGSC0003DMP400049245 | PGSC0003DMP400049245 | PGSC0003DMP400049245 | ||
GhSNAP33 | ALD83640.1 | KR011955 | GenBank | |
CkSNAP33 | ALH22085.1 | KR011961 | GenBank | |
MpSNAP | Mapoly0199s0021.1 | Mapoly0199s0021.1 | Marchantia |
All information regarding SNAP25 protein species, name, accession No., and gene ID was retrieved from publicly available databases; UniProt, GenBank (MpSNAP sequence obtained from Marchandia), Sol Genomics, and Phytozyome. SNAP25 proteins in
Reported functions of plant SNAP25 proteins
Name | Expression | Interaction | Reference | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
AtSNAP33 | Whole plant | KNOLLE, VAMP721/722 | (Heese et al., 2001; El Kasmi et al., 2013) | Cell division |
SYP123, VAMP721/722/724 | (Ichikawa et al., 2014) | |||
SYP132, VAMP721/722 | (Park et al., 2018) | |||
PEN1, VAMP721/722 | (Kwon et al., 2008; Pajonk et al., 2008) | Biotic stress | ||
AtSNAP29 | Root, whole plant | KNOLLE/SYP111 | (Heese et al., 2001) | ND |
AtSNAP30 | Flower | KNOLLE/SYP111 | (Heese et al., 2001) | ND |
Glyma17g08450 | Root | ND | (Sharma et al., 2016) | Biotic stress |
GsSNAP33 | Pod, root, seed, stem | ND | (Nisa et al., 2017) | Abiotic stress |
OsSNAP32 | Leaf, root, flowering panicle | ND | (Luo et al., 2016) | Biotic stress |
(Bao et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2016) | Abiotic stress | |||
HvSNAP34 | ND | ROR2, HvVAMP721 | (Collins et al., 2003) | Biotic stress |
GhSNAP33 | Leaf, root, stem | ND | (Wang et al., 2018) | Biotic stress |
Abiotic stress | ||||
StSNAP33-1 | ND | StSYP1 | (Eschen-Lippold et al., 2012) | Biotic stress |
CkSNAP33 | Root, stem, leaf | ND | (Wang et al., 2017) | Biotic stress |
ND, not determined.
Mol. Cells 2020; 43(4): 313-322
Published online April 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2020.2245
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Department of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
Correspondence to:ranny@kangwon.ac.kr
Eukaryotes transport biomolecules between intracellular organelles and between cells and the environment via vesicle trafficking. Soluble N -ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE proteins) play pivotal roles in vesicle and membrane trafficking. These proteins are categorized as Qa, Qb, Qc, and R SNAREs and form a complex that induces vesicle fusion for targeting of vesicle cargos. As the core components of the SNARE complex, the SNAP25 Qbc SNAREs perform various functions related to cellular homeostasis. The Arabidopsis thaliana SNAP25 homolog AtSNAP33 interacts with Qa and R SNAREs and plays a key role in cytokinesis and in triggering innate immune responses. However, other Arabidopsis SNAP25 homologs, such as AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, are not well studied; this includes their localization, interactions, structures, and functions. Here, we discuss three biological functions of plant SNAP25 orthologs in the context of AtSNAP33 and highlight recent findings on SNAP25 orthologs in various plants. We propose future directions for determining the roles of the less well-characterized AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30 proteins.
Keywords: abiotic stress responses, cytokinesis, innate immune response, Qbc SNARE, SNAP25
Vesicle trafficking is a fundamental mechanism for maintaining cellular homeostasis in eukaryotes. Soluble
The first cDNA encoding SNAP25 was identified in mouse brain (Oyler et al., 1989). Five years later, human
The
Here, to examine plant SNAP25 proteins, we first generated a phylogenetic tree of plant SNAP25 proteins based on the Qbc SNARE motifs in
In general, SNARE proteins have a transmembrane domain and an α-helical coiled-coil domain termed the “SNARE domain”, which forms part of the SNARE complex (Weimbs et al., 1997). The coiled-coil domains in SNARE proteins twist together to induce the fusion of vesicles and membranes. Unlike general SNARE proteins, SNAP25 proteins consist of two SNARE domains, namely Qb and Qc, and a linker (Weimbs et al., 1997). The N-terminal Qb SNARE domain is connected via a linker region to the C-terminal Qc SNARE domain of the SNAP25 protein (Fig. 2).
SNAP25 homologs have no transmembrane domains; therefore, it is unclear how SNAP25 homologs localize to the cellular membranes. One possibility is that lipid modifications allow the SNAP25 proteins to associate with membranes. For example, PtSNAP25 from
Similar to SNAP29 and SNAP47, plant SNAP25 homologs have a linker region lacking the cysteine residue. This indicates that plant SNAP25 homologs use another mechanism, possibly fatty acid modification, for cell membrane attachment. However, to our knowledge, no structural studies on plant SNAP25 homologs have been reported and further studies are needed to determine how plant SNAP25 localizes to the cellular membrane, and how it forms complex structures with other SNARE proteins.
The mechanism of cytokinesis in plants differs from that in animals. An animal cell is divided by cytoplasmic abscission through the formation of a cleavage furrow (Cao and Wang, 1990; Mierzwa and Gerlich, 2014), whereas a plant cell is divided by the formation of a cell plate through vesicle fusion and concomitant formation of vesicular-tubular structures (Ahn et al., 2017). Plants contain a Qa SNARE, a cytokinesis-specific syntaxin termed SYP111 (SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS 111)/KNOLLE (meaning tuber-shaped in German), which localizes to the Golgi stacks and plasma membranes, and is involved in the fusion of vesicles from the Golgi to the center of the dividing cell (Lauber et al., 1997; Volker et al., 2001). The delivered vesicles and
Other SNAP25 homologs, such as the Qbc SNAREs AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, also interact with KNOLLE/ SYP111
Members of
Unlike animals, plants do not have an adaptive immune system, but depend on their innate immunity against various pathogens. Secreted defense molecules are crucial for defense against non-host-adapted pathogens and plants primarily secrete compounds associated with defense, such as pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and secondary metabolites, via SNARE complex-mediated vesicle trafficking. PENETRATION RESISTANCE1 (PEN1)/AtSYP121 is the main syntaxin involved in mediating resistance responses (Collins et al., 2003). Additionally, the PEN2/PEN3 pathway transports phytoalexins to the outside of the cell via a membrane transporter (Lipka et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2006). In response to pathogen infection,
SNAP25 orthologs play a role in the innate immune response against fungal pathogens in
SNAP25 homologs in
The AtSNAP33 orthologs in dicots as well as in monocots have conserved functions as a component of a ternary SNARE complex in innate immune responses against environmental pathogens. However, plants have other SNAP25 homologs, such as AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30, which are differentially expressed throughout the plant and may have evolved to counter distinct pathogens or to trigger immune responses via different SNARE interactions to enable plant survival in varied environments.
Plants have evolved high-order trafficking mechanisms via numerous SNAREs to maintain cellular homeostasis against environmental stresses. Plant vacuoles and the
Plants have evolved high-order trafficking mechanisms via numerous SNAREs to maintain cellular homeostasis against environmental stresses. Plant vacuoles and the
How SNARE and SNAP25 proteins mechanistically func tion in abiotic stress responses remains unclear; however, several studies have suggested that they have important roles in mediating these responses. For example, AtSYP61 and AtSYP121 are involved in aquaporin distribution, and
How SNAP25 homologs are maintained at appropriate levels in various organelles, such as the
Work on animal SNAP25s has identified interactions with proteins lacking SNARE motifs; however, whether plant SNAP25s interact with other non-SNARE proteins remains to be determined. For example, during mitosis, the C-terminal SNARE domain of SNAP29 directly recruits kinetochores and supports tissue development in
Similarities in domain structure can help identify candidate interactors. Unlike other SNAP25 homologs in mammals, human SNAP29 harbors an NPF (Asn-Pro-Phe) motif, which interacts with the Eps15-Homology (EH) domain-containing protein1, EHD1 (Rotem-Yehudar et al., 2001; Rapaport et al., 2010). EHD1 is required for the redistribution of the endocytic recycling compartment (Lin et al., 2001). EHD1 and SNAP29 directly interact and form a complex with insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, IGF-1R (Rotem-Yehudar et al., 2001; Rapaport et al., 2010). Based on these interactions in animals, we predicted that AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP33, which harbor the NPF motif, can interact with AtEHD1, a regulator of endocytosis. It has been shown that down-regulation of AtEHD1 delays the internalization of the styryl dye FM4-64, an endocytosis marker (Bar et al., 2008).
Studies on SNAP29 and SNAP47 in animals suggested that plant SNAP25 homologs could interact with other proteins in autophagy or endocytosis, or other functions, in addition to their role in regulating SNARE complexes. As an autophagy-regulating Qbc SNARE in animals, SNAP29 was identified together with STX17 on autophagosomes (Diao et al., 2015). Autophagy Related 14 (ATG14), an essential autophagy-specific regulator, directly binds to the STX17–SNAP29 binary SNARE complex on autophagosomes, thus priming the SNAP29 complex to interact with VAMP8 and stimulating autophagosome–endolysosome fusion (Diao et al., 2015). Additionally, animal SNAP47 interacts with STX16 and VAMP7, which localize in ATG9a-resident vesicles from recycling endosomes (Aoyagi et al., 2018). The autophagic trafficking of SNAP29 and SNAP47 proteins was hijacked by coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), respectively, to enhance viral replication (Mohamud et al., 2018; Corona et al., 2018).
A recent report identified QUIRKY, a member of the family of multiple C2 domain and transmembrane region proteins, as interacting with an
Animal SNAP25 proteins undergo several post-translational modifications to modulate their functions. In animals,
The NetOGlyc 4.0 Server (
Numerous tools for predicting post-translational modifications based on large-scale proteome profiling are available, but the predictions require additional experimental validation. For example, regarding the phosphorylation site in AtSNAP33, one prediction tool (Functional Analysis Tools for Post-Translational Modifications, FAT-PTM;
AtSNAP29 proteins contain K119 as a potential ubiq-uitination modification site without a phosphorylation site from FAT-PTM tool and 13 phosphorylation sites from PhosPhAt4.0 tool. AtSNAP30 proteins contain S183 as a matched phosphorylation site from both 1 residue in FAT-PTM and 14 residues in PhosPhAt4.0. Interestingly, phosphorylated AtSNAP30 proteins were enriched in pollen (Mayank et al., 2012), where AtSNAP30 proteins are specifically and highly expressed. However, which residues contribute to post-translational modifications in specific cellular functions require further analysis.
Based on genetic, biochemical, and cell biological studies in
AtSNAP29 and AtSNAP30 have distinct expression profiles throughout development of
This work was supported by funds from the Basic Science Research Program of National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (grant No. 2018R1A2B6006233). Both authors appreciate the PCGE lab members.
. Plant SNAP25 proteins used to construct the phylogenetic tree.
Species | Name (in tree) | Accession No. | Gene ID | ID source |
---|---|---|---|---|
AtSNAP29 | Q9SD96 | At5g07880 | UniProt | |
AtSNAP30 | Q9LMG8 | At1g13890 | ||
AtSNAP33 | Q9S7P9 | At5g61210 | ||
Bra012978 | M4D918 | Bra012978 | UniProt | |
Bra029328 | M4EKL1 | Bra029328 | ||
Bra005958 | M4CP20 | Bra005958 | ||
Bra009311 | M4CYL4 | Bra009311 | ||
Bra026875 | M4EDL5 | Bra026875 | ||
Glyma04g32710 | C6T803 | Glyma04g32710 | UniProt | |
Glyma06g21560 | I1KCY1 | Glyma06g21560 | ||
Glyma05g00640 | I1JZK8 | Glyma05g00640 | ||
Glyma17g08450 | C6TJG5 | Glyma17g08450 | ||
Glyma02g12821 | K7K7S4 | Glyma02g12821 | ||
Glyma01g06860 | I1J5Y3 | Glyma01g06860 | ||
GsSNAP33 | KHN18338.1 | KHN18338 | GenBank | |
MTR_3g023720 | KEH33106 | MTR_3g023720 | GenBank | |
MTR_4g109310 | KEH31992 | MTR_4g109310 | ||
MTR_5g043850 | AES96982 | MTR_5g043850 | ||
MTR_8g021950 | AET01821 | MTR_8g021950 | ||
OsSNAP32 | Q5EEP3 | AAW82752 | UniProt | |
OsSNAP29 | Q10Q25 | Os03g0212400 | ||
HvSNAP34 | AAP79417.1 | AAP79417 | GenBank | |
TaSNAP34 | AFQ60149.1 | AFQ60149 | GenBank | |
Zm00001d019505_P001 | A0A1D6HXY8 | Zm00001d019505_P001 | UniProt | |
Zm00001d016686_P002 | A0A1D6H9U2 | Zm00001d016686_P002 | ||
CA03g29520 | CA03g29520 | CA03g29520 | Sol Genomics | |
CA06g18580 | CA06g18580 | CA06g18580 | ||
CA11g03560 | CA11g03560 | CA11g03560 | ||
Solyc06g069570.3 | Solyc06g069570.3 | Solyc06g069570.3 | Sol Genomics | |
Solyc03g115470.3 | Solyc03g115470.3 | Solyc03g115470.3 | ||
Solyc05g012520.3 | Solyc05g012520.3 | Solyc05g012520.3 | ||
PGSC0003DMP400055866 | PGSC0003DMP400055866 | PGSC0003DMP400055866 (StSNAP33-1) | Sol Genomics | |
PGSC0003DMP400042481 | PGSC0003DMP400042481 | PGSC0003DMP400042481 (StSNAP33-2) | ||
PGSC0003DMP400049245 | PGSC0003DMP400049245 | PGSC0003DMP400049245 | ||
GhSNAP33 | ALD83640.1 | KR011955 | GenBank | |
CkSNAP33 | ALH22085.1 | KR011961 | GenBank | |
MpSNAP | Mapoly0199s0021.1 | Mapoly0199s0021.1 | Marchantia |
All information regarding SNAP25 protein species, name, accession No., and gene ID was retrieved from publicly available databases; UniProt, GenBank (MpSNAP sequence obtained from Marchandia), Sol Genomics, and Phytozyome. SNAP25 proteins in
. Reported functions of plant SNAP25 proteins.
Name | Expression | Interaction | Reference | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
AtSNAP33 | Whole plant | KNOLLE, VAMP721/722 | (Heese et al., 2001; El Kasmi et al., 2013) | Cell division |
SYP123, VAMP721/722/724 | (Ichikawa et al., 2014) | |||
SYP132, VAMP721/722 | (Park et al., 2018) | |||
PEN1, VAMP721/722 | (Kwon et al., 2008; Pajonk et al., 2008) | Biotic stress | ||
AtSNAP29 | Root, whole plant | KNOLLE/SYP111 | (Heese et al., 2001) | ND |
AtSNAP30 | Flower | KNOLLE/SYP111 | (Heese et al., 2001) | ND |
Glyma17g08450 | Root | ND | (Sharma et al., 2016) | Biotic stress |
GsSNAP33 | Pod, root, seed, stem | ND | (Nisa et al., 2017) | Abiotic stress |
OsSNAP32 | Leaf, root, flowering panicle | ND | (Luo et al., 2016) | Biotic stress |
(Bao et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2016) | Abiotic stress | |||
HvSNAP34 | ND | ROR2, HvVAMP721 | (Collins et al., 2003) | Biotic stress |
GhSNAP33 | Leaf, root, stem | ND | (Wang et al., 2018) | Biotic stress |
Abiotic stress | ||||
StSNAP33-1 | ND | StSYP1 | (Eschen-Lippold et al., 2012) | Biotic stress |
CkSNAP33 | Root, stem, leaf | ND | (Wang et al., 2017) | Biotic stress |
ND, not determined..
Sung Ho Park
Mol. Cells 2021; 44(6): 384-391 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0068Hwajung Choi, Kyungjin Min, Bunzo Mikami, Hye-Jin Yoon, and Hyung Ho Lee
Mol. Cells 2016; 39(11): 814-820 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0202Hye-Ra Lee, Un Yung Choi, Sung-Woo Hwang, Stephanie Kim, and Jae U. Jung
Mol. Cells 2016; 39(11): 777-782 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2016.0232