Mol. Cells 2015; 38(6): 562-572
Published online May 22, 2015
https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0051
© The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence: jeoungd@kangwon.ac.kr
We previously reported the role of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) in response to anti-cancer drugs. The decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell line is responsible for the resistance to anti-cancer drugs. In this study, we investigated molecular mechanisms associated with regulation of HDAC3 expression. MG132, an inhibitor of proteasomal degradation, induced the expression of HDAC3 in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. Ubiquitination of HDAC3 was observed in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. HDAC3 showed an interaction with SIAH2, an ubiquitin E3 ligase, that has increased expression in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. miRNA array analysis showed the decreased expression of miR-335 in these cells. Targetscan analysis predicted the binding of miR-335 to the 3′-UTR of SIAH2. miR-335-mediated increased sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs was associated with its effect on HDAC3 and SIAH2 expression. miR-335 exerted apoptotic effects and inhibited ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. miR-335 negatively regulated the invasion, migration, and growth rate of cancer cells. The mouse xenograft model showed that miR-335 negatively regulated the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells. The down-regulation of SIAH2 conferred sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. The results of the study indicated that the miR-335/SIAH2/HDAC3 axis regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs.
Keywords anti-cancer drug-resistance, miR-335, SIAH2, ubiquitination
Among the numerous HDACs, histone deacetylase-3 (HDAC3) is ubiquitously expressed and conserved in a wide range of species (Mahlknecht et al., 1999). HDAC3 forms large corepressor complexes containing N-CoR/SMRT and additional proteins (Li et al., 2000). HDAC3 regulates the JNK pathway (Zhang et al., 2002), NF-kB activity (Chen et al., 2001), MAPK activation (Mahlknecht et al., 2004) and apoptosis (Bardai and D’Mello, 2011; Uo et al., 2009). It represses CREB3-mediate transcription and migration of metastatic breast cancer cells (Kim et al., 2010) and acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis (Park et al., 2014a). HDAC3 confers sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs (Kim et al., 2014). HDAC3 expression is lower in various anti-cancer drug-resistant vs. anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Kim et al., 2014). The molecular mechanism of anti-cancer drug sensitivity conferred by HDAC3 remains unknown.
The loss of Siah2 increases chemo-sensitivity (Wong et al., 2012). The E3 ubiqutin ligase activity of Siah2 is necessary for resistance to death receptor-mediated apoptosis (Christian et al., 2011). The Inhibition of Siah2 ubiquitin ligase blocks melanoma tumorigenesis (Shah et al., 2009). SIAH2 expression is upregulated in basal-like breast cancers via copy number changes and/or transcriptional activation by p53 (Chan et al., 2011). The inhibition of Siah2 activity reduces metastasis through HIF-1alpha (Qi et al., 2008). Siah2 regulates HIF1 alpha expression and response to hypoxia (Nakayama et al, 2004). SIAH2 diminishes p53 acetylation and transcriptional activity (Grishina et al., 2012). Loss of SIAH2 suppresses tumorigenesis in a LATS2-dependent manner in a xenograft mouse model (Ma et al., 2015). Knockdown of SIAH2 causes growth suppression and apoptosis induction in a p53-independent mechanism (Hsieh et al., 2013). Blood vessel normalization in Siah2 (?/?) tumors resulted in an increased response to chemotherapy and prolonged survival (Wong et al., 2012). These reports collectively suggest the role of SIAH2 in tumorigenesis and the response to anti-cancer drugs. However, the molecular mechanisms associated with the effect of SIAH2 on the response to anti-cancer drugs remains largely unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNA molecules that mediate posttranscriptional gene regulation (Calin and Croce, 2006). miRNAs play important roles in tumor development by regulating the expression of various oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (Calin and Croce, 2006; Xu et al., 2013). For example, miR-199a suppresses tumorigenicity and multidrug resistance of ovarian cancer-initiating cells (Cheng et al., 2012). miR-27a reverses the multidrug resistance phenotype by regulating the expression of MDR1and β-catenin (Chen et al., 2013). miR-146b-5p suppresses translation of EGFR, binds to the EGFR 3′-UTR, and inhibits migration of gliomas (Katakowski et al., 2010). Furthermore, analysis of U87-MG laser-capture micro dissected cells in tumor-bearing mice indicated that expression of miR-146b-5p is inversely correlated with distance from the tumor core (Katakowski et al., 2010). miR-335 activates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway to limit cell proliferation and neoplastic cell transformation (Scarola et al., 2010). miR-335 is increased by CREB and ATM-dependent miR-335 targets CtIP and modulates the DNA damage response (Martin et al., 2013). miR-335 targets Bcl-w and negatively regulates invasion potential of ovarian cancer cells (Cao et al., 2013). In addition, miR-335 inhibits proliferation and migration of human mesenchymal stem cells by targeting RUNX2 (Tome et al, 2011). miR-335 is involved in regulating target genes in several oncogenic signal-pathways such as p53, MAPK, TGF-β, Wnt, ERbB, mTOR, Toll-like receptor and focal adhesion (Yan et al., 2012). Upregulation of miR-335 simultaneously suppresses the invasiveness and promote apoptosis of A549 and H1299 lung cancer cells by targeting Bcl-w and SP1 (Wang et al., 2013). miR-335 level is decreased in hepatocellular carcinoma (Dohi et al., 2013) suggestive of its role as a tumor suppressor. The tumor suppressor role of miR-335 has been reported in prostate cancer (Xiong et al., 2013). miR-335 is reportedly down-regulated in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines indicative of its potential role in anti-cancer drug-resistance (Sorrentino et al., 2008). The identification of miRNAs that regulate the expression of HDAC3 is necessary for a better understanding of the mechanism of anti-cancer drug-sensitivity conferred by HDAC3.
In this study, we showed that the decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines results from the ubiquitination of HDAC3 by SIAH2. Furthermore, we showed that miR-335 targets SIAH2 to increase the expression of HDAC3 and miR-335 prevents SIAH2 from inducing ubiquitnation of HDAC3. The overexpression of SIAH2 induced anti-cancer drug-resistance associated with its effect on the expression and ubiquitination of HDAC3. Thus, the miR-335-SIAH2-HDAC3 axis is a potential target for the development of anti-cancer therapeutics.
Anti mouse and anti rabbit IgG-horse radish peroxidase conjugate antibodies were purchased from Pierce Company. An ECL (enhanced chemiluminiscence) kit was purchased from Amersham. Lipofectamin, Plus™ reagent, Trizol and reverse trancriptase (Superscript II RT) were purchased from Invitrogen (USA). Bioneer (Korea) synthesized all primers and miR-inhibitor used in this study. 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and all other chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma. Anchorage-independent growth assays kit was purchased from Millipore. Annexin V-FITC kit for the detection of apoptosis was purchased from Biovision. Transwell chamber system with 8-μm pore polycarbonate filter inserts for the determination of invasion potential was purchased from CoSTAR (USA). Quick-change site-directed mutagenesis kit was purchased from Stratagene. miRNA array was purchased from Signosis Company. SiRNA construction kit,
Cancer cell lines used in this study were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified minimal essential medium (DMEM; Gibco, USA) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and antibiotics at 37°C in a humidified incubator with a mixture of 95% air and 5% CO2. Cancer cell lines made resistant to anti-cancer drugs (SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-taxol, Malme3MR-Taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastine) were established by stepwise addition of the respective drug. SNU387R and Malme3MR cells are cancer cell lines made resistant to celastrol. Cells surviving drug treatment (attached fraction) were obtained and used throughout this study. SNU387R or Malme3MR cells that stably express HDAC3 S424A-Flag or HDAC3-Flag were selected by G418 (400 μg/ml). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells were also selected by G418.
Western blot analysis, immunoprecipitation and cellular fractionation were performed according to the standard procedures (Kim et al., 2014). For analysis of proteins from tumor tissues, frozen samples were grounded to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle over liquid nitrogen. Proteins were solubilized in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors, and insoluble material removed by centrifugation.
Viable cell number counting was carried out by trypan blue exclusion assays.
Apoptosis determination was carried out by using annexin V-FITC. Ten thousand cells were counted for three independent experiments.
Athymic nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu, 5?6-week-old females) were obtained from Orient Bio Inc. (Korea) and were maintained in a laminar air-flow cabinet under aseptic conditions. Each cancer cells (1 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal flank area of the mice. Tumor volume was determined by direct measurement with calipers and calculated by the following formula: length × width × height × 0.5. Following the establishment of sizeable tumor, celastrol (1 mg/kg) or taxol (1 mg/kg) was administered via tail vein. Tumor volume was measured as describe above. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kangwon National University (KW-140707-1).
The assays were done in 96-well plates, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 21?28 days. Anchorage-independent growth was evaluated by using the cell stain solution. Stained colonies were counted using a microscope and intensity of staining was quantified by measuring absorbance at 490 nm.
The invasive potential was determined by using a transwell chamber system with 8-μm pore polycarbonate filter inserts. The lower and upper sides of the filter were coated with gelatin and Matrigel, respectively. Trypsinized cells (5 × 03) in the serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin were added to each upper chamber of the transwell. RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum was placed in the lower chamber, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 16 h. The cells were fixed with methanol, and the invaded cells were stained and counted. Results were analyzed for statistical significance using the Student’s
Cells were plated overnight to achieve a confluent layer in 24-well plates. A scratch was made on the cell layer with a micropipette tip, and cultures were washed twice with serum-free medium. Cells were then transfected with the construct of interest. Wound healing was visualized by comparing photographs taken at the time of transfection and 48 h later.
miRNA was extended by a poly(A) tailing reaction using the A-Plus Poly(A) Polymerase Tailing Kit. cDNA was synthesized from miRNA with poly(A) tail using a poly(T) adaptor primer and qScript™ reverse transcriptase (Quanta Biogenesis). Expression levels of miR-335 was quantified with SYBR Green qRT-PCR kit using a miRNA-specific forward primer and a universal poly (T) adaptor reverse primer. The expression of miR-335 was defined based on the threshold (Ct), and relative expression levels were calculates as 2? [(Ct of miR-335)?(Ct of U6)] after normalization with reference to expression of U6 small nuclear RNA. For detection of HDAC3 RNA level, Total RNA was isolated using Trizol and 1 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize complementary DNA using random primers and reverse transcriptase (SuperScript II RT). For quantitative real-time PCR, SYBR PCR Master Mix was used in a CFX96 Real-Time System thermocycler (Biorad). The mRNA level for HDAC3 was normalized to the β-actin value and relative quantification was determined using the ΔC model presented by PE Applied Biosystems (Perkin Elmer, USA).
HDAC3S424A-Myc/His(6) expression plasmid (catalytically inactive HDAC3 mutant) was derived from pFlag-HDAC3 with the Quick-change site-directed mutagenesis kit. HDAC3 serial deletion mutant constructs were made by cloning various PCR-amplified HDAC3 fragments into pcDNA3.1-Myc/His vector.
To generate miR-335 expression vector, a 351bp genomic fragment encompassing primary miR-335 gene was PCR amplified and cloned into
miRNA array analysis to identify miRNAs that are related with anti cancer drug-resistance was performed according to the instruction manual provided by manufactures (Signosis Company). Genes that contain the miR-binding site (s) in the UTR were obtained using the TargetScan program.
For miR-335 knockdown, cells were transfected with 100 nM of oligonucleotide with Lipofectamine 2000. The sequences used were: 5′-ACAUUUUUCGUUAUUGCUCUUGA-3′ (miR-335 inhibitor oligonucleotide); and 5′-UUGUACUACACAAAAGUACUG-3′ (control inhibitor).
Data were analyzed and graphed using the GraphPad Prism statistics program (GraphPad Software).
Results are presented as mean ± S.E. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s
The expression level of HDAC3 is lower in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines than in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Kim et al., 2014). We therefore investigated the mechanism of expression regulation of HDAC3. In most of the anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines, the expression level of HDAC3 did not show difference from anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (data not shown). We therefore examined the possibility of proteasomal degradation of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. MG132, an inhibitor of proteasomal degradation, restored the expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR, SN387R-taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastine, Malme3MR-Taxol, and WM266-4 cells (Fig. 1A). This suggests that the expression level of HDAC3 may be under proteasomal regulation. Celastrol and taxol decreased the expression of HDAC3 while increasing the expression of SIAH2 in Malme3M cells (Fig. 1B). SIAH2, E3 ubiquitin ligase, induces proteasomal degradation of target proteins (Christian et al., 2011) suggestive of its regulatory role in the response to anti-cancer drugs. Because HDAC3 expression level is regulated by proteasome-dependent ubiquitination, we hypothesized that the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases, including SIAHs are increased in cancer cell lines resistant to anti-cancer drugs. The E2 ubiquitin conjugase UBCH8 (ubiquitin conjugating enzyme [human] 8) cooperates with the E3 ubiquitin ligases SIAH1 and SIAH2 (seven in absentia homolog 1/2) to mediate the proteasomal degradation of oncoproteins (Pietschmann et al., 2012). SIAH2 mediates HDAC3 degradation, and Ski protein exerts a negative effect on SIAH2-mediated HDAC3 degradation by interaction with SIAH2 (Zhao et al., 2010). Ski is necessary for proper chromosome segregation and interacts with aurora kinase A at the centrosome (Mosquera et al., 2011). HDAC3 serves as a substrate of Src (Longworth and Laimins, 2006) and Src activates SIAH2 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (Sarkar et al., 2012). These reports imply a role for SIAH2 in the regulation of HDAC3 expression. SIAH1 and SIAH2 showed relatively higher expression in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines vs. anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Fig. 1C). The down-regulation of SIAH2 increased the expression of HDAC3 (Fig. 1D), suggesting that SIAH2 may act as a negative regulator of HDAC3. Taken together, these results suggested that proteasomal degradation is responsible for the decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells.
Because expression level of HDAC3 is regulated by proteasomal degradation regulation, we examined ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells. Anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells, such as SNU387R, SNU387R-taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastne, Malme3MR and Malme3MR-taxol, showed ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 2A). The down-regulation of SIAH2 prevented the ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR and WM266-4 cells (Fig. 2B). Because SIAH2 regulated the expression of HDAC3 by ubiquitination (Fig. 2B), we examined the possibility of interaction between HDAC3 and SIAHs. Wild type HDAC3, but not mutant HDAC3 (HDAC3S424A), showed an interaction with SIAH2, but not with SIAH1 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that SIAH2, but not SIAH1, may target HDAC3 for ubiquitination. Wild type HDAC3 that contains nuclear localization signal sequences (313?428 of HDAC3) shows localization into the nucleus (Park et al., 2014a). However, HDAC3S424A does not show localization into the nucleus (Park et al., 2014b). Taken together, these results suggested that SIAH2 might target HDAC3 for ubiquitina- tion to decrease the expression of HDAC3.
We performed microRNA array (miRNA array) experiments in an effort to identify factor(s) that would affect the expression of HDAC3 and SIAH2. We found that several microRNAs were decreased in the Malme3MR cells (Fig. 3A). These miRNAs may regulate expression of SIAH2, which in turn could affect response to anti-cancer drugs by regulating the expression of HDAC3. Targetscan analysis predicted the binding of miR-335 to the 3′-UTR of SIAH2 (Fig. 3B). miR-335 decreased the luciferase activity of wild type pGL3-3′UTR-SIAH2, but not mutant pGL3-3′UTR-SIAH2, in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines (Fig. 3C), suggesting that miR-335 directly targets SIAH2. Taxol decreased expression of miR-335 in Malme3M and SNU387 cells (Fig. 3D), suggesting the involvement of miR-335 in regulating the response to anti-cancer drugs. miR-335 decreased the expression of SIAH2 and MDR1 while increasing expression of HDAC3 in cancer cell lines that were made resistant to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 3E). However, miR-335 did not affect the expression of SIAH1 (data not shown). miR-335 inhibited ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 3F). Taken together, these results suggest that miR-335 increases the expression of HDAC3 by targeting SIAH2.
Next, we examined whether miR-335 would confer sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. For this, miR-335 was transfected into various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol or Malme3MR-Taxol (Fig. 4A). Based on annexin V-FITC staining, miR-335 enhanced the sensitivity of SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol and Malme3MR-Taxol to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 4B). miR-335 enhanced cleavages of PARP and Caspase-3 in SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol and Malme3MR-Taxol in response to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 4C). We next examined the effect of miR-335 inhibitor on the response to anti-cancer drugs. miR-335 inhibitor induced resistance to anti-cancer drugs in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines such as Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5A). miR-335 inhibitor decreased the expression of miR-335 in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5B). miR-335 inhibitor prevented cleavage of PARP by anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5C). miR-335 inhibitor induced the expression of SIAH2 and MDR1 while decreasing the expression of HDAC3 in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these results suggested that miR-335 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs in association with its effect on SIAH2 and HDAC3 expression.
Because SIAH2 regulates the expression of HDAC3 (Fig. 1D), we examined the effect of SIAH2 on the response to anti-cancer drugs. Over expression of SIAH2 conferred resistance to anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M cells (Fig. 6A). SIAH2 decreased expression of HDAC3 while increasing the expression of MDR1 (Fig. 6B). SIAH2 prevented cleavage of PARP by anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M cells (Fig. 6C). SIAH2 induced ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 6D). Taken together, these results suggested that SIAH2 targets HDAC3 for ubiquitination to confer resistance to anti-cancer drugs.
The invasion and migration potential of cancer cells are associated with the response to anti-cancer drugs (Kim et al., 2014). We therefore examined the effect of miR-335 on the invasion and migration of cancer cells. SNU387R-miR335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower invasion potential than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7A). SNU387R-miR335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower expression of SNAIL than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7A). SNU387R-miR-335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells also showed lower migration potential than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7B). Taken together, these results suggest that miR-335 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs by affecting the invasion and migration potential of cancer cells.
We next examined whether miR-335 affects the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells. It is well known that anti-cancer drug-resistance is correlated with higher tumorigenic potential (Kim et al., 2014). The xenograft of Malme3MR cells showed a higher tumorigenic potential than the xenograft of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 8A). The xenograft of Malme3MR cells showed resistance to celastrol and taxol while the xenograft of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed sensitivity to celastrol and taxol (Fig. 8A). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower growth than Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8B). Western blot of tumor tissue lysates showed that the lower tumorigenic potential of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells was associated with the lower expression levels of SIAH2, MDR1, and SNAIL in comparison to Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8C). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower anchorage-independent gowth potential than Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8D). Taken together, these results suggested that the effect of miR-335 on the response to anti-cancer drugs is associated with its effect on the tumorigenic potential and growth potential of cancer cells.
The SIAH family of proteins interacts with N-CoR, an HDAC3-interacting protein. Silencing SIAH2 leads to increased caspase activity and apoptosis in response to both TRAIL and Fas ligand (Christian et al., 2011). Our results show that SIAH2 regulates expression of HDAC3 and induces the ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 2B). TBL1 and TBLR1 function as ubiquitin ligases and are involved in HDAC3 degradation (Zhao et al., 2010; Dimitrova et al., 2010). It would be interesting to examine the effects of these ubiqutin ligases on the expression of HDAC3.
Acetylation is an important post-translational modification that regulates various cellular processes (Shan et al., 2014). The acetylation of HDAC3 is increased in SNU387R and Malme3MR cell lines (data not shown). In this study, we found that Tip60, a histone acetyl transferase, was necessary for acetylation of HDAC3 (data not shown). It will be necessary to examine the effect of Tip60 on the expression of HDAC3 and the response to anti-cancer drugs. Knockdown of HDAC3 in cells increases TIP60 acetylation levels after DNA damage (Yi et al., 2014). HDAC3 and Tip60 may thus form a negative feedback loop.
In this study, we found that taxol decreased HDAC3 expressionwhile increasing the level of active rac1 in anti-cancer cancer cell lines (data not shown). This suggested that rac1 might regulate the expression of HDAC3. In addition, we found tyrosine nitration of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as Malme3MR and SNU387R cells (data not shown). The activated Rac1/Cdc42 enhances p53 protein ubiquitination and weakens p53 protein stability to increase VEGF expression (Ma et al., 2013). ubiquitination of HDAC3 by rac1 requires further study.
miR-335 acts as a metastasis suppressor in gastric cancer by targeting Bcl-w and specificity protein 1 (Xu et al., 2012). miR-335 inhibits tumor re-initiation and is epigenetically silenced in breast cancers (Png et al., 2011). miR-335 suppresses neuroblastoma cell invasiveness by down regulating multiple genes from TGF-β signaling pathways (Lynch et al., 2012). miR-335 down-regulates ROCK and MAPK1, resulting in reduced phosphorylation of downstream signaling molecules (Lynch et al., 2012). It will be interesting to examine the roles of ROCK1 and MAPK1 in resistance to anti-cancer drugs. The miR-335/SIAH2/HDAC3 axis possibly regulates MAPK.
Target Scan analysis revealed the binding of miR-326 to the 3′ UTR of HDAC3. miR-326 is involved in chemo-resistance in breast cancer cell by modulating expression of multi drug resistance-associated protein 1 (Liang et al., 2010). miR-326 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs by forming a negative feedback loop with HDAC3 (Kim et al., 2014). It will be interesting to examine whether miR-326 induces the expression of SIAH2 and the ubiquitination of HDAC3. It is probable that miR-326 may negatively regulate the expression of miR-335 to decrease the expression of HDAC3.
miRNA array analysis showed that miR-138 is decreased in Malme3MR cells (Fig. 3A). miR-138 increases radio-sensitivity in lung cancer cells by up-regulating the expression of γ-H2AX (Yang et al., 2014). The down-regulation of miR-138-5p contributes to gefitinib resistance in non- small cell lung cancer (Gao et al., 2014). It will be necessary to examine whether anti-cancer drugs, such as taxol, affects the expression of miR-138. miRNA array analysis also showed that the expression of miR-211 is lower in Malme3MR cells than in Malme3M cells (Fig. 3A). miR-211, a melanocyte lineage-specific small non-coding miRNA, acts as a tumor suppressor by regulating the activity of oncogenes such as PRAME and KCNMA1 (Mazar et al., 2010; Sakurai et al., 2011). miR-211 suppresses the invasion potential of melanoma cells (Levy et al., 2010; Mazar et al., 2010). The induction of the miR-211 expression in the cells increases the sensitivity to gemcitabine and reduced the expression of its target ribonucleotide reductase subunit 2 (RRM2) (Maftouh et al., 2014). miR-211 overexpression leads to the activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial/Caspase-9/3-mediated apoptotic pathway in glioma and cancer stem cells (CSC) (Asuthkar et al., 2012). miR-211 targets MMP-9 and forms a negative feedback loop with MMP-9 (Asuthkar et al., 2012). qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of miR-138 and miR-211 is lower in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines than in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (data not shown). It will be necessary to further identify targets of miR-138 and/or miR-211 for better understanding of the mechanism of anti-cancer drug-resistance.
miR-146 targets SIAH2 (Liao et al., 2013). miR-146a/b-TRAF6/IRAK1-NF-κB axis regulates dendritic cell apoptosis (Park et al., 2015). The down-regulation of miR-146a and miR-146b increases the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (Park et al., 2015). It will be necessary to examine whether miR146a/-146b regulate the expression of HDAC3.
HDAC3, along with c-Myc, represses the expression of miR-15a/miR-16-1 (Zhang et al., 2012). It will be interesting to furthet identify miRNAs that are regulated by HDAC3. So far, there are few known HDAC3-regulated miRNAs. miRNAs that are increased in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells may form a negative feedback loop with HDAC3. In conclusion, the miR-335-SAIH2-HDAC3 axis offers a valuable target for the development of anti-cancer drugs.
Mol. Cells 2015; 38(6): 562-572
Published online June 30, 2015 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0051
Copyright © The Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Youngmi Kim1,2, Hyuna Kim1,2, Deokbum Park1, and Dooil Jeoung1,*
1Department of Biochemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chunchon 200-701, Korea
Correspondence to:*Correspondence: jeoungd@kangwon.ac.kr
We previously reported the role of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) in response to anti-cancer drugs. The decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell line is responsible for the resistance to anti-cancer drugs. In this study, we investigated molecular mechanisms associated with regulation of HDAC3 expression. MG132, an inhibitor of proteasomal degradation, induced the expression of HDAC3 in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. Ubiquitination of HDAC3 was observed in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. HDAC3 showed an interaction with SIAH2, an ubiquitin E3 ligase, that has increased expression in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. miRNA array analysis showed the decreased expression of miR-335 in these cells. Targetscan analysis predicted the binding of miR-335 to the 3′-UTR of SIAH2. miR-335-mediated increased sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs was associated with its effect on HDAC3 and SIAH2 expression. miR-335 exerted apoptotic effects and inhibited ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. miR-335 negatively regulated the invasion, migration, and growth rate of cancer cells. The mouse xenograft model showed that miR-335 negatively regulated the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells. The down-regulation of SIAH2 conferred sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. The results of the study indicated that the miR-335/SIAH2/HDAC3 axis regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs.
Keywords: anti-cancer drug-resistance, miR-335, SIAH2, ubiquitination
Among the numerous HDACs, histone deacetylase-3 (HDAC3) is ubiquitously expressed and conserved in a wide range of species (Mahlknecht et al., 1999). HDAC3 forms large corepressor complexes containing N-CoR/SMRT and additional proteins (Li et al., 2000). HDAC3 regulates the JNK pathway (Zhang et al., 2002), NF-kB activity (Chen et al., 2001), MAPK activation (Mahlknecht et al., 2004) and apoptosis (Bardai and D’Mello, 2011; Uo et al., 2009). It represses CREB3-mediate transcription and migration of metastatic breast cancer cells (Kim et al., 2010) and acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis (Park et al., 2014a). HDAC3 confers sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs (Kim et al., 2014). HDAC3 expression is lower in various anti-cancer drug-resistant vs. anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Kim et al., 2014). The molecular mechanism of anti-cancer drug sensitivity conferred by HDAC3 remains unknown.
The loss of Siah2 increases chemo-sensitivity (Wong et al., 2012). The E3 ubiqutin ligase activity of Siah2 is necessary for resistance to death receptor-mediated apoptosis (Christian et al., 2011). The Inhibition of Siah2 ubiquitin ligase blocks melanoma tumorigenesis (Shah et al., 2009). SIAH2 expression is upregulated in basal-like breast cancers via copy number changes and/or transcriptional activation by p53 (Chan et al., 2011). The inhibition of Siah2 activity reduces metastasis through HIF-1alpha (Qi et al., 2008). Siah2 regulates HIF1 alpha expression and response to hypoxia (Nakayama et al, 2004). SIAH2 diminishes p53 acetylation and transcriptional activity (Grishina et al., 2012). Loss of SIAH2 suppresses tumorigenesis in a LATS2-dependent manner in a xenograft mouse model (Ma et al., 2015). Knockdown of SIAH2 causes growth suppression and apoptosis induction in a p53-independent mechanism (Hsieh et al., 2013). Blood vessel normalization in Siah2 (?/?) tumors resulted in an increased response to chemotherapy and prolonged survival (Wong et al., 2012). These reports collectively suggest the role of SIAH2 in tumorigenesis and the response to anti-cancer drugs. However, the molecular mechanisms associated with the effect of SIAH2 on the response to anti-cancer drugs remains largely unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNA molecules that mediate posttranscriptional gene regulation (Calin and Croce, 2006). miRNAs play important roles in tumor development by regulating the expression of various oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (Calin and Croce, 2006; Xu et al., 2013). For example, miR-199a suppresses tumorigenicity and multidrug resistance of ovarian cancer-initiating cells (Cheng et al., 2012). miR-27a reverses the multidrug resistance phenotype by regulating the expression of MDR1and β-catenin (Chen et al., 2013). miR-146b-5p suppresses translation of EGFR, binds to the EGFR 3′-UTR, and inhibits migration of gliomas (Katakowski et al., 2010). Furthermore, analysis of U87-MG laser-capture micro dissected cells in tumor-bearing mice indicated that expression of miR-146b-5p is inversely correlated with distance from the tumor core (Katakowski et al., 2010). miR-335 activates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway to limit cell proliferation and neoplastic cell transformation (Scarola et al., 2010). miR-335 is increased by CREB and ATM-dependent miR-335 targets CtIP and modulates the DNA damage response (Martin et al., 2013). miR-335 targets Bcl-w and negatively regulates invasion potential of ovarian cancer cells (Cao et al., 2013). In addition, miR-335 inhibits proliferation and migration of human mesenchymal stem cells by targeting RUNX2 (Tome et al, 2011). miR-335 is involved in regulating target genes in several oncogenic signal-pathways such as p53, MAPK, TGF-β, Wnt, ERbB, mTOR, Toll-like receptor and focal adhesion (Yan et al., 2012). Upregulation of miR-335 simultaneously suppresses the invasiveness and promote apoptosis of A549 and H1299 lung cancer cells by targeting Bcl-w and SP1 (Wang et al., 2013). miR-335 level is decreased in hepatocellular carcinoma (Dohi et al., 2013) suggestive of its role as a tumor suppressor. The tumor suppressor role of miR-335 has been reported in prostate cancer (Xiong et al., 2013). miR-335 is reportedly down-regulated in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines indicative of its potential role in anti-cancer drug-resistance (Sorrentino et al., 2008). The identification of miRNAs that regulate the expression of HDAC3 is necessary for a better understanding of the mechanism of anti-cancer drug-sensitivity conferred by HDAC3.
In this study, we showed that the decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines results from the ubiquitination of HDAC3 by SIAH2. Furthermore, we showed that miR-335 targets SIAH2 to increase the expression of HDAC3 and miR-335 prevents SIAH2 from inducing ubiquitnation of HDAC3. The overexpression of SIAH2 induced anti-cancer drug-resistance associated with its effect on the expression and ubiquitination of HDAC3. Thus, the miR-335-SIAH2-HDAC3 axis is a potential target for the development of anti-cancer therapeutics.
Anti mouse and anti rabbit IgG-horse radish peroxidase conjugate antibodies were purchased from Pierce Company. An ECL (enhanced chemiluminiscence) kit was purchased from Amersham. Lipofectamin, Plus™ reagent, Trizol and reverse trancriptase (Superscript II RT) were purchased from Invitrogen (USA). Bioneer (Korea) synthesized all primers and miR-inhibitor used in this study. 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and all other chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma. Anchorage-independent growth assays kit was purchased from Millipore. Annexin V-FITC kit for the detection of apoptosis was purchased from Biovision. Transwell chamber system with 8-μm pore polycarbonate filter inserts for the determination of invasion potential was purchased from CoSTAR (USA). Quick-change site-directed mutagenesis kit was purchased from Stratagene. miRNA array was purchased from Signosis Company. SiRNA construction kit,
Cancer cell lines used in this study were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified minimal essential medium (DMEM; Gibco, USA) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and antibiotics at 37°C in a humidified incubator with a mixture of 95% air and 5% CO2. Cancer cell lines made resistant to anti-cancer drugs (SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-taxol, Malme3MR-Taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastine) were established by stepwise addition of the respective drug. SNU387R and Malme3MR cells are cancer cell lines made resistant to celastrol. Cells surviving drug treatment (attached fraction) were obtained and used throughout this study. SNU387R or Malme3MR cells that stably express HDAC3 S424A-Flag or HDAC3-Flag were selected by G418 (400 μg/ml). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells were also selected by G418.
Western blot analysis, immunoprecipitation and cellular fractionation were performed according to the standard procedures (Kim et al., 2014). For analysis of proteins from tumor tissues, frozen samples were grounded to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle over liquid nitrogen. Proteins were solubilized in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors, and insoluble material removed by centrifugation.
Viable cell number counting was carried out by trypan blue exclusion assays.
Apoptosis determination was carried out by using annexin V-FITC. Ten thousand cells were counted for three independent experiments.
Athymic nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu, 5?6-week-old females) were obtained from Orient Bio Inc. (Korea) and were maintained in a laminar air-flow cabinet under aseptic conditions. Each cancer cells (1 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal flank area of the mice. Tumor volume was determined by direct measurement with calipers and calculated by the following formula: length × width × height × 0.5. Following the establishment of sizeable tumor, celastrol (1 mg/kg) or taxol (1 mg/kg) was administered via tail vein. Tumor volume was measured as describe above. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kangwon National University (KW-140707-1).
The assays were done in 96-well plates, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 21?28 days. Anchorage-independent growth was evaluated by using the cell stain solution. Stained colonies were counted using a microscope and intensity of staining was quantified by measuring absorbance at 490 nm.
The invasive potential was determined by using a transwell chamber system with 8-μm pore polycarbonate filter inserts. The lower and upper sides of the filter were coated with gelatin and Matrigel, respectively. Trypsinized cells (5 × 03) in the serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin were added to each upper chamber of the transwell. RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum was placed in the lower chamber, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 16 h. The cells were fixed with methanol, and the invaded cells were stained and counted. Results were analyzed for statistical significance using the Student’s
Cells were plated overnight to achieve a confluent layer in 24-well plates. A scratch was made on the cell layer with a micropipette tip, and cultures were washed twice with serum-free medium. Cells were then transfected with the construct of interest. Wound healing was visualized by comparing photographs taken at the time of transfection and 48 h later.
miRNA was extended by a poly(A) tailing reaction using the A-Plus Poly(A) Polymerase Tailing Kit. cDNA was synthesized from miRNA with poly(A) tail using a poly(T) adaptor primer and qScript™ reverse transcriptase (Quanta Biogenesis). Expression levels of miR-335 was quantified with SYBR Green qRT-PCR kit using a miRNA-specific forward primer and a universal poly (T) adaptor reverse primer. The expression of miR-335 was defined based on the threshold (Ct), and relative expression levels were calculates as 2? [(Ct of miR-335)?(Ct of U6)] after normalization with reference to expression of U6 small nuclear RNA. For detection of HDAC3 RNA level, Total RNA was isolated using Trizol and 1 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize complementary DNA using random primers and reverse transcriptase (SuperScript II RT). For quantitative real-time PCR, SYBR PCR Master Mix was used in a CFX96 Real-Time System thermocycler (Biorad). The mRNA level for HDAC3 was normalized to the β-actin value and relative quantification was determined using the ΔC model presented by PE Applied Biosystems (Perkin Elmer, USA).
HDAC3S424A-Myc/His(6) expression plasmid (catalytically inactive HDAC3 mutant) was derived from pFlag-HDAC3 with the Quick-change site-directed mutagenesis kit. HDAC3 serial deletion mutant constructs were made by cloning various PCR-amplified HDAC3 fragments into pcDNA3.1-Myc/His vector.
To generate miR-335 expression vector, a 351bp genomic fragment encompassing primary miR-335 gene was PCR amplified and cloned into
miRNA array analysis to identify miRNAs that are related with anti cancer drug-resistance was performed according to the instruction manual provided by manufactures (Signosis Company). Genes that contain the miR-binding site (s) in the UTR were obtained using the TargetScan program.
For miR-335 knockdown, cells were transfected with 100 nM of oligonucleotide with Lipofectamine 2000. The sequences used were: 5′-ACAUUUUUCGUUAUUGCUCUUGA-3′ (miR-335 inhibitor oligonucleotide); and 5′-UUGUACUACACAAAAGUACUG-3′ (control inhibitor).
Data were analyzed and graphed using the GraphPad Prism statistics program (GraphPad Software).
Results are presented as mean ± S.E. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s
The expression level of HDAC3 is lower in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines than in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Kim et al., 2014). We therefore investigated the mechanism of expression regulation of HDAC3. In most of the anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines, the expression level of HDAC3 did not show difference from anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (data not shown). We therefore examined the possibility of proteasomal degradation of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines. MG132, an inhibitor of proteasomal degradation, restored the expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR, SN387R-taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastine, Malme3MR-Taxol, and WM266-4 cells (Fig. 1A). This suggests that the expression level of HDAC3 may be under proteasomal regulation. Celastrol and taxol decreased the expression of HDAC3 while increasing the expression of SIAH2 in Malme3M cells (Fig. 1B). SIAH2, E3 ubiquitin ligase, induces proteasomal degradation of target proteins (Christian et al., 2011) suggestive of its regulatory role in the response to anti-cancer drugs. Because HDAC3 expression level is regulated by proteasome-dependent ubiquitination, we hypothesized that the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases, including SIAHs are increased in cancer cell lines resistant to anti-cancer drugs. The E2 ubiquitin conjugase UBCH8 (ubiquitin conjugating enzyme [human] 8) cooperates with the E3 ubiquitin ligases SIAH1 and SIAH2 (seven in absentia homolog 1/2) to mediate the proteasomal degradation of oncoproteins (Pietschmann et al., 2012). SIAH2 mediates HDAC3 degradation, and Ski protein exerts a negative effect on SIAH2-mediated HDAC3 degradation by interaction with SIAH2 (Zhao et al., 2010). Ski is necessary for proper chromosome segregation and interacts with aurora kinase A at the centrosome (Mosquera et al., 2011). HDAC3 serves as a substrate of Src (Longworth and Laimins, 2006) and Src activates SIAH2 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (Sarkar et al., 2012). These reports imply a role for SIAH2 in the regulation of HDAC3 expression. SIAH1 and SIAH2 showed relatively higher expression in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines vs. anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (Fig. 1C). The down-regulation of SIAH2 increased the expression of HDAC3 (Fig. 1D), suggesting that SIAH2 may act as a negative regulator of HDAC3. Taken together, these results suggested that proteasomal degradation is responsible for the decreased expression of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells.
Because expression level of HDAC3 is regulated by proteasomal degradation regulation, we examined ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells. Anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells, such as SNU387R, SNU387R-taxol, SNU387R-Vinblastne, Malme3MR and Malme3MR-taxol, showed ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 2A). The down-regulation of SIAH2 prevented the ubiquitination of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR and WM266-4 cells (Fig. 2B). Because SIAH2 regulated the expression of HDAC3 by ubiquitination (Fig. 2B), we examined the possibility of interaction between HDAC3 and SIAHs. Wild type HDAC3, but not mutant HDAC3 (HDAC3S424A), showed an interaction with SIAH2, but not with SIAH1 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that SIAH2, but not SIAH1, may target HDAC3 for ubiquitination. Wild type HDAC3 that contains nuclear localization signal sequences (313?428 of HDAC3) shows localization into the nucleus (Park et al., 2014a). However, HDAC3S424A does not show localization into the nucleus (Park et al., 2014b). Taken together, these results suggested that SIAH2 might target HDAC3 for ubiquitina- tion to decrease the expression of HDAC3.
We performed microRNA array (miRNA array) experiments in an effort to identify factor(s) that would affect the expression of HDAC3 and SIAH2. We found that several microRNAs were decreased in the Malme3MR cells (Fig. 3A). These miRNAs may regulate expression of SIAH2, which in turn could affect response to anti-cancer drugs by regulating the expression of HDAC3. Targetscan analysis predicted the binding of miR-335 to the 3′-UTR of SIAH2 (Fig. 3B). miR-335 decreased the luciferase activity of wild type pGL3-3′UTR-SIAH2, but not mutant pGL3-3′UTR-SIAH2, in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines (Fig. 3C), suggesting that miR-335 directly targets SIAH2. Taxol decreased expression of miR-335 in Malme3M and SNU387 cells (Fig. 3D), suggesting the involvement of miR-335 in regulating the response to anti-cancer drugs. miR-335 decreased the expression of SIAH2 and MDR1 while increasing expression of HDAC3 in cancer cell lines that were made resistant to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 3E). However, miR-335 did not affect the expression of SIAH1 (data not shown). miR-335 inhibited ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 3F). Taken together, these results suggest that miR-335 increases the expression of HDAC3 by targeting SIAH2.
Next, we examined whether miR-335 would confer sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. For this, miR-335 was transfected into various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol or Malme3MR-Taxol (Fig. 4A). Based on annexin V-FITC staining, miR-335 enhanced the sensitivity of SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol and Malme3MR-Taxol to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 4B). miR-335 enhanced cleavages of PARP and Caspase-3 in SNU387R, Malme3MR, SNU387R-Taxol and Malme3MR-Taxol in response to anti-cancer drugs (Fig. 4C). We next examined the effect of miR-335 inhibitor on the response to anti-cancer drugs. miR-335 inhibitor induced resistance to anti-cancer drugs in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines such as Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5A). miR-335 inhibitor decreased the expression of miR-335 in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5B). miR-335 inhibitor prevented cleavage of PARP by anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5C). miR-335 inhibitor induced the expression of SIAH2 and MDR1 while decreasing the expression of HDAC3 in Malme3M and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these results suggested that miR-335 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs in association with its effect on SIAH2 and HDAC3 expression.
Because SIAH2 regulates the expression of HDAC3 (Fig. 1D), we examined the effect of SIAH2 on the response to anti-cancer drugs. Over expression of SIAH2 conferred resistance to anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M cells (Fig. 6A). SIAH2 decreased expression of HDAC3 while increasing the expression of MDR1 (Fig. 6B). SIAH2 prevented cleavage of PARP by anti-cancer drugs in Malme3M cells (Fig. 6C). SIAH2 induced ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 6D). Taken together, these results suggested that SIAH2 targets HDAC3 for ubiquitination to confer resistance to anti-cancer drugs.
The invasion and migration potential of cancer cells are associated with the response to anti-cancer drugs (Kim et al., 2014). We therefore examined the effect of miR-335 on the invasion and migration of cancer cells. SNU387R-miR335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower invasion potential than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7A). SNU387R-miR335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower expression of SNAIL than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7A). SNU387R-miR-335 and Malme3MR-miR-335 cells also showed lower migration potential than SNU387R and Malme3MR cells (Fig. 7B). Taken together, these results suggest that miR-335 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs by affecting the invasion and migration potential of cancer cells.
We next examined whether miR-335 affects the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells. It is well known that anti-cancer drug-resistance is correlated with higher tumorigenic potential (Kim et al., 2014). The xenograft of Malme3MR cells showed a higher tumorigenic potential than the xenograft of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells (Fig. 8A). The xenograft of Malme3MR cells showed resistance to celastrol and taxol while the xenograft of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed sensitivity to celastrol and taxol (Fig. 8A). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower growth than Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8B). Western blot of tumor tissue lysates showed that the lower tumorigenic potential of Malme3MR-miR-335 cells was associated with the lower expression levels of SIAH2, MDR1, and SNAIL in comparison to Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8C). Malme3MR-miR-335 cells showed lower anchorage-independent gowth potential than Malme3MR cells (Fig. 8D). Taken together, these results suggested that the effect of miR-335 on the response to anti-cancer drugs is associated with its effect on the tumorigenic potential and growth potential of cancer cells.
The SIAH family of proteins interacts with N-CoR, an HDAC3-interacting protein. Silencing SIAH2 leads to increased caspase activity and apoptosis in response to both TRAIL and Fas ligand (Christian et al., 2011). Our results show that SIAH2 regulates expression of HDAC3 and induces the ubiquitination of HDAC3 (Fig. 2B). TBL1 and TBLR1 function as ubiquitin ligases and are involved in HDAC3 degradation (Zhao et al., 2010; Dimitrova et al., 2010). It would be interesting to examine the effects of these ubiqutin ligases on the expression of HDAC3.
Acetylation is an important post-translational modification that regulates various cellular processes (Shan et al., 2014). The acetylation of HDAC3 is increased in SNU387R and Malme3MR cell lines (data not shown). In this study, we found that Tip60, a histone acetyl transferase, was necessary for acetylation of HDAC3 (data not shown). It will be necessary to examine the effect of Tip60 on the expression of HDAC3 and the response to anti-cancer drugs. Knockdown of HDAC3 in cells increases TIP60 acetylation levels after DNA damage (Yi et al., 2014). HDAC3 and Tip60 may thus form a negative feedback loop.
In this study, we found that taxol decreased HDAC3 expressionwhile increasing the level of active rac1 in anti-cancer cancer cell lines (data not shown). This suggested that rac1 might regulate the expression of HDAC3. In addition, we found tyrosine nitration of HDAC3 in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines such as Malme3MR and SNU387R cells (data not shown). The activated Rac1/Cdc42 enhances p53 protein ubiquitination and weakens p53 protein stability to increase VEGF expression (Ma et al., 2013). ubiquitination of HDAC3 by rac1 requires further study.
miR-335 acts as a metastasis suppressor in gastric cancer by targeting Bcl-w and specificity protein 1 (Xu et al., 2012). miR-335 inhibits tumor re-initiation and is epigenetically silenced in breast cancers (Png et al., 2011). miR-335 suppresses neuroblastoma cell invasiveness by down regulating multiple genes from TGF-β signaling pathways (Lynch et al., 2012). miR-335 down-regulates ROCK and MAPK1, resulting in reduced phosphorylation of downstream signaling molecules (Lynch et al., 2012). It will be interesting to examine the roles of ROCK1 and MAPK1 in resistance to anti-cancer drugs. The miR-335/SIAH2/HDAC3 axis possibly regulates MAPK.
Target Scan analysis revealed the binding of miR-326 to the 3′ UTR of HDAC3. miR-326 is involved in chemo-resistance in breast cancer cell by modulating expression of multi drug resistance-associated protein 1 (Liang et al., 2010). miR-326 regulates the response to anti-cancer drugs by forming a negative feedback loop with HDAC3 (Kim et al., 2014). It will be interesting to examine whether miR-326 induces the expression of SIAH2 and the ubiquitination of HDAC3. It is probable that miR-326 may negatively regulate the expression of miR-335 to decrease the expression of HDAC3.
miRNA array analysis showed that miR-138 is decreased in Malme3MR cells (Fig. 3A). miR-138 increases radio-sensitivity in lung cancer cells by up-regulating the expression of γ-H2AX (Yang et al., 2014). The down-regulation of miR-138-5p contributes to gefitinib resistance in non- small cell lung cancer (Gao et al., 2014). It will be necessary to examine whether anti-cancer drugs, such as taxol, affects the expression of miR-138. miRNA array analysis also showed that the expression of miR-211 is lower in Malme3MR cells than in Malme3M cells (Fig. 3A). miR-211, a melanocyte lineage-specific small non-coding miRNA, acts as a tumor suppressor by regulating the activity of oncogenes such as PRAME and KCNMA1 (Mazar et al., 2010; Sakurai et al., 2011). miR-211 suppresses the invasion potential of melanoma cells (Levy et al., 2010; Mazar et al., 2010). The induction of the miR-211 expression in the cells increases the sensitivity to gemcitabine and reduced the expression of its target ribonucleotide reductase subunit 2 (RRM2) (Maftouh et al., 2014). miR-211 overexpression leads to the activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial/Caspase-9/3-mediated apoptotic pathway in glioma and cancer stem cells (CSC) (Asuthkar et al., 2012). miR-211 targets MMP-9 and forms a negative feedback loop with MMP-9 (Asuthkar et al., 2012). qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of miR-138 and miR-211 is lower in various anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cell lines than in anti-cancer drug-sensitive cancer cell lines (data not shown). It will be necessary to further identify targets of miR-138 and/or miR-211 for better understanding of the mechanism of anti-cancer drug-resistance.
miR-146 targets SIAH2 (Liao et al., 2013). miR-146a/b-TRAF6/IRAK1-NF-κB axis regulates dendritic cell apoptosis (Park et al., 2015). The down-regulation of miR-146a and miR-146b increases the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (Park et al., 2015). It will be necessary to examine whether miR146a/-146b regulate the expression of HDAC3.
HDAC3, along with c-Myc, represses the expression of miR-15a/miR-16-1 (Zhang et al., 2012). It will be interesting to furthet identify miRNAs that are regulated by HDAC3. So far, there are few known HDAC3-regulated miRNAs. miRNAs that are increased in anti-cancer drug-resistant cancer cells may form a negative feedback loop with HDAC3. In conclusion, the miR-335-SAIH2-HDAC3 axis offers a valuable target for the development of anti-cancer drugs.
Jae Jin Kim, Seo Yun Lee, Soyeon Kim, Jee Min Chung, Mira Kwon, Jung Hyun Yoon, Sangwook Park, Yiseul Hwang, Dongsun Park, Jong-Soo Lee, and Ho Chul Kang
Mol. Cells 2018; 41(8): 799-807 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.0078Nensi Shrestha, Hridaya Shrestha, Taeyong Ryu, Hangun Kim, Shishli Simkhada, Young-Chang Cho, So-Yeon Park, Sayeon Cho, Kwang-Youl Lee, Jae-Hyuk Lee, and Kwonseop Kim
Mol. Cells 2018; 41(4): 320-330 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.2292Daniel Hormaechea-Agulla, Youngjo Kim, Min Sup Song, and Su Jung Song
Mol. Cells 2018; 41(3): 168-178 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.0008