
The organismal size is determined by multiple inputs from various biological pathways that affect the size, structure, and organization of the cells comprising the tissues and organs (Bar et al., 2016; Tuck, 2014; Uppaluri et al., 2016). During development, various genetic pathways that regulate cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis need to be activated appropriately to define the body’s dimension and proportion, ultimately determining an individual’s body size (Nagashima et al., 2017). Although the regulation of body size by internal and external factors in various organisms has been extensively studied, the genetic pathways contributing to a different aspect of body growth have not been fully identified at the organismal level.
In contrast,
Analyzing the characteristics of body shape phenotypes in various mutants, such as Dpy, Sma, and Lon, will be essential for investigating the role of genetic pathways in body growth. However, due to the differential gene expression in different body parts, there is a significant challenge in analyzing body size and shape to determine the phenotype accurately. In the currently available open-source databases, some strains are often reported as both Dpy and Sma, bringing confusion to morphological concepts and phenotype designations (WormBase; https://wormbase.org/). But, at the same time, these records suggest that there may be a growth-regulating gene in complex networks of pathways differentially regulating body shape and size and contributing to organismal growth. Thus, the question of how a gene regulating body size plays a role in constructing an organismal body with optimal size and shape remains unanswered.
In this study, we determined the morphological phenotype, in terms of body size, of 46 strains of
Worms were grown at 20°C according to the standard protocol (Brenner, 1974). The wild-type N2 animals and the following strains used in this study were obtained from the
L4 larvae were picked to fresh plates and incubated at 20°C for 24 h to measure the body sizes of adults (Fig. 1). L4 larvae worms with an apparent white crescent surrounding the visible prospective vulva were chosen. One-day adult worms were mounted on a 2% agarose pad, paralyzed with 10 mM levamisole (L9756; Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and imaged under 100× with Zeiss AxioCam using the Normarski optics and an attached AxioCam digital camera. All measurements were performed with AxioVs40 V 4.8.2.0 (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
We compared the ratio of body length to body width to the ratio of head size to pharynx length to further quantify the parameters of the worm’s morphology. We applied the k-means clustering approach with the Euclidean distance (ED) to measure for similarity. Then, we analyzed 4 formed clusters of wildtype, dumpy, small, and long, to study the existing phenotypic characteristics of the worm’s morphology.
Measuring the distance between data points and cluster centroids was the fundamental first step for all clustering methods. The algorithm used in clustering was the objective function given by:
where ||
Data points are in the space represented by the objects that are being clustered. These points represent initial group centroids in which each object is assigned to the group that has the closest centroid according to the formula given by:
where
All objects were reassigned when the number of cluster centers was manually inputted as three. The calculation of the positions of the K centroids was repeated until the centroids became constant. Wolfram Mathematica and R were used to compute the
Organismal morphology is determined by various genetic pathways; however, it remains unclear how these genetic pathways play a role in defining certain characteristics of body size and morphology. We investigated the body morphology of mutants with previously reported defects in body size. First, we chose a group of diverse strains, such as
When the worms were measured 24 h after the L4 larval stage, the average body length of the reportedly
We also measured the body width of these mutants (Fig. 1). The reportedly dpy and lon mutants’ average body width was 10.78% and 8.97%, respectively, greater than that of the wild type (Fig. 2C). The average body width of the reportedly
Some
We then measured the head size and found that the average head size of the
The analysis of body morphology suggests that previous phenotyping may not reflect the actual, i.e., proportionate morphology. We visualized individual mutants’ morphological phenotype by plotting each worm’s body size relative to the wild type by integrating four parameters: body length, body width, pharynx length, and head size (Figs. 4 and 5). Our k-means clustering centroids indicate that the average body lengths of the
Mutants that belong to their respective morphological phenotype tend to cluster at a specific region of the graph (Fig. 5). The mutants with a defect in a cuticle collagen protein,
The plotting revealed that
In the plotting, we also included several mutants’ data points to try to determine their morphology, which had never been reported. Among them,
Morphological analysis of mutant
Here, we demonstrate a novel method of categorizing morphological phenotypes of Dpy, Sma, and Lon with multiple body parameters. We analyze 46 mutant worms’ body size by measuring their body length, body width, pharynx length, and head size. We evaluated the ratios between each parameter to detect the relatively subtle differences in body morphology and head shape. We also validated some previously reported phenotypes with reassignments and provided the optimal parameters to identify a worm’s phenotype.
WormBase has served as a database for in-depth phenotypic and genetic information of
Extensive phenotyping requires measuring many parameters that quantify body size and organ length and calculate the ratios between different parameters. While mutations that affect cuticle collagen are often responsible for the Dpy phenotype, several major pathways involving TGF-β, spectrin, calcineurin, and feeding efficiency determine the body size phenotypes (Mörck and Pilon, 2006). Though the smaller body size of
Some strains are provided by the CGC, funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) or National Bioresource Project Japan. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2018R1A2A3074987 to S.K.L.; 2018R1D1A1B07046893 to J.A.) and Research Grant from Hanyang University (201500000001686).
J.Y.C., T.W.C., and S.H.K. performed experiments and collected data. J.Y.C. and S.K.L. analyzed data and generated figures. J.Y.C., S.K.L., and J.A. wrote the manuscript. S.K.L. and J.A. designed the study and secured funding.
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.