Mol. Cells 2021; 44(7): 425~432  https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0080
Combinatorial Approach Using Caenorhabditis elegans and Mammalian Systems for Aging Research
Gee-Yoon Lee 1,2, Jooyeon Sohn 1,2, and Seung-Jae V. Lee 1,*
1Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Korea, 2These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received April 6, 2021; Revised May 21, 2021; Accepted May 23, 2021.; Published online July 12, 2021.
© Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology. All rights reserved.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
ABSTRACT
Aging is associated with functional and structural declines in organisms over time. Organisms as diverse as the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and mammals share signaling pathways that regulate aging and lifespan. In this review, we discuss recent combinatorial approach to aging research employing C. elegans and mammalian systems that have contributed to our understanding of evolutionarily conserved aging-regulating pathways. The topics covered here include insulin/IGF-1, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and sirtuin signaling pathways; dietary restriction; autophagy; mitochondria; and the nervous system. A combinatorial approach employing high-throughput, rapid C. elegans systems, and human model mammalian systems is likely to continue providing mechanistic insights into aging biology and will help develop therapeutics against age-associated disorders.
Keywords: aging, Caenorhabditis elegans, combinatorial approach, lifespan, mammal
INTRODUCTION

Aging is associated with the gradual structural and functional decline of organisms. Diverse species, such as yeast, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, fruit flies, and mice, share biological processes that influence aging. Longevity and healthy aging, respectively measured by lifespan and health span, are the major phenotypes measured for aging research (Brooks-Wilson, 2013). Interventions that improve health span have been reported focusing on various aspects of health parameters, including immunosenescence (Lee et al., 2021), stress resistance (Park et al., 2017), motility (Hahm et al., 2015), and cognitive function (Lu et al., 2014) in various organisms. For example, inhibition of insulin/IGF-1 signaling extends lifespan and health span by downregulating a phosphoinositide-3 kinase cascade, shown first in C. elegans, and subsequently in flies, mice, and very likely humans (An et al., 2017; Kenyon, 2010). Additionally, reducing the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling increases lifespan first shown in yeast, and then mice, flies, and C. elegans (Johnson et al., 2013; 2015; Lee et al., 2015). Furthermore, dietary restriction delays aging in almost all tested species, including primates (Gems and Partridge, 2013; Santos et al., 2016). These findings have been mostly made through consecutive publications by various research groups, and have greatly contributed to our knowledge in multiple processes underlying the regulation of aging and lifespan that are evolutionarily conserved.

C. elegans and mice are two major model organisms for investigating aging-regulating mechanisms (Pitt and Kaeberlein, 2015) (Fig. 1). Indeed, C. elegans is the first model organism for which longevity mutants were discovered (Friedman and Johnson, 1988). C. elegans has been extensively used for aging research mainly because of relatively short wild-type lifespan (approximately 2-3 weeks) and large brood size (over 300 progeny/animal), making it suitable for population analysis. C. elegans is also genetically tractable to identify genes that modulate aging via random mutagenesis, RNAi screening, and CRISPR genome editing (Brenner, 1974; Dickinson and Goldstein, 2016; Kamath and Ahringer, 2003). However, C. elegans has limitations as a model for human aging. It lacks many essential anatomical and physiological characteristics found in mammals, such as a brain and an adaptive immune system (Tissenbaum, 2015). In addition, some aging-regulating pathways are specific for C. elegans; for example, sterol signaling comprising DAF-9/CYP27A1 and DAF-12/nuclear receptor, regulates lifespan in C. elegans (Antebi, 2013), but have not been reported to be conserved in mammalian systems. Thus, many researchers have used mammalian systems for aging research, with mice being the most popular model mammal (Folgueras et al., 2018). Mice have a short lifespan compared to longer-lived larger mammals, including humans, and are amenable to molecular genetics research of aging and age-related human disease (Mitchell et al., 2015). To exploit the strengths of both these systems, e.g., the short lifespan and genetic tractability of C. elegans and the physiological similarity to humans in mammalian systems, many recent studies on aging have employed them together.

In this review, we discuss previous research in which combinatorial approaches employing C. elegans and mammals were used to characterize the environmental and genetic factors that regulate aging. Specifically, we focus on individual research papers that identify conserved aging-regulating mechanisms by using both C. elegans and mammalian systems, rather than numerous consecutive publications that have been already covered by many outstanding previous reviews (Carmona and Michan, 2016; Fontana and Partridge, 2015; Gems and Partridge, 2013; Johnson et al., 2013; Kenyon, 2010; López-Otín et al., 2013; Pitt and Kaeberlein, 2015; Taormina et al., 2019). We describe findings regarding conserved aging-regulating factors and pathways, including insulin/IGF-1 signaling, mTOR, sirtuins, dietary restriction, autophagy, mitochondria, and neuronal regulation. Making advances in aging research using C. elegans and mammals will improve our understanding of conserved aging mechanisms, which will help devise strategies that prevent age-associated diseases in humans.

INSULIN/IGF-1 SIGNALING

Insulin/IGF-1 signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that regulates aging in diverse organisms. Reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling caused by genetic inhibition of daf-2 (insulin/IGF-1 receptor) in C. elegans and Igf1r (IGF-1 receptor) or fat-specific insulin receptor in mice increases lifespan (Blüher et al., 2003; Holzenberger et al., 2003; Kenyon et al., 1993). In C. elegans, daf-2 mutations promote longevity by activating downstream transcription factors, including DAF-16/forkhead box O (FOXO) (An et al., 2017; Kenyon, 2010).

Several studies have employed C. elegans and mammalian systems in various contexts to demonstrate the role of DAF-16/FOXO in longevity responses (Fig. 2A). Genetic inhibition of EFL-1/E2F1, a transcription factor for cell proliferation and development, promotes longevity in C. elegans and delays senescence by upregulating DAF-16/FOXO (Xie et al., 2014). This study efficiently used C. elegans for determining the effects of EFL-1 on organismal longevity, and mammalian cells for biochemical experiments showing that E2F1 inhibits FOXO via physical interaction. Mutations in ercc-1/Ercc1, which encodes a structure-specific endonuclease for DNA repair, increase stress resistance at a young age by activating DAF-16/FOXO in worms and mice, while accelerating aging by inhibiting DAF-16/FOXO in old age (Gurkar et al., 2018). The effect of ercc-1/Ercc1 loss on DAF-16/FOXO arises through the tumor suppressor CEP-1/p53 in C. elegans and mice. These studies demonstrate the evolutionarily conserved roles of DAF-16/FOXO in regulating aging and lifespan using both C. elegans and mice.

mTOR SIGNALING

The mTOR signaling is a nutrient-sensing pathway that affects various cellular and physiological responses, including autophagy, metabolism, and protein synthesis (Johnson et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015). Several combinatorial studies using both C. elegans and mice have demonstrated that reduced mTOR signaling promotes longevity (Houtkooper et al., 2013; Robida-Stubbs et al., 2012; Selman et al., 2009) (Fig. 2B). Genetic inhibition of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (RSKS-1/S6K1), a key mTOR signaling component that regulates protein synthesis, increases the lifespan of both C. elegans and mice (Hansen et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2007; Selman et al., 2009). The activation of adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key cellular energy sensor and longevity-promoting protein (Burkewitz et al., 2016), is required for the longevity caused by mutations in C. elegans rsks-1 (Selman et al., 2009). Treatment with rapamycin, which inhibits mTOR, elicits mitochondrial–nuclear protein imbalance in both C. elegans and mice, which, in turn, contributes to longevity by activating the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) (Houtkooper et al., 2013). In addition, the longevity-promoting effect of rapamycin in C. elegans requires SKN-1/Nrf, an oxidative-stress responsive transcription factor, and the activation of Nrf by rapamycin treatment is recapitulated in mouse livers (Robida-Stubbs et al., 2012). Overall, these studies have improved our knowledge in the role of mTOR in aging and confirmed that mTOR signaling is a universal means that promotes longevity across species.

SIRTUINS

Sirtuins are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent protein deacetylases that sense nutrient depletion (Covarrubias et al., 2021). Multiple sirtuins, including SIR-2.1/SIR2/SIRT1, delay aging in several organisms, while the longevity conferred by sirtuins requires the maintenance of NAD+ (Lin et al., 2000) (Fig. 2C). NAD+ levels decline with age, while genetic inhibition of NAD+ synthase accelerates aging in C. elegans and mice (Hekimi and Guarente, 2003; Mouchiroud et al., 2013). Conversely, administration of NAD+ precursors in C. elegans promotes longevity by activating SIR-2.1. In isolated mouse primary hepatocytes, replenishing NAD+ increases mitochondrial function and biogenesis in a SIRT1-dependent manner. Kallistatin, a serine protease-inhibitor protein that functions as a vasodilator, delays aging in C. elegans and in cultured human cells by downregulating microRNA-34a (miR-34a), which leads to the activation of SIR-2.1/SIRT1 (Guo et al., 2017). Treatment with kallistatin also protects diabetic model mice defective in pancreatic beta cells from vascular aging, likely by upregulating SIRT1. These studies demonstrate the conserved prolongevity function of SIR-2.1/SIRT1 in both C. elegans and mammals. Currently, the conserved downstream longevity effectors of SIR-2.1/SIRT remain poorly understood; thus, identifying such factors will be an important avenue for future research employing C. elegans and mammalian systems in a combinatorial manner.

DIETARY RESTRICTION

After the first discovery demonstrating lifespan extension by dietary restriction in rats (McCay et al., 1935), the dietary restriction has been established as a universally conserved longevity-promoting regimen across species (Fontana and Partridge, 2015). In C. elegans, multiple dietary restriction methods, including dilution of dietary bacteria, food deprivation, and genetic mutations that impair feeding, have been shown to extend lifespan (Kapahi et al., 2017). In mice, dietary restriction improves overall health and promotes longevity (Fontana and Partridge, 2015).

Several studies using both C. elegans and mouse systems have indicated the crucial roles of RNA regulation in dietary restriction-mediated longevity (Fig. 3A). First, dietary restriction appears to promote longevity through mRNA processing and quality control in C. elegans and mice (Tabrez et al., 2017). In C. elegans, the prolongevity effect of dietary restriction is mediated by proper alternative splicing (Heintz et al., 2017) coupled with nonsense-mediated decay (Tabrez et al., 2017), which is crucial for the longevity conferred by various interventions (Kim et al., 2020; Son et al., 2017). In mice, dietary restriction enhances alternative splicing events in the brain, displaying higher alternative splicing levels than those found in other tissues (Tabrez et al., 2017). Consistent with these reports, dietary restriction upregulates age-dependently downregulated mRNA-processing genes in mice and humans (Lee et al., 2016; Swindell, 2009). Therefore, proper processing and quality control of mRNAs are essential for dietary restriction-mediated longevity.

Second, the regulation of miRNAs, through maintenance of the ribonucleases crucial for miRNA biogenesis also contributes to the longevity conferred by dietary restriction in C. elegans and mice (Guerra et al., 2019; Mori et al., 2012). miRNAs are generally downregulated with age in C. elegans, mice, and humans (Kim and Lee, 2019); this process is associated with decreased expression of ribonucleases responsible for miRNA processing, including dcr-1/Dicer and drsh-1/Drosha (Mori et al., 2012). In C. elegans, dietary restriction upregulates dcr-1/Dicer, which is required to promote longevity (Guerra et al., 2019; Mori et al., 2012). Consistently, in mouse adipose tissues, dietary restriction restores age-dependently downregulated miRNAs in a Dicer-dependent manner (Mori et al., 2012), leading to an antidiabetic response (Guerra et al., 2019). Thus, dietary restriction upregulates the miRNAs that mediate longevity in C. elegans and enhance fitness in mice. Overall, these studies suggest that proper regulation of RNAs contributes to dietary restriction-mediated longevity across species.

AUTOPHAGY

Autophagy is a process that degrades intracellular components and organelles to remove damaged molecules and to recycle nutrients (Chun and Kim, 2018). The major physiological function of autophagy is maintaining homeostasis, which helps protect organisms from various diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disease, and autoimmune disease (Levine and Kroemer, 2019; Yang and Klionsky, 2020). Autophagy also affects aging and lifespan in several organisms, including both C. elegans and mice (Gelino and Hansen, 2012; Wong et al., 2020).

Interestingly, recent studies employing both C. elegans and mice have shown that autophagy can be either beneficial or harmful for longevity (Fig. 3B). Two studies in which transcription factors were characterized have established the beneficial roles of autophagy in longevity. Activation of HLH-30/TFEB, the master transcriptional regulator of autophagy, promotes longevity caused by various interventions in C. elegans, including mutations in daf-2/insulin/IGF-1 receptor, dietary restriction, and germline deficiency (Lapierre et al., 2013). Mammalian TFEB is also upregulated in long-lived dietary restricted mice, implying that TFEB contributes to longevity in mammals. Another family of transcription factors, the Krüppel-like transcription factors, promote longevity by activating autophagy in C. elegans and maintain proper vascular functions during aging in mice by enhancing autophagy (Hsieh et al., 2017). In contrast, a recent study reported that upregulation of autophagy can negatively affect longevity (Zhou et al., 2019). Genetic inhibition of serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK-1/Sgk1), increases mitochondrial permeability, leading to autophagy activation. This increased autophagy reduces lifespan in C. elegans and exacerbates hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Therefore, elevated autophagy can be either beneficial or harmful in a context-dependent manner.

MITOCHONDRIA

Mitochondria are responsible for cellular energy production and the regulation of lifespan and health span. Mild inhibition of mitochondrial respiration extends lifespan in C. elegans. Genetic inhibition of electron transport chain genes, including clk-1 (coenzyme Q biosynthesis enzyme), isp-1 (Rieske iron-sulfur protein in complex III), sod-2 (superoxide dismutase 2), and sft-1 (cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 1-like protein), promotes longevity (Lee et al., 2015; Maxwell et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2018). Likewise, mutations in each of Mclk1, Risp, Sod2, and Surf1, which are the respective orthologs of the aforementioned C. elegans genes, promote longevity in mice (Dell'Agnello et al., 2007; Hughes and Hekimi, 2011; Lapointe et al., 2009). Several studies using both C. elegans and mammalian systems have demonstrated that epigenetic regulators mediate the longevity caused through reduced mitochondrial functions by increasing UPRmt (Fig. 3C). Histone deacetylase-1 (HDA-1) activates UPRmt under mitochondrial stress conditions and subsequently extends lifespan in C. elegans (Shao et al., 2020). The expression levels of HDAC, a mammalian histone deacetylase gene, positively correlate with those of UPRmt genes in primates. The histone lysine demethylases JMJD-1.2 and JMJD-3.1 promote longevity in mitochondrial mutant C. elegans by activating UPRmt via downstream histone acetyltransferase CBP-1 (Li et al., 2021; Merkwirth et al., 2016). Consistently, Phf8 and Jmjd3 (Kdm6b) expression levels, i.e., the respective mouse homologs of jmjd-1.2 and jmjd-3.1, as well as CBP/p300, the mammalian homolog of cbp-1, positively correlate with those of UPRmt genes and mouse lifespan. These studies show that the conserved epigenetic regulation of mitochondrial stress responses contributes to longevity in animals with reduced mitochondrial electron transport chains.

Conversely, recent studies employing C. elegans and mammalian systems have also shown that increased mitochondrial function can contribute to longevity and ameliorate age-associated diseases. As discussed above, maintenance of the NAD+ pool is crucial for longevity and increased mitochondrial function in C. elegans and mice. NAD+ triggers mitochondrial–nuclear protein imbalance and UPRmt, which leads to enhanced mitochondrial function in C. elegans and mice (Mouchiroud et al., 2013). Replenishing NAD+ restores impaired mitophagy and lengthens lifespan in C. elegans and mouse ataxia models (Fang et al., 2016). Increasing NAD+ levels also upregulates mitophagy and UPRmt in C. elegans and mouse Alzheimer’s disease models to alleviate amyloid β proteotoxicity (Sorrentino et al., 2017). In addition, mutations in rgs-2/Rgs14 (regulator of G protein signaling 14), which upregulate mitochondrial functions, extend C. elegans lifespan and also promote longevity by increasing NAD+ levels in mice (Vatner et al., 2018). Activation of sirtuins, longevity transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO, and UPRmt through increased mitochondrial function promotes longevity in C. elegans and ameliorates age-associated diseases in mammals (Katsyuba et al., 2018). In addition to NAD+, supplementation of D-glucosamine, which is used for treating osteoarthritis, increases lifespan by increasing mitochondrial biogenesis in C. elegans and mice (Weimer et al., 2014). Overall, the beneficial roles of NAD+ and D-glucosamine, which promote longevity and ameliorate age-associated diseases in C. elegans and mammals, are at least partially mediated by increases in mitochondrial function or biogenesis. Because both decreased and enhanced mitochondrial function leads to longevity, future research should differentiate these opposing processes to improve our overall understanding of the role of mitochondria in aging.

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

The nervous system coordinates physiological responses to internal and external stimuli across various tissues. Interestingly, neuronal activity regulates organismal lifespan and aging rates in many animals, including C. elegans and mammals (Jeong et al., 2012) (Fig. 3D). The expression level of REST, repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor, in the human brain positively correlates with lifespan (Lu et al., 2014). A subsequent study that employed C. elegans, mice, and humans to further characterize REST in aging, showed that REST downregulates genes associated with neural activity and synaptic function in long-lived humans (Zullo et al., 2019). Consistently, spr-3 and spr-4, the REST orthologs, are required for the longevity conferred by genetic inhibition of insulin/IGF-1 signaling in C. elegans. Another report showed that the loss of TRPV1, a capsaicin receptor that acts in sensory neurons, extends the lifespan in C. elegans and mice by inactivating CREB/CRTC1, a nutrient-sensing cAMP-responsive element-binding protein, and its coactivator, which are negative regulators of longevity (Riera et al., 2014). A recent study demonstrated that loss of the epigenetic reader gene baz-2/Baz2b in neurons improves age-dependent decreases in mitochondrial function to promote longevity in C. elegans and enhances cognitive function in aged mice (Yuan et al., 2020). These studies highlight the contribution of combinatorial approaches using C. elegans and mammalian systems for understanding of lifespan regulation by neurons.

Neuronal degeneration and functional declines are associated with aging and age-associated disease in most animals, including C. elegans and mammals (Bishop et al., 2010; Chew et al., 2013). Several studies have shown the value of using transgenic C. elegans and mouse models of age-associated neurodegenerative disease to investigate pathophysiology. Upregulation of the aforementioned longevity-associated factors, including REST and NAD+, ameliorates amyloid β proteotoxicity in both C. elegans and mice (Lu et al., 2014; Sorrentino et al., 2017). Pharmacological inhibition of steroid hormone sulfatase increases neuroprotection by reducing amyloid β aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease model C. elegans and mice (Pérez-Jiménez et al., 2021). Age-dependent changes in the expression of synaptogenesis factors in C. elegans and mice appear to be critical for age-dependent synaptic loss (Maeder et al., 2018). Therefore, combined approaches employing both C. elegans and mammalian systems will help enhance our understanding of age-dependent neurodegeneration and relevant drugs. In addition, such approaches may help to elucidate the conserved mechanisms underlying neuronal regulation of aging.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Here, we reviewed aging research literature in which a combinatorial approach, employing both C. elegans and mammalian systems, was applied. These studies have directly contributed to improving our understanding of many evolutionarily conserved aging-regulating factors and signaling pathways, including insulin/IGF-1 signaling, mTOR, sirtuins, dietary restriction, autophagy, mitochondrial alterations, and the nervous system. In contrast to invertebrate models, such as C. elegans, aging research in which mammalian model organisms are employed presents a time challenge because of relatively long lifespan of mammals. Vertebrate model organisms with a very short lifespan, such as the African turquoise killifish, Nothobranchius furzeri, have recently been developed to overcome this time issue (Hu and Brunet, 2018). Nevertheless, C. elegans remains one of the most popular and powerful models for advancing the aging research field mainly because of its rapid aging and short lifespan. It will likely continue to serve as a workhorse for aging research, particularly when used in combination with mammalian systems.

Conventional research approaches, such as a research using C. elegans followed by consecutive studies using different systems, have contributed to the understanding of common aging mechanisms. However, such strategies have difficulties in defining conserved aging mechanisms without the publication of a subsequent mammalian research. Research using both C. elegans and mammalian systems together is advantageous, because it can show evolutionarily conserved physiological roles in organismal aging in a single paper. One difficultly for a group of researchers is to become experts in both systems. Therefore, in many cases, this combinatorial approach requires extensive collaboration among multiple laboratories. One alternative is using C. elegans for genetics of aging research and cultured mammalian cells for biochemical assays. For example, we recently showed that VRK-1, a nuclear protein kinase, promotes longevity in C. elegans and activates AMPK, a cellular energy sensor, by phosphorylation in mammalian cells (Park et al., 2020). Another alternative approach would be to use more diverse model systems in addition to C. elegans and mammals; however, only a handful of studies have employed such an approach. A study in which four different organisms were used demonstrated that nucleolar size negatively correlates with longevity in C. elegans and is reduced by interventions that extend lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, mice, and very likely humans (Tiku et al., 2017). Regardless of the number of organisms used, studies that exploit the advantages of various organisms, including C. elegans and mammalian systems, in a combinatorial manner will continue to help elucidate underlying mechanisms in the evolution of aging and lead to developing new treatments for age-associated diseases in humans.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all Lee laboratory members for helpful discussion and comments. This study is supported by the Korean Government (MSICT) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A5A1015366) to S.J.V.L.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

G.Y.L., J.S., and S.J.V.L. wrote the paper.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

FIGURES
Fig. 1. Advantages of using a combinatorial approach, employing both C. elegans and mammalian systems, in aging research. C. elegans has various advantages as a model organism in aging research, e.g., genetic tractability for random mutagenesis and RNAi screen, a large brood size, and a relatively short wild-type lifespan of 2-3 weeks. Mammalian systems, such as mouse models, compensate the limitations of C. elegans because of their physiological similarity to humans, suitability as age-associated disease models (such as being models of Alzheimer’s disease and sarcopenia), and amenability to organ-level approaches. By exploiting the advantages of these two complementary model systems, researchers can efficiently elucidate evolutionarily conserved aging mechanisms.
Fig. 2. Schematic models for combinatorial C. elegans and mammalian system studies regarding the role of insulin/IGF-1 signaling, mTOR pathway, and sirtuins. (A) DAF-16/forkhead box O (FOXO) is activated by genetic inhibition of EFL-1/E2F1 while being inhibited by mutations in ercc-1/Ercc1. Activated DAF-16/FOXO delays aging by increasing target gene expression. (B) Reduced mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling by genetic inhibition or treatment with rapamycin activates adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) via downregulating RSKS-1/S6K1 and upregulates SKN-1/Nrf to induce protective genes, leading to longevity. (C) Kallistatin downregulates miR-34a leading to the activation of SIR-2.1/SIRT1 to delay aging. Increased nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) levels also delay aging through upregulation of SIR-2.1/SIRT1.
Fig. 3. Combinatorial C. elegans and mammalian studies regarding the conserved aging regulation by dietary restriction, autophagy, mitochondria, and neuronal system. (A) Dietary restriction upregulates age-dependently downregulated mRNA processing and quality control by improving proper alternative splicing coupled with nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). Dietary restriction also upregulates DCR-1/Dicer and DRSH-1/Drosha, ribonucleases responsible for miRNA processing, thereby improving longevity-associated miRNA processing. Enhanced mRNA processing and quality control, and miRNA processing contribute to longevity and enhanced fitness in C. elegans and mammals. (B) Autophagy activation regulates aging in a context-dependent manner. HLH-30/TFEB and Krüppel-like transcription factor delay aging by enhancing autophagy. In contrast, genetic inhibition of serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK-1/Sgk1) accelerates aging by activating autophagy. (C) Reduced mitochondrial respiration induces mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) and promotes longevity through activation of histone deacetylase HDA-1/HDAC, histone lysine demethylase JMJD-3.1/JMJD3, and histone acetyltransferase CBP-1/CBP/p300. Increased levels of NAD+ promote longevity and ameliorate age-associated disease models via enhancing mitophagy and UPRmt. (D) Levels of SPR-3/4/REST positively correlate with lifespan in C. elegans, mice, and humans. SPR-3/4/REST downregulates neural activity and synaptic function to promote longevity. Increased NAD+ and SPR-3/4/REST levels ameliorate the toxicity caused by amyloid β in C. elegans and mice.
REFERENCES
  1. An S.W.A., Artan M., Park S., Altintas O., and Lee S.J.V. (2017). Longevity regulation by insulin/IGF-1 signalling. In Ageing: Lessons from C. elegans, Olsen A. and Gill M.S., eds. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), pp. 63-81.
    CrossRef
  2. Antebi A. (2013). Steroid regulation of C. elegans diapause, developmental timing, and longevity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 105, 181-212.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bishop N.A., Lu T., and Yankner B.A. (2010). Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature 464, 529-535.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Blüher M., Kahn B.B., and Kahn C.R. (2003). Extended longevity in mice lacking the insulin receptor in adipose tissue. Science 299, 572-574.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Brenner S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71-94.
    CrossRef
  6. Brooks-Wilson A.R. (2013). Genetics of healthy aging and longevity. Hum. Genet. 132, 1323-1338.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Burkewitz K., Weir H.J., and Mair W.B. (2016). AMPK as a pro-longevity target. Exp. Suppl. 107, 227-256.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Carmona J.J. and Michan S. (2016). Biology of healthy aging and longevity. Rev. Invest. Clin. 68, 7-16.
    Pubmed
  9. Chew Y.L., Fan X., Götz J., and Nicholas H.R. (2013). Aging in the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6, e25288.
    CrossRef
  10. Chun Y. and Kim J. (2018). Autophagy: an essential degradation program for cellular homeostasis and life. Cells 7, 278.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Covarrubias A.J., Perrone R., Grozio A., and Verdin E. (2021). NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 119-141.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Dell'agnello C., Leo S., Agostino A., Szabadkai G., Tiveron C., Zulian A., Prelle A., Roubertoux P., Rizzuto R., and Zeviani M. (2007). Increased longevity and refractoriness to Ca2+-dependent neurodegeneration in Surf1 knockout mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 431-444.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Dickinson D.J. and Goldstein B. (2016). CRISPR-based methods for Caenorhabditis elegans genome engineering. Genetics 202, 885-901.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Fang E.F., Kassahun H., Croteau D.L., Scheibye-Knudsen M., Marosi K., Lu H., Shamanna R.A., Kalyanasundaram S., Bollineni R.C., and Wilson M.A., et al. (2016). NAD+ replenishment improves lifespan and healthspan in ataxia telangiectasia models via mitophagy and DNA repair. Cell Metab. 24, 566-581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Folgueras A.R., Freitas-Rodríguez S., Velasco G., and López-Otín C. (2018). Mouse models to disentangle the hallmarks of human aging. Circ. Res. 123, 905-924.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Fontana L. and Partridge L. (2015). Promoting health and longevity through diet: from model organisms to humans. Cell 161, 106-118.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Friedman D.B. and Johnson T.E. (1988). A mutation in the age-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility. Genetics 118, 75-86.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  18. Gelino S. and Hansen M. (2012). Autophagy - an emerging anti-aging mechanism. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. Suppl 4, 006.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Gems D. and Partridge L. (2013). Genetics of longevity in model organisms: debates and paradigm shifts. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 621-644.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Guerra B.A., Brandão B.B., Pinto S.S., Salgueiro W.G., De-Souza E.A., Reis F.C.G., Batista T.M., Cavalcante-Silva V., D'Almeida V., and Castilho B.A., et al. (2019). Dietary sulfur amino acid restriction upregulates DICER to confer beneficial effects. Mol. Metab. 29, 124-135.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Guo Y., Li P., Gao L., Zhang J., Yang Z., Bledsoe G., Chang E., Chao L., and Chao J. (2017). Kallistatin reduces vascular senescence and aging by regulating microRNA-34a-SIRT1 pathway. Aging Cell 16, 837-846.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Gurkar A.U., Robinson A.R., Cui Y., Li X., Allani S.K., Webster A., Muravia M., Fallahi M., Weissbach H., and Robbins P.D., et al. (2018). Dysregulation of DAF-16/FOXO3A-mediated stress responses accelerates oxidative DNA damage induced aging. Redox Biol. 18, 191-199.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Hahm J.H., Kim S., DiLoreto R., Shi C., Lee S.J., Murphy C.T., and Nam H.G. (2015). C. elegans maximum velocity correlates with healthspan and is maintained in worms with an insulin receptor mutation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8919.
    CrossRef
  24. Hansen M., Taubert S., Crawford D., Libina N., Lee S.J., and Kenyon C. (2007). Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6, 95-110.
    CrossRef
  25. Heintz C., Doktor T.K., Lanjuin A., Escoubas C., Zhang Y., Weir H.J., Dutta S., Silva-García C.G., Bruun G.H., and Morantte I., et al. (2017). Splicing factor 1 modulates dietary restriction and TORC1 pathway longevity in C. elegans. Nature 541, 102-106.
    CrossRef
  26. Hekimi S. and Guarente L. (2003). Genetics and the specificity of the aging process. Science 299, 1351-1354.
    CrossRef
  27. Holzenberger M., Dupont J., Ducos B., Leneuve P., Géloën A., Even P.C., Cervera P., and Le Bouc Y. (2003). IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature 421, 182-187.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Houtkooper R.H., Mouchiroud L., Ryu D., Moullan N., Katsyuba E., Knott G., Williams R.W., and Auwerx J. (2013). Mitonuclear protein imbalance as a conserved longevity mechanism. Nature 497, 451-457.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Hsieh P.N., Zhou G., Yuan Y., Zhang R., Prosdocimo D.A., Sangwung P., Borton A.H., Boriushkin E., Hamik A., and Fujioka H., et al. (2017). A conserved KLF-autophagy pathway modulates nematode lifespan and mammalian age-associated vascular dysfunction. Nat. Commun. 8, 914.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Hu C.K. and Brunet A. (2018). The African turquoise killifish: a research organism to study vertebrate aging and diapause. Aging Cell 17, e12757.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Hughes B.G. and Hekimi S. (2011). A mild impairment of mitochondrial electron transport has sex-specific effects on lifespan and aging in mice. PLoS One 6, e26116.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Jeong D.E., Artan M., Seo K., and Lee S.J. (2012). Regulation of lifespan by chemosensory and thermosensory systems: findings in invertebrates and their implications in mammalian aging. Front. Genet. 3, 218.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Johnson S.C., Rabinovitch P.S., and Kaeberlein M. (2013). mTOR is a key modulator of ageing and age-related disease. Nature 493, 338-345.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Johnson S.C., Sangesland M., Kaeberlein M., and Rabinovitch P.S. (2015). Modulating mTOR in aging and health. Interdiscip. Top. Gerontol. 40, 107-127.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Kamath R.S. and Ahringer J. (2003). Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 30, 313-321.
    CrossRef
  36. Kapahi P., Kaeberlein M., and Hansen M. (2017). Dietary restriction and lifespan: lessons from invertebrate models. Ageing Res. Rev. 39, 3-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Katsyuba E., Mottis A., Zietak M., De Franco F., van der Velpen V., Gariani K., Ryu D., Cialabrini L., Matilainen O., and Liscio P., et al. (2018). De novo NAD+ synthesis enhances mitochondrial function and improves health. Nature 563, 354-359.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Kenyon C., Chang J., Gensch E., Rudner A., and Tabtiang R. (1993). A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366, 461-464.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Kenyon C.J. (2010). The genetics of ageing. Nature 464, 504-512.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Kim E.J.E., Son H.G., Park H.H., Jung Y., Kwon S., and Lee S.V. (2020). Caenorhabditis elegans algn-2 is critical for longevity conferred by enhanced nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Science 23, 101713.
    CrossRef
  41. Kim S.S. and Lee S.V. (2019). Non-coding RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Mol. Cells 42, 379-385.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Lapierre L.R., De Magalhaes Filho C.D., McQuary P.R., Chu C.C., Visvikis O., Chang J.T., Gelino S., Ong B., Davis A.E., and Irazoqui J.E., et al. (2013). The TFEB orthologue HLH-30 regulates autophagy and modulates longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun. 4, 2267.
    CrossRef
  43. Lapointe J., Stepanyan Z., Bigras E., and Hekimi S. (2009). Reversal of the mitochondrial phenotype and slow development of oxidative biomarkers of aging in long-lived Mclk1+/- mice. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 20364-20374.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Lee B.P., Pilling L.C., Emond F., Flurkey K., Harrison D.E., Yuan R., Peters L.L., Kuchel G.A., Ferrucci L., and Melzer D., et al. (2016). Changes in the expression of splicing factor transcripts and variations in alternative splicing are associated with lifespan in mice and humans. Aging Cell 15, 903-913.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Lee Y., An S.W.A., Artan M., Seo M., Hwang A.B., Jeong D.E., Son H.G., Hwang W., Lee D., and Seo K., et al. (2015). Genes and pathways that influence longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Mechanisms: Longevity, Metabolism, and Brain Aging , 123-169.
    CrossRef
  46. Lee Y., Jung Y., Jeong D.E., Hwang W., Ham S., Park H.H., Kwon S., Ashraf J.M., Murphy C.T., and Lee S.V. (2021). Reduced insulin/IGF1 signaling prevents immune aging via ZIP-10/bZIP-mediated feedforward loop. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202006174.
    CrossRef
  47. Levine B. and Kroemer G. (2019). Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell 176, 11-42.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Li T.Y., Sleiman M.B., Li H., Gao A.W., Mottis A., Bachmann A.M., Alam G.E., Li X., Goeminne L.J.E., and Schoonjans K., et al. (2021). The transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300 is an evolutionarily conserved node that promotes longevity in response to mitochondrial stress. Nat. Aging 1, 165-178.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Lin S.J., Defossez P.A., and Guarente L. (2000). Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 289, 2126-2128.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. López-Otín C., Blasco M.A., Partridge L., Serrano M., and Kroemer G. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194-1217.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  51. Lu T., Aron L., Zullo J., Pan Y., Kim H., Chen Y., Yang T.H., Kim H.M., Drake D., and Liu X.S., et al. (2014). REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Nature 507, 448-454.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Maeder C.I., Kim J.I., Liang X., Kaganovsky K., Shen A., Li Q., Li Z., Wang S., Xu X.Z.S., and Li J.B., et al. (2018). The THO complex coordinates transcripts for synapse development and dopamine neuron survival. Cell 174, 1436-1449.e20.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Maxwell S., Harding J., Brabin C., Appleford P.J., Brown R., Delaney C., Brown G., and Woollard A. (2013). The SFT-1 and OXA-1 respiratory chain complex assembly factors influence lifespan by distinct mechanisms in C. elegans. Longev. Healthspan 2, 9.
    CrossRef
  54. McCay C.M., Crowell M.F., and Maynard L.A. (1935). The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body size: one figure. J. Nutr. 10, 63-79.
    CrossRef
  55. Merkwirth C., Jovaisaite V., Durieux J., Matilainen O., Jordan S.D., Quiros P.M., Steffen K.K., Williams E.G., Mouchiroud L., and Tronnes S.U., et al. (2016). Two conserved histone demethylases regulate mitochondrial stress-induced longevity. Cell 165, 1209-1223.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Mitchell S.J., Scheibye-Knudsen M., Longo D.L., and de Cabo R. (2015). Animal models of aging research: implications for human aging and age-related diseases. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 3, 283-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Mori M.A., Raghavan P., Thomou T., Boucher J., Robida-Stubbs S., Macotela Y., Russell S.J., Kirkland J.L., Blackwell T.K., and Kahn C.R. (2012). Role of microRNA processing in adipose tissue in stress defense and longevity. Cell Metab. 16, 336-347.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Mouchiroud L., Houtkooper R.H., Moullan N., Katsyuba E., Ryu D., Cantó C., Mottis A., Jo Y.S., Viswanathan M., and Schoonjans K., et al. (2013). The NAD+/sirtuin pathway modulates longevity through activation of mitochondrial UPR and FOXO signaling. Cell 154, 430-441.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Pan K.Z., Palter J.E., Rogers A.N., Olsen A., Chen D., Lithgow G.J., and Kapahi P. (2007). Inhibition of mRNA translation extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6, 111-119.
    CrossRef
  60. Park H.H., Jung Y., and Lee S.V. (2017). Survival assays using Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cells 40, 90-99.
    CrossRef
  61. Park S., Artan M., Han S.H., Park H.H., Jung Y., Hwang A.B., Shin W.S., Kim K.T., and Lee S.V. (2020). VRK-1 extends life span by activation of AMPK via phosphorylation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw7824.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Pérez-Jiménez M.M., Monje-Moreno J.M., Brokate-Llanos A.M., Venegas-Calerón M., Sánchez-García A., Sansigre P., Valladares A., Esteban-García S., Suárez-Pereira I., and Vitorica J., et al. (2021). Steroid hormones sulfatase inactivation extends lifespan and ameliorates age-related diseases. Nat. Commun. 12, 49.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  63. Pitt J.N. and Kaeberlein M. (2015). Why is aging conserved and what can we do about it? PLoS Biol. 13, e1002131.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Riera C.E., Huising M.O., Follett P., Leblanc M., Halloran J., Van Andel R., de Magalhaes Filho C.D., Merkwirth C., and Dillin A. (2014). TRPV1 pain receptors regulate longevity and metabolism by neuropeptide signaling. Cell 157, 1023-1036.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Robida-Stubbs S., Glover-Cutter K., Lamming D.W., Mizunuma M., Narasimhan S.D., Neumann-Haefelin E., Sabatini D.M., and Blackwell T.K. (2012). TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO. Cell Metab. 15, 713-724.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Santos J., Leitão-Correia F., Sousa M.J., and Leão C. (2016). Dietary restriction and nutrient balance in aging. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 4010357.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. Selman C., Tullet J.M., Wieser D., Irvine E., Lingard S.J., Choudhury A.I., Claret M., Al-Qassab H., Carmignac D., and Ramadani F., et al. (2009). Ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 signaling regulates mammalian life span. Science 326, 140-144.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Shao L.W., Peng Q., Dong M., Gao K., Li Y., Li Y., Li C.Y., and Liu Y. (2020). Histone deacetylase HDA-1 modulates mitochondrial stress response and longevity. Nat. Commun. 11, 4639.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Son H.G., Seo M., Ham S., Hwang W., Lee D., An S.W., Artan M., Seo K., Kaletsky R., and Arey R.N., et al. (2017). RNA surveillance via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay is crucial for longevity in daf-2/insulin/IGF-1 mutant C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 8, 14749.
    CrossRef
  70. Sorrentino V., Romani M., Mouchiroud L., Beck J.S., Zhang H., D'Amico D., Moullan N., Potenza F., Schmid A.W., and Rietsch S., et al. (2017). Enhancing mitochondrial proteostasis reduces amyloid-β proteotoxicity. Nature 552, 187-193.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  71. Swindell W.R. (2009). Genes and gene expression modules associated with caloric restriction and aging in the laboratory mouse. BMC Genomics 10, 585.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Tabrez S.S., Sharma R.D., Jain V., Siddiqui A.A., and Mukhopadhyay A. (2017). Differential alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated decay of mRNA ensures dietary restriction-induced longevity. Nat. Commun. 8, 306.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Taormina G., Ferrante F., Vieni S., Grassi N., Russo A., and Mirisola M.G. (2019). Longevity: lesson from model organisms. Genes (Basel) 10, 518.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  74. Tiku V., Jain C., Raz Y., Nakamura S., Heestand B., Liu W., Späth M., Suchiman H.E.D., Müller R.U., and Slagboom P.E., et al. (2017). Small nucleoli are a cellular hallmark of longevity. Nat. Commun. 8, 16083.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Tissenbaum H.A. (2015). Using C. elegans for aging research. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 59(sup1), 59-60.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Vatner D.E., Zhang J., Oydanich M., Guers J., Katsyuba E., Yan L., Sinclair D., Auwerx J., and Vatner S.F. (2018). Enhanced longevity and metabolism by brown adipose tissue with disruption of the regulator of G protein signaling 14. Aging Cell 17, e12751.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Weimer S., Priebs J., Kuhlow D., Groth M., Priebe S., Mansfeld J., Merry T.L., Dubuis S., Laube B., and Pfeiffer A.F., et al. (2014). D-Glucosamine supplementation extends life span of nematodes and of ageing mice. Nat. Commun. 5, 3563.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Wong S.Q., Kumar A.V., Mills J., and Lapierre L.R. (2020). Autophagy in aging and longevity. Hum. Genet. 139, 277-290.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Wu Z., Senchuk M.M., Dues D.J., Johnson B.K., Cooper J.F., Lew L., Machiela E., Schaar C.E., DeJonge H., and Blackwell T.K., et al. (2018). Mitochondrial unfolded protein response transcription factor ATFS-1 promotes longevity in a long-lived mitochondrial mutant through activation of stress response pathways. BMC Biol. 16, 147.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  80. Xie Q., Peng S., Tao L., Ruan H., Yang Y., Li T.M., Adams U., Meng S., Bi X., and Dong M.Q., et al. (2014). E2F transcription factor 1 regulates cellular and organismal senescence by inhibiting Forkhead box O transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 34205-34213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  81. Yang Y. and Klionsky D.J. (2020). Autophagy and disease: unanswered questions. Cell Death Differ. 27, 858-871.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  82. Yuan J., Chang S.Y., Yin S.G., Liu Z.Y., Cheng X., Liu X.J., Jiang Q., Gao G., Lin D.Y., and Kang X.L., et al. (2020). Two conserved epigenetic regulators prevent healthy ageing. Nature 579, 118-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. Zhou B., Kreuzer J., Kumsta C., Wu L., Kamer K.J., Cedillo L., Zhang Y., Li S., Kacergis M.C., and Webster C.M., et al. (2019). Mitochondrial permeability uncouples elevated autophagy and lifespan extension. Cell 177, 299-314.e16.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  84. Zullo J.M., Drake D., Aron L., O'Hern P., Dhamne S.C., Davidsohn N., Mao C.A., Klein W.H., Rotenberg A., and Bennett D.A., et al. (2019). Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST. Nature 574, 359-364.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef


Current Issue

30 September 2021 Volume 44,
Number 9, pp. 627~698
COVER PICTURE Non-mitochondrial localization of the N-terminal-deleted mutant form of ACSL1 in Cos7 cells. Green, ACSL1 mutant; Red, mitotracker; Blue, DAPI (Nan et al., pp. 637-646).

This Article


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Social Network Service
Services

Indexed in

  • Science Central
  • CrossMark